Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Invariant transports of stationary random measures: asymptotic variance, hyperuniformity, and examples

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that, under a two-point Palm mixing condition, invariant transports preserve asymptotic variance and hyperuniformity, and that randomizing points inside fair partition cells makes any ergodic point process hyperuniform.

desk verdict A rigorous and genuinely unifying paper on asymptotic variance under invariant transports; the body is better than the abstract, which overreaches on Lloyd's algorithm and on the hyperuniformerer's scope. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05907 v1 pith:N2AICOMP submitted 2025-06-06 math.PR cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.soft

Michael A. Klatt , Günter Last , Luca Lotz , D. Yogeshwaran This is my paper
classification math.PRcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.soft MSC 60G5560G57
keywords randommeasurepointprocessasymptoticvariancetransporthyperuniformityBartlettspectralorganizationLloyd'salgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks when moving the mass of a stationary random measure around, by a rule that commutes with translations, changes how strongly its density fluctuates at large scales. It proves that a natural mixing condition, expressed through two-point Palm probabilities, makes the asymptotic variance of the destination equal to that of the source; hyperuniformity, the case of zero asymptotic variance, is preserved. On the constructive side, the paper proves that any stationary ergodic point process with finite intensity can be hyperuniformized: put one random point uniformly in each cell of a fair partition, and the resulting point process is hyperuniform, with an explicit formula for its structure factor. On the destructive side, the same theory shows that finitely many steps of Lloyd's algorithm or of a random organization model cannot make a Poisson process hyperuniform, since the asymptotic variance remains exactly $\gamma$. The paper also supplies spectral formulas for the transported measure and verifies the mixing assumptions for many point processes via factorial moment expansions and stopping sets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the mixing coefficient in (3.17), $\kappa(y) := \| \mathbb{E}^{\Phi}_{0,y}[K^*_y \otimes K^*_0] - (\mathbb{E}^{\Phi}_{0}[K^*_0])^{\otimes 2} \|$, where $K^*$ is the relative displacement kernel and the norm is total variation of a signed measure. Integrated against the reduced second moment measure $\alpha_\Phi$, this coefficient controls the difference $\eta = \alpha_{K\Phi} - \alpha_{L\Phi}$ between the reduced second moment measures of two destinations; when $\eta$ has total mass zero, the asymptotic variances agree. For the randomization results the machinery is a kernel $F$ on probability measures with the mean value property and translation covariance (4.6)-(4.7), which lets a transported law be replaced by a conditionally independent randomization without changing the asymptotic variance. Fair partitions, translation-covariant partitions of space into equal-volume cells constructed by stable-marriage and Gale-Shapley allocations, supply the geometric input for the hyperuniformerer. The mixing assumptions are verified by bounding $\kappa(y)$ through stopping sets and factorial moment expansions, reducing the problem to void probabilities and fast decay of correlations.

What would settle it

Compute the asymptotic variance of a fixed number $k$ of Lloyd iterations applied to a stationary Poisson process in the plane over large windows; the theorem predicts it is exactly the Poisson intensity $\gamma$ for every $k$, so a statistically robust deviation for any fixed $k$ would falsify the variance-preservation claim in the non-hyperuniform regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 3.5. Let $\Phi$ be a locally square-integrable stationary random measure, let $K$ be an invariant probability transport kernel, and define $\kappa(y)$ as the total-variation norm of the difference between the two-point Palm law (the conditional law of the configuration given points at $0$ and $y$) of the relative displacements $(K^*_y, K^*_0)$ and the product of the one-point Palm law with itself. If $\kappa$ is integrable against the reduced second moment measure $\alpha_\Phi$ of $\Phi$, then a hyperuniform $\Phi$ is transported to a hyperuniform $K\Phi$, and under mild additional conditions (a Fourier-smooth window or finite total variation of the covariance measure) the asymptotic variances of $\Phi$ and $K\Phi$ coincide. A companion result, Theorem 4.1, removes the mixing condition when an extra randomization of the kernel has conditional mean given by a reference transport and is conditionally independent across source points; Theorem 4.3 packages this into a hyperuniformerer that turns any ergodic finite-intensity point process into a hyperuniform one by placing a single point uniformly at random in each cell of a fair partition. In the non-hyperuniform direction, the paper shows that applying finitely many steps of Lloyd's algorithm or of a bounded random-organization displacement to a Poisson process preserves the asymptotic variance, so hyperuniformity cannot be reached in finite time by these local rules. Throughout, the Bartlett spectral measure of the destination is expressed through Palm expectations, giving structure-factor formulas for the transported random measure.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on two unproved-here inputs: the deep existence theorem for fair partitions of every ergodic finite-intensity point process, and the integrability of the two-point Palm mixing coefficient $\kappa(y)$ against the reduced second moment measure $\alpha_\Phi$, which the examples confirm only under fast decay of correlations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any ergodic point process with finite intensity has a hyperuniform counterpart obtained by placing one random point in each cell of a fair partition; the structure factor of the output is $S_\Gamma(k) = \gamma(\gamma^{-2} - \mathbb{E}|\widehat{1}_{C_\tau(0)}(k)|^2)$.
  • An invariant transport satisfying the $\kappa$-integrability condition transfers a vanishing asymptotic variance from source to destination, so hyperuniformity is stable under correlated but mixing displacements.
  • For a stationary lattice with an independent displacement field whose two-point $\beta$-mixing coefficients are summable, the displaced lattice is hyperuniform; in the Gaussian case a covariance decay of power strictly larger than $d$ suffices.
  • Finitely many Lloyd iterations or random-organization steps leave the asymptotic variance of a Poisson source equal to $\gamma$, so hyperuniform states of these models can only emerge in the infinite-iteration limit.
  • Tessellation-based weights, such as Voronoi cell volumes and the hyperuniform random sets of Section 9, are rigorously hyperuniform, providing disordered two-phase media with perfectly suppressed density fluctuations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the hyperuniformerer gives a black-box recipe for hyperuniformization: any statistically homogeneous spatial pattern, regardless of its correlation length, can be made fluctuation-free at large scales by fair-cell randomization, and the output's structure factor depends only on the law of one cell.
  • Inference: since the mixing coefficient involves only two-point Palm probabilities, every bounded-range transport kernel satisfies the condition; hence no finite composition of bounded local updates can create hyperuniformity from a non-hyperuniform ergodic source, which explains why random-organization hyperuniformity must be an infinite-time phenomenon.
  • Inference: the variance-equality theorem can transfer variance lower bounds, and hence Gaussian fluctuation results, from a source to transported random measures whenever the $\kappa$-condition holds; the paper explicitly notes such lower bounds are useful for central limit theorems.
  • Inference: the simulation study applies the hyperuniformerer to an anti-hyperuniform hyperplane intersection process and a cloaked lattice; a ready extension is to apply it to other long-range-correlated point processes and to compare the predicted single-cell structure factor directly with scattering estimates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a framework for when stationary invariant transports preserve the asymptotic variance (and hyperuniformity) of a stationary random measure. Theorem 3.1 compares two destinations under a two-point Palm total-variation mixing condition; Theorem 3.5 specializes to comparing a source with its transport and gives hyperuniformity persistence; Theorems 3.4 and 3.6 provide Bartlett spectral formulas. Section 4 treats conditionally randomized transports and derives the hyperuniformerer (Example 4.7), which randomizes each point uniformly in a cell of a fair partition and is claimed to turn any ergodic finite-intensity point process into a hyperuniform one. Section 5 treats independent displacement fields and kernels, Section 6 gives stopping-set/factorial-moment-expansion criteria for verifying the mixing condition, and Sections 7-9 apply these to random organization, nearest-neighbour shifts, Lloyd's algorithm, transports of Lebesgue measure, and hyperuniform random sets.

Significance. The paper's main theorems, if correct, provide a flexible and quite general mechanism for proving variance persistence under transport, with the Bartlett spectral formulas as a useful by-product. The hyperuniformerer construction is a striking advertised application, and the verification of variance preservation for random organization and Lloyd's algorithm addresses questions from the physics literature. The proofs are detailed and the paper makes systematic use of Palm calculus, stopping sets and factorial moment expansions; the stopping-set toolbox of Theorem 6.1 is likely to be reusable. The main qualifications are that the abstract's scope goes beyond what the propositions prove, and the fair-partition input is quoted without its exact hypotheses.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §7.3, Proposition 7.5; §7.1, Proposition 7.2] The abstract claims that finitely many steps of Lloyd's algorithm or of a random organization model preserve asymptotic variance 'if we start from a Poisson process or a point process with exponentially fast decaying correlation.' The body does not prove this for Lloyd's algorithm or for the random organization model from non-Poisson sources: Proposition 7.5 treats a stationary Poisson process only, and Proposition 7.2 also assumes a Poisson source and explicitly states that extension to more general point processes would require an extension of the factorial moment expansion to marked processes. Proposition 7.1, which does allow exponentially fast decaying correlations, concerns a different class of bounded local perturbations. Please correct the abstract so that it matches the theorems actually proved.
  2. [§4.2, Example 4.7; §1] The universality of the hyperuniformerer is conditional on the existence of fair partitions with cells of volume γ^{-1}. The paper refers to [35,36] and [57, Corollary 10.10] but never states the precise hypotheses of these existence theorems. The introduction asserts existence for 'any stationary and ergodic point process (with finite intensity),' while Example 4.7 starts with an invariant partition and the earlier setup in §4.2 restricts to simple point processes; the case of point processes with atoms is not discussed. Since this is the load-bearing external input for the advertised 'turns any ergodic point process into a hyperuniform process' claim, please quote the fair-partition theorem and verify explicitly that every source process covered by the abstract satisfies its hypotheses.
  3. [§7.3, proof of Proposition 7.5] Theorem 6.1's assumption (6.6) requires the two-point Palm tail bound sup_{y∈R^d} P^Φ_{0,y}(S_k(0,Φ) ⊄ B_t) ≤ δ1(t). The proof of Proposition 7.5 contains only a sketch of this bound ('Following the proof method as in Lemma 7.7...'), with the key point being that B(Z,at) can be chosen to avoid y while keeping the constant a independent of y. Because this sup bound is essential for the application of Theorem 6.1, the derivation should be written out in full or reduced to Lemma 7.7 by an explicit argument.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (2.22)] The structure factor S_Φ is scalar-valued, but the text writes S_Φ : R^d → R^d; correct the codomain to R.
  2. [§1, §4.2] The informal phrase 'any stationary and ergodic point process (with finite intensity)' should be aligned with the formal hypothesis in Example 4.7 and §4.2 that the point process is simple; otherwise the hyperuniformerer statement is ambiguous.
  3. [§5.2, Theorem 5.5] The assumption (5.10) is introduced inside the statement; for readability, define the stationary family Z and its mixing coefficient before the theorem, as is done in Section 5.1.
  4. [§7.1] The sentence 'Our methods directly apply to a prominent model of self-organization...' is stronger than Proposition 7.2, which covers a Poisson source; qualify the sentence or point forward to the exact proposition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the variance-preservation and hyperuniformerer results are derived from Palm calculus, stopping sets, and an independent fair-partition theorem, not from fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper's central results are derived from first principles within the paper itself. Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.5 impose an explicit mixing condition (3.3)/(3.17) on Palm expectations of the transport kernel and then prove equality of asymptotic variances via Lemmas 3.2 and 3.3, using dominated convergence on a signed measure with total mass zero. The mixing condition is not defined in terms of the asymptotic variance it is used to prove, so there is no self-definitional circularity. The hyperuniformerer (Example 4.7) is a direct application of Theorem 4.3, which is proved in the paper through conditional independence and the mean-value/covariance properties (4.6)-(4.8); the only external input is the existence of fair partitions for ergodic point processes, cited to [35,36,57, Corollary 10.10]. That theorem is an independent, published result and is not the paper's own conclusion, nor is it equivalent by construction to hyperuniformity of the destination. The factorial moment expansion used in Section 6 is given a self-contained derivation in Appendix A.5, and the stopping-set estimates are proven in Section 6.2. The paper contains several self-citations, e.g. [8,9,50,51,53,57], but these provide prior technical building blocks (Palm calculus, FME, stable matching, hyperuniformity criteria) rather than replacing the present arguments. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction, and no known result is merely relabelled. The reliance on the external fair-partition existence theorem is a fragility of the universality claim, not a circularity. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Pure mathematics paper: no free parameters fitted to data, no new physical entities. The only background assumptions are standard point-process tools (Palm calculus, factorial moment expansion) and the cited existence of fair partitions, which the paper uses as a black box.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Fair partitions exist for every stationary ergodic point process with finite intensity (Gale-Shapley stable allocation).
    Used in Example 4.7 and Section 4.2 to define the hyperuniformerer; cited from [35,36,57, Corollary 10.10]. If this failed, the universal hyperuniformization claim would collapse.
  • domain assumption The point processes under consideration have fast (or exponentially fast) decay of correlation functions with constants C_k = O(k^a) for some a < 1.
    Used in Theorem 6.1 and Section 6.3 to verify the mixing condition (3.3). This restricts the class of sources for the examples, e.g., Poisson, alpha-determinantal, permanental processes.
  • standard math Palm calculus and factorial moment expansion framework.
    Standard results in point process theory, summarized in Appendix A and used throughout the paper. They are unproved background results the paper relies on.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Invariant transports of stationary random measures: asymptotic variance, hyperuniformity, and examples." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N2AICOMP

@misc{pith2026250605907,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Invariant transports of stationary random measures: asymptotic variance, hyperuniformity, and examples},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N2AICOMP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05907}
}
abstract

We consider invariant transports of stationary random measures on $\mathbb{R}^d$ and establish natural mixing criteria that guarantee persistence of asymptotic variances. To check our mixing assumptions, which are based on two-point Palm probabilities, we combine factorial moment expansion with stopping set techniques, among others. We complement our results by providing formulas for the Bartlett spectral measure of the destinations. We pay special attention to the case of a vanishing asymptotic variance, known as hyperuniformity. By constructing suitable transports from a hyperuniform source we are able to rigorously establish hyperuniformity for many point processes and random measures. On the other hand, our method can also refute hyperuniformity. For instance, we show that finitely many steps of Lloyd's algorithm or of a random organization model preserve the asymptotic variance if we start from a Poisson process or a point process with exponentially fast decaying correlation. Finally, we define a hyperuniformerer that turns any ergodic point process with finite intensity into a hyperuniform process by randomizing each point within its cell of a fair partition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05907 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two examples of invariant transports: (Left, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Hyperuniform weighted point processes: (Left) We start from a Poisson hyper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Exemplary applications of the hyperuniformerer: (Left) samples of point pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Structure factors before and after the application of the hyperuniformerer for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hyperuniform random measures, transport and rigidity

    math.PR 2025-10 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A lecture-note survey unifying the spectral, transport, and rigidity sides of hyperuniform random measures, with worked proofs for emblematic models such as the Ginibre ensemble, Sine-β processes, and Gaussian analyti...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Ayyer, S

    A. Ayyer, S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. R. Speer (2023). Stationary states of the one-dimensional facilitated asymmetric exclusion process. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat., 59, 726–742. 54 73

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Baccelli, B

    F. Baccelli, B. B llaszczyszyn, and M. Karray (2020). Random measures, point processes, and stochastic geometry. Available on https://hal.inria.fr/ hal-02460214/ 7

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Berg and G

    C. Berg and G. Forst (1975). Potential theory on locally compact Abelian groups . Springer, New-York. 10, 20

    work page 1975

  4. [4]

    S. Betsch. (2022). A point process theoretic study of Gibbs measures in abstract state spaces. Ph.D. Thesis , Karlsruhe, Karlsruher Institut f¨ ur Technologie (KIT). https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000150234 49, 53

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Bj¨ orklund, and T

    M. Bj¨ orklund, and T. Hartnick (2024). Hyperuniformity and non-hyperuniformity of quasicrystals. Math. Ann. 389, 365–426. 3, 10, 17

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    B laszczyszyn (1995)

    B. B laszczyszyn (1995). Factorial moment expansion for stochastic systems. Stoch. Proc. Appl., 56, 321–335. 69, 70

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    B laszczyszyn, E

    B. B laszczyszyn, E. Merzbach, and V. Schmidt (1997). A note on expansion for functionals of spatial marked point processes. Stat. Probab. Lett. , 36, 299–306. 69, 70

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    B laszczyszyn, D

    B. B laszczyszyn, D. Yogeshwaran, and J. E. Yukich (2019). Limit theory for geometric statistics of point processes having fast decay of correlations. Ann. Probab., 47, 835–

    work page 2019

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Limit theory for geometric statistics of point processes having fast decay of correlations

    B. B laszczyszyn, D. Yogeshwaran, and J. E. Yukich (2019). Supplement to “Limit theory for geometric statistics of point processes having fast decay of correlations.” Ann. Probab., 47, 835–895. 47, 49, 63

    2019

  2. [10]

    Br´ emaud (2020).Point process calculus in time and space

    P. Br´ emaud (2020).Point process calculus in time and space. Springer, Cham. 4, 7, 10

    2020

  3. [11]

    Butez, S

    R. Butez, S. Dallaporta and D. Garc ´ ıa-Zelada (2024). On the Wasserstein distance between a hyperuniform point process and its mean. arXiv:2404.09549. 37

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Chatterjee, R

    S. Chatterjee, R. Peled, Y. Peres, and D. Romik (2010). Gravitational allocation to Poisson points. Ann. Math. 172, 617–671 29

    2010

  5. [13]

    A. T. Chieco and D. D. Durian (2021). Quantifying the long-range structure of foams and other cellular patterns with hyperuniformity disorder length spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. E , 103, 062609-1–11. 3, 63

    2021

  6. [14]

    Cort´ e, P

    L. Cort´ e, P. M. Chaikin, J. P. Gollub, and D. J. Pine (2008). Random organization in periodically driven systems. Nat. Phys. , 4, 420–424. 3, 53

    2008

  7. [15]

    Coste (2021)

    S. Coste (2021). Order, fluctuations, rigidities. https://scoste.fr/assets/ survey_hyperuniformity.pdf 3, 10

    2021

  8. [16]

    De Luca, X

    F. De Luca, X. Ma, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates (2024). Hyperuniformity in phase ordering: The roles of activity, noise, and non-constant mobility. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 36, 405101-1–19. 3 74

    2024

  9. [17]

    Dereudre, D

    D. Dereudre, D. Flimmel, M. Huesmann and T. Lebl´ e (2024). (Non)-hyperuniformity of perturbed lattices. arXiv:2405.19881 3, 4, 6, 32, 37

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Dereudre and D

    D. Dereudre and D. Flimmel (2023). Hyperuniformity of Gibbs point processes with short range interaction. arXiv:2306.17276. 3

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    A. Ezoe, M. Katori and T. Shirai (2025). Weighted point configurations with hype- runiformity: An ecological example and models. arXiv:2501.12807. 3

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Erbar, M

    M. Erbar, M. Huesmann, J. Jalowy and B. M¨ uller (2025). Optimal transport of sta- tionary point processes: Metric structure, gradient flow and convexity of the specific entropy. J. Func. Anal. , 110974. 3

    2025

  13. [21]

    Farago, A

    J. Farago, A. Semenov, S. Frey, and J. Baschnagel (2014). New conserved structural fields for supercooled liquids. Eur. Phys. J. E , 37, 46-1–14. 3, 63

    2014

  14. [22]

    Flimmel (2025)

    D. Flimmel (2025). Fitting regular point patterns with a hyperuniform perturbed lattice, arxiv:2503.12179. 3, 6, 37

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Gabrielli, M

    A. Gabrielli, M. Joyce and F. S. Labini (2002). Glass-like universe: Real-space cor- relation properties of standard cosmological models. Phys. Rev. D. , 65(8). 3

    2002

  16. [24]

    Gabrielli (2004)

    A. Gabrielli (2004). Point processes and stochastic displacement fields. Phys. Rev. E, 70, 066131-1–16. 3, 6, 33

    2004

  17. [25]

    Gabrielli, M

    A. Gabrielli, M. Joyce, and S. Torquato (2008). Tilings of space and superhomoge- neous point processes. Phys. Rev. E. , 77(3). 3, 5

    2008

  18. [26]

    Gacs & D

    P. Gacs & D. Sz´ asz (1975). On a problem of Cox concerning point processes in Rk of ”controlled variability”. Ann. Probab., 597-607. 3, 36

    1975

  19. [27]

    Ghosh and J

    S. Ghosh and J. Lebowitz (2017). Number rigidity in superhomogeneous random point fields. J. Stat. Phys. , 166, 1016–1027. 3

    2017

  20. [28]

    Ghosh and J

    S. Ghosh and J. L. Lebowitz (2017). Fluctuations, large deviations and rigidity in hyperuniform systems: A brief survey. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. , 48, 609–631. 3

    2017

  21. [29]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. R. Speer (2024). Approach to hyperuniformity of steady states of facilitated exchange processes. arXiv:2401.16505. 3, 54

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Georgii and T

    H.-O. Georgii and T. K¨ uneth, (1997). Stochastic order of point processes. J. Appl. Probab. 34, 868–881. 52

    1997

  23. [31]

    Hanisch (1982)

    K.-H. Hanisch (1982). On inversion formulae for n-fold Palm distributions of point processes in LCS-spaces. Math. Nachr. , 106, 171–179. 69

    1982

  24. [32]

    Hexner and D

    D. Hexner and D. Levine (2015). Hyperuniformity of critical absorbing states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 110602-1–. 3, 54

    2015

  25. [33]

    Hexner and D

    D. Hexner and D. Levine (2017). Noise, diffusion, and hyperuniformity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 020601-1–. 3, 54 75

    2017

  26. [34]

    Hexner, P

    D. Hexner, P. M. Chaikin, and D. Levine (2017). Enhanced hyperuniformity from random reorganization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 114, 4294–4299. 3, 54

    2017

  27. [35]

    Hoffman, A.E

    C. Hoffman, A.E. Holroyd and Y. Peres (2006). A stable marriage of Poisson and Lebesgue. Ann. Probab. 34, 1241–1272. 4, 29, 31

    2006

  28. [36]

    Holroyd, and Y

    A.E. Holroyd, and Y. Peres (2005). Extra heads and invariant allocations. Ann. Probab. 33, 31–52. 4, 29, 31

    2005

  29. [37]

    Holroyd, R

    A.E. Holroyd, R. Pemantle, Y. Peres, and O. Schramm (2009). Poisson matching. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e B45, 266–287. 31

    2009

  30. [38]

    Huesmann and T

    M. Huesmann and T. Lebl´ e (2024). The link between hyperuniformity, Coulomb energy, and Wasserstein distance to Lebesgue for two-dimensional point processes. arXiv:2404.18588. 3, 37

    2024

  31. [39]

    Hug and R

    D. Hug and R. Schneider (2007). Asymptotic shapes of large cells in random tessel- lations. Geom. Funct. Anal. 17, 156-191. 65

    2007

  32. [40]

    Hug and R

    D. Hug and R. Schneider (2024). Poisson hyperplane tessellations . Springer, Cham. 31

    2024

  33. [41]

    Janson (2021)

    S. Janson (2021). The space D in several variables: random variables and higher moments. Math. Scandin., 127(3). 33, 38

    2021

  34. [42]

    Kallenberg (2017)

    O. Kallenberg (2017). Random measures, theory and applications (Vol. 1). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 7, 38, 40

    2017

  35. [43]

    Kampf and E

    J. Kampf and E. Spodarev (2018). A functional central limit theorem for integrals of stationary mixing random fields. Theory Probab. Appl., 63 135–150. 63

    2018

  36. [44]

    Kim and S

    J. Kim and S. Torquato (2018). Effect of imperfections on the hyperuniformity of many-body systems. Phys. Rev. B , 97, 054105-1–18. 3

    2018

  37. [45]

    Kim and S

    J. Kim and S. Torquato (2019). New tessellation-based procedure to design perfectly hyperuniform disordered dispersions for materials discovery. Acta Mater., 168, 143–

    2019

  38. [46]

    Kim and S

    J. Kim and S. Torquato (2019). Methodology to construct large realizations of per- fectly hyperuniform disordered packings. Phys. Rev. E , 99, 052141-1–20. 3, 6, 63

    2019

  39. [47]

    M. A. Klatt, G. Last, and N. Henze (2022). A genuine test for hyperuniformity. arXiv:2210.12790. 32

    2022

  40. [48]

    M. A. Klatt, J. Lovri´ c, D. Chen, S. C. Kapfer, F. M. Schaller, P. W. A. Sch¨ onh¨ ofer, B. S. Gardiner, A.-S. Smith, G. E. Schr¨ oder-Turk, and S. Torquato (2019). Universal hidden order in amorphous cellular geometries. Nat. Commun. , 10, 811-1–9. 3, 31, 58

    2019

  41. [49]

    M. A. Klatt, J. Kim and S. Torquato (2020). Cloaking the underlying long-range order of randomly perturbed lattices. Phys. Rev. E , 101(3), 032118. 3, 6, 31, 33 76

    2020

  42. [50]

    M. A. Klatt, G. Last, and D. Yogeshwaran (2020). Hyperuniform and rigid stable matchings. Rand. Struct. Algor. , 57, 439–473. 3

    2020

  43. [51]

    Krishnapur and D

    M. Krishnapur and D. Yogeshwaran (2024). Stationary random measures : Covari- ance asymptotics, variance bounds and central limit theorems. arXiv:2411.08848. 4

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Lachi` eze-Rey (2022)

    R. Lachi` eze-Rey (2022). Variance linearity for real Gaussian zeros.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat., 58, 2114–2128. 3

    2022

  45. [53]

    Lachi` eze-Rey and D

    R. Lachi` eze-Rey and D. Yogeshwaran (2024). Hyperuniformity and optimal transport of point processes. arXiv:2402.13705. 3, 37

    2024

  46. [54]

    Last (2006)

    G. Last (2006). Stationary partitions and Palm probabilities. Adv. Appl. Probab. 37, 603–620. 27

    2006

  47. [55]

    G. Last, M. Otto (2023). Disagreement coupling of Gibbs processes with an applica- tion to Poisson approximation. Ann. Appl. Probab. 33, 4091–4126. 51, 52

    2023

  48. [56]

    G. Last, G. Peccati, and D. Yogeshwaran (2023). Phase transitions and noise sen- sitivity on the Poisson space via stopping sets and decision trees. Random Struct. Algorithms 63, 457–511. 41

    2023

  49. [57]

    Last and M

    G. Last and M. Penrose (2017). Lectures on the Poisson process. Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge. 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 24, 25, 29, 31, 35, 36, 40, 44, 49, 50, 51, 55, 56, 64, 66, 67, 69, 71

    2017

  50. [58]

    Last and H

    G. Last and H. Thorisson (2019). Invariant transports of stationary random measures and mass-stationarity. Ann. Probab. 37, 790–813. 13, 65

    2019

  51. [59]

    Lebl´ e (2023) The two-dimensional one-component plasma is hyperuniform

    T. Lebl´ e (2023) The two-dimensional one-component plasma is hyperuniform. arXiv:2104.05109. 3

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    V. A. Malyshev (1975). The central limit theorem for Gibbsian random fields. Sov. Math. Dokl. , 16, 1141–1145. 40

    1975

  53. [61]

    Ph. A. Martin and T. Yalcin (1980). The charge fluctuations in classical Coulomb systems. J. Stat. Phys. , 22, 435–463. 40

    1980

  54. [62]

    Mugglestone and E

    M.A. Mugglestone and E. Renshaw (1996). A practical guide to the spectral analysis of spatial point processes. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. , 21 (1):43–65. 4

    1996

  55. [63]

    Nazarov and M

    F. Nazarov and M. Sodin (2012). Correlation functions for random complex zeroes: Strong clustering and local universality. Comm. Math. Phys. , 310, 75–98. 4, 40

    2012

  56. [64]

    Neveu (1977)

    J. Neveu (1977). Processus ponctuels. ´Ecole d’Et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour VI. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 598, 249–445. 65

    1977

  57. [65]

    Newby, W

    E. Newby, W. Shi, Y. Jiao, R. Albert & S. Torquato. (2025). Structural properties of hyperuniform Voronoi networks. Phy. Rev. E. , 111(3), 034123. 3 77

    2025

  58. [66]

    Penrose (2007)

    M. Penrose (2007). Laws of large numbers in stochastic geometry with statistical applications. Bern., 13(4), 1124–1150. 58

    2007

  59. [67]

    Poinas (2019)

    A. Poinas (2019). A bound of the β-mixing coefficient for point processes in terms of their intensity functions. Stat. Probab. Let. 148, 88–93. 71

    2019

  60. [68]

    Schreiber and J.E

    T. Schreiber and J.E. Yukich (2013). Limit theorems for geometric functionals of Gibbs point processes. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist. 49, 1158–1182. 49, 51, 53

    2013

  61. [69]

    Soch et al

    J. Soch et al. (2024). StatProofBook/StatProofBook.github.io: The book of statistical proofs (Version 2023). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4305949 73

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    Torquato (2016)

    S. Torquato (2016). Hyperuniformity and its generalizations. Phys. Rev. E , 94, 022122-1–19. 3

    2016

  63. [71]

    Torquato (2018)

    S. Torquato (2018). Hyperuniform states of matter. Phys. Rep., 745, 1–95. 3, 4, 10

    2018

  64. [72]

    Torquato (2021)

    S. Torquato (2021). Diffusion spreadability as a probe of the microstructure of com- plex media across length scales. Phys. Rev. E , 104, 054102-1–17. 3

    2021

  65. [73]

    Torquato and F

    S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger (2003). Local density fluctuations, hyperuniformity, and order metrics. Phys. Rev. E , 68, 041113-1–25. 3

    2003

  66. [74]

    Zheng, M

    Y. Zheng, M. A. Klatt, and H. L¨ owen (2024). Universal hyperuniformity in active field theories. Phys. Rev. Res. , 6, L032056-1–6. 3

    2024

  67. [75]

    Zuyev (1999)

    S. Zuyev (1999). Stopping sets: Gamma-type results and hitting properties. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 31(2), 355–366. 58, 64 78

    1999

  68. [895]

    4, 40, 45, 46, 48, 49

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.