Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 48 references

Fractional short-time dynamics in driven quantum gases

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-07-01 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The pairing amplitude at small separation in driven quantum gases obeys a fractional differential equation derived from the time-dependent interaction.

desk verdict The paper derives a fractional DE for short-distance pairing amplitude under time-dependent interactions and ties it to a nonrelativistic conformal fixed point with self-similar scaling. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.28606 v2 pith:NG3L3UAU submitted 2026-05-27 cond-mat.quant-gas nucl-th

Uri Sharell , Tilman Enss This is my paper
classification cond-mat.quant-gasnucl-th
keywords quantumgasespairingamplitudefractionaldifferentialequationshort-timedynamicsconformalfixedpointinteractionquenchdrivensystemshydrodynamicattractor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that in quantum gases with short-range attractive interactions under time-dependent driving, the pairing amplitude at small separation satisfies a fractional differential equation. This equation yields exact analytic solutions for sudden interaction quenches and for power-law drives that approach resonant scattering. The short-time solutions exhibit universal dynamics controlled by a nonrelativistic conformal fixed point, producing self-similar scaling in the momentum distribution that matches experimental observations. At later times the same equation reduces to a hydrodynamic form that describes relaxation toward equilibrium.

What carries the argument

The fractional differential equation for the pairing amplitude at small separation, obtained directly from the time-dependent short-range interaction.

What would settle it

A time-resolved measurement of the short-distance pairing amplitude after a sudden quench that deviates from the analytic solution of the fractional differential equation would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We find that the pairing amplitude at small separation satisfies a fractional differential equation (FDE). We derive analytic solutions of the pairing evolution for sudden interaction quenches and power-law drives toward resonant scattering. We observe universal short-time dynamics governed by a nonrelativistic conformal fixed point at which the momentum distribution exhibits self-similar dynamic scaling, in quantitative agreement with experiment. At longer times, many-body effects induce relaxation toward an equilibrium state. In this limit, the FDE turns into a Müller-Israel-Stewart type equation that describes a hydrodynamic attractor approaching equilibrium.

Load-bearing premise

The pairing amplitude at small separation can be isolated from longer-range many-body effects and obeys a closed fractional differential equation derived solely from the time-dependent short-range interaction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Analytic expressions exist for the pairing evolution under sudden quenches and power-law drives.
  • Short-time dynamics is universal and controlled by a nonrelativistic conformal fixed point.
  • The momentum distribution displays self-similar dynamic scaling at early times.
  • At later times the equation reduces to a hydrodynamic attractor that relaxes to equilibrium.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fractional equation may describe short-time pair formation in other systems with tunable short-range interactions, such as Rydberg gases or excitons.
  • The conformal fixed point identified here could be used to classify scaling in other nonrelativistic driven systems without needing microscopic details.
  • Extending the drive protocols beyond power laws might reveal additional fixed points or crossover behaviors that experiments could target.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in quantum gases with time-dependent short-range attractive interactions, the pairing amplitude at small separation obeys a closed fractional differential equation (FDE). Analytic solutions are derived for sudden quenches and power-law drives toward resonance. Universal short-time dynamics are identified at a nonrelativistic conformal fixed point, producing self-similar scaling in the momentum distribution that agrees quantitatively with experiment. At longer times, many-body effects cause relaxation, with the FDE reducing to a Müller-Israel-Stewart hydrodynamic attractor equation.

Significance. If the derivation of the isolated FDE is rigorous and the experimental agreement is not post-hoc, the work would supply an analytic bridge between few-body pairing dynamics, fractional calculus, and conformal symmetry in driven quantum gases, with potential implications for non-equilibrium universality and hydrodynamic attractors.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (first paragraph): the central claim that the pairing amplitude at small separation satisfies a closed FDE derived solely from the time-dependent short-range interaction rests on the unverified assumption that longer-range many-body effects can be neglected at short times; without the explicit derivation steps showing how the FDE is obtained and closed, it is impossible to assess whether this isolation is justified or introduces uncontrolled approximations.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement of 'quantitative agreement with experiment' for the self-similar dynamic scaling at the conformal fixed point does not specify whether the scaling exponents or fixed-point parameters are independently predicted from the FDE or adjusted to the same data used for validation; this distinction is load-bearing for the universality claim and must be demonstrated with explicit comparison (e.g., via a table of predicted vs. measured exponents).
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The transition from the FDE to the Müller-Israel-Stewart equation at longer times is stated without indicating the section or intermediate steps where the many-body terms are reintroduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, providing clarifications from the full text and indicating where revisions will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (first paragraph): the central claim that the pairing amplitude at small separation satisfies a closed FDE derived solely from the time-dependent short-range interaction rests on the unverified assumption that longer-range many-body effects can be neglected at short times; without the explicit derivation steps showing how the FDE is obtained and closed, it is impossible to assess whether this isolation is justified or introduces uncontrolled approximations.

    Authors: The derivation of the closed FDE is given explicitly in Section II of the manuscript. Starting from the time-dependent two-body Schrödinger equation with a short-range attractive potential, we integrate over high-momentum components and obtain the fractional differential equation for the pairing amplitude at small separation. The isolation follows from a controlled short-time expansion in which longer-range many-body correlations enter only at higher orders due to the locality of the contact interaction; this is not an assumption but a consequence of the separation between the ultraviolet two-body scale and infrared many-body scales. We will revise the abstract to include a brief reference to this derivation in Section II. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement of 'quantitative agreement with experiment' for the self-similar dynamic scaling at the conformal fixed point does not specify whether the scaling exponents or fixed-point parameters are independently predicted from the FDE or adjusted to the same data used for validation; this distinction is load-bearing for the universality claim and must be demonstrated with explicit comparison (e.g., via a table of predicted vs. measured exponents).

    Authors: The scaling exponents and fixed-point parameters are obtained analytically from the exact solution of the FDE at the nonrelativistic conformal fixed point (Section III), independent of any experimental input. These predictions are then compared to the measured momentum distributions. To make the distinction explicit, we will add a table in the revised manuscript that lists the FDE-derived exponents alongside the corresponding experimental values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and description indicate that the central claim is a derivation of a closed FDE for the short-distance pairing amplitude directly from the time-dependent short-range interaction, followed by analytic solutions for quenches and drives, and observation of universal scaling. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are quoted or described. The derivation is presented as independent, with experimental agreement as external validation rather than input. This qualifies as self-contained against benchmarks, warranting score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated beyond the domain assumption of short-range attractive interactions.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Short-range attractive interactions cause pairing that can be isolated at small separation
    Stated in first sentence of abstract as the physical starting point.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractional short-time dynamics in driven quantum gases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NG3L3UAU

@misc{pith2026260528606,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractional short-time dynamics in driven quantum gases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NG3L3UAU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.28606}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum gases with short-range attractive interaction tend to form pairs. For time-dependent interaction we find that the pairing amplitude at small separation satisfies a fractional differential equation (FDE). We derive analytic solutions of the pairing evolution for sudden interaction quenches and power-law drives toward resonant scattering. We observe universal short-time dynamics governed by a nonrelativistic conformal fixed point at which the momentum distribution exhibits self-similar dynamic scaling, in quantitative agreement with experiment. At longer times, many-body effects induce relaxation toward an equilibrium state. In this limit, the FDE turns into a M\"uller-Israel-Stewart type equation that describes a hydrodynamic attractor approaching equilibrium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28606 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the wave function solution for a sudden [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Nonthermal fixed point scaling in quench dynamics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Experimental data showing the normalized change in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dynamics of the pairing amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    to interacting particles (a(t >0) =a). For the attrac- tor solution (13) we obtain ˜ϕ(k, t) = −4πa V 1/2k2 h 1− k2a2 1 +k 2a2 erfcx(− p iD0t/a) − 1−kaerfi( √iD0k2t) 1 +k 2a2 exp(−iD0k2t) i ; (15) its Fourier transform agrees withϕ(r, t) computed in [28]. Specifically for a quench to the scattering resonance 1/a→0, this simplifies to (cf. [10] for a trappe...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalat- tore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed in- teracting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 863 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Gogolin and J

    C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 056001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech.2005, P04010 (2005)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum ther- malization through entanglement in an isolated many- body system, Science353, 794 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Langen, R

    T. Langen, R. Geiger, and J. Schmiedmayer, Ultracold Atoms Out of Equilibrium, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 201 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms, Nature Rev

    M. Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms, Nature Rev. Phys. 2, 669 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Makotyn, C

    P. Makotyn, C. E. Klauss, D. L. Goldberger, E. A. Cor- nell, and D. S. Jin, Universal dynamics of a degenerate unitary Bose gas, Nature Phys.10, 116 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    A. G. Sykes, J. P. Corson, J. P. D’Incao, A. P. Koller, C. H. Greene, A. M. Rey, K. R. A. Hazzard, and J. L. Bohn, Quenching to unitarity: Quantum dynamics in a three-dimensional Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A89, 021601(R) (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    L. W. Clark, A. Gaj, L. Feng, and C. Chin, Collective emission of matter-wave jets from driven Bose-Einstein condensates, Nature551, 356 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Liebster, M

    N. Liebster, M. Sparn, E. Kath, J. Duchene, K. Fujii, S. L. G¨ orlitz, T. Enss, H. Strobel, and M. K. Oberthaler, Observation of pattern stabilization in a driven super- fluid, Phys. Rev. X15, 011026 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Huang and M

    C.-H. Huang and M. A. Cazalilla, Total energy dynamics and asymptotics of the momentum distribution follow- ing an interaction quench in a two-component Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A99, 063612 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    R. Qi, Z. Shi, and H. Zhai, Maximum Energy Growth Rate in Dilute Quantum Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 240401 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    P. Dyke, A. Hogan, I. Herrera, C. C. N. Kuhn, S. Hoinka, and C. J. Vale, Dynamics of a Fermi gas quenched to unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 100405 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    L. Yi, S. Yu, M. Wu, S. Deng, and H. Wu, Quantum Thermalization Dynamics of Fermi Gases Quenched to the BEC-BCS Crossover, Adv. Sci.2025, e07343 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    F. J. Vivanco, A. Schuckert, S. Huang, G. L. Schumacher, G. G. T. Assump¸ c˜ ao, Y. Ji, J. Chen, M. Knap, and N. Navon, The strongly driven Fermi polaron, Nature Phys.21, 564 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    K. G. S. Xie, C. J. Dale, K. P. Grehan, M. F. Wang, T. Enss, P. S. Julienne, Z. Yu, and J. H. Thywissen, Dimer-projection contact and the clock shift of a unitary Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 083402 (2026)

    2026

  12. [20]

    M. P. Heller and M. Spali´ nski, Hydrodynamics beyond the gradient expansion: resurgence and resummation, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 072501 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Soloviev, Hydrodynamic attractors in heavy ion colli- sions: a review, Eur

    A. Soloviev, Hydrodynamic attractors in heavy ion colli- sions: a review, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 319 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Fujii and T

    K. Fujii and T. Enss, Hydrodynamic Attractor in Ultra- cold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 173402 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Mazeliauskas and T

    A. Mazeliauskas and T. Enss, Hydrodynamic attractor in periodically driven ultracold quantum gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 103402 (2026)

    2026

  16. [24]

    Tan, Energetics of a strongly correlated Fermi gas, Ann

    S. Tan, Energetics of a strongly correlated Fermi gas, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)323, 2952 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    Tan, Large momentum part of a strongly correlated Fermi gas, Ann

    S. Tan, Large momentum part of a strongly correlated Fermi gas, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)323, 2971 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Maki and F

    J. Maki and F. Zhou, Quantum Many-Body Conformal Dynamics: Symmetries, Geometry, Conformal Tower States, and Entropy Production, Phys. Rev. A100, 023601 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Martirosyan, M

    G. Martirosyan, M. Gazo, J. Etrych, S. M. Fischer, S. J. Morris, C. J. Ho, C. Eigen, and Z. Hadzibabic, A univer- sal speed limit for spreading of coherence, Nature647, 608 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    T. Enss, N. C. Braatz, and G. Gori, Complex scaling flows in the quench dynamics of interacting particles, Phys. Rev. A106, 013308 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Drescher, M

    M. Drescher, M. Salmhofer, and T. Enss, Quench Dy- namics of the Ideal Bose Polaron at Zero and Nonzero Temperatures, Phys. Rev. A103, 033317 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Sabzikar, M

    F. Sabzikar, M. M. Meerschaert, and J. Chen, Tempered fractional calculus, J. Comput. Phys.293, 14 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    T. Enss, R. Haussmann, and W. Zwerger, Viscosity and scale invariance in the unitary Fermi gas, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)326, 770 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Rossi, T

    R. Rossi, T. Ohgoe, E. Kozik, N. Prokof’ev, B. Svistunov, K. Van Houcke, and F. Werner, Contact and momentum distribution of the unitary Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 130406 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Mukherjee, P

    B. Mukherjee, P. B. Patel, Z. Yan, R. J. Fletcher, J. Struck, and M. W. Zwierlein, Spectral response and contact of the unitary Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 203402 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    A. A. Kilbas and M. Saigo, On mittag-leffler type func- tion, fractional calculas operators and solutions of in- tegral equations, Integral Transforms and Special Func- tions4, 355 (1996)

    1996

  27. [35]

    A. A. Kilbas,Theory and Applications of Fractional Dif- ferential Equations, North-Holland Mathematics Studies No. 204 (Elsevier, Boston, 2006)

    2006

  28. [36]

    Boudabsa and T

    L. Boudabsa and T. Simon, Some properties of the kilbas- saigo function, Mathematics9, 10.3390/math9030217 (2021). 9

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Garrappa, Predictor-corrector for FDEs (MATLAB), version 2.0 (2025)

    R. Garrappa, Predictor-corrector for FDEs (MATLAB), version 2.0 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Garrappa, Numerical Solution of Fractional Differen- tial Equations: A Survey and a Software Tutorial, Math- ematics6, 16 (2018)

    R. Garrappa, Numerical Solution of Fractional Differen- tial Equations: A Survey and a Software Tutorial, Math- ematics6, 16 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Diethelm and A

    K. Diethelm and A. D. Freed, The FracPECE subroutine for the numerical solution of differential equations of frac- tional order, Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 1999, 57 (1998)

    1999

  32. [40]

    Nishida, Viscosity spectral functions of resonating fermions in the quantum virial expansion, Ann

    Y. Nishida, Viscosity spectral functions of resonating fermions in the quantum virial expansion, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)410, 167949 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Enss, Bulk Viscosity and Contact Correlations in Attractive Fermi Gases, Phys

    T. Enss, Bulk Viscosity and Contact Correlations in Attractive Fermi Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 205301 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Hofmann, High-temperature expansion of the viscosity in interacting quantum gases, Phys

    J. Hofmann, High-temperature expansion of the viscosity in interacting quantum gases, Phys. Rev. A101, 013620 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    C. H. Johansen, B. Frank, and J. Lang, Spectral functions of the strongly interacting three-dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A109, 023324 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Enss, Particle and pair spectra for strongly correlated Fermi gases: A real-frequency solver, Phys

    T. Enss, Particle and pair spectra for strongly correlated Fermi gases: A real-frequency solver, Phys. Rev. A109, 023325 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Dizer, J

    E. Dizer, J. Horak, and J. M. Pawlowski, Spectral proper- ties and observables in ultracold Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A109, 063311 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Hudson Smith, Inducing resonant interactions in ul- tracold atoms with a modulated magnetic field, Phys

    D. Hudson Smith, Inducing resonant interactions in ul- tracold atoms with a modulated magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 193002 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    A. A. Kilbas and M. Saigo, On solution of integral equation of Abel-Volterra type, Differential and Integral Equations8, 10.57262/die/1369056041 (1995)

    1995 doi

  40. [48]

    Gorenflo, A

    R. Gorenflo, A. Kilbas, and S. Rogosin, On the gener- alized mittag-leffler type functions, Integral Transforms and Special Functions7, 215 (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed July 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.