Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

4G: Pure fourth-order gravity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.06432 v1 pith:N2K46A5A submitted 2018-07-17 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

classification gr-qcastro-ph.CO
keywords equationsfieldgravitationalgravityfourth-ordermetricproptopure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Einstein field equations are second-order differential equations. In this paper, we propose a new gravity theory with pure fourth-order field equations, which we call 4G for brevity. We discuss the applications of 4G in cosmology, gravitational waves, and local gravitational systems. 4G predicts the scale factor $a\propto t^{4/3}$ for the matter-dominated universe, and $a\propto t$ for the radiation-dominated universe. The former can explain the late-time acceleration without suffering from the coincidence and fine-tuning problems, while the latter can solve the horizon problem. 4G is a massless gravity, which means the speed of gravitational waves equals to the speed of light. Based on the discussions about exact vacuum solution and weak field approximation, we argue that Schwarzschild metric should be the real physical metric to describe solar system in 4G.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing the Schwarzschild metric in a strong field region with the Event Horizon Telescope

    gr-qc 2019-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A modified Schwarzschild metric with a horizon at n times the usual radius can reproduce M87*'s shadow-to-gas mass ratio only if n ≈ 3, not the n ≈ 2 the paper quotes, so the central numerical claim does not follow fr...

Pith tools