Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Verification and Refinement of Natural Language Explanations through LLM-Symbolic Theorem Proving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.01379 v4 pith:N44NBLYQ submitted 2024-05-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords explanationslanguagenaturalllmsexplanation-refinerexplanatorygenerateinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Natural language explanations represent a proxy for evaluating explanation-based and multi-step Natural Language Inference (NLI) models. However, assessing the validity of explanations for NLI is challenging as it typically involves the crowd-sourcing of apposite datasets, a process that is time-consuming and prone to logical errors. To address existing limitations, this paper investigates the verification and refinement of natural language explanations through the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Theorem Provers (TPs). Specifically, we present a neuro-symbolic framework, named Explanation-Refiner, that integrates TPs with LLMs to generate and formalise explanatory sentences and suggest potential inference strategies for NLI. In turn, the TP is employed to provide formal guarantees on the logical validity of the explanations and to generate feedback for subsequent improvements. We demonstrate how Explanation-Refiner can be jointly used to evaluate explanatory reasoning, autoformalisation, and error correction mechanisms of state-of-the-art LLMs as well as to automatically enhance the quality of explanations of variable complexity in different domains.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Grammars of Formal Uncertainty: When to Trust LLMs in Automated Reasoning Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A grammar-based model of LLM-generated SMT-LIB code produces uncertainty signals that predict formalization errors on some reasoning tasks, with fused signals giving large error reductions only in an in-sample evaluation.

  2. Leveraging LLMs for Formal Software Requirements -- Challenges and Prospects

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLM-based formalisation of software requirements is promising but faces five persistent challenges; the proposed VERIFAI framework plans to address them with human-in-the-loop and tool-neutral pipelines.

  3. A Short Survey on Formalising Software Requirements using Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey summarizing 35 papers on using LLMs to formalize software requirements, but it contains no new experimental results and its classification tables have errors.

  4. Formalising Software Requirements using Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A short project-position paper describing VERIFAI, a planned system for automatic formalisation and traceability of natural language requirements, with no experimental results yet.

Pith tools