REVIEW 5 cited by
PhysiX: A Foundation Model for Physics Simulations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Foundation models have achieved remarkable success across video, image, and language domains. By scaling up the number of parameters and training datasets, these models acquire generalizable world knowledge and often surpass task-specific approaches. However, such progress has yet to extend to the domain of physics simulation. A primary bottleneck is data scarcity: while millions of images, videos, and textual resources are readily available on the internet, the largest physics simulation datasets contain only tens of thousands of samples. This data limitation hinders the use of large models, as overfitting becomes a major concern. As a result, physics applications typically rely on small models, which struggle with long-range prediction due to limited context understanding. Additionally, unlike images, videos, or text-which typically exhibit fixed granularity-physics datasets often vary drastically in scale, amplifying the challenges of scaling up multitask training. We introduce PhysiX, the first large-scale foundation model for physics simulation. PhysiX is a 4.5B parameter autoregressive generative model. It uses a discrete tokenizer to encode physical processes at different scales into a sequence of discrete tokens, and employs an autoregressive next-token prediction objective to model such processes in the token space. To mitigate the rounding error in the discretization process, PhysiX incorporates a specialized refinement module. Through extensive experiments, we show that PhysiX effectively addresses the data bottleneck, outperforming task-specific baselines under comparable settings as well as the previous absolute state-of-the-art approaches on The Well benchmark. Our results indicate that knowledge learned from natural videos can be successfully transferred to physics simulation, and that joint training across diverse simulation tasks enables synergistic learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Kastor: An efficient fine-tuning strategy for generative emulation of PDE simulations
A fine-tuning and inference strategy combining time-stride autoregression, non-causal temporal upsampling, mean prediction regularization, and gradient difference loss improves generative emulation of PDE simulations ...
-
Image Editing Models are Numerical Solvers
A FLUX image editor, adapted per task, maps rendered inputs to rendered solutions across ten numerical problems, but several encodings leak the target's scale and the model cannot track chaotic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky dynamics.
-
Generative Inverse Design with Abstention via Diagonal Flow Matching
Diagonal Flow Matching (zero-anchoring) makes inverse-design CFM permutation-invariant and cuts round-trip error by up to an order of magnitude, with built-in abstention metrics.
-
Probabilistic Retrofitting of Learned Simulators
Retrofitting pre-trained deterministic PDE surrogates with noise modulation and fair-CRPS yields probabilistic ensembles that outperform compute-matched deterministic fine-tuning on chaotic-flow benchmarks.
-
Physics-Encoded Inverse Modeling for Arctic Snow Depth Estimation
PhysE-Inv predicts a snow-depth proxy generated from the same ERA5 inputs the model sees, so its accuracy against real Arctic snow depth is unestablished.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.