Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Measuring $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariants in dimer models and cross-coupled ladders with a programmable photonic molecule

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A coupled two-ring photonic molecule realizes SSH, extended SSH, and Creutz-ladder lattices in the synthetic frequency dimension and extracts their topological winding numbers from single-shot steady-state measurements.

desk verdict Solid experimental demonstration of SSH/xSSH winding measurements with a new single-shot heterodyne readout, but the xSSH quantized claim and the Creutz ladder section need careful scrutiny before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04151 v1 pith:N4N4RCSQ submitted 2025-05-07 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Sashank Kaushik Sridhar , Rohith Srikanth , Alexander R. Miller , Ferguson J. McComb , Avik Dutt This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hall
keywords syntheticfrequencydimensiontopologicalwindingnumbermeanchiraldisplacementSu-Schrieffer-HeegermodelextendedSSHCreutzladderheterodynedetectionphotonicmolecule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a compact fiber-optic simulator that encodes one-dimensional topological lattice models in the frequency axis of a pair of coupled ring resonators—a "photonic molecule"—and reads out their topological winding numbers from a single steady-state measurement. The authors realize the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model in both trivial and topological phases, the extended SSH (xSSH) model, and a staggered-flux Creutz ladder, using electro-optic modulation to set hopping amplitudes and phases. Their cascaded optical and RF heterodyne detection gives high-signal-to-noise, site-resolved lattice occupations, from which the mean chiral displacement yields the winding number: about 0 on the trivial side and about 1 on the topological side of the SSH transition, with near-quantized values for xSSH. They also show the mean-chiral-displacement correspondence breaks when a synthetic flux breaks inversion symmetry and revives when it is restored. If correct, the work makes topological invariants of dimer lattices directly measurable in a single shot on a platform that can be translated to integrated photonics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the photonic molecule: two identical fiber ring resonators coupled so that each unperturbed resonance splits into symmetric and antisymmetric supermodes, which form the two sublattices of a dimer lattice along the synthetic frequency dimension. Electro-optic modulators inside the rings impose hopping couplings $J_0$, $J_1$, $J_2$ at chosen frequency spacings, with RF phases that control synthetic magnetic flux. The readout mechanism is cascaded heterodyning: an optical heterodyne signal is down-converted and IQ-detected by a real-time RF spectrum analyzer, then sliced at the round-trip period and stacked to produce site-resolved occupations. The identity that converts these occupations into topology is the mean chiral displacement, $\langle\Gamma x\rangle_{\mathrm{int}} = W/2$, computed from the detuning-averaged imbalance between sublattice occupations; this formula is the measurable bridge between raw transmission and the winding number.

What would settle it

Detune the two rings' resonances by a controlled amount comparable to the dimer splitting $\mu$ and measure the detuning-averaged mean chiral displacement for $J_1/J_0 = 2$; if the averaged value no longer sits at $W \approx 1$, the assumption that supermode imbalance preserves the MCD–winding correspondence is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the steady-state, site-resolved transmission of a dynamically modulated two-ring photonic molecule directly encodes the bulk topological winding number $W$ of the synthetic frequency lattice. For the SSH lattice, the measured mean chiral displacement $\langle\Gamma x\rangle_{\mathrm{int}}$ equals $W/2$, giving $W\approx 0$ for $J_1/J_0<1$ and $W\approx 1$ for $J_1/J_0>1$. The same observable remains quantized for the xSSH lattice even though the next-nearest-neighbor coupling $J_2$ breaks chiral symmetry, confirming that inversion symmetry suffices for the correspondence. When a flux $\phi$ is added to the xSSH couplings, the measured mean chiral displacement drops sharply for $\phi$ away from $0$ and $\pi$, showing that loss of inversion symmetry destroys the correspondence; at $\phi=\pi$ the correspondence revives. The paper also presents the first direct measurement of the xSSH band structure on a synthetic lattice and an alternating-flux Creutz ladder whose measured bands match numerical and analytical predictions, including an uncalibrated phase-induced tilt about $k=0$.

Load-bearing premise

The measurement assumes that the systematic imbalance between the two cavity supermodes—imperfect locking and residual polarization mismatch—preserves enough inversion or chiral symmetry that the steady-state mean chiral displacement still equals $W/2$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single steady-state transmission trace, rather than a long-time dynamical evolution, is enough to determine the winding number of an SSH-type synthetic lattice, simplifying topological state characterization.
  • Inversion symmetry, not chiral symmetry, is the operative protection for the mean-chiral-displacement measurement, so the protocol extends to lattices with longer-range couplings that break chirality.
  • Adding a controllable flux to the couplings produces a measurable breakdown and revival of the mean-chiral-displacement–winding correspondence, giving an in situ probe of inversion-symmetry breaking in the lattice.
  • The same photonic molecule can realize ladder models with staggered flux per plaquette, bringing Aharonov-Bohm caging and edge-transport phenomena of Creutz ladders into frequency-lattice experiments.
  • Because the RF drives, rather than the device geometry, define the Hamiltonian, the platform is reconfigurable and portable to integrated photonic circuits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The measured drop of the mean chiral displacement as a function of flux could be used in reverse as a sensitive calibration of synthetic gauge fields: a lattice with known winding could infer the actual phase applied to a hopping term from the MCD response.
  • The cascaded-heterodyne readout should also recover the mean chiral displacement in lower-finesse integrated rings, where single-shot site occupation has previously been signal-to-noise limited; testing that transfer is a natural next step the paper points to but does not perform.
  • If the systematic supermode imbalance is genuinely symmetry-preserving, deliberately engineering a controlled imbalance could turn the platform into a testbed for distinguishing symmetry-preserving dissipation from symmetry-breaking errors in bulk winding-number measurements.
  • Stacking additional RF tones, already used to build the ladder, could synthesize higher-dimensional frequency lattices where a single-shot displacement observable might probe invariants beyond the dimer winding number; this extension is speculative.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments on a 'photonic molecule' made of two coupled fiber ring resonators, using the synthetic frequency dimension to realize three 1D lattice models: the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model, the extended SSH (xSSH) model with inversion symmetry but broken chiral symmetry, and an alternating-flux Creutz ladder. The authors introduce cascaded optical and RF heterodyne detection to obtain single-shot, site-resolved measurements of the mean chiral displacement (MCD) and band structures, and they claim to measure the topological winding number W via the relation ⟨Γx⟩ = W/2 (Eq. 3). They report band-structure measurements for SSH and xSSH, a qualitative SSH winding-number distinction across the critical point, near-perfect quantized winding for xSSH, and Creutz-ladder band structures with an alternating flux. A multi-tone dynamical coupled-mode simulator is used to reproduce the bands.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work offers a compact, reconfigurable fiber-optic platform for simulating symmetry-protected topological lattices in synthetic frequency dimensions, and the cascaded heterodyne detection scheme could be valuable for low-noise, single-shot invariant measurements in other photonic platforms. The qualitative agreement between measured and simulated band structures, the clean trivial-to-topological distinction in the SSH data, and the explicit demonstration of MCD breakdown under inversion-symmetry breaking are notable strengths. However, the quantitative support for the load-bearing claim that the measured MCD equals the true winding number is thin, and the manuscript does not yet demonstrate the robustness of the MCD-winding correspondence against the experimentally acknowledged cavity imbalance and polarization mismatch.

major comments (3)
  1. [Site-resolved measurement of W (Fig. 3)] The quantitative basis for the winding-number claims is not reported. For the SSH model, the text states that the measured W is 'close to 0' for J1/J0 ≤ 1 and 'approximately 1' for J1/J0 > 1, but Fig. 3(d) shows no numerical values, error bars, or repetition counts. For the xSSH model, the text claims 'near-perfect quantized values of W' but the value is not displayed or stated anywhere. Since the central claim is a quantitative measurement of a topological invariant, each data point should be reported with its uncertainty and the number of independent measurements.
  2. [Site-resolved measurement of W (asymmetry discussion)] The manuscript acknowledges that the individual supermode windings are asymmetric, hinting at imperfect cavity locking and polarization mismatch, and asserts that these effects are 'quite systematic and still preserve the overall physics.' This assertion is load-bearing because Eq. (3) is derived under chiral-symmetry (or inversion-symmetry for xSSH) conditions; relative detunings or polarization mismatches introduce symmetry-breaking terms in the effective Hamiltonian. The paper's own Fig. 3(e) shows that even small phases can drastically shift the measured W away from the ideal value. The authors should quantify the magnitude of the imbalance (e.g., from the measured band asymmetry) and provide a tolerance analysis showing that the deviation of MCD from W/2 is smaller than the experimental resolution, or provide an independent check such as a Zak-phase extraction from the measured bands.
  3. [Alternating Flux Creutz Ladder (Eqs. 4-5, Fig. 4)] The Creutz-ladder simulation and analytical bands include an uncalibrated phase offset φ1 on the J2 leg hopping, but the value of φ1 and how it is determined are not given. Introducing an adjustable parameter weakens the statement that the experimental data 'corroborates very well' with the simulations, and it also raises the question of whether the realized flux pattern is actually the intended alternating-flux Creutz ladder. The authors should report the value of φ1, explain how it was calibrated, and show that the qualitative conclusions are insensitive to its precise value.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Introduction] There is a typo: 'breaks the chiral symmetr' should read 'breaks the chiral symmetry.'
  2. [Eq. (3)] The notation in Eq. (3) is incomplete: the integration range of δω and the summation range of n are not defined, and the derivation of the equality with W/2 should be briefly stated or referenced so the reader knows the assumptions.
  3. [Synthetic lattice setup] The text says the measurement covers 10 lattice sites (5 dimers) but does not explain how this number relates to the total number of resonant modes or whether the MCD summation in Eq. (3) uses all 10 sites; this should be clarified.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption labels (d,e,f) as 'numerical' but the main text refers to 'simulated bands'; please make the caption wording consistent and explicitly state that (d)-(f) are simulation results.
  5. [Fig. 3] For panels (f)-(h), the specific laser detunings at which the linecuts are taken are not indicated; please add the corresponding δω values or mark them in panels (a)-(c).
  6. [Alternating Flux Creutz Ladder] In the Hamiltonian Eqs. (4)-(5), J3 appears in the text and Fig. 4 but not in the displayed equations; the notation and the roles of J0, J1, J2, J3 should be defined consistently.
  7. [References] Reference [33] is an arXiv preprint; if a published version exists, it should be cited instead.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the winding-number extraction rests on an external theoretical formula and is tested against independent experimental data; self-citations are platform background only.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is the measurement of the mean chiral displacement (MCD) via Eq. (3), which is explicitly attributed to the external theory of Villa, Carusotto, and Ozawa [40]. The MCD is computed from steady-state frequency-lattice site occupations obtained by cascaded heterodyne detection, and the resulting values are compared with the known SSH and extended-SSH winding numbers. Thus the measured quantity is not defined in terms of the claimed result; it is an independently obtained observable whose relation to the winding number is supplied by prior external theory. The xSSH extension likewise relies on the inversion-symmetry result of Longhi and co-workers [44,45], which is cited as external support and then checked against the authors' own experimental measurements rather than assumed. The only disclosed adjustable quantity is the small phase offset phi_1 used in the Creutz-ladder band-structure comparison, where the authors explicitly state it accounts for an uncalibrated experimental phase; it is not used to extract a topological invariant and is not disguised as a prediction. The self-citations in the manuscript concern the synthetic-frequency platform, EOM-induced hopping, band-structure spectroscopy, and boundary-creation techniques; these support the experimental apparatus and methodology but are not the load-bearing justification for the winding-number measurements, which are benchmarked against known model Hamiltonians and analytical band structures. Consequently, no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations or citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on four unproved premises: the synthetic-lattice tight-binding mapping with counter-rotating terms neglected; the imported steady-state MCD formula of Villa et al.; Longhi's result that inversion symmetry suffices for the MCD-winding correspondence; and the paper's own assertion that cavity locking and polarization imbalances preserve the relevant symmetries. The only numerical adjustment identified as fitted to the data is the nonzero phase offset phi_1 used in the Creutz-ladder band comparison. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • phase offset phi_1 on the J2 hopping in the Creutz ladder = nonzero, unspecified
    Inserted into the analytical and simulated bands to match an experimental asymmetric tilt about k=0 caused by an uncalibrated phase on the ladder leg hopping; this is a fitted adjustment, not a measured or derived constant.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The frequency modes of the coupled rings, with EOM tones at mu, Omega-mu, and Omega, faithfully implement the tight-binding Hamiltonians of Eqs. (1), (2), (4)-(5), with counter-rotating terms negligible.
    Stated in 'Synthetic lattice setup': voltages are chosen so couplings exceed linewidth but stay below the frequency separations, suppressing counter-rotating terms. This rotating-wave assumption is standard but unproved in the paper.
  • domain assumption The steady-state mean chiral displacement formula, Eq. (3), from Villa et al. is valid for this coherently driven photonic molecule and equals W/2.
    The formula is imported without derivation and is the basis for all winding-number extractions in the paper.
  • domain assumption For the xSSH lattice, inversion symmetry is sufficient for the mean chiral displacement to remain a valid winding-number observable, following Longhi.
    This justifies the xSSH winding measurement after chiral symmetry is broken by J2; the paper provides no new proof.
  • ad hoc to paper Residual cavity locking errors and polarization mismatches, which make the individual supermode windings asymmetric, preserve the inversion and chiral symmetry needed for the MCD-winding correspondence.
    The paper states the cavities are not perfectly locked and there is slight polarization mismatch, then asserts these factors are systematic and 'still preserve the overall physics.' This is the least supported premise and is load-bearing for all MCD measurements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Measuring $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariants in dimer models and cross-coupled ladders with a programmable photonic molecule." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N4N4RCSQ

@misc{pith2026250504151,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Measuring $\mathbbZ_2$ invariants in dimer models and cross-coupled ladders with a programmable photonic molecule},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N4N4RCSQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04151}
}
read the original abstract

Topological models are characterized by a quantized topological invariant and provide a description of novel phases of matter that can exhibit localized edge states, corner modes, and chiral transport. We experimentally realize two 1-D lattices supporting symmetry-protected topology - the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) and extended SSH models using the synthetic frequency dimension of coupled fiber ring resonators. We introduce and experimentally demonstrate cascaded heterodyning as a technique for low-noise, single-shot winding number measurements through the mean chiral displacement and band structure measurements. Through our robust setup and detection techniques we can extend our capability to realizing 1-D ladder models, demonstrating a modified Creutz ladder with a staggered flux with each plaquette. This highly reconfigurable and compact fiber optics platform for Hamiltonian simulation, along with a low-noise detection scheme, provides a path forward for chip-scale realizations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04151 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of a photonic molecule with electro-optic modulators (EOMs) in each ring to realize the lattices in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The optical heterodyne signal is measured on an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (a) Ladder configuration of the dimer lattice with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-Abelian Electric Field and Zitterbewegung on a Photonic Frequency Chain

    physics.optics 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A polarization-multiplexed ring resonator synthesizes non-Abelian electric fields on a synthetic frequency lattice and shows photon Zitterbewegung and its interference with Bloch oscillations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Miyake, G

    H. Miyake, G. A. Siviloglou, C. J. Kennedy, W. C. Bur- ton, and W. Ketterle, Realizing the harper hamiltonian with laser-assisted tunneling in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185302 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Realization of the hofstadter hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185301 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    Price, Y

    H. Price, Y. Chong, A. Khanikaev, H. Schomerus, L. J. Maczewsky, M. Kremer, M. Heinrich, A. Szameit, O. Zil- berberg, Y. Yang, B. Zhang, A. Al` u, R. Thomale, I. Carusotto, P. St-Jean, A. Amo, A. Dutt, L. Yuan, S. Fan, X. Yin, C. Peng, T. Ozawa, and A. Blanco- Redondo, Roadmap on topological photonics, J. Phys. Photonics 4, 032501 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    A. B. Khanikaev, R. Fleury, S. H. Mousavi, and A. Alu, Topologically robust sound propagation in an angular- momentum-biased graphene-like resonator lattice, Na- ture communications 6, 8260 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    G. Ma, M. Xiao, and C. T. Chan, Topological phases in acoustic and mechanical systems, Nature Reviews Physics 1, 281 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Imhof, C

    S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, F. Schindler, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, T. Neupert, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical- circuit realization of topological corner modes, Nature Physics 14, 925 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, M. Atala, J. T. Barreiro, S. Nascimb` ene, N. R. Cooper, I. Bloch, and N. Goldman, Measuring the Chern number of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms, Nature Physics 11, 162 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Blatt and C

    R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Quantum simulations with trapped ions, Nature Physics 8, 277 (2012)

    2012

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Hafezi, S

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. M. Tay- lor, Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics, Nature Photonics 7, 1001 (2013). 6

    2013

  2. [10]

    L. Yuan, A. Dutt, and S. Fan, Synthetic frequency di- mensions in dynamically modulated ring resonators, APL Photonics 6, 071102 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Ozawa and H

    T. Ozawa and H. M. Price, Topological quantum matter in synthetic dimensions, Nature Reviews Physics 1, 349 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    L. Yuan, A. Dutt, M. Qin, S. Fan, and X. Chen, Creat- ing locally interacting Hamiltonians in the synthetic fre- quency dimension for photons, Photon. Res.8, B8 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Leefmans, A

    C. Leefmans, A. Dutt, J. Williams, L. Yuan, M. Parto, F. Nori, S. Fan, and A. Marandi, Topological dissipation in a time-multiplexed photonic resonator network, Nat. Phys. 18, 442 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Bartlett, A

    B. Bartlett, A. Dutt, and S. Fan, Deterministic photonic quantum computation in a synthetic time dimension, Op- tica 8, 1515 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Lustig, S

    E. Lustig, S. Weimann, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, M. A. Bandres, A. Szameit, and M. Segev, Photonic topolog- ical insulator in synthetic dimensions, Nature 567, 356 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    A. Dutt, Q. Lin, L. Yuan, M. Minkov, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, A single photonic cavity with two independent physical synthetic dimensions, Science 367, 59 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Boada, A

    O. Boada, A. Celi, J. I. Latorre, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum Simulation of an Extra Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 133001 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    B. K. Stuhl, H.-I. Lu, L. M. Aycock, D. Genkina, and I. B. Spielman, Visualizing edge states with an atomic Bose gas in the quantum Hall regime, Science 349, 1514 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Mancini, G

    M. Mancini, G. Pagano, G. Cappellini, L. Livi, M. Rider, J. Catani, C. Sias, P. Zoller, M. Inguscio, M. Dalmonte, and L. Fallani, Observation of chiral edge states with neutral fermions in synthetic Hall ribbons, Science 349, 1510 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    Sundar, B

    B. Sundar, B. Gadway, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Synthetic dimensions in ultracold polar molecules, Scientific Re- ports 8, 3422 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    X.-W. Luo, X. Zhou, C.-F. Li, J.-S. Xu, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-W. Zhou, Quantum simulation of 2D topological physics in a 1D array of optical cavities, Nature Commu- nications 6, 7704 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    S. K. Kanungo, J. D. Whalen, Y. Lu, M. Yuan, S. Das- gupta, F. B. Dunning, K. R. A. Hazzard, and T. C. Killian, Realizing topological edge states with Rydberg- atom synthetic dimensions, Nat Commun 13, 972 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Yang, H.-Q

    M. Yang, H.-Q. Zhang, Y.-W. Liao, Z.-H. Liu, Z.-W. Zhou, X.-X. Zhou, J.-S. Xu, Y.-J. Han, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Realization of exceptional points along a syn- thetic orbital angular momentum dimension, Science Ad- vances 9, eabp8943 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Y. Hu, C. Reimer, A. Shams-Ansari, M. Zhang, and M. Loncar, Realization of high-dimensional frequency crystals in electro-optic microcombs, Optica 7, 1189 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    A. Dutt, M. Minkov, I. A. D. Williamson, and S. Fan, Higher-order topological insulators in synthetic dimen- sions, Light: Science & Applications 9, 131 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi,A Short Course on Topological Insulators , Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 919 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Q. Shan, D. Yu, G. Li, L. Yuan, and a. X. Chen, One- Way Topological States Along Vague Boundaries in Syn- thetic Frequency Dimensions Including Group Velocity Dispersion (Invited), Progress In Electromagnetics Re- search 169, 33 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J. T. Barreiro, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler, and I. Bloch, Direct measure- ment of the Zak phase in topological Bloch bands, Nature Physics 9, 795 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    J. M. Zeuner, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, M. S. Rudner, M. Segev, and A. Szameit, Ob- servation of a topological transition in the bulk of a non- hermitian system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 040402 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Cardano, A

    F. Cardano, A. D’Errico, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, B. Pic- cirillo, C. de Lisio, G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, E. San- tamato, L. Marrucci, M. Lewenstein, and P. Massignan, Detection of Zak phases and topological invariants in a chiral quantum walk of twisted photons, Nature Com...

    2017

  23. [31]

    Creutz, End states, ladder compounds, and domain- wall fermions, Phys

    M. Creutz, End states, ladder compounds, and domain- wall fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2636 (1999)

    1999

  24. [32]

    J. H. Kang, J. H. Han, and Y.-i. Shin, Creutz ladder in a resonantly shaken 1d optical lattice, New Journal of Physics 22, 013023 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    J. S. C. Hung, J. H. Busnaina, C. W. S. Chang, A. M. Vadiraj, I. Nsanzineza, E. Solano, H. Alaeian, E. Rico, and C. M. Wilson, Quantum Simulation of the Bosonic Creutz Ladder with a Parametric Cavity, arXiv:2101.03926 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in Polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  27. [35]

    L. Li, Z. Xu, and S. Chen, Topological phases of general- ized Su-Schrieffer-Heeger models, Physical Review B 89, 085111 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Ozawa and I

    T. Ozawa and I. Carusotto, Anomalous and Quantum Hall Effects in Lossy Photonic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 133902 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Bardyn, S

    C.-E. Bardyn, S. D. Huber, and O. Zilberberg, Measur- ing topological invariants in small photonic lattices, New Journal of Physics 16, 123013 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Wimmer, H

    M. Wimmer, H. M. Price, I. Carusotto, and U. Peschel, Experimental measurement of the Berry curvature from anomalous transport, Nature Physics 13, 545 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Gianfrate, O

    A. Gianfrate, O. Bleu, L. Dominici, V. Ardizzone, M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, G. Lerario, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, D. D. Solnyshkov, D. Sanvitto, and G. Malpuech, Measurement of the quantum geometric tensor and of the anomalous hall drift, Nature 578, 381 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Villa, I

    G. Villa, I. Carusotto, and T. Ozawa, Mean-chiral dis- placement in coherently driven photonic lattices and its application to synthetic frequency dimensions, Commu- nications Physics 7, 246 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    G. Li, L. Wang, R. Ye, Y. Zheng, D.-W. Wang, X.-J. Liu, A. Dutt, L. Yuan, and X. Chen, Direct extraction of topological zak phase with the synthetic dimension, Light: Science & Applications 12, 81 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Pellerin, R

    F. Pellerin, R. Houvenaghel, W. A. Coish, I. Carusotto, and P. St-Jean, Wave-function tomography of topological dimer chains with long-range couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 183802 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    A. Dutt, M. Minkov, Q. Lin, L. Yuan, D. A. B. Miller, and S. Fan, Experimental band structure spectroscopy along a synthetic dimension, Nature Communications10, 3122 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Longhi, Probing one-dimensional topological phases in waveguide lattices with broken chiral symmetry, Opt

    S. Longhi, Probing one-dimensional topological phases in waveguide lattices with broken chiral symmetry, Opt. Lett. 43, 4639 (2018). 7

    2018

  37. [45]

    Z.-Q. Jiao, S. Longhi, X.-W. Wang, J. Gao, W.-H. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y.-X. Fu, L. Wang, R.-J. Ren, L.-F. Qiao, and X.-M. Jin, Experimentally detecting quantized zak phases without chiral symmetry in photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 147401 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    H¨ ugel and B

    D. H¨ ugel and B. Paredes, Chiral ladders and the edges of quantum Hall insulators, Physical Review A 89, 023619 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    Vidal, R

    J. Vidal, R. Mosseri, and B. Dou¸ cot, Aharonov-bohm cages in two-dimensional structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5888 (1998)

    1998

  40. [48]

    Andersson and S

    M. Andersson and S. ¨Ostlund, Staggered flux and stripes in doped antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 67, 014403 (2003)

    2003

  41. [49]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, S. Nascimb` ene, S. Trotzky, Y.-A. Chen, and I. Bloch, Experimental realization of strong effective magnetic fields in optical superlattice po- tentials, Appl. Phys. B 113, 1 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Struck, M

    J. Struck, M. Weinberg, C. ¨Olschl¨ ager, P. Windpassinger, J. Simonet, K. Sengstock, R. H¨ oppner, P. Hauke, A. Eckardt, M. Lewenstein, and L. Mathey, Engineering ising-xy spin-models in a triangular lattice using tunable artificial gauge fields, Nature Physics 9, 738 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    Jotzu, M

    G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Experimental realization of the topological haldane model with ultra- cold fermions, Nature 515, 237 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    C. Le, Q. Zhang, F. Cui, X. Wu, and C.-K. Chiu, Double and quadruple flat bands tuned by alternative magnetic fluxes in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 246401 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Senanian, L

    A. Senanian, L. G. Wright, P. F. Wade, H. K. Doyle, and P. L. McMahon, Programmable large-scale simulation of bosonic transport in optical synthetic frequency lattices, Nat. Phys. 19, 1333 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Cheng, E

    D. Cheng, E. Lustig, K. Wang, and S. Fan, Multi- dimensional band structure spectroscopy in the synthetic frequency dimension, Light: Science & Applications 12, 158 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    A. Dutt, L. Yuan, K. Y. Yang, K. Wang, S. Buddhiraju, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, and S. Fan, Creating boundaries along a synthetic frequency dimension, Nat Commun 13, 3377 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Ch´ enier, B

    A. Ch´ enier, B. d’Aligny, F. Pellerin, P. ´Edouard Blan- chard, T. Ozawa, I. Carusotto, and P. St-Jean, Quantized hall drift in a frequency-encoded photonic chern insulator (2024), arXiv:2412.04347 [physics.optics]

    2024

  49. [57]

    H. X. Dinh, A. Balˇ cytis, T. Ozawa, Y. Ota, G. Ren, T. Baba, S. Iwamoto, A. Mitchell, and T. G. Nguyen, Reconfigurable synthetic dimension frequency lattices in an integrated lithium niobate ring cavity, Communica- tions Physics 7, 185 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Balˇ cytis, T

    A. Balˇ cytis, T. Ozawa, Y. Ota, S. Iwamoto, J. Maeda, and T. Baba, Synthetic dimension band structures on a Si CMOS photonic platform, Science Advances 8, eabk0468 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.