Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Vision-Language Models Struggle to Align Entities across Modalities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.03854 v2 pith:N5CVSO3Q submitted 2025-03-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords cross-modalentitylinkingbenchmarkmodelstaskacrossalign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cross-modal entity linking refers to the ability to align entities and their attributes across different modalities. While cross-modal entity linking is a fundamental skill needed for real-world applications such as multimodal code generation, fake news detection, or scene understanding, it has not been thoroughly studied in the literature. In this paper, we introduce a new task and benchmark to address this gap. Our benchmark, MATE, consists of 5.5k evaluation instances featuring visual scenes aligned with their textual representations. To evaluate cross-modal entity linking performance, we design a question-answering task that involves retrieving one attribute of an object in one modality based on a unique attribute of that object in another modality. We evaluate state-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and humans on this task, and find that VLMs struggle significantly compared to humans, particularly as the number of objects in the scene increases. Our analysis also shows that, while chain-of-thought prompting can improve VLM performance, models remain far from achieving human-level proficiency. These findings highlight the need for further research in cross-modal entity linking and show that MATE is a strong benchmark to support that progress.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Same Content, Different Answers: Cross-Modal Inconsistency in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    State-of-the-art MLLMs show substantial inconsistency when reasoning over the same information presented in image, text, or mixed modalities, even after accounting for OCR errors, with inconsistency linked to visual f...

  2. MMGraphRAG: Bridging Vision and Language with Interpretable Multimodal Knowledge Graphs

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MMGraphRAG links scene-graph entities from images to text knowledge graph entities via SpecLink, and reports accuracy gains over naive RAG and GraphRAG on multimodal document QA.

Pith tools