Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Occupancy Learning with Spatiotemporal Memory

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new occupancy learning framework, ST-Occ, claims to beat state-of-the-art methods by 3 mIoU and cut temporal inconsistency by 29%.

desk verdict Plausible, well-motivated method, but the headline numbers need a frame-matched baseline comparison before they can be believed. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04705 v1 pith:NAATO3GA submitted 2025-08-06 cs.CV

Ziyang Leng , Jiawei Yang , Wenlong Yi , Bolei Zhou This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords 3Doccupancypredictionspatiotemporalmemoryautonomousdrivingtemporalconsistencyscene-levelrepresentationattentionuncertaintymodelingmulti-frameaggregation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tackles 3D occupancy prediction for autonomous driving, where the vehicle must model its surroundings at fine-grained voxel scale. Aggregating information across multiple camera frames is costly and error-prone because voxels appear, disappear, and move. The authors propose ST-Occ, which keeps a compact scene-level spatiotemporal memory of historical occupancy and conditions the current prediction on that memory using an uncertainty- and dynamics-aware attention mechanism. They report that ST-Occ outperforms existing methods by 3 mIoU and reduces temporal inconsistency by 29%. If true, this shows that storing a compact scene history, rather than aligning per-voxel features, is a viable way to make occupancy prediction both more accurate and more stable over time.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing components are (1) a spatiotemporal memory that stores historical occupancy information as a compact scene-level representation, and (2) a memory attention module that reads this memory when forming the current occupancy prediction, weighting past evidence according to per-voxel uncertainty and dynamics. The first component makes temporal aggregation tractable; the second decides how much to trust stale versus current evidence for each voxel.

What would settle it

Train ST-Occ with the memory attention replaced by a fixed time-decay weighting of past frames. If mIoU does not drop or temporal inconsistency does not improve relative to the full model, then the learned uncertainty and dynamics modeling is not essential to the reported gains.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a scene-level representation can serve as an efficient spatiotemporal memory for 3D occupancy prediction. ST-Occ's spatiotemporal memory compresses comprehensive historical information into a compact scene-level representation, and its memory attention module conditions the current occupancy representation on that memory while modeling uncertainty and dynamics. This lets the model exploit temporal dependency between multi-frame inputs without the high processing cost of per-voxel temporal alignment. The paper reports a 3 mIoU improvement over state-of-the-art methods and a 29% reduction in temporal inconsistency, interpreted as evidence that the learned memory and a

Load-bearing premise

The scene-level representation can compress historical occupancy information without losing the fine-grained spatial detail that per-voxel prediction needs, and the learned uncertainty/dynamics weights correctly separate stale from current evidence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ST-Occ can be used as the temporal aggregation backbone for 3D occupancy prediction in autonomous driving, yielding higher mIoU than per-frame baselines.
  • A compact scene-level memory keeps the computational cost of multi-frame aggregation low enough for practical use.
  • Temporal inconsistency in occupancy predictions drops by about a third, implying smoother and more reliable outputs across consecutive frames.
  • The uncertainty- and dynamics-aware attention prevents stale historical evidence from corrupting occupancy predictions for moving voxels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Our inference: the scene-level memory design could transfer to other dense prediction tasks (e.g., semantic occupancy or bird's-eye-view maps) where storing a compact history is cheaper than per-cell alignment. The paper does not claim this transfer.
  • Our inference: the 29% temporal-consistency gain implies downstream planning modules would see fewer flicker-induced artifacts; quantifying that system-level benefit is a testable extension we propose.
  • Our inference: replacing the learned uncertainty/dynamics attention with a fixed exponential decay of old evidence would directly test whether the uncertainty model is essential; if mIoU does not drop, the claimed role of explicit uncertainty modeling would need re-evaluation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ST-Occ, a 3D occupancy prediction framework that learns spatiotemporal features by maintaining a scene-level spatiotemporal memory and using a memory-attention module with uncertainty and dynamic awareness. The abstract claims that ST-Occ outperforms state-of-the-art 3D occupancy methods by 3 mIoU and reduces temporal inconsistency by 29%. The present manuscript, as supplied, consists only of the abstract; no full text, experimental protocol, tables, or derivations are available.

Significance. If the claims hold, ST-Occ would address two practical problems in 3D occupancy perception for autonomous driving: the high cost of aggregating multi-frame features and the temporal inconsistency of occupancy predictions. A scene-level memory that retains comprehensive historical information while remaining efficient is a plausible and potentially valuable design. The quantitative claims are specific and falsifiable, which is a strength. However, the evidence currently available is insufficient to establish significance, because the experimental setup, metric definitions, and ablations needed to validate the central claims are not presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Experimental comparison] The headline claim of '+3 mIoU over SOTA' cannot be assessed for fairness. The abstract does not identify benchmark datasets, baseline methods, or the number of temporal input frames used by ST-Occ versus each baseline. If ST-Occ is evaluated with a longer input history than the baselines, part or all of the gain would reflect additional input information rather than the proposed memory and attention. The authors must specify the input-frame count for every method and provide matched comparisons, including a single-frame-input baseline for ST-Occ.
  2. [Abstract / Temporal inconsistency metric] The reported '29% reduction in temporal inconsistency' is unauditable without a definition. The manuscript must state the exact metric, e.g., voxel-wise flip rate over consecutive frames, how stale predictions are treated, and whether the metric is computed only on observable regions. Without this, the claim could reward temporally smooth but incorrect predictions. The simultaneous mIoU improvement mitigates that risk only if the metric is reported jointly; please provide the formulation and per-class results.
  3. [Abstract / Scene-level memory compression] The design bet that a compact scene-level representation retains 'comprehensive historical information' is load-bearing. If the compression discards fine-grained spatial detail, conditioning on this memory could blur small objects and boundaries. The paper needs an ablation comparing the proposed scene-level memory against per-voxel or hierarchical spatiotemporal features, plus an analysis of performance on small objects, boundaries, and distant voxels to demonstrate that no critical detail is lost.
  4. [Abstract / Uncertainty and dynamic-awareness model] The 'model of uncertainty and dynamic awareness' inside the memory attention is not specified. This is central to the claim that temporal aggregation handles moving and static voxels correctly. The paper should define the model, state what uncertainty it estimates, and provide ablations showing its contribution (e.g., with and without the uncertainty term, and separate results for moving vs. static voxels). A misspecified dynamics model would make temporal aggregation harmful, so the design must be validated explicitly.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists no concrete benchmark names (e.g., nuScenes, SemanticKITTI), no baselines, and no error bars or variance statistics. Adding these would make the headline numbers interpretable.
  2. [Abstract] The term 'scene-level representation' is used without a quick definition; a one-sentence clarification (e.g., top-down BEV grid or set of learned scene tokens) would help the reader understand the architecture from the abstract.
  3. [Abstract] No run-time or memory comparison is reported. Since the motivation includes 'high processing cost,' a brief statement of efficiency relative to baselines would strengthen the contribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation detected in the provided abstract; the central claims are anchored to external SOTA comparisons.

full rationale

The only text available is the abstract. It makes three kinds of claims: (1) a design claim that the proposed spatiotemporal memory and memory attention improve occupancy representation, (2) a comparative claim of +3 mIoU over state-of-the-art methods, and (3) a consistency claim of 29% lower temporal inconsistency. None of these is presented as a derivation from inputs. The abstract gives no equations, no fitted parameters that are later re-renamed as predictions, and no self-citations that are load-bearing. The method is evaluated against external baselines, which is the appropriate independent yardstick for the mIoU claim. The temporal-inconsistency metric is undefined in the provided text, and the fairness of the comparison (e.g., number of input frames per baseline) is not verifiable from the abstract; however, those are external-validity or auditability concerns, not circularity. Under the hard rule that circularity requires quoting a specific reduction (Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction), no such reduction can be identified from the available material. Therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Abstract-only ledger. No numeric free parameters are named in the visible text; the full paper will presumably contain hyperparameters, loss weights, and design scales that must be audited separately. The two architectural components, the scene-level spatiotemporal memory and the memory attention module, are the paper's invented design elements; their only evidence on offer is the paper's own benchmark results, so independent_evidence is false for both. The domain assumptions (occupancy plus mIoU as the task and metric; temporal fusion as beneficial) are standard for the subfield. The two ad hoc axioms capture the paper's own design premises: that scene-level compression preserves occupancy detail, and that the uncertainty/dynamics model is faithful. Both are mirrored in weakest_assumption.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption 3D occupancy is a useful perception representation and mIoU is the appropriate accuracy metric for evaluating it.
    The abstract takes occupancy grids and mean intersection-over-union as the task and yardstick without argument; standard within this subfield, but still an unproved framing.
  • domain assumption Exploiting temporal dependency between multi-frame inputs improves occupancy prediction.
    The motivating premise of the method (abstract, second sentence); the paper's design assumes past frames carry information worth aggregating despite cost and dynamics challenges.
  • ad hoc to paper A scene-level representation can store comprehensive historical information without losing the detail needed for fine-grained occupancy.
    Core design bet of the spatiotemporal memory (abstract, fourth sentence). No proof is given in the abstract that compression preserves the spatial detail that per-voxel occupancy requires; this is the weakest load-bearing premise.
  • ad hoc to paper The uncertainty and dynamic-awareness model in the memory attention correctly captures voxel dynamics and staleness.
    The abstract (fifth sentence) states the attention includes 'a model of uncertainty and dynamic awareness' but gives no evidence that this model is faithful; incorrect weighting of stale versus current evidence would invalidate the temporal conditioning benefit.
invented entities (2)
  • Scene-level spatiotemporal memory
    purpose: Stores historical occupancy information compactly across time so that current frames can be conditioned on the past without storing all prior frames in detail.
    This is a new architectural construct. Its only evidence so far is the benchmark gain reported in the same paper; it has no external falsifiable signature (normal for a model component, but still a postulated design).
  • Memory attention module with uncertainty and dynamic awareness
    purpose: Weights the contribution of historical memory against the current frame based on per-voxel uncertainty and dynamics.
    Introduced as part of the framework; whether its uncertainty model is faithful is tested only through the paper's own experiments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Occupancy Learning with Spatiotemporal Memory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NAATO3GA

@misc{pith2026250804705,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Occupancy Learning with Spatiotemporal Memory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NAATO3GA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04705}
}
read the original abstract

3D occupancy becomes a promising perception representation for autonomous driving to model the surrounding environment at a fine-grained scale. However, it remains challenging to efficiently aggregate 3D occupancy over time across multiple input frames due to the high processing cost and the uncertainty and dynamics of voxels. To address this issue, we propose ST-Occ, a scene-level occupancy representation learning framework that effectively learns the spatiotemporal feature with temporal consistency. ST-Occ consists of two core designs: a spatiotemporal memory that captures comprehensive historical information and stores it efficiently through a scene-level representation and a memory attention that conditions the current occupancy representation on the spatiotemporal memory with a model of uncertainty and dynamic awareness. Our method significantly enhances the spatiotemporal representation learned for 3D occupancy prediction tasks by exploiting the temporal dependency between multi-frame inputs. Experiments show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a margin of 3 mIoU and reduces the temporal inconsistency by 29%.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. VISA: VLM-Guided Instance Semantic Auditing for 3D Occupancy World Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    VISA improves closed-set 3D occupancy mIoU on nuScenes by using VLM instance audits as reliability-weighted semantic supervisors during training of existing world models.

  2. VISA: VLM-Guided Instance Semantic Auditing for 3D Occupancy World Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Offline VLM instance audits, grounded to matched object voxels and distilled via taxonomy, attribute, and graph losses, raise OccWorld and GaussianWorld closed-set occupancy mIoU without inference-time VLM cost.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION format.date year duplicate empty "emp...

  2. [2]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0z4FweCy4M, 2021

    Tesla AI Day . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0z4FweCy4M, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    The lov \'a sz-softmax loss: A tractable surrogate for the optimization of the intersection-over-union measure in neural networks

    Maxim Berman, Amal Rannen Triki, and Matthew B Blaschko. The lov \'a sz-softmax loss: A tractable surrogate for the optimization of the intersection-over-union measure in neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4413--4421, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving

    Holger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H Lang, Sourabh Vora, Venice Erin Liong, Qiang Xu, Anush Krishnan, Yu Pan, Giancarlo Baldan, and Oscar Beijbom. nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11621--11631, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Monoscene: Monocular 3d semantic scene completion

    Anh-Quan Cao and Raoul De Charette. Monoscene: Monocular 3d semantic scene completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3991--4001, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Pasco: Urban 3d panoptic scene completion with uncertainty awareness

    Anh-Quan Cao, Angela Dai, and Raoul de Charette. Pasco: Urban 3d panoptic scene completion with uncertainty awareness. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14554--14564, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Environment perception using grid occupancy estimation with belief functions

    Jean Dezert, Julien Moras, and Benjamin Pannetier. Environment perception using grid occupancy estimation with belief functions. In 2015 18th international conference on information fusion (Fusion), pages 1070--1077. IEEE, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770--778, 2016

    2016

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Bevdet4d: Exploit temporal cues in multi-camera 3d object detection

    Junjie Huang and Guan Huang. Bevdet4d: Exploit temporal cues in multi-camera 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.17054, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bevdet: High-performance multi-camera 3d object detection in bird-eye-view

    Junjie Huang, Guan Huang, Zheng Zhu, Yun Ye, and Dalong Du. Bevdet: High-performance multi-camera 3d object detection in bird-eye-view. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11790, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Tri-perspective view for vision-based 3d semantic occupancy prediction

    Yuanhui Huang, Wenzhao Zheng, Yunpeng Zhang, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Tri-perspective view for vision-based 3d semantic occupancy prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9223--9232, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Occmamba: Semantic occupancy prediction with state space models

    Heng Li, Yuenan Hou, Xiaohan Xing, Xiao Sun, and Yanyong Zhang. Occmamba: Semantic occupancy prediction with state space models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09859, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Viewformer: Exploring spatiotemporal modeling for multi-view 3d occupancy perception via view-guided transformers

    Jinke Li, Xiao He, Chonghua Zhou, Xiaoqiang Cheng, Yang Wen, and Dan Zhang. Viewformer: Exploring spatiotemporal modeling for multi-view 3d occupancy perception via view-guided transformers. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 90--106. Springer, 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Bevdepth: Acquisition of reliable depth for multi-view 3d object detection

    Yinhao Li, Zheng Ge, Guanyi Yu, Jinrong Yang, Zengran Wang, Yukang Shi, Jianjian Sun, and Zeming Li. Bevdepth: Acquisition of reliable depth for multi-view 3d object detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1477--1485, 2023 a

    2023

  7. [15]

    Voxformer: Sparse voxel transformer for camera-based 3d semantic scene completion

    Yiming Li, Zhiding Yu, Christopher Choy, Chaowei Xiao, Jose M Alvarez, Sanja Fidler, Chen Feng, and Anima Anandkumar. Voxformer: Sparse voxel transformer for camera-based 3d semantic scene completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern rec...

    2023

  8. [16]

    Bevformer: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers

    Zhiqi Li, Wenhai Wang, Hongyang Li, Enze Xie, Chonghao Sima, Tong Lu, Yu Qiao, and Jifeng Dai. Bevformer: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers. In European conference on computer vision, pages 1--18. Springer, 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    Fb-occ: 3d occupancy prediction based on forward-backward view transformation

    Zhiqi Li, Zhiding Yu, David Austin, Mingsheng Fang, Shiyi Lan, Jan Kautz, and Jose M Alvarez. Fb-occ: 3d occupancy prediction based on forward-backward view transformation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01492, 2023 c

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Fb-bev: Bev representation from forward-backward view transformations

    Zhiqi Li, Zhiding Yu, Wenhai Wang, Anima Anandkumar, Tong Lu, and Jose M Alvarez. Fb-bev: Bev representation from forward-backward view transformations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 6919--6928, 2023 d

    2023

  11. [19]

    Focal loss for dense object detection

    T Lin. Focal loss for dense object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.02002, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Sparse4d: Multi-view 3d object detection with sparse spatial-temporal fusion

    Xuewu Lin, Tianwei Lin, Zixiang Pei, Lichao Huang, and Zhizhong Su. Sparse4d: Multi-view 3d object detection with sparse spatial-temporal fusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10581, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Fully sparse 3d occupancy prediction

    Haisong Liu, Yang Chen, Haiguang Wang, Zetong Yang, Tianyu Li, Jia Zeng, Li Chen, Hongyang Li, and Limin Wang. Fully sparse 3d occupancy prediction. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 54--71. Springer, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Cotr: Compact occupancy transformer for vision-based 3d occupancy prediction

    Qihang Ma, Xin Tan, Yanyun Qu, Lizhuang Ma, Zhizhong Zhang, and Yuan Xie. Cotr: Compact occupancy transformer for vision-based 3d occupancy prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19936--19945, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    OpenDriveLab Challenge 2024: Occupancy and Flow Track , 2024

    OpenDriveLab . OpenDriveLab Challenge 2024: Occupancy and Flow Track , 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Octocc: High-resolution 3d occupancy prediction with octree

    Wenzhe Ouyang, Xiaolin Song, Bailan Feng, and Zenglin Xu. Octocc: High-resolution 3d occupancy prediction with octree. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 4369--4377, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Time will tell: New outlooks and a baseline for temporal multi-view 3d object detection

    Jinhyung Park, Chenfeng Xu, Shijia Yang, Kurt Keutzer, Kris Kitani, Masayoshi Tomizuka, and Wei Zhan. Time will tell: New outlooks and a baseline for temporal multi-view 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02443, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Dynamic occupancy grid mapping with recurrent neural networks

    Marcel Schreiber, Vasileios Belagiannis, Claudius Gl \"a ser, and Klaus Dietmayer. Dynamic occupancy grid mapping with recurrent neural networks. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 6717--6724. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    Occfiner: Offboard occupancy refinement with hybrid propagation

    Hao Shi, Song Wang, Jiaming Zhang, Xiaoting Yin, Zhongdao Wang, Zhijian Zhao, Guangming Wang, Jianke Zhu, Kailun Yang, and Kaiwei Wang. Occfiner: Offboard occupancy refinement with hybrid propagation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08504, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Occ3d: A large-scale 3d occupancy prediction benchmark for autonomous driving

    Xiaoyu Tian, Tao Jiang, Longfei Yun, Yucheng Mao, Huitong Yang, Yue Wang, Yilun Wang, and Hang Zhao. Occ3d: A large-scale 3d occupancy prediction benchmark for autonomous driving. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Scene as occupancy

    Wenwen Tong, Chonghao Sima, Tai Wang, Li Chen, Silei Wu, Hanming Deng, Yi Gu, Lewei Lu, Ping Luo, Dahua Lin, et al. Scene as occupancy. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 8406--8415, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection

    Shihao Wang, Yingfei Liu, Tiancai Wang, Ying Li, and Xiangyu Zhang. Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3621--3631, 2023 a

    2023

  23. [31]

    Openoccupancy: A large scale benchmark for surrounding semantic occupancy perception

    Xiaofeng Wang, Zheng Zhu, Wenbo Xu, Yunpeng Zhang, Yi Wei, Xu Chi, Yun Ye, Dalong Du, Jiwen Lu, and Xingang Wang. Openoccupancy: A large scale benchmark for surrounding semantic occupancy perception. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, p...

    2023

  24. [32]

    Panoocc: Unified occupancy representation for camera-based 3d panoptic segmentation

    Yuqi Wang, Yuntao Chen, Xingyu Liao, Lue Fan, and Zhaoxiang Zhang. Panoocc: Unified occupancy representation for camera-based 3d panoptic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 17158--17168, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Surroundocc: Multi-camera 3d occupancy prediction for autonomous driving

    Yi Wei, Linqing Zhao, Wenzhao Zheng, Zheng Zhu, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Surroundocc: Multi-camera 3d occupancy prediction for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 21729--21740, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Flashocc: Fast and memory-efficient occupancy prediction via channel-to-height plugin

    Zichen Yu, Changyong Shu, Jiajun Deng, Kangjie Lu, Zongdai Liu, Jiangyong Yu, Dawei Yang, Hui Li, and Yan Chen. Flashocc: Fast and memory-efficient occupancy prediction via channel-to-height plugin. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12058, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Occformer: Dual-path transformer for vision-based 3d semantic occupancy prediction

    Yunpeng Zhang, Zheng Zhu, and Dalong Du. Occformer: Dual-path transformer for vision-based 3d semantic occupancy prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 9433--9443, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Occworld: Learning a 3d occupancy world model for autonomous driving

    Wenzhao Zheng, Weiliang Chen, Yuanhui Huang, Borui Zhang, Yueqi Duan, and Jiwen Lu. Occworld: Learning a 3d occupancy world model for autonomous driving. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 55--72. Springer, 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection

    Xizhou Zhu, Weijie Su, Lewei Lu, Bin Li, Xiaogang Wang, and Jifeng Dai. Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04159, 2020

    2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.