Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Revisiting Knowledge Distillation for Object Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.10633 v1 pith:N54PA2ZF submitted 2021-05-22 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords distillationlabelsobjectteacherdatadetectiondifferentexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The existing solutions for object detection distillation rely on the availability of both a teacher model and ground-truth labels. We propose a new perspective to relax this constraint. In our framework, a student is first trained with pseudo labels generated by the teacher, and then fine-tuned using labeled data, if any available. Extensive experiments demonstrate improvements over existing object detection distillation algorithms. In addition, decoupling the teacher and ground-truth distillation in this framework provides interesting properties such: as 1) using unlabeled data to further improve the student's performance, 2) combining multiple teacher models of different architectures, even with different object categories, and 3) reducing the need for labeled data (with only 20% of COCO labels, this method achieves the same performance as the model trained on the entire set of labels). Furthermore, a by-product of this approach is the potential usage for domain adaptation. We verify these properties through extensive experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SHeRL-FL: When Representation Learning Meets Split Learning in Hierarchical Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The submitted body is an unrelated survey, not the SHeRL-FL method claimed in the metadata.

Pith tools