Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Optimal frequency scales for probing black-hole geometries

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that the information a reflected wave carries about a black hole's near-horizon geometry is maximized at a specific pulse width, approximately the inverse square root of the potential barrier's height.

desk verdict A clean, useful result on optimal Gaussian-pulse widths for black-hole scattering, with an honest analytic proof for PT and a plausible but under-documented numerical extension to RZ. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01061 v1 pith:NC2OFCAL submitted 2026-08-02 gr-qc

Saulo Albuquerque , Sebastian H. Völkel This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords black-holescatteringFisherinformationquasinormalmodesPöschl-TellerpotentialRezzolla-ZhidenkometricGaussianwavepacketsnear-horizonstructuregravitationalspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether scattered waves can reveal the near-horizon geometry of a black hole and, if so, what pulse width extracts the most information. It argues that the best probe is not the shortest, highest-frequency pulse: very narrow pulses mostly tunnel through the potential barrier and are absorbed, while very broad pulses are reflected efficiently but cannot resolve short-scale structure. Using the Fisher information of reflected Gaussian scalar pulses, the paper finds a universal optimal width, about $\sigma_{\mathrm{opt}} \sim 1/\sqrt{V_{\max}^\ell}$, where $V_{\max}^\ell$ is the peak of the effective potential for a given multipole. It proves this scaling analytically for the Pöschl-Teller barrier and shows that near the optimum the fundamental quasinormal mode carries most of the information, while at low frequencies the full waveform is needed. If correct, this means black-hole spectroscopy is governed by a preferred frequency scale set by the potential barrier, not by the shortest wavelength available.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a spectral trade-off, quantified by the Fisher information matrix of the reflected waveform: at fixed SNR a Gaussian packet of width $\sigma$ has spectrum $\propto \sigma e^{-\sigma^2\omega^2/2}$, so narrow packets resolve short scales but are largely transmitted, while wide packets are reflected but frequency-poor. The analytic proof uses the Pöschl-Teller barrier $V(r_*)=V_0/\cosh^2(\alpha(r_*-r_{*0}))$, whose reflection coefficient and quasinormal modes are known in closed form. The key identity is the exact condition $\sigma_{\mathrm{opt}}^2\langle\omega^2\rangle_{\mathrm{eff}}=1$, which gives $\sigma_{\mathrm{opt}}=c_i/\sqrt{V_0}$ after scaling by the fundamenta

What would settle it

Evolve Gaussian scalar pulses with a wide range of widths for a Rezzolla-Zhidenko black hole whose higher-order coefficients produce a pronounced near-horizon shelf or secondary barrier in the effective potential; if the marginalized Fisher uncertainties minimize at a width that deviates measurably from $1/\sqrt{V_{\max}^\ell}$ as those coefficients grow, the claimed universality fails. A complementary analogue test is to measure, in a waveguide or water-tank experiment with a tunable barrier, the Fisher information of the reflected signal as a function of pulse width and check that the minimu

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within a controlled scattering Gedankenexperiment using Gaussian scalar pulses and the Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrization, the paper finds that the marginalized uncertainties of the inferred metric parameters are minimized at a pulse width approximately $\sigma_{\mathrm{opt}} \sim 1/\sqrt{V_{\max}^\ell}$. For the Pöschl-Teller barrier the scaling is exact: $\sigma_{\mathrm{opt}} = c_i/\sqrt{V_0}$ with order-one constants $c_i$. The mechanism is the exact condition $\sigma_{\mathrm{opt}}^2\langle\omega^2\rangle_{\mathrm{eff}}=1$: the optimal width is the inverse RMS frequency of the scattering response. Near the optimum, the fundamental quasinormal mode alone carries essentially all the inform

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a black-hole effective potential is, for this scaling, sufficiently characterized by its peak height and its curvature (quality factor), so that barriers with different detailed shapes—especially strong near-horizon modifications—still select essentially the same optimal width $1/\sqrt{V_{\max}}$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any given multipole there is a single best pulse width for recovering the metric parameters; pushing to higher frequencies beyond that point worsens the constraints.
  • The optimal width tracks the fundamental quasinormal-mode frequency of the barrier, so quasinormal-mode-only inference and full-waveform inference coincide near the optimum.
  • The fundamental-mode approximation underestimates the recoverable information for low-frequency packets; the prompt response and late-time tail carry additional information there.
  • The scaling persists when several Rezzolla-Zhidenko parameters are estimated simultaneously, including higher-order coefficients that encode near-horizon structure, so the optimal scale does not shift as the parametrization is extended.
  • Single-parameter conditional estimates also have an optimal width, given by closed-form constants for the Pöschl-Teller barrier, so the effect is not an artifact of parameter degeneracy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural experimental test is an analog-gravity setup with a tunable barrier: the pulse width that best recovers a controlled parameter change should scale as $1/\sqrt{V_{\max}}$ as the barrier peak is varied.
  • The result suggests a design principle for gravitational-wave spectroscopy: templates that target near-horizon deviations should concentrate power near the barrier's quasinormal-mode frequency rather than maximizing broadband high-frequency content.
  • The exact condition $\sigma_{\mathrm{opt}}^2\langle\omega^2\rangle_{\mathrm{eff}}=1$ may hold for other one-dimensional scattering barriers; checking it for Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli potentials at higher $\ell$ would test how universal the scaling really is.
  • Rotating black holes introduce frame-dragging and superradiance, which could modify the reflectivity side of the trade-off; the paper leaves open whether a similar optimum persists for Kerr and where it sits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a controlled scattering Gedankenexperiment in which Gaussian scalar-field pulses are sent toward a black hole described by the Rezzolla-Zhidenko (RZ) parametrization, and the reflected waveform is used to infer metric parameters via the Fisher information matrix. The central numerical claim is that the optimal pulse width minimizing parameter uncertainties scales universally as σ_opt ~ 1/sqrt(V_max^ℓ) (Eq. 11 and Fig. 1), independent of the RZ parameter order and multipole. This scaling is then derived analytically for the Pöschl-Teller (PT) potential, whose closed-form reflection coefficient and Fisher matrix yield σ_opt = c_i / sqrt(V_max) (Eq. C5), with the constants depending on the barrier quality factor Q. The authors further separate the information in the fundamental quasinormal mode from the full waveform and show that the fundamental-mode approximation is accurate near and below the optimal scale but fails for very broad (low-frequency) pulses. The paper concludes that the optimal probe is not the highest-frequency pulse but the one balancing spatial resolution against reflected information.

Significance. If the claimed scaling law holds, it is a conceptually interesting result: it links black-hole spectroscopy, barrier scattering, and information theory, and it gives a concrete, testable prediction for optimal probing frequencies in both gravitational-wave and analogue-gravity settings. The PT analytic derivation is a genuine strength: it starts from the exact reflection coefficient, derives the Fisher matrix via Parseval's theorem, and reduces the minimization to a dimensionless condition independent of the barrier height. The time-domain numerical code is independently cross-checked against the analytic PT result in Fig. 3, which lends credibility to the numerical pipeline. The fixed-injected-SNR normalization is a sensible way to isolate the effect of pulse width. However, the paper's broadest claim — that the universal σ_opt ~ 1/sqrt(V_max) scaling holds across RZ geometries of different orders — is supported only by Fig. 1, which lacks the parameter values, quantitative spreads, and convergence tests needed to establish that the PT result extends to non-PT potentials. This is the main factor preventing acceptance in its present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Fig. 1 and Eq. (11)] The universal RZ scaling is the paper's headline numerical result, but the evidence presented in Fig. 1 is not quantitatively reproducible. The injected RZ parameter values are not given, the numerical values of the minima σ_opt are not reported, no error bars or convergence tests are shown, and the spread around Eq. (11) across the different line styles and opacities is not quantified. Since the Fisher matrix is a local quantity, the location of the optimum can depend on the fiducial parameters; with only a representative figure, it is impossible to assess whether the apparent universality is robust. Please provide the parameter sets, the measured minima with uncertainties, and a convergence study (grid resolution, domain size, waveform extraction) for at least the cases shown.
  2. [Appendix C, Eq. (C5); §III, Eq. (14)] The analytic proof of the scaling law is established only for the Pöschl-Teller family, which is characterized by just two shape parameters (V0 and α) and, after scaling, by the quality factor Q. The paper's extension of this scaling to generic RZ barriers is an extrapolation. For non-PT effective potentials, the reflection coefficient is not controlled by V_max and a single curvature parameter alone; near-horizon modifications encoded in higher-order RZ coefficients can create shelves or secondary maxima, for which σ_opt√V_max may deviate from a constant. Even within the PT family, Eq. (14) shows that the prefactor contains sqrt(1-α²/(4V0)), so the constant in front of 1/sqrt(V0) is not strictly universal unless that factor is negligible. To support the central claim, please either provide numerical evidence for RZ potentials with shapes that are not PT-like, including the quantitative
  3. [§III, Fig. 3 and Eq. (13)] The paper states that the fundamental-mode approximation Eq. (13) is 'reliable for intermediate- and high-frequency wave packets, but fails for low-frequency packets.' This is an important caveat, and the failure at large σ is discussed qualitatively. However, the boundary of validity and the quantitative difference between the fundamental-mode and full-waveform Fisher matrices are not characterized. Since the analytic derivation in Appendix C is a central element, it would be helpful to state the range of σ for which the approximation is within a given tolerance, and to clarify whether the same limitation applies to the RZ numerical results in Fig. 1, which include the full waveform.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption uses opacity to encode the number of simultaneously varied parameters, which is difficult to read in print. Please use explicit line styles or a separate panel, and include a legend with the specific RZ parameter sets.
  2. [Eq. (7) and Appendix C] The time-domain inner product in Eq. (7) is defined with a constant S, while Appendix C uses Parseval's theorem with a factor (πS)^{-1}. The normalization conventions should be made consistent and explicit, especially because the fixed-SNR condition in Eq. (10) depends on this normalization.
  3. [Appendix B] No convergence test is reported for the finite-difference scheme. Given that the numerical Fisher matrix is compared to the analytic PT result, a brief statement on grid convergence (e.g., varying Δr* and Δt) would strengthen the numerical claims.
  4. [Eq. (B1)] There is a typographical inconsistency: the spatial term uses lowercase 'ψ' while the field is denoted 'Ψ'. Please correct.
  5. [§III, Fig. 3 caption] The sentence 'Different parameter of the Pöschl-Teller potential are shown with different colors and linestyles represent different ways of obtaining them' is grammatically unclear. Please rewrite and specify which colors correspond to which parameter (r*_0, V0, α) and which linestyles correspond to analytic, fundamental-mode, and time-domain results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: optimal-width scaling is derived from the PT scattering kernel and independently read off from RZ Fisher scans.

full rationale

The paper's central result, sigma_opt ~ 1/sqrt(Vmax), is not an input. For the Pöschl-Teller barrier, Eq. (C2) constructs the Fisher matrix from the analytic reflection coefficient (C1), and the change of variables u = omega/omega_R, x = sigma omega_R leads to the minimization condition (C4). Since the kernel M depends on the barrier only through x and the dimensionless quality factor Q, its minimizer is a pure number and Eq. (C5) gives sigma_opt = c_i/sqrt(Vmax). This is a derivation, not a restatement. The RZ scaling in Fig. 1 is obtained by numerically scanning the pulse width at fixed SNR and reading off the minimum of each Delta theta_i; it is compared with 1/sqrt(Vmax) as an independent quantity. No parameter is fitted to force Eq. (11). The self-citations (Refs. [8], [29], [36]) are methodological or contextual and do not carry the derivation; the analytic PT result relies on standard external solutions (Ferrari-Mashhoon, Landau-Lifshitz). The QNM approximation Eq. (C8) is validated against both the exact PT Fisher matrix and the time-domain code, so it is not an assumed result. The only weakness is the extrapolation from PT to generic RZ shapes, which is a robustness limitation, not a circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the scalar-wave scattering setup, the RZ/PT potential models, the Gaussian-pulse fixed-SNR experiment design, and the Fisher-matrix approximation. No fundamentally new entity is introduced. The only numbers chosen by hand are the injected RZ values and the PT matching parameters; neither is fitted to the target scaling.

free parameters (2)
  • Injected RZ parameters (r0, a0, b0, epsilon, a1, b1) = not stated in text
    The Fisher-matrix simulations of Fig. 1 use a reference RZ geometry; the specific injected values are not listed in the main text or appendices, but the universal scaling claim is asserted across these values.
  • PT barrier matching parameters (V0, alpha), equivalently Q = Q about 2.5 used for example quadrature
    The analytic c_i constants in Eq. (C5) depend on the barrier quality factor Q = sqrt(V0/alpha^2 - 1/4). The paper tunes the PT barrier to the Regge-Wheeler ell=2 potential and uses Q = 2.5 for the illustrative quadrature; the 'universal' constant is thus Q-dependent, though weakly.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The massless scalar wave equation on a static, spherically symmetric background serves as a proxy for gravitational-wave scattering.
    Section II states 'scalar-field perturbations cover many aspects of the full gravitational wave case in general relativity'; the central claim is established for scalar fields only.
  • domain assumption The RZ parametrization truncated at second order captures the near-horizon deviations relevant to the inference.
    Appendix A retains continued fractions up to second order; higher-order coefficients are set to zero.
  • domain assumption The Pöschl-Teller barrier accurately represents the relevant peak of the Regge-Wheeler/RZ effective potential, and the analytic result transfers to the RZ case.
    Section III: 'the Pöschl-Teller potential provides an accurate approximation of the peak'; the extension to RZ is validated only numerically.
  • standard math The Fisher information matrix in the high-SNR, white-Gaussian-noise limit gives the parameter covariance.
    Eq. (8) is the standard Fisher-matrix and Cramér-Rao bound.
  • ad hoc to paper The incident pulse is a Gaussian wave packet and the SNR of the incoming pulse is held fixed while changing its width.
    Section II: 'we vary its width sigma while keeping its SNR fixed'; this normalization is a modeling choice that shapes the location of the optimum.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimal frequency scales for probing black-hole geometries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NC2OFCAL

@misc{pith2026260801061,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimal frequency scales for probing black-hole geometries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NC2OFCAL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01061}
}
read the original abstract

Can gravitational waves probe the near-horizon geometry of black holes, and if yes, which frequency scale is optimal? Although shorter wavelengths usually resolve smaller scales, we show that black-hole scattering may impose an information-theoretic optimum. We study a controlled scattering Gedankenexperiment in which Gaussian pulses of scalar test fields are sent toward a black- hole potential and the reflected waveform is used to infer the geometry. Near-horizon deviations are parametrized with the Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric, and information recovery is quantified by the Fisher matrix in the high-signal-to-noise limit. Narrow, high-frequency pulses resolve short scales but are mostly transmitted through the barrier, while wide pulses are efficiently reflected but poorly resolve the potential. Their competition selects an optimal pulse width, numerically found to be set by about the inverse square root of the potential peak. Using the P\"oschl-Teller analytical solutions, we further model the correct excitation of quasinormal modes and separate the information in the fundamental mode from that in the full waveform, including the prompt response. The optimal probe is therefore not the highest-frequency pulse, but the waveform that balances spatial resolution against reflected information, linking black-hole spectroscopy, semiclassical barrier scattering, and information theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01061 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the marginalized measurement uncer￾tainties as functions of the dimensionless combination σ p V max ℓ , where σ denotes the wave-packet width and V max ℓ is the maximum of the effective potential for a given angular multipole number ℓ. To explore a broad range of scenarios, we vary both ℓ and the total number of RZ parameters included simultaneously in the analysis. Re￾markably, the marginalized uncertainties … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. We show the injected effective potential (black line) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Gravitational parameter estimation in a waveguide

    J. Doukas, L. Westwood, D. Faccio, A. Di Falco, and I. Fuentes, Gravitational parameter estimation in a waveguide, Phys. Rev. D90, 024022 (2014), arXiv:1403.4855 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  2. [1]

    Rutherford, The scattering of alpha and beta particles by matter and the structure of the atom, Phil

    E. Rutherford, The scattering of alpha and beta particles by matter and the structure of the atom, Phil. Mag. Ser. 621, 669 (1911)

    work page 1911

  3. [2]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  4. [3]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [4]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    arXiv 1999

  6. [5]

    Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, Class

    E. Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, Class. Quant. Grav.43, 123001 (2026), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  7. [6]

    B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, Black hole normal modes: A semianalytic approach, Astrophys. J. Lett.291, L33 (1985)

    1985

  8. [7]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, First few overtones probe the event horizon geometry, JHEAp44, 419 (2024), arXiv:2209.00679 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    P. J. Nee, S. H. Völkel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Role of black hole quasinormal mode overtones for ringdown analysis, Phys. Rev. D108, 044032 (2023), arXiv:2302.06634 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Baibhav, M

    V. Baibhav, M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, R. Cotesta, W. Del Pozzo, and F. Duque, Agnostic black hole spectroscopy: Quasinormal mode content of numerical relativity waveforms and limits of validity of linear perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D108, 104020 (20...

    2023 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Mino and J

    Y. Mino and J. Brink, Gravitational Radiation from Plunging Orbits: Perturbative Study, Phys. Rev. D78, 124015 (2008), arXiv:0809.2814 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Zimmerman and Y

    A. Zimmerman and Y. Chen, New Generic Ringdown Frequencies at the Birth of a Kerr Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D84, 084012 (2011), arXiv:1106.0782 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Oshita, S

    N. Oshita, S. Ma, Y. Chen, and H. Yang, Probing direct waves in black hole ringdowns (2025), arXiv:2509.09165 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  6. [13]

    N. Lu, S. Ma, O. J. Piccinni, Y. Chen, and L. Sun, GW250114 reveals signatures of post-merger black-hole horizon, Nature655, 71 (2026), arXiv:2510.01001 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  7. [14]

    K. D. Kokkotas, Pulsating relativistic stars, inLes Houches School of Physics: Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Radiation(1995) pp. 89–102, arXiv:gr- qc/9603024

    1995

  8. [15]

    Ferrari and K

    V. Ferrari and K. D. Kokkotas, Scattering of particles by neutron stars: Time evolutions for axial perturbations, Phys. Rev. D62, 107504 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0008057. 6

    2000 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Tominaga, M

    K. Tominaga, M. Saijo, and K.-i. Maeda, Gravitational waves from a test particle scattered by a neutron star: Axial mode case, Phys. Rev. D60, 024004 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9901040

    1999 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Cardoso, E

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, and P. Pani, Is the gravitational- wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 171101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 089902 (2016)], arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [18]

    C. V. Vishveshwara, Scattering of Gravitational Radi- ation by a Schwarzschild Black-hole, Nature227, 936 (1970)

    1970

  12. [19]

    Rezzolla and A

    L. Rezzolla and A. Zhidenko, New parametrization for spherically symmetric black holes in metric theories of gravity,Phys.Rev.D90,084009(2014),arXiv:1407.3086 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [20]

    L. S. Finn, Detection, measurement and gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D46, 5236 (1992), arXiv:gr- qc/9209010

    1992

  14. [21]

    Cutler and E

    C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan, Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral wave form?, Phys. Rev. D49, 2658 (1994), arXiv:gr- qc/9402014

    1994

  15. [23]

    Poschl and E

    G. Poschl and E. Teller, Bemerkungen zur Quanten- mechanik des anharmonischen Oszillators, Z. Phys.83, 143 (1933)

    1933

  16. [24]

    Ferrari and B

    V. Ferrari and B. Mashhoon, Oscillations of a Black Hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1361 (1984)

    1984

  17. [25]

    Ferrari and B

    V. Ferrari and B. Mashhoon, New approach to the quasi- normal modes of a black hole, Phys. Rev. D30, 295 (1984)

    1984

  18. [26]

    Kuntz, Green function of the Pöschl-Teller potential, SciPost Phys.20, 120 (2026), arXiv:2510.17954 [gr-qc]

    A. Kuntz, Green function of the Pöschl-Teller potential, SciPost Phys.20, 120 (2026), arXiv:2510.17954 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  19. [27]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, General parametriza- tion of black holes: The only parameters that matter, Phys. Rev. D101, 124004 (2020), arXiv:2001.06100 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal ringing of general spherically symmetric parametrized black holes, Phys. Rev. D105, 104032 (2022), arXiv:2201.12897 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Albuquerque and S

    S. Albuquerque and S. H. Völkel, Bayesian analysis of analog gravity systems with the Rezzolla-Zhidenko met- ric, Phys. Rev. D111, 124020 (2025), arXiv:2501.09000 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Barcelo, S

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Analogue gravity, Living Rev. Rel.8, 12 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505065

    2005 arXiv

  23. [31]

    W. G. Unruh, Experimental black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 1351 (1981)

    1981

  24. [32]

    Steinhauer, Observation of quantum Hawking radia- tion and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Na- ture Phys.12, 959 (2016), arXiv:1510.00621 [gr-qc]

    J. Steinhauer, Observation of quantum Hawking radia- tion and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Na- ture Phys.12, 959 (2016), arXiv:1510.00621 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Torres, S

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, E. W. Tedford, and S. Weinfurtner, Observation of superra- diance in a vortex flow, Nature Phys.13, 833 (2017), arXiv:1612.06180 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Torres, S

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, M. Richartz, and S. Weinfurtner, Quasinormal Mode Oscillations in an Analogue Black Hole Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 011301 (2020), arXiv:1811.07858 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Smaniotto, L

    P. Smaniotto, L. Solidoro, P. Švančara, S. Patrick, M. Richartz, C. F. Barenghi, R. Gregory, and S. We- infurtner, Black-hole spectroscopy from a giant quantum vortex (2026), arXiv:2502.11209 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Solidoro, S

    L. Solidoro, S. H. Völkel, and S. Weinfurtner, Spec- troscopy of analogue black holes using simulation-based inference (2026), arXiv:2604.12800 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Solidoro, S

    L. Solidoro, S. Patrick, S. Weinfurtner, and R. Gregory, Origin of Quasinormal Modes in Semi-Open Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 051401 (2025), arXiv:2406.11013 [gr-qc]

    2025

  30. [38]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    G. B. Arfken, H.-J. Weber, and F. E. Harris,Mathemati- cal Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide, 7th ed. (Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2013). Appendix A: Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric We adopt the Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrization [19], whose continued-fraction expa...

    2013

  32. [40]

    (C11) This complementary result shows that for conditional un- certainty, i.e

    = (x3 + 2x)e−x2/2, x cond opt = 1.369. (C11) This complementary result shows that for conditional un- certainty, i.e. the regime where parameters are probed in- dividually rather than simultaneously marginalized, the optimal Gaussian packet width also exists and obeys a simila...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.