Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Test for homogeneity with unordered paired observations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.01402 v1 pith:NE2NUGCV submitted 2019-05-04 math.ST stat.MEstat.TH

classification math.STstat.MEstat.TH
keywords assumptionsmethodsobservationspairedunordereddistributionsobservesimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In some applications, an experimental unit is composed of two distinct but related subunits. The response from such a unit is $(X_{1}, X_{2})$ but we observe only $Y_1 = \min\{X_{1},X_{2}\}$ and $Y_2 = \max\{X_{1},X_{2}\}$, i.e., the subunit identities are not observed. We call $(Y_1, Y_2)$ unordered paired observations. Based on unordered paired observations $\{(Y_{1i}, Y_{2i})\}_{i=1}^n$, we are interested in whether the marginal distributions for $X_1$ and $X_2$ are identical. Testing methods are available in the literature under the assumptions that $Var(X_1) = Var(X_2)$ and $Cov(X_1, X_2) = 0$. However, by extensive simulation studies, we observe that when one or both assumptions are violated, these methods have inflated type I errors or much lower powers. In this paper, we study the likelihood ratio test statistics for various scenarios and explore their limiting distributions without these restrictive assumptions. Furthermore, we develop Bartlett correction formulae for these statistics to enhance their precision when the sample size is not large. Simulation studies and real-data examples are used to illustrate the efficacy of the proposed methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools