Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Calculated Boldness: Optimizing Financial Decisions with Illiquid Assets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.13830 v1 pith:N3UMMV6X submitted 2020-12-26 q-fin.PM econ.THphysics.bio-phq-fin.RM

classification q-fin.PMecon.THphysics.bio-phq-fin.RM
keywords capitalexternalplaystrategybettingdetermineexpectedgame
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider games of chance played by someone with external capital that cannot be applied to the game and determine how this affects risk-adjusted optimal betting. Specifically, we focus on Kelly optimization as a metric, optimizing the expected logarithm of total capital including both capital in play and the external capital. For games with multiple rounds, we determine the optimal strategy through dynamic programming and construct a close approximation through the WKB method. The strategy can be described in terms of short-term utility functions, with risk aversion depending on the ratio of the amount in the game to the external money. Thus, a rational player's behavior varies between conservative play that approaches Kelly strategy as they are able to invest a larger fraction of total wealth and extremely aggressive play that maximizes linear expectation when a larger portion of their capital is locked away. Because you always have expected future productivity to account for as external resources, this goes counter to the conventional wisdom that super-Kelly betting is a ruinous proposition.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Market Making without Regret

    cs.GT 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For online market making with partial feedback, the minimax regret is Theta(T^(2/3)) under Lipschitz or i.i.d.-independent valuations, and linear when both assumptions fail.

Pith tools