Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics and metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0303376 v1 pith:N6RLRFWR submitted 2003-03-17 astro-ph

The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics and metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement

classification astro-ph
keywords resolutionscelestialgravitationalpotentialsreferenceaccuraciesastrometrydiscussed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This paper discusses the IAU Resolutions B1.3, B1.4, B1.5 and B1.9 (2000) that were adopted during the 24th General Assembly in Manchester, 2000 and provides details and explanations for these Resolutions. It is explained why they present significant progress over the corresponding IAU 1991 Resolutions and why they are necessary in the light of present accuracies in astrometry, celestial mechanics and metrology. In fact most of these Resolutions are consistent with astronomical models and software already in use. The metric tensors and gravitational potentials of both the Barycentric Celestial Reference System and Geocentric Celestial Reference System are defined and discussed. The necessity and relevance of the two celestial reference systems are explained. The transformations of coordinates and gravitational potentials are discussed. Potential coefficients parameterizing the post-Newtonian gravitational potentials are expounded. Simplified versions of the time transformations suitable for modern clock accuracies are elucidated. Various approximations used in the Resolutions are explicated and justified. Some models (e.g. for higher spin moments) that serve the purpose for estimating orders of magnitude have actually never been published before.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Relativistic Time Modeling for Lunar Positioning Navigation and Timing

    astro-ph.EP 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    A master's thesis that validates TCL formulations, maps lunar surface clock drift at ±15 ns/day, and finds Moonlight-type orbiters run about 1.99 µs/day faster than lunar surface clocks.