Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

HyQE: Ranking Contexts with Hypothetical Query Embeddings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15262 v1 pith:NBXLVTGI submitted 2024-10-20 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords contextsrankingquerysimilaritycontextframeworkllmsrelevance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In retrieval-augmented systems, context ranking techniques are commonly employed to reorder the retrieved contexts based on their relevance to a user query. A standard approach is to measure this relevance through the similarity between contexts and queries in the embedding space. However, such similarity often fails to capture the relevance. Alternatively, large language models (LLMs) have been used for ranking contexts. However, they can encounter scalability issues when the number of candidate contexts grows and the context window sizes of the LLMs remain constrained. Additionally, these approaches require fine-tuning LLMs with domain-specific data. In this work, we introduce a scalable ranking framework that combines embedding similarity and LLM capabilities without requiring LLM fine-tuning. Our framework uses a pre-trained LLM to hypothesize the user query based on the retrieved contexts and ranks the context based on the similarity between the hypothesized queries and the user query. Our framework is efficient at inference time and is compatible with many other retrieval and ranking techniques. Experimental results show that our method improves the ranking performance across multiple benchmarks. The complete code and data are available at https://github.com/zwc662/hyqe

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ask, Retrieve, Summarize: A Modular Pipeline for Scientific Literature Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    XSum, a question-generation plus editor RAG pipeline, produces survey-style summaries from multiple scientific papers and reports improved scores on the SurveySum benchmark.

  2. The Paradox of Stochasticity: Limited Creativity and Computational Decoupling in Temperature-Varied LLM Outputs of Structured Fictional Data

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In three LLMs generating fictional names and birthdates, model choice dominates processing time and default name archetypes persist across temperature, while rare names appear mainly at mid-range temperatures.

Pith tools