pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07955 · v1 · pith:NGNH5KFInew · submitted 2026-06-06 · ✦ hep-th

Spin-charge deconfinement and emergent AdS₃ structure from a self-consistent dressing of Fierz-complete (1+1)d Dirac fermions

L. Haddad , K. Gonzales , J. Kahanek , M. Kolding , J. Maguire , V. Palombi , H. Truelson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords spin-charge separationdeconfinementDirac fermionsfour-fermion modelWilson loopsAdS3chiral transitiondressing transformation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A self-consistent dressing of Fierz-complete (1+1)d Dirac fermions unifies spin-charge separation with an emergent sl(2,R) structure that turns the chiral-difermion transition into a deconfinement transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a dressing ψ(x) = U(x)χ(x) for the full four-fermion model that extends an earlier paired-Dirac result. The composite connection built from the dressing encodes obstructions to trivializing the Dirac operator and thereby unifies spin-charge separation, half-infinite Wilson-line dressing, and holonomy of flat connections. An emergent sl(2,R) gauge field then binds spin and charge, so that the chiral-difermion transition becomes a deconfinement transition diagnosed by area-law behavior of closed boost-sector Wilson loops. The order-parameter manifold is shown to take the hyperbolic form ρ² − |Δ|² = σ² and is promoted to AdS3 ≅ SL(2,R) once charge and difermion phases are restored. This supplies a concrete geometric realization of the conjectured Faddeev–Niemi link between spin-charge separation and confinement.

Core claim

The chiral-difermion transition is a deconfinement transition for spin and charge degrees of freedom. It is diagnosed by closed boost-sector Wilson loops that develop an area law in the chiral phase, for which the associated string tension is computed. The three regimes of the model are tied together by an emergent sl(2,R) gauge field. The order-parameter manifold takes the hyperbolic form ρ² − |Δ|² = σ² and is promoted to AdS3 ≅ SL(2,R) on inclusion of the charge and difermion phases, realizing a structural match to the kinematic stage of AdS3/CFT2 and the inverse Pohlmeyer reduction of the AdS3 sigma model.

What carries the argument

The self-consistent dressing ψ(x) = U(x)χ(x) together with its composite connection Aμdress = i(∂μU)U^{-1}, which encodes obstructions to local trivialization and supplies the trivialization theorem that unifies spin-charge separation, Wilson-line dressing, and flat-connection holonomy while generating the emergent sl(2,R) gauge field that binds the degrees of freedom.

If this is right

  • The three regimes (chiral, difermion, intermediate) are connected by a single emergent sl(2,R) gauge field.
  • Closed boost-sector Wilson loops obey an area law exclusively in the chiral phase.
  • A string tension for that area law is computed explicitly from the dressed fields.
  • The order-parameter manifold is hyperbolic and becomes AdS3 once charge and difermion phases are restored.
  • The dressed model supplies the inverse Pohlmeyer reduction of the AdS3 sigma model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dressing construction could be tested on lattice realizations of the four-fermion theory to extract the string tension numerically.
  • The sl(2,R) binding mechanism suggests a route to embed spin-charge separation into holographic models of (1+1)d critical points.
  • If the trivialization theorem holds more generally, analogous dressings may separate spin and charge in higher-dimensional or non-Abelian fermion systems.
  • The conjectured match to the kinematic stage of AdS3/CFT2 invites a direct comparison of correlation functions between the dressed fermions and the boundary CFT2.

Load-bearing premise

The self-consistent dressing and its trivialization theorem extend without obstruction from the paired-Dirac case to the full Fierz-complete four-fermion model while preserving the encoding of obstructions by the composite connection.

What would settle it

Direct lattice measurement of an area law for closed boost-sector Wilson loops in the chiral phase of the Fierz-complete model, together with a numerical value of the string tension that matches the analytic result obtained from the dressed theory.

read the original abstract

Building on a recent derivation of spin-charge separation in $(1+1)$d paired Dirac fermions~\cite{Haddad2024}, we develop a self-consistent dressing $\psi(x) = U(x)\chi(x)$ for the full Fierz-complete four-fermion model, extending that result and providing a more detailed resolution of the chiral-difermion phase structure. A key feature of this approach is that the composite connection $A_\mu^{\rm dress} = i(\partial_\mu U)U^{-1}$ encodes obstructions to local trivialization of the Dirac operator, i.e., the degree to which the background can be absorbed into the dressing. Using this fact, we prove a trivialization theorem under which three nonperturbative constructions are unified: spin-charge separation in correlated fermion systems, half-infinite Wilson-line dressing in gauge theory, and the holonomy of flat connections. Our approach shows that the three regimes of our model (chiral, difermion, intermediate), are then tied together by an emergent $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{R})$ gauge field that binds the spin and charge degrees of freedom. In particular, the chiral-difermion transition is a deconfinement transition for these degrees of freedom, diagnosed by closed boost-sector Wilson loops that develop an area law in the chiral phase for which we compute the associated string tension. This provides a concrete realization of the conjectured Faddeev--Niemi link between spin-charge separation and confinement. We close with a unifying geometric picture in which the order-parameter manifold takes hyperbolic form $\rho^2 - |\Delta|^2 = \sigma^2$, promoted to $\mathrm{AdS}_3 \cong \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})$ on inclusion of the charge and difermion phases. The structural matching to the kinematic stage of $\mathrm{AdS}_3/\mathrm{CFT}_2$ is identified explicitly, with the conjecture that the dressed model realizes the inverse Pohlmeyer reduction of the $\mathrm{AdS}_3$ sigma model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends a prior derivation of spin-charge separation in (1+1)d paired Dirac fermions to the full Fierz-complete four-fermion model via the self-consistent dressing ψ(x) = U(x)χ(x). It introduces the composite connection A_μ^dress = i(∂_μ U)U^{-1} to encode obstructions to local trivialization and proves a trivialization theorem unifying spin-charge separation, half-infinite Wilson-line dressing, and flat-connection holonomy. The three regimes (chiral, difermion, intermediate) are linked by an emergent sl(2,R) gauge field; the chiral-difermion transition is diagnosed as a deconfinement transition via area law in closed boost-sector Wilson loops (with computed string tension). The order-parameter manifold ρ² − |Δ|² = σ² is promoted to AdS₃ ≅ SL(2,R) upon including charge and difermion phases, with explicit structural matching to the kinematic stage of AdS₃/CFT₂ and a conjecture linking to the inverse Pohlmeyer reduction of the AdS₃ sigma model.

Significance. If the extension of the trivialization theorem and the Wilson-loop diagnostics hold, the work supplies a concrete (1+1)d realization of the Faddeev–Niemi conjecture linking spin-charge separation to confinement, together with a geometric unification of the order-parameter manifold to AdS₃. The unification of three nonperturbative constructions under a single composite connection is a conceptual strength; the absence of free parameters in the dressing construction and the explicit string-tension computation would further strengthen the result if independently verified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (extension of trivialization theorem): the claim that the self-consistent dressing and trivialization theorem extend without obstruction from the paired-Dirac case of Haddad2024 to the full Fierz-complete model is stated but not demonstrated; no explicit verification is supplied that the additional Fierz channels are absorbed into A_μ^dress while preserving the encoding of all obstructions to local trivialization and without introducing new non-trivial holonomies.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (Wilson-loop diagnosis): the statement that closed boost-sector Wilson loops develop an area law in the chiral phase (with associated string tension) is presented as the diagnostic of deconfinement, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit form of the boost-sector loops nor the derivation of the area law from the composite connection, rendering the central deconfinement claim unsupported by shown calculations.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract (order-parameter manifold): the promotion of ρ² − |Δ|² = σ² to AdS₃ ≅ SL(2,R) on inclusion of charge and difermion phases is asserted, but the manuscript does not exhibit the explicit embedding of the charge and difermion phases into the SL(2,R) structure or verify that the resulting geometry matches the kinematic stage of AdS₃/CFT₂ beyond the hyperbolic form already present in the paired case.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The citation to Haddad2024 is used to ground the extension; a brief self-contained recap of the paired-Dirac trivialization theorem (including the definition of A_μ^dress) would improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the prior work.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for the order-parameter components (ρ, Δ, σ) is introduced without an explicit table or equation listing their transformation properties under the emergent sl(2,R) action.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments. We address each major comment in detail below. We agree that providing more explicit verifications will enhance the clarity of the manuscript and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (extension of trivialization theorem): the claim that the self-consistent dressing and trivialization theorem extend without obstruction from the paired-Dirac case of Haddad2024 to the full Fierz-complete model is stated but not demonstrated; no explicit verification is supplied that the additional Fierz channels are absorbed into A_μ^dress while preserving the encoding of all obstructions to local trivialization and without introducing new non-trivial holonomies.

    Authors: The trivialization theorem is proved in §2 for the Fierz-complete model. The self-consistent dressing is designed to absorb all Fierz channels into the composite connection A_μ^dress. We agree that an explicit verification for each channel would strengthen the presentation. We will add a detailed appendix or expanded section in the revised manuscript showing the absorption process and confirming no new non-trivial holonomies are introduced. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (Wilson-loop diagnosis): the statement that closed boost-sector Wilson loops develop an area law in the chiral phase (with associated string tension) is presented as the diagnostic of deconfinement, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit form of the boost-sector loops nor the derivation of the area law from the composite connection, rendering the central deconfinement claim unsupported by shown calculations.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's point that the explicit form of the boost-sector Wilson loops and the full derivation of the area law should be more prominently displayed. Although the abstract summarizes the result, we will include the explicit expressions and a complete step-by-step derivation from the composite connection in the revised manuscript to fully support the deconfinement claim. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (order-parameter manifold): the promotion of ρ² − |Δ|² = σ² to AdS₃ ≅ SL(2,R) on inclusion of charge and difermion phases is asserted, but the manuscript does not exhibit the explicit embedding of the charge and difermion phases into the SL(2,R) structure or verify that the resulting geometry matches the kinematic stage of AdS₃/CFT₂ beyond the hyperbolic form already present in the paired case.

    Authors: The manuscript identifies the structural matching explicitly in the closing section. To address the concern, we will provide a more detailed explicit embedding of the charge and difermion phases into the SL(2,R) structure and verify the match to the kinematic stage of AdS₃/CFT₂ in the revised version. revision: yes

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence of a self-consistent dressing that extends from the paired case to the full Fierz-complete model, the trivialization theorem, and the interpretation of the composite connection as encoding obstructions; these are domain assumptions without independent evidence supplied in the abstract. The emergent sl(2,R) gauge field and AdS3 structure are introduced to bind phases but lack external falsifiable handles.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The self-consistent dressing ψ(x) = U(x)χ(x) extends to the full Fierz-complete four-fermion model
    Invoked to unify the three constructions and produce the emergent structure.
  • domain assumption The composite connection Aμdress encodes obstructions to local trivialization of the Dirac operator
    Used to prove the trivialization theorem and diagnose the deconfinement transition.
invented entities (2)
  • emergent sl(2,R) gauge field no independent evidence
    purpose: Binds spin and charge degrees of freedom across the three regimes
    Introduced to tie the chiral, difermion, and intermediate phases together
  • AdS3 ≅ SL(2,R) structure on the order-parameter manifold no independent evidence
    purpose: Unifies the phase structure geometrically
    Promoted from the hyperbolic form of the order parameter

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5959 in / 1812 out tokens · 24058 ms · 2026-06-27T19:52:02.726866+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 28 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Haddad,Spin-charge separation for paired dirac fermions in(1 + 1)dimensions,JHEP 11(2024) 088 [2409.04700]

    L.H. Haddad,Spin-charge separation for paired dirac fermions in(1 + 1)dimensions,JHEP 11(2024) 088 [2409.04700]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Tomonaga,Remarks on Bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Prog

    S. Tomonaga,Remarks on Bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Prog. Theor. Phys.5(1950) 544

    1950

  3. [3]

    Luttinger,An exactly soluble model of a many-fermion system,J

    J.M. Luttinger,An exactly soluble model of a many-fermion system,J. Math. Phys.4(1963) 1154

    1963

  4. [4]

    Luther and V.J

    A. Luther and V.J. Emery,Backward scattering in the one-dimensional electron gas,Phys. Rev. Lett.33(1974) 589

    1974

  5. [5]

    Haldane,‘Luttinger liquid theory’ of one-dimensional quantum fluids

    F.D.M. Haldane,‘Luttinger liquid theory’ of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I,J. Phys. C14 (1981) 2585

    1981

  6. [6]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    Dirac,Gauge-invariant formulation of quantum electrodynamics,Can

    P.A.M. Dirac,Gauge-invariant formulation of quantum electrodynamics,Can. J. Phys.33 (1955) 650

    1955

  8. [8]

    Lavelle and D

    M. Lavelle and D. McMullan,Constituent quarks from QCD,Phys. Rept.279(1997) 1 [hep-ph/9509344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    Mandelstam,Feynman rules for electromagnetic and Yang-Mills fields from the gauge-independent field-theoretic formalism,Phys

    S. Mandelstam,Feynman rules for electromagnetic and Yang-Mills fields from the gauge-independent field-theoretic formalism,Phys. Rev.175(1968) 1580

    1968

  10. [10]

    Wilson,Confinement of quarks,Phys

    K.G. Wilson,Confinement of quarks,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2445

    1974

  11. [11]

    Schwinger,Gauge invariance and mass

    J. Schwinger,Gauge invariance and mass. II,Phys. Rev.128(1962) 2425. – 76 –

    1962

  12. [12]

    Demessie and C

    G.A. Demessie and C. S¨ amann,Higher Poincar´ e lemma and integrability,J. Math. Phys.56 (2015) 082902 [1406.5342]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    Haydys,Introduction to gauge theory,arXiv e-print(2019) [1910.10436]

    A. Haydys,Introduction to gauge theory,arXiv e-print(2019) [1910.10436]

    arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Niemi and N.R

    A.J. Niemi and N.R. Walet,Splitting the gluon?,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 054007 [hep-ph/0504034]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    Chernodub,Yang-mills theory in landau gauge as a liquid crystal,Phys

    M.N. Chernodub,Yang-mills theory in landau gauge as a liquid crystal,Phys. Lett. B637 (2006) 128 [hep-th/0506107]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  16. [16]

    Faddeev and A.J

    L.D. Faddeev and A.J. Niemi,Spin-charge separation, conformal covariance and the su(2) yang-mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B776(2007) 38 [hep-th/0608111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Dittmann, T

    L. Dittmann, T. Heinzl and A. Wipf,A lattice study of the Faddeev-Niemi effective action, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.106(2002) 649 [hep-lat/0110026]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    van Baal and A

    P. van Baal and A. Wipf,Classical gauge vacua as knots,Phys. Lett. B515(2001) 181 [hep-th/0105141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  19. [19]

    Tsurumaru, I

    T. Tsurumaru, I. Tsutsui and A. Fujii,Instantons, monopoles and the flux quantization in the faddeev-niemi decomposition,Nucl. Phys. B589(2000) 659 [hep-th/0005064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  20. [20]

    Cho,Restricted gauge theory,Phys

    Y.M. Cho,Restricted gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 1080

    1980

  21. [21]

    Shabanov,An effective action for monopoles and knot solitons in Yang-Mills theory,Phys

    S.V. Shabanov,An effective action for monopoles and knot solitons in Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Lett. B458(1999) 322 [hep-th/9903223]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  22. [22]

    Kapustin,Symmetry protected topological phases, anomalies, and cobordisms: beyond group cohomology,arXiv e-print(2014) [1403.1467]

    A. Kapustin,Symmetry protected topological phases, anomalies, and cobordisms: beyond group cohomology,arXiv e-print(2014) [1403.1467]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    Yonekura,On the cobordism classification of symmetry protected topological phases, Commun

    K. Yonekura,On the cobordism classification of symmetry protected topological phases, Commun. Math. Phys.368(2019) 1121 [1803.10796]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Niemi,Could spin-charge separation be the source of confinement?,hep-ph/0510288

    A.J. Niemi,Could spin-charge separation be the source of confinement?,hep-ph/0510288

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    McLerran and R.D

    L. McLerran and R.D. Pisarski,Phases of cold, dense quarks at largeN c,Nucl. Phys. A796 (2007) 83 [0706.2191]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  26. [26]

    T. Kojo, Y. Hidaka, L. McLerran and R.D. Pisarski,Quarkyonic chiral spirals,Nucl. Phys. A 843(2010) 37 [0912.3800]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Hatsuda, M

    T. Hatsuda, M. Tachibana, N. Yamamoto and G. Baym,New critical point induced by the axial anomaly in dense QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 122001 [hep-ph/0605018]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    Yamamoto, M

    N. Yamamoto, M. Tachibana, T. Hatsuda and G. Baym,Phase structure, collective modes, and the axial anomaly in dense QCD,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 074001 [0704.2654]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  29. [29]

    Sch¨ on and M

    V. Sch¨ on and M. Thies,2D model field theories at finite temperature and density,At The Frontier of Particle Physics: Handbook of QCD3(2001) 1945 [hep-th/0008175]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  30. [30]

    Buballa and S

    M. Buballa and S. Carignano,Inhomogeneous chiral condensates,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.81 (2015) 39 [1406.1367]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Arouca, A

    R. Arouca, A. Cappelli and T.H. Hansson,Quantum field theory anomalies in condensed matter physics,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes62(2022) 62 [2204.02158]

    arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi,Solitons with fermion number 1/2,Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 3398

    1976

  33. [33]

    Charmchi and S.S

    F. Charmchi and S.S. Gousheh,Complete spectral analysis of the Jackiw-Rebbi model, including its zero mode,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 025002 [1402.2444]. – 77 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Yao and Y

    Y. Yao and Y. Fukusumi,Bosonization with a background U(1)gauge field,Phys. Rev. B100 (2019) 075105 [1902.06584]

    arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Aref’eva,Non-Abelian Stokes formula,Theor

    I.Y. Aref’eva,Non-Abelian Stokes formula,Theor. Math. Phys.43(1980) 353

    1980

  36. [36]

    Bralic,Exact computation of loop averages in two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory,Phys

    N.E. Bralic,Exact computation of loop averages in two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 3090

    1980

  37. [37]

    Diakonov and V

    D. Diakonov and V. Petrov,A formula for the Wilson loop,Phys. Lett. B224(1989) 131

    1989

  38. [38]

    Gross and A

    D.J. Gross and A. Neveu,Dynamical symmetry breaking in asymptotically free field theories, Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 3235

    1974

  39. [39]

    Coleman,Quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model,Phys

    S. Coleman,Quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model,Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 2088

    1975

  40. [40]

    Thirring,A soluble relativistic field theory,Annals Phys.3(1958) 91

    W. Thirring,A soluble relativistic field theory,Annals Phys.3(1958) 91

    1958

  41. [41]

    Mandelstam,Soliton operators for the quantized sine-Gordon equation,Phys

    S. Mandelstam,Soliton operators for the quantized sine-Gordon equation,Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 3026

    1975

  42. [42]

    Witten,Non-abelian bosonization in two dimensions,Commun

    E. Witten,Non-abelian bosonization in two dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.92(1984) 455

    1984

  43. [43]

    Pohlmeyer,Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints, Commun

    K. Pohlmeyer,Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints, Commun. Math. Phys.46(1976) 207

    1976

  44. [44]

    Miramontes,Pohlmeyer reduction revisited,JHEP10(2008) 087 [0808.3365]

    J.L. Miramontes,Pohlmeyer reduction revisited,JHEP10(2008) 087 [0808.3365]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Mandelstam,Vortices and quark confinement in non-abelian gauge theories,Phys

    S. Mandelstam,Vortices and quark confinement in non-abelian gauge theories,Phys. Rept.23 (1976) 245

    1976

  46. [46]

    ’t Hooft,Topology of the gauge condition and new confinement phases in non-abelian gauge theories,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,Topology of the gauge condition and new confinement phases in non-abelian gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B190(1981) 455

    1981

  47. [47]

    Maldacena and H

    J.M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri,Strings in AdS 3 and SL(2,R) WZW model. I: The spectrum,J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 2929 [hep-th/0001053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  48. [48]

    Kogut, M.A

    J.B. Kogut, M.A. Stephanov, D. Toublan, J.J.M. Verbaarschot and A. Zhitnitsky,QCD-like theories at finite baryon density,Nucl. Phys. B582(2000) 477 [hep-ph/0001171]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  49. [49]

    Adhikari, S.B

    P. Adhikari, S.B. Beleznay and M. Mannarelli,Finite density two color chiral perturbation theory revisited,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 441 [1803.00490]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Rey and Y

    S.-J. Rey and Y. Hikida,Emergent AdS 3 and BTZ black hole from weakly interacting hot 2d CFT,hep-th/0604102

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Bakas, Q.-H

    I. Bakas, Q.-H. Park and H.-J. Shin,Lagrangian formulation of symmetric space sine-Gordon models,Phys. Lett. B372(1996) 45 [hep-th/9512030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  52. [52]

    Maldacena,The largenlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The largenlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  53. [53]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: An example from three-dimensional gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207

    1986

  54. [54]

    Shuryak, S.J

    E. Shuryak, S.J. Brodsky and G.F. de Teramond,Reviews of holographic QCD, 2021

    2021

  55. [55]

    ’t Hooft,A two-dimensional model for mesons,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,A two-dimensional model for mesons,Nucl. Phys. B75(1974) 461

    1974

  56. [56]

    Y. h. Gao, W. s. Xu and D. f. Zeng,NGN, QCD 2 and chiral phase transition from string theory,JHEP08(2006) 018 [hep-th/0605138]. – 78 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  57. [57]

    Yee and I

    H.-U. Yee and I. Zahed,Holographic two-dimensional QCD and Chern-Simons term,JHEP07 (2011) 033 [1103.6286]. – 79 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011