Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 6 cited by

Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of superconducting (La,Pr)3Ni2O7/SrLaAlO4 heterostructures

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Direct photoemission of an ambient-pressure superconducting nickelate film shows a hole-doped Fermi surface with both dx2-y2 and dz2 orbital pockets, localized to the interfacial unit cell.

desk verdict First ARPES on ambient-pressure superconducting nickelate films, with real data value, but the paper overstates the link between the measured films and the superconducting state. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09255 v2 pith:NDVMLJ4U submitted 2025-01-16 cond-mat.supr-con

Peng Li , Guangdi Zhou , Wei Lv , Yueying Li , Changming Yue , Haoliang Huang , Lizhi Xu , Jianchang Shen
show 14 more authors
Yu Miao Wenhua Song Zihao Nie Yaqi Chen Heng Wang Weiqiang Chen Yaobo Huang Zhen-Hua Chen Tian Qian Junhao Lin Junfeng He Yu-Jie Sun Zhuoyu Chen Qi-Kun Xue
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con MSC 82D55 PACS 74.25.Jb74.78.-w79.60.-i
keywords nickelatesuperconductivityARPESRuddlesden-PopperphaseFermisurfaceholedopingthin-filmheterostructureinterfacialconfinementoxygenstoichiometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements of 1-, 2-, and 3-unit-cell La2.85Pr0.15Ni2O7 films grown on SrLaAlO4, giving a direct electronic-structure look at an ambient-pressure superconducting bilayer nickelate. It claims that the superconducting state is hole-doped relative to the non-superconducting ambient-pressure bulk, with a hole count of 21% ± 5% per Ni, and that the Fermi level is crossed by both Ni 3dx2-y2 and 3dz2 bands. It also claims that conduction is confined largely to the first unit cell near the substrate interface, explained by interfacial Sr diffusion and a p-d hybridization gradient across the film. If these claims hold, they provide the first direct electronic-structure constraints on the pairing mechanism of bilayer nickelates under ambient pressure.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by ARPES polarization and photon-energy contrast: LH polarization at 200 eV reveals overall Fermi surface topology, LV polarization isolates orbital character, and 21.2 eV photons have a short mean free path that makes the measurement surface-sensitive. MDC peak separations along MXM provide the hole-doping estimate by comparison with bulk, while the pre-peak intensity of the O-K edge in EELS provides a spatial map of p-d hybridization across the film. DFT+U on the strained film lattice supplies the band-structure context that connects the observed pockets to specific Ni orbitals.

What would settle it

Grow a 3UC film and measure it by 21.2 eV ARPES in situ, without ever leaving the growth chamber or exposing it to vacuum transfer, while maintaining oxygen annealing until the measurement; if the top unit cell then shows metallic Fermi-level intensity, the reported insulating top layer is an oxygen-loss artifact of the transfer protocol, whereas if it remains insulating, the p-d hybridization gradient is intrinsic to the as-grown heterostructure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a direct electronic-structure determination of a superconducting nickelate thin film. Using 200 eV synchrotron light and 21.2 eV helium lamp light to vary probing depth, the paper finds that the top unit cell of a 3UC film is insulating while the interfacial unit cell is metallic, and that Fermi surface maps for all thicknesses are hole-doped compared with bulk La3Ni2O7. Band-resolved spectra show two kinds of pockets at the Fermi level: 'a' and 'b' pockets from Ni 3dx2-y2 orbitals and a 'g' pocket from Ni 3dz2 orbitals. From the pocket areas, the paper estimates 0.21 holes per Ni, and DFT+U calculations of the strained structure reproduce the qualitative band topology and pocket shapes.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusions assume the films measured by photoemission (transported in an oxygen suitcase and quenched) have the same oxygen content and superconducting character as the separately prepared transport samples, and that the top-layer insulating behavior reflects the as-grown film rather than oxygen loss during transfer or STEM specimen preparation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pairing theories for bilayer nickelates must include both $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $d_{z^2}$ Fermi pockets; single-band cuprate-type models miss part of the low-energy physics.
  • The 21% hole doping per Ni sets a quantitative reference for tight-binding and DFT+U calculations of the strained film.
  • Interfacial confinement of conduction means the substrate and interface chemistry (Sr diffusion, strain) are control parameters for superconductivity, not just the film itself.
  • The insulating top unit cell implies that preserving oxygen stoichiometry through the full film thickness is a concrete route to improving $T_c$ and film quality.
  • The similar Fermi surface topology from 1UC to 3UC indicates that the essential superconducting electronic structure is already established at a single bilayer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's confinement scenario suggests an untested lever: engineering more interfacial Sr diffusion or intentional hole doping at the interface could raise $T_c$ further, since the first unit cell carries the superconductivity.
  • If top-layer insulating behavior is indeed oxygen-loss driven, then in-situ oxygen dosing or a protective capping layer should restore metallic top layers; this prediction is testable by ARPES on capped or in-situ-grown films.
  • The 21% hole count is estimated by comparing pocket areas with bulk Fermi surface maps; if strong correlations renormalize the band masses differently in film and bulk, the true doping could differ, so a direct comparison with a chemically hole-doped bulk parent would be a useful cross-check.
  • The coexistence of both orbital pockets at the Fermi level may point toward inter-orbital pairing fluctuations, an idea the paper's cited theories entertain but which the ARPES data alone do not prove.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports ARPES measurements on 1, 2, and 3 unit-cell La2.85Pr0.15Ni2O7 films grown on SrLaAlO4 substrates and transported under oxygen to the measurement station. The authors claim that the Fermi surface maps reveal a hole-doped electronic structure relative to non-superconducting bulk La3Ni2O7, with contributions from both Ni 3dx2-y2 and 3dz2 orbitals at the Fermi level, and a hole doping level of 21% ± 5%. Combining photon-energy-dependent ARPES with STEM/EDS/EELS, they further conclude that conduction is confined primarily to the first unit cell near the interface, driven by interfacial Sr diffusion and a p-d hybridization gradient. DFT+U calculations are presented as qualitative support for the hole-doped scenario.

Significance. If the claims hold, this would be the first ARPES study of the electronic structure of ambient-pressure superconducting bilayer nickelate films, providing direct constraints on Fermi surface topology, orbital content, and doping that are central to current theoretical debates. The paper's strengths include the use of a pure-oxygen suitcase transfer and rapid quench to preserve the metastable film state, the combination of synchrotron and helium-lamp ARPES with different probing depths, atomically resolved STEM/EDS/EELS data, and an explicit DFT+U model based on strained thin-film lattice parameters. These elements make the experimental dataset valuable regardless of the final interpretation. The main limitations are that the ARPES films are not independently shown to be superconducting, the quantitative doping estimate lacks a documented procedure, and the interfacial-confinement story is entangled with possible oxygen-loss artifacts acknowledged by the authors.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, Fig. 1d-f and caption; Methods, Transport measurements] The sentence 'these transport measurements confirm that the ARPES measurement conducted at 10 K reflect the superconducting state' is not supported by the evidence presented. The transport data were obtained on separately prepared films, and the 1UC transport film was capped with approximately 0.5 nm SrTiO3 while the 1UC ARPES film was uncapped. The paper itself states that oxygen loss during cooling in vacuum is 'inevitable' and 'increasingly significant with reduced film thickness.' No resistance or magnetization measurement on the actual ARPES films, or on sister films from the same growth run subjected to the identical suitcase/quench protocol, is reported. Therefore the label 'superconducting state' for the ARPES data rests on an extrapolation. Please provide a direct superconducting characterization of the ARPES-equivalent samples or explicitly limit the claims to the measured film state.
  2. [Results, Fig. 3b and accompanying text] The hole doping level of '21% ± 5%' is stated without the area-integration procedure, the definition of the Fermi-surface area enclosed, the background subtraction, or the error propagation. The ±5% uncertainty is not derived anywhere in the text or the supplementary material. Because the doping level is a headline quantitative result that is compared with DFT and with the bulk parent compound, the authors should provide a step-by-step description of the area integral, the k-space boundaries used, the treatment of the diffuse g pocket, and a justification of the 2D assumption underlying the conversion from area to doping.
  3. [DFT+U calculations, Fig. 4b and text] The DFT+U comparison is partially circular. The text states that 'the Fermi level is calibrated for comparison with the experiment, based on the proximity of a band minimum to the Fermi level at the G point,' and the resulting hole-doped Fermi surface then 'qualitatively agrees' with the experiment. Because the Fermi-level shift is a free parameter chosen using the experimental data, the qualitative agreement cannot independently confirm the hole-doping level or the orbital assignment. The authors should state this explicitly, show the sensitivity of the calculated Fermi surface to the magnitude of the shift, and avoid presenting the DFT comparison as independent confirmation of the hole-doped scenario.
  4. [Results, Fig. 2 and text] The interfacial-confinement conclusion is not uniquely determined by the data because the authors themselves identify oxygen loss as a viable alternative explanation for the top-layer insulating behavior. The text notes that 'one possible scenario is that oxygen loss at the surface induces insulating behavior at the top layer' and that 'additional oxygen loss may be introduced during STEM sample preparation.' Since the 21.2 eV ARPES data and the EELS p-d hybridization gradient are both surface-sensitive, they could reflect transfer- or preparation-induced oxygen depletion rather than an intrinsic as-grown confinement. To support the claim that conduction is localized primarily in the first unit cell, the authors should either provide an in-situ oxygen-content measurement, compare with a deliberately oxygen-controlled sample, or substantially soften the causal language in the conclusion.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There is a typo in 'SrLaAlO4 substates' (should be 'substrates') in the abstract and in the first paragraph of the Introduction.
  2. [Fig. 4d and text] The sentence 'with the latter qualitatively agrees with experiments (Fig. 3e) qualitatively' contains a duplicated adverb and a grammatical error; please revise to 'the latter agrees qualitatively with the experiments (Fig. 3e).'
  3. [Fig. 3c and caption] The assignment of the small 'a' pocket to the dx2-y2 orbital relies on matrix-element arguments and is stated rather than demonstrated. Please provide a quantitative matrix-element simulation or additional polarization-dependent cuts to justify the orbital character of the weak a pocket.
  4. [Results, Fig. 3f and Fig. 3j] The 'small peak' near the G point in the MDC at the Fermi level is discussed as evidence for a band bottom just above the Fermi level, but the statistical significance of this peak is not assessed. Please provide a fit residual or an estimate of the signal-to-noise ratio for this feature.
  5. [Methods, Band structure calculations] The DFT+U calculation is described as using 'preliminary parameters U=5 eV and J=1 eV,' but the sensitivity of the resulting Fermi surface topology to these parameters is not reported. At least a brief statement of the range of U values tested would help assess robustness.
  6. [References] Reference 37 is cited as 'lnorg Chem' (should be 'Inorg Chem'), and reference 32 uses 'SciChina' without a space; please correct these and check all journal abbreviations for consistency.
  7. [Supplementary Fig. S6] The background-subtraction procedure shown in Fig. S6 is not described in the Methods section; please add a brief description of how the average EDC background was constructed and subtracted.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

One minor fitted-input element in the supporting DFT comparison; the main experimental claims are independently measured and not circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, Results, DFT+U paragraph (Fig. 4b-d)]
    "Note that the Fermi level is calibrated for comparison with the experiment, based on the proximity of a band minimum to the Fermi level at the G point. The Fermi level for the undoped case is also shown for reference. The calculated band dispersions qualitatively capture the ARPES results. Figures 4c and 4d present the Fermi surfaces for undoped and hole-doped cases, with the latter qualitatively agrees with experiments (Fig. 3e) qualitatively."

    The DFT Fermi level is shifted so that a calculated band minimum sits at the experimentally observed G-point Fermi level. The same shifted calculation is then offered as 'qualitatively capturing' the ARPES band structure and as a hole-doped Fermi surface that 'qualitatively agrees' with the experiment. That specific agreement is imposed by the calibration rather than independently derived. The 'hole-doped case' is defined to correspond to the experiments, for which the doping level has already been estimated from ARPES area integrals (21% ± 5%), so the DFT comparison does not independently confirm the doping scenario. Agreement of band shapes away from the calibration point remains non-trivial, which limits the severity, and the main ARPES claims do not reduce to this fit.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental conclusions — hole doping relative to bulk, dz2 and dx2-y2 contributions at EF, and conduction localized in the first unit cell — rest on direct ARPES, EDC, STEM/EDS/EELS measurements, not on the DFT calculation. The MDC peak-separation comparison is made against an external bulk ARPES reference (ref. 35), and the layer-resolved conductivity gradient is inferred from the contrasting 200 eV and 21.2 eV responses plus atomically resolved spectroscopy. The self-citations (refs. 41, 42) supply growth recipes and lattice parameters and are corroborated by the paper's own transport data; they are not load-bearing circularity. The sole notable circular element is the DFT+U comparison: the Fermi level is calibrated to the experimental G-point band minimum and the hole-doped calculation corresponds to the ARPES-derived doping, so the subsequent 'agreement' is partly built from the data. Because this DFT comparison is a supporting consistency check rather than the source of the headline findings, the overall circularity is low. The assumption that the transferred, quenched ARPES films are in the same superconducting state as the separately prepared, partly capped transport films is an extrapolation about sample state, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs; it is a validity risk rather than a circular step and is therefore not scored here.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented entities: the paper introduces no new particle, force, dimension, or conserved quantity; 'conductivity gradient' and 'g pocket' are interpretations or labels for measured features, not postulates. Parameter load is modest: the DFT+U interaction parameters, a Fermi-level calibration that matches the experiment, and a hand-estimated doping number with undocumented error bars. The heavier burden sits in domain assumptions: two-dimensional character for the carrier count, transfer of cuprate-derived pocket assignments to nickelates, depth-resolved interpretation of photon-energy contrast, and extrapolation from transport samples to ARPES specimens.

free parameters (3)
  • DFT+U on-site interaction parameters U and J = U = 5 eV, J = 1 eV
    Chosen as 'preliminary parameters' in Methods; the computed band dispersions and Fermi surfaces used for comparison depend on these values and were not otherwise constrained.
  • DFT Fermi-level shift relative to the undoped calculation = Set so that a band minimum touches the Fermi level at the G point, matching ARPES
    Fig. 4b: 'the Fermi level is calibrated for comparison with the experiment, based on the proximity of a band minimum to the Fermi level at the G point.' The hole-doped calculated Fermi surface inherits this calibration.
  • Hole doping estimate from Fermi-surface area integrals = 21% ± 5% (0.21 holes per Ni)
    Stated 'based on area integrals of this Fermi surface map'; the integration procedure and the origin of the ±5% error bar are not documented, so the value functions as a hand-assigned estimate that the DFT is then matched to.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Two-dimensional electronic structure is assumed when converting Fermi-surface area to a doping level.
    Quoted in the paper: 'assuming the two-dimensional nature of the electronic structure [35].' If out-of-plane dispersion is significant in these strained films, the 21% ± 5% carrier count is unreliable.
  • domain assumption The cuprate-derived a-b-g pocket schematic applies to bilayer nickelates.
    Fig. 3c is reproduced from cuprate ARPES reviews [6,47]; the orbital labeling of the measured pockets (dx2-y2 vs dz2) inherits this analogy.
  • domain assumption Photon-energy-dependent probing depth maps directly onto unit-cell depth.
    The 21.2 eV vs 200 eV EDC comparison (Fig. 2a,b) is interpreted as a thickness-resolved conductivity gradient (Fig. 2c) via standard photoelectron mean-free-path behavior.
  • domain assumption Transport results on separately prepared samples transfer to the ARPES specimens.
    The 1UC transport film was SrTiO3-capped; ARPES films were uncapped and quenched. The claim that ARPES at 10 K probes the superconducting state rests on this extrapolation.
  • standard math Standard ARPES dipole matrix-element analysis justifies orbital assignment from LH/LV intensity differences.
    Fig. S1 provides the matrix-element table used to attribute the observed polarization contrast to dz2 and dx2-y2 bands.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of superconducting (La,Pr)3Ni2O7/SrLaAlO4 heterostructures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NDVMLJ4U

@misc{pith2026250109255,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of superconducting (La,Pr)3Ni2O7/SrLaAlO4 heterostructures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NDVMLJ4U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09255}
}
read the original abstract

Ruddlesden-Popper bilayer nickelate thin film superconductors discovered under ambient pressure enable vast possibilities for investigating electronic structures of the superconducting state. Here, we report angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements of 1, 2, and 3 unit-cell epitaxial La2.85Pr0.15Ni2O7 films grown on SrLaAlO4 substates, through pure-oxygen in situ sample transportation. Evidence obtained using photons with distinct probing depths shows that conduction is localized primarily at the first unit cell near the interface. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), together with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), indicates that interfacial Sr diffusion and pronounced p-d hybridization gradient may collectively account for the interfacial confinement of conduction. Fermi surface maps reveal hole doping compared to non-superconducting ambient-pressure bulk crystals. Measurements of dispersive band structures suggest the contributions from both Ni dx2-y2 and dz2 orbitals at the Fermi level. Density functional theory (DFT) + U calculations capture qualitative features of the ARPES results, consistent with a hole-doped scenario. These findings constrain theoretical models of the superconducting mechanism and suggest potential for enhancing superconductivity in nickelates under ambient pressure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Superconducting gap structure and bosonic mode in La2PrNi2O7 thin films at ambient pressure

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Tunneling spectra on La2PrNi2O7 thin films reveal a dominant anisotropic s-wave gap near 19 meV, a smaller gap of 6-8 meV, and a bosonic mode at about 30 meV, pointing to s± pairing.

  2. Pairing symmetry and superconductivity in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ thin films

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RMFT on the bilayer two-orbital t-J model predicts s±-wave pairing in La3Ni2O7 thin films, with a nodeless beta pocket and Tc near 60 K, plus an inter-orbital d-wave channel that reinforces the dominant pairing.

  3. Correlated electronic structures and unconventional superconductivity in bilayer nickelate heterostructures

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A DFT+cRPA+CDMFT calculation for bilayer nickelate thin films reproduces ARPES Fermi surfaces and predicts s±-wave pairing from spin fluctuations.

  4. Orbital-selective correlation effects and superconducting pairing symmetry in a multiorbital $t$-$J$ model for bilayer nickelates

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a bilayer two-orbital t-J model for La3Ni2O7, the leading pairing is either extended s-wave or d_{x^2-y^2}-wave, and moving the z2 bonding band through the Fermi level switches the dominant pairing orbital from z2 ...

  5. Orbital correlations in bilayer nickelates: roles of doping and interlayer coupling

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a two-orbital RPA model of La3Ni2O7, transverse orbital fluctuations peak at (π/2, π/2) and sit closer to divergence than longitudinal ones, pointing to a possible orbital-fluctuation mechanism.

  6. The effect of Carrier Doping and Thickness on the Electronic Structures of La$3$Ni$2$O$7$ Thin Films

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A DFT+U study finds that a two-unit-cell La3Ni2O7 film doped with roughly 0.3 holes per formula unit reproduces the ARPES-observed gamma Fermi pockets, linking hole doping and film thickness to ambient-pressure superc...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of superconducting (La,Pr)3Ni2O7/SrLaAlO4 heterostructures Peng Li1,2†, Guangdi Zhou1,2†, Wei Lv2†, Yueying Li2†, Changming Yue1,2,3*, Haoliang Huang1,2, Lizhi Xu2, Jianchang Shen4,5, Yu Miao4,5, Wenhua Song2, Zihao Nie2, Yaqi Chen2, Heng Wang2, Weiqiang Chen1,2, Yaobo Huang6, Zhen-Hua Chen6, Tian Qian7, Junhao Li...

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Advances in the physics of high-temperature superconductivity

    Orenstein J, Millis AJ. Advances in the physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Science 2000; 288: 468-74

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity

    Lee PA, Nagaosa N, Wen X-G. Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Rev Mod Phys 2006; 78: 17-85

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors

    Fradkin E, Kivelson SA, Tranquada JM. Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors. Rev Mod Phys 2015; 87: 457-82

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides

    Keimer B, Kivelson SA, Norman MR, et al. From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Nature 2015; 518: 179-86

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Energy gaps in high-transition-temperature cuprate superconductors

    Hashimoto M, Vishik IM, He R-H, et al. Energy gaps in high-transition-temperature cuprate superconductors. Nat Phys 2014; 10: 483-95

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Angle-resolved photoemission studies of quantum materials

    Sobota JA, He Y , Shen Z-X. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of quantum materials. Rev Mod Phys 2021; 93: 025006

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate

    Li DF, Lee K, Wang BY , et al. Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate. Nature 2019; 572: 624-27

    work page 2019

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Electronic structure of the parent compound of superconducting infinite-layer nickelates

    Hepting M, Li D, Jia CJ, et al. Electronic structure of the parent compound of superconducting infinite-layer nickelates. Nat Mater 2020; 19: 381-85

    2020

  2. [10]

    Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate

    Pan GA, Ferenc Segedin D, LaBollita H, et al. Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate. Nat Mater 2021; 21: 160-64

    2021

  3. [11]

    Cuprate-like electronic structures in infinite-layer nickelates with substantial hole dopings

    Ding X, Fan Y , Wang X, et al. Cuprate-like electronic structures in infinite-layer nickelates with substantial hole dopings. Natl Sci Rev 2024; 11: nwae194

    2024

  4. [12]

    Electronic structure of superconducting infinite-layer lanthanum nickelates

    Sun W, Jiang Z, Xia C, et al. Electronic structure of superconducting infinite-layer lanthanum nickelates. Sci Adv 2025; 11: eadr5116

    2025

  5. [13]

    Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure

    Sun H, Huo M, Hu X, et al. Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure. Nature 2023; 621: 493-98

    2023

  6. [14]

    Bulk high-temperature superconductivity in pressurized tetragonal La2PrNi2O7

    Wang N, Wang G, Shen X, et al. Bulk high-temperature superconductivity in pressurized tetragonal La2PrNi2O7. Nature 2024; 634: 579-84

    2024

  7. [15]

    High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ

    Zhang Y , Su D, Huang Y , et al. High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ. Nat Phys 2024; 20: 1269-73

    2024

  8. [16]

    Bilayer two-orbital model of La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Luo Z, Hu X, Wang M, et al. Bilayer two-orbital model of La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Phys Rev Lett 2023; 131: 126001

    2023

  9. [17]

    Normal and superconducting properties of La3Ni2O7

    Wang M, Wen H-H, Wu T, et al. Normal and superconducting properties of La3Ni2O7. Chin Phys Lett 2024; 41: 077402

    2024

  10. [18]

    Correlated Electronic Structure of La3Ni2O7 under Pressure

    Christiansson V , Petocchi F, Werner P. Correlated Electronic Structure of La3Ni2O7 under Pressure. Phys Rev Lett 2023; 131: 206501

    2023

  11. [19]

    s±-wave pairing and the destructive role of apical-oxygen deficiencies in La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Liu Y-B, Mei J-W, Ye F, et al. s±-wave pairing and the destructive role of apical-oxygen deficiencies in La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Phys Rev Lett 2023; 131: 236002

    2023

  12. [20]

    High-Tc superconductivity by mobilizing local spin singlets and possible route to higher Tc in pressurized La3Ni2O7

    Qin Q, Yang Y-f. High-Tc superconductivity by mobilizing local spin singlets and possible route to higher Tc in pressurized La3Ni2O7. Phys Rev B 2023; 108: L140504

    2023

  13. [21]

    Possible s±-wave superconductivity in La3Ni2O7

    Yang Q-G, Wang D, Wang Q-H. Possible s±-wave superconductivity in La3Ni2O7. Phys Rev B 2023; 108: L140505

    2023

  14. [22]

    Effective bi-Layer model Hamiltonian and density-matrix renormalization group study for the high-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure

    Shen Y , Qin M, Zhang G-M. Effective bi-Layer model Hamiltonian and density-matrix renormalization group study for the high-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure. Chin Phys Lett 2023; 40: 127401

    2023

  15. [23]

    Interlayer valence bonds and two-component theory for high-Tc superconductivity of La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Yang Y-f, Zhang G-M, Zhang F-C. Interlayer valence bonds and two-component theory for high-Tc superconductivity of La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Phys Rev B 2023; 108: L201108

    2023

  16. [24]

    Electronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Zhang Y , Lin L-F, Moreo A, et al. Electronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Phys Rev B 2023; 108: L180510

    2023

  17. [25]

    Superconductivity in nickelate and cuprate superconductors with strong bilayer coupling

    Fan Z, Zhang J-F, Zhan B, et al. Superconductivity in nickelate and cuprate superconductors with strong bilayer coupling. Phys Rev B 2024; 110: 024514

    2024

  18. [26]

    High-temperature superconductivity in La3Ni2O7

    Jiang K, Wang Z, Zhang F-C. High-temperature superconductivity in La3Ni2O7. Chin Phys Lett 2024; 41: 017402

    2024

  19. [27]

    Pressure driven fractionalization of ionic spins results in cupratelike high-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7

    Jiang R, Hou J, Fan Z, et al. Pressure driven fractionalization of ionic spins results in cupratelike high-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7. Phys Rev Lett 2024; 132: 126503

    2024

  20. [28]

    Interlayer-coupling-driven high-temperature superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Lu C, Pan Z, Yang F, et al. Interlayer-coupling-driven high-temperature superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Phys Rev Lett 2024; 132: 146002

    2024

  21. [29]

    High-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 based on the bilayer two-orbital t-J model

    Luo Z, Lv B, Wang M, et al. High-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 based on the bilayer two-orbital t-J model. npj Quantum Mater 2024; 9:

    2024

  22. [30]

    Hund electronic correlation in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure

    Ouyang Z, Wang J-M, Wang J-X, et al. Hund electronic correlation in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure. Phys Rev B 2024; 109: 115114

    2024

  23. [31]

    Bilayer t-J-J⊥ model and magnetically mediated pairing in the pressurized nickelate La3Ni2O7

    Qu X-Z, Qu D-W, Chen J, et al. Bilayer t-J-J⊥ model and magnetically mediated pairing in the pressurized nickelate La3Ni2O7. Phys Rev Lett 2024; 132: 036502

    2024

  24. [32]

    Possible high Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure through manifestation of a nearly half-filled bilayer Hubbard model

    Sakakibara H, Kitamine N, Ochi M, et al. Possible high Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure through manifestation of a nearly half-filled bilayer Hubbard model. Phys Rev Lett 2024; 132: 106002

    2024

  25. [33]

    Superexchange and charge transfer in the nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Wú W, Luo Z, Yao D-X, et al. Superexchange and charge transfer in the nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure. SciChina Phys, Mech Astron 2024; 67: 117402

    2024

  26. [34]

    Structural phase transition, s±-wave pairing, and magnetic stripe order in bilayered superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Zhang Y , Lin L-F, Moreo A, et al. Structural phase transition, s±-wave pairing, and magnetic stripe order in bilayered superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Nat Commun 2024; 15:

    2024

  27. [35]

    Visualization of oxygen vacancies and self-doped ligand holes in La3Ni2O7−δ

    Dong Z, Huo M, Li J, et al. Visualization of oxygen vacancies and self-doped ligand holes in La3Ni2O7−δ. Nature 2024; 630: 847-52

    2024

  28. [36]

    Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7

    Yang J, Sun H, Hu X, et al. Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7. Nat Commun 2024; 15:

    2024

  29. [37]

    Electronic correlation and pseudogap-like behavior of high-temperature superconductor La3Ni2O7

    Li Y , Xian Du, Yantao Cao, et al. Electronic correlation and pseudogap-like behavior of high-temperature superconductor La3Ni2O7. Chin Phys Lett 2024; 41: 087402

    2024

  30. [38]

    Long-range structural order in a hidden phase of Ruddlesden–Popper bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7

    Wang H, Chen L, Rutherford A, et al. Long-range structural order in a hidden phase of Ruddlesden–Popper bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7. lnorg Chem 2024; 63: 5020-26

    2024

  31. [39]

    Electronic structure of the alternating monolayer-trilayer phase of La3Ni2O7

    Abadi SN, Xu K-J, Lomeli EG, et al. Electronic structure of the alternating monolayer-trilayer phase of La3Ni2O7. Phys Rev Lett 2025; 134: 126001

    2025

  32. [40]

    Unconventional crystal structure of the high-pressure superconductor La3Ni2O7

    Puphal P, Reiss P, Enderlein N, et al. Unconventional crystal structure of the high-pressure superconductor La3Ni2O7. Phys Rev Lett 2024; 133: 146002

    2024

  33. [41]

    Revealing nanoscale structural phase separation in La3Ni2O7-δ single crystal via scanning near-field optical microscopy

    Zhou X, He W, Zhou Z, et al. Revealing nanoscale structural phase separation in La3Ni2O7-δ single crystal via scanning near-field optical microscopy. arXiv 2024: 2410.06602

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7

    Ko EK, Yu Y , Liu Y , et al. Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7. Nature 2025; 638: 935-40

    2025

  35. [43]

    Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 films

    Zhou G, Lv W, Wang H, et al. Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 films. Nature 2025; 640: 641-46

    2025

  36. [44]

    Fermi surface reconstruction in strained La3Ni2O7 on LaAlO3(001) and SrTiO3(001)

    Geisler B, Hamlin JJ, Stewart GR, et al. Fermi surface reconstruction in strained La3Ni2O7 on LaAlO3(001) and SrTiO3(001). arXiv 2024: 2411.14600

    2024

  37. [45]

    Electronic structure of Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates: strain to mimic the effects pressure

    Zhao Y-F, Botana AS. Electronic structure of Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates: strain to mimic the effects pressure. Phys Rev B 2025; 111: 115154

    2025

  38. [46]

    Doping evolution of the Mott-Hubbard landscape in infinite-layer nickelates

    Goodge BH, Li D, Lee K, et al. Doping evolution of the Mott-Hubbard landscape in infinite-layer nickelates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021; 118: e2007683118

    2021

  39. [47]

    Direct observation of strong surface reconstruction in partially reduced nickelate films

    Yang C, Pons R, Sigle W, et al. Direct observation of strong surface reconstruction in partially reduced nickelate films. Nat Commun 2024; 15:

    2024

  40. [48]

    Angle-resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors

    Damascelli A, Hussain Z, Shen Z-X. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors. Rev Mod Phys 2003; 75: 473-541

    2003

  41. [49]

    Electronic correlations and partial gap in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7

    Liu Z, Huo M, Li J, et al. Electronic correlations and partial gap in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7. Nat Commun 2024; 15:

    2024

  42. [50]

    Gigantic-oxidative atomic-layer-by-layer epitaxy for artificially designed complex oxides

    Zhou G, Huang H, Wang F, et al. Gigantic-oxidative atomic-layer-by-layer epitaxy for artificially designed complex oxides. Natl Sci Rev 2024; 12: nwae429

    2024

  43. [51]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals

    Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 1993; 47: 558-61

    1993

  44. [52]

    Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Computational Materials Science 1996; 6: 15-50

    1996

  45. [53]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 1996; 54: 11169-86

    1996

  46. [54]

    An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions

    Mostofi AA, Yates JR, Pizzi G, et al. An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions. Comput Phys Commun 2014; 185: 2309-10

    2014

  47. [55]

    Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications

    Pizzi G, Vitale V , Arita R, et al. Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications. J Phys: Condens Matter 2020; 32: 165902. Figure 1 | Fermi surface maps of La2.85Pr0.15Ni2O7/SrLaAlO4 heterostructures. a-c, Structural schematics of La2.85Pr0.15Ni2O7 films with t...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.