Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural-Symbolic Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey from a Query Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.10390 v1 pith:N3H7LDOZ submitted 2024-11-30 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords knowledgereasoninggraphsymbolicdatagraphsneuralcomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge graph reasoning is pivotal in various domains such as data mining, artificial intelligence, the Web, and social sciences. These knowledge graphs function as comprehensive repositories of human knowledge, facilitating the inference of new information. Traditional symbolic reasoning, despite its strengths, struggles with the challenges posed by incomplete and noisy data within these graphs. In contrast, the rise of Neural Symbolic AI marks a significant advancement, merging the robustness of deep learning with the precision of symbolic reasoning. This integration aims to develop AI systems that are not only highly interpretable and explainable but also versatile, effectively bridging the gap between symbolic and neural methodologies. Additionally, the advent of large language models (LLMs) has opened new frontiers in knowledge graph reasoning, enabling the extraction and synthesis of knowledge in unprecedented ways. This survey offers a thorough review of knowledge graph reasoning, focusing on various query types and the classification of neural symbolic reasoning. Furthermore, it explores the innovative integration of knowledge graph reasoning with large language models, highlighting the potential for groundbreaking advancements. This comprehensive overview is designed to support researchers and practitioners across multiple fields, including data mining, AI, the Web, and social sciences, by providing a detailed understanding of the current landscape and future directions in knowledge graph reasoning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Top Ten Challenges Towards Agentic Neural Graph Databases

    cs.AI 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Agentic Neural Graph Databases are proposed as graph databases with autonomous query construction, neural query execution, and continuous learning, with ten open challenges listed.

Pith tools