Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fast and Accurate Task Planning using Neuro-Symbolic Language Models and Multi-level Goal Decomposition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.19250 v2 pith:NAQRBUPQ submitted 2024-09-28 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords planningtaskratessuccesssymbolictasksapproachesdecomposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In robotic task planning, symbolic planners using rule-based representations like PDDL are effective but struggle with long-sequential tasks in complicated environments due to exponentially increasing search space. Meanwhile, LLM-based approaches, which are grounded in artificial neural networks, offer faster inference and commonsense reasoning but suffer from lower success rates. To address the limitations of the current symbolic (slow speed) or LLM-based approaches (low accuracy), we propose a novel neuro-symbolic task planner that decomposes complex tasks into subgoals using LLM and carries out task planning for each subgoal using either symbolic or MCTS-based LLM planners, depending on the subgoal complexity. This decomposition reduces planning time and improves success rates by narrowing the search space and enabling LLMs to focus on more manageable tasks. Our method significantly reduces planning time while maintaining high success rates across task planning domains, as well as real-world and simulated robotics environments. More details are available at http://graphics.ewha.ac.kr/LLMTAMP/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can LLM-Reasoning Models Replace Classical Planning? A Benchmark Study

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Reasoning-optimized LLMs reach at most 63.4% success across the five PDDL benchmarks, versus 97.9% for Fast Downward, and frequently produce plans that fail during execution.

  2. CoreThink: A Symbolic Reasoning Layer to reason over Long Horizon Tasks with LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper claims a symbolic orchestration layer, CoreThink, achieves state-of-the-art results on seven coding and reasoning benchmarks with no training, but provides no verifiable implementation or method details.

Pith tools