Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Exact WKB analysis for dynamical and geometric exponents in generalized and nonlinear Landau-Zener transitions

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For generalized and twisted Landau-Zener models, exact WKB gives the complete non-perturbative transition exponent as the sum of a dynamical term, a geometric term, and a quasi-geometric term, with all higher-order corrections vanishing.

desk verdict A useful but not yet rigorous extension of Berry's geometric amplitude calculation; the new quasi-geometric term is interesting, but the all-order claim needs proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09240 v3 pith:NGWRXE33 submitted 2025-05-14 hep-th

Tomohiro Matsuda This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 34M6081Q2081Q70 PACS 03.65.Vf03.65.Ta
keywords exactWKBLandau-Zenertransitiongeometricexponentquasi-geometricBorelresummationStokesphenomenonnon-perturbativephantom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the exact WKB method—a Borel-resummed treatment of the Planck-constant expansion that fixes the Stokes-line structure exactly—computes the non-perturbative transition exponent in a wide family of two-level Landau-Zener models. In the models treated here, the total exponent splits into a dynamical part, a geometric part, and a new higher-order “quasi-geometric” part, and the paper claims that no further WKB corrections appear. This matters because the conventional way of deriving geometric amplitude factors uses a first-order expansion whose turning points drift when the Planck constant enters the Hamiltonian, and the paper argues that this makes the conventional calculation ambiguous. The exact WKB removes that ambiguity and also reveals a previously missing second-order contribution to the geometric exponent.

What carries the argument

The central object is the exact WKB solution pair $\psi_\pm = S_{\mathrm{odd}}^{-1/2} \exp(\pm \int^x S_{\mathrm{odd}} \, dx')$, where $S_{\mathrm{odd}}$ satisfies a Riccati equation and is expanded as $S_{\mathrm{odd}} = \eta \sqrt{Q_0} + S_0 + \eta^{-1} S_1 + \cdots$. The argument is carried by the residue at complex infinity: the exponent along the merged-pair contour is $-\mathrm{Re}\,\int_{\gamma_\pm} S_{\mathrm{odd}}\,dx = -\mathrm{Re}\,\pi i \,\mathrm{Res}_{x=\infty} [ S_{\mathrm{odd}} ]$, so each order contributes only through the residue of $S_n$. The geometric part comes from $S_0 = Q_1/(2\sqrt{Q_0})$, and the quasi-geometric part from the $S_1$ coefficient; for the models at hand the higher residues vanish, which is what makes the three-term formula exact.

What would settle it

Compute the next WKB coefficient $S_2$ for the cubic double-twist model and evaluate $\mathrm{Res}_{\tau=\infty} S_2$; if the residue is nonzero in any parameter range, the claimed vanishing of higher orders is false. A numerical integration of the next-order term around the merged-pair contour for $D(t)=-a^2+b^2t^2$ would also settle whether the three-term exponent formula is complete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, after converting the two-level system into a Schrödinger equation with potential $Q = Q_0 + \eta^{-1} Q_1 + \eta^{-2} Q_2$, the total Landau-Zener exponent is the contour integral of the exact WKB function $S_{\mathrm{odd}}$ around the merged pair of turning points, and only the first three terms $S_{-1}$, $S_0$, and $S_1$ contribute. The term $S_{-1}$ gives the dynamical exponent, $S_0$ gives the geometric exponent, and $S_1$ gives the quasi-geometric exponent. The paper claims this is exact for all orders, because every higher coefficient $S_n$ with $n \ge 2$ is regular at complex infinity and therefore its integral vanishes. Explicit residue calculations for quadratic, cubic, and shifted twists, and for nonlinear diagonal elements, are used to show the structure and to expose the failure of the conventional linear approximation at level crossings.

Load-bearing premise

The all-order exactness rests on the paper's assertion, offered without proof, that every higher-order WKB coefficient is smooth enough at infinity that its contribution to the contour integral is zero.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper's claim is correct, the transition probability for the twisted Landau-Zener model is fully determined by three residue integrals, with no unknown higher-order corrections.
  • The geometric amplitude factor acquires a genuine second-order piece: for a quadratic twist with rate $B$, the quasi-geometric exponent is $\pi B^2 \Lambda^2/(2A^3)$ rather than zero.
  • For the cubic double-twist model, the geometric exponent can vanish while the quasi-geometric exponent remains nonzero, so the two corrections probe different features of the trajectory.
  • Shifting the twist away from the level crossing changes both geometric and quasi-geometric exponents, so the common statement that geometric factors are independent of the twist's location holds only when the twist sits at the crossing.
  • For nonlinear diagonal elements $D(t)=\pm a^2 + b^2 t^2$, the conventional linear expansion near a crossing is numerically unreliable, and a “phantom” Landau-Zener transition with the same transition matrix occurs even without a level crossing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if regularity at infinity is the actual mechanism, the same three-term exactness should hold for any two-level model with a quadratic $Q_0$ and polynomial $Q_1, Q_2$ of bounded degree; this gives a concrete test family the paper does not enumerate.
  • Inference: the quasi-geometric exponent can be read as the first $\hbar$-correction to the geometric amplitude, suggesting a link to quantum-geometric tensors beyond the usual adiabatic curvature in driven materials.
  • Inference: for the phantom transition, a driven two-level system with no actual crossing of the diagonal levels should still show non-adiabatic tunneling or pair production with the same exponent as a real crossing, which would be a sharp test of the Stokes-line picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper applies exact WKB analysis to a class of two-level Landau-Zener-type models and claims that the complete nonadiabatic transition exponent is exactly given by three residue contributions: the dynamical exponent from S_{-1}, the geometric exponent from S_0, and a new 'quasi-geometric' exponent from S_1, with all higher WKB coefficients contributing zero. The models treated include the original Landau-Zener transition, the twisted model φ=Bτ² and its shifted version, the double-twist model φ=λτ³, a model with non-linear diagonal elements, and a model with Δ=Λe^{iΘ(τ)/ℏ}. The paper also discusses the 'phantom' Landau-Zener transition and argues that conventional linear approximations at level crossings are unreliable. The central technical claim is that for these models higher-order odd WKB coefficients are regular at complex infinity, so their contour integrals vanish and the transition matrix retains the same form as the standard Landau-Zener matrix.

Significance. If the all-order vanishing lemma were proven, the paper would provide a valuable systematic exact-WKB derivation of Berry's geometric amplitude factors and an explicit second-order 'quasi-geometric' correction, going beyond Berry's first-order result. The residue-based method is computationally concrete and the explicit formulas for S_{odd,0}, S_{odd,1}, and the double-twist model are useful. The paper also makes a physically interesting observation about phantom Landau-Zener transitions and the unreliability of naive linear approximations. However, the advertised exactness for all orders rests on an assertion that is not proven in the manuscript, and several displayed central equations contain apparent algebraic or typographical errors. The contribution is therefore not yet in a form where its central claim can be accepted without additional work.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, after Eq. (48), footnote 4, and before Eq. (58)] The exactness claim 'correct for all orders' depends entirely on the assertion that S_{odd,n} for n≥2 has zero residue at complex infinity for the models considered. This is stated in footnote 4 and again before Eq. (58) as something that 'can be proven inductively,' but no proof is given. Moreover, the recurrence displayed in Eq. (23) is the recurrence for the coefficients of the full Riccati solution S^(±), not for the odd combination S_{odd} defined in Eq. (24); the odd coefficient satisfies a different nonlinear equation, as follows from Eqs. (26)-(27). Therefore the stated induction cannot be checked from the equations in the paper. If, for example, S_{odd,2} had a nonzero 1/x coefficient, Eq. (58) would not be the exact transition matrix and the quasi-geometric term would not be the last correction. I ask the authors either to supply a proof of the vanishing lemma, ideally with explicit residue computations for the first few n≥2, or to weaken the all-order claim and state the result as valid up to the quasi-geometric order.
  2. [Eqs. (79) and (85)] The integrands displayed in the geometric-exponent calculations do not match the Q1 obtained from the general formulas. For the twisted model φ=Bτ², using Eqs. (65)-(67) with Δ=Λe^{-iφ(τ)} and D=Aτ gives Q1 = -iA - 2ABτ², whereas Eq. (79) displays the numerator -A + 2Bτ² i. For the shifted model, Eq. (85) displays a denominator A²(τ²-τ0)², whereas the correct Q0 from the model has A²(τ-τ0)². Since these expressions determine the geometric exponents that are central results of the paper, the sign and factor conventions must be corrected and the final values recomputed. At present the displayed equations cannot reproduce the quoted results as written.
  3. [Section III A and Eq. (58)] The claim that the transition matrix keeps the same form (58) even when Q1(τ) and Q2(τ) are nontrivial functions is asserted rather than demonstrated. This is a load-bearing point because it justifies extracting the complete transition exponent from the contour integral of S_{odd} alone. The paper invokes the Borel-resummation starting point and the resulting connection formula, but no precise statement or reference is given for the generalized connection formula. A citation to the relevant exact-WKB theorem, or a short derivation in the present normalization, is needed before the 'same form' claim can be accepted.
  4. [Section III C and Eq. (88)] The double-twist model is presented as a case where the all-order exact WKB calculation is essential, but the paper provides no numerical or independent check of the quasi-geometric exponent, and the vanishing of all higher terms is again only asserted. Since this model is the main evidence for the new 'quasi-geometric' contribution, I recommend adding a direct check, for example by computing the residue of S_{odd,2} for this model or by comparing the exponent with a high-order numerical solution of the original two-level system.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (57)] The relation between the contour integral in Eq. (56), the coefficient -πκ, and the definition Γ_d ≡ -2πκ should be spelled out; as written, the factor 2 appears only in the definition and could confuse readers checking Eq. (56) against Eq. (55).
  2. [Eq. (72)] In the expansion of F(x), the penultimate line contains a term C4 = 16(-A²B²Λ² + iA⁴B - iA⁴B) in which the two imaginary terms cancel; this looks like a typographical error and should be corrected or simplified.
  3. [Eq. (80)] The expansion uses 'C1x' where the variable is τ; this is a minor notational inconsistency.
  4. [Throughout] Several equations in Sections III B and III C have sign or notational inconsistencies (e.g., the numerator in Eq. (79), the denominator in Eq. (85), and the sign of the imaginary part in the displayed results). Even if the final real exponents are unaffected, the intermediate expressions should be made internally consistent.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract is much more general than the technical content of the paper and contains statements about 'universal phenomena' that are not directly established by the calculations; I suggest making the abstract more closely reflect the specific models and results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: exact-WKB residue integrals are computed from Hamiltonian inputs; the all-order claim rests on an unproved vanishing lemma, which is a derivation gap, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. The exact-WKB inputs are the Hamiltonian-defined Q0, Q1, and Q2 through Eq. (19), and the recurrence (20)-(23) determines Sodd,n. The claimed exponents are then not fitted or defined by the outputs: Gamma_d, Gamma_g, and Gamma_g2 are contour integrals (40), (45), and (47) of the already-determined Sodd coefficients, evaluated as residues at infinity. The quasi-geometric exponent is a new coefficient of the eta expansion, not a renaming of Berry's result. The transition-matrix form (58) is imported from standard exact-WKB connection theory, with background references including the author's earlier works; those citations support the method, and the numerical exponent values are not extracted from them. The only load-bearing assertion without proof is the inductive vanishing of Sodd,n for n>=2 (footnote 4 and the remarks before Eq. (58)); the paper states that proving it only requires finding that such higher terms are regular at x=infinity, but it does not display the induction for the odd combination. That is a derivation gap or correctness risk, not a circular reduction: the vanishing is not assumed as the definition of any exponent, and nothing is fitted to the predicted transition probabilities. Section III E's 'quantization' enhancement follows from the explicit ansatz Delta = Lambda exp(i Theta / hbar) with Theta = epsilon tau; whether that is the right physical model is a modeling question, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; A, B, Λ, λ, a, b, Δ are Hamiltonian inputs. The derivation assumes the exact WKB connection formula and the unproved vanishing of higher S_n; no new physical entities such as particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Exact WKB connection formula applies to second-order ODEs of the form ψ'' - η² Q(x,η)ψ = 0 with Q = Q0 + η^{-1}Q1 + η^{-2}Q2, including nontrivial Q1 and Q2. (Section II, Eqs. (15)-(28), used in Eqs. (55)-(58))
    The paper cites Refs [2-10] for Borel summability and connection formulas; for the generalized models with non-polynomial Q1,Q2 it assumes the same connection matrix form (58) without proof.
  • ad hoc to paper Higher-order WKB coefficients S_n (n≥2) have zero residue at complex infinity for the Landau-Zener models considered, so they do not contribute to contour exponents. (Section III, after Eq. (48), footnote 4)
    Stated as provable by induction, but no proof or computation is given; this underpins the 'all orders' claim.
  • standard math Turning points are simple zeros of Q0 and the MTP contour is the correct cycle for the transition exponent. (Section II, Fig. 2, Eqs. (40)-(46))
    Standard exact WKB and Stokes geometry for quadratic Q0; the resulting leading exponents match known Landau-Zener results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exact WKB analysis for dynamical and geometric exponents in generalized and nonlinear Landau-Zener transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NGWRXE33

@misc{pith2026250509240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exact WKB analysis for dynamical and geometric exponents in generalized and nonlinear Landau-Zener transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NGWRXE33}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09240}
}
read the original abstract

The Berry phase is a geometric phase that is important in explaining topological quantum phenomena. The Berry phase is also important in non-perturbative phenomena, as the imaginary part of the phase explains the non-perturbative transitions. However, problems arose because the singular perturbation with respect to the Planck constant has not been treated adequately in conventional calculations, where the most serious problem is the arbitrariness of approximate calculations. To solve this problem, we consider the exact WKB, which is a mathematical method that treats perturbative expansion with respect to the Planck constant as a rigorous singular perturbation. This method is also a powerful computational tool that makes analytical computation much easier for mathematical software. Using the exact WKB, we analyze the derivation of the dynamical and the geometric exponents in generalized Landau-Zener models, highlighting the differences from other calculational methods. The discontinuity of complex geometric factor is a universal phenomenon that manifests itself in phase transitions, boundaries, particle generation, and topology changes. These phenomena are ``non-perturbative'' in physics, while mathematically, these discontinuities can be deeply related to the singular structure of complex analysis. The mathematical structure of these phenomena will be revealed by using the exact WKB.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09240 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The diagram of the contour integral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Four solutions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The Stokes lines are written for non-linear diagonal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: In the upper panel, the linear approximation given by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Advanced Mathe- matical Methods for Scientists and Engineers

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, “Advanced Mathe- matical Methods for Scientists and Engineers”, Springer (1978), ISBN-13:978-0387989310

    work page 1978

  2. [2]

    Schr¨ odinger equation

    disappear from ∫ γ±Sodddx, as what one has to do for the proof is just to find that such higher terms are regular at complex x-infinity. A. The exact WKB for generalized Landau-Zener models Next, we will try to use the exact WKB on a model with an extension of the original Landau-Zener transi- tion. For the case where the non-diagonal element ∆( t) is expli...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The return of the quartic oscillator – The complex WKB method

    A. Voros, “The return of the quartic oscillator – The complex WKB method”, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, 39 (1983), 211-338

    work page 1983

  4. [4]

    Delabaere, H

    E. Delabaere, H. Dillinger and F. Pham: Resurgence de Voros et peeriodes des courves hyperelliptique. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 43 (1993), 163- 199

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Observations on the JWKB treatment of the quadratic barrier, Algebraic analysis of differential equations from microlocal anal- ysis to exponential asymptotics

    H. Shen and H. J. Silverstone, “Observations on the JWKB treatment of the quadratic barrier, Algebraic analysis of differential equations from microlocal anal- ysis to exponential asymptotics”, Springer, 2008, pp. 237 - 250

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Resurgence, quantized canonical transforma- tions, and multiinstanton expansions,

    F. Pham, “Resurgence, quantized canonical transforma- tions, and multiinstanton expansions,” Algebraic Analy- sis, Vol. II, Academie Press, 1988, pp. 699-726

    work page 1988

  7. [7]

    Ap- proche de la Resurgence,

    B. Candelpergher, J. G. Nositicls and F. Pham, “Ap- proche de la Resurgence,” Hermann, 1993

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Resurgence de Voros et periodes des courbes hyper elliptiques,

    E. Delabaere, H. Dillinger and F. Pham, “Resurgence de Voros et periodes des courbes hyper elliptiques,” Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 4 3 (1993), 163-199

    work page 1993

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Exact semi- classical expansions for one dimensional quantum oscil- lators,

    E. Delabaere, H. Dillinger and F. Pham, “Exact semi- classical expansions for one dimensional quantum oscil- lators,” J. Math. Phys. 38 (1997), 6126-6184

    1997

  2. [10]

    Algebraic Analysis of Singular Perturbation Theory,

    T. Kawai and Y. Takei, “Algebraic Analysis of Singular Perturbation Theory,” Iwanami Series in Modern Math- ematics, 2005, 978-0-8218-3547-0

    2005

  3. [11]

    Virtual Turning Points

    N. Honda, T. Kawai and Y. Takei, “Virtual Turning Points”, Springer (2015), 978-4-431-55702-9

    2015

  4. [12]

    Resurgence, Physics and Numbers

    “Resurgence, Physics and Numbers” edited by F. Fauvet, D. Manchon, S. Marmi and D. Sauzin, Publications of the Scuola Normale Superiore, ISBN-13:978-88-7642-613-1

  5. [13]

    Reconstructing WKB from topological recursion

    V. Bouchard and B. Eynard, “Reconstructing WKB from topological recursion”, Journal de l’ Ecole polytech- nique - Mathematiques, Volume 4 (2017), 845-908

    2017

  6. [14]

    The exact WKB for cos- mological particle production,

    S. Enomoto and T. Matsuda, “The exact WKB for cos- mological particle production,” JHEP 03 (2021), 090

    2021

  7. [15]

    The exact WKB and the Landau-Zener transition for asymmetry in cosmological particle production,

    S. Enomoto and T. Matsuda, “The exact WKB and the Landau-Zener transition for asymmetry in cosmological particle production,” JHEP 02 (2022), 131

    2022

  8. [16]

    The Exact WKB analysis for asymmetric scalar preheating,

    S. Enomoto and T. Matsuda, “The Exact WKB analysis for asymmetric scalar preheating,” JHEP 01 (2023), 088

    2023

  9. [17]

    Quantal phase factors accompanying adi- abatic changes,

    M. V. Berry, “Quantal phase factors accompanying adi- abatic changes,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 392 (1984), 45-57

    1984

  10. [18]

    Geometric amplitude factors in adia- batic quantum transitions

    M. V. Berry, “Geometric amplitude factors in adia- batic quantum transitions”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 430(1990),405-411

    1990

  11. [19]

    Berry phase effects on electronic properties

    D. Xiao, M-C Chang, and Q. Niu “Berry phase effects on electronic properties”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 1959

    2010

  12. [20]

    Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two- Dimensional Periodic Potential

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, “Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two- Dimensional Periodic Potential”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405

  13. [21]

    Parallel transport and “quantum holon- omy

    A. Uhlmann, “Parallel transport and “quantum holon- omy” along density operators”, Rep. Math. Phys. 24(1986) 229

    1986

  14. [22]

    Physical Effects of Geometric Phases

    Q. .Niu, Ming-Che Chang, B. Wu, D. Xiao, R. Cheng, “Physical Effects of Geometric Phases”, World Scientific (2017), ISBN-13:978-981-3225-72-5

    2017

  15. [23]

    Phase Change During a Cyclic Quantum Evolution,

    Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, “Phase Change During a Cyclic Quantum Evolution,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987), 1593

    1987

  16. [24]

    Appearance of Gauge Struc- ture in Simple Dynamical Systems,

    F. Wilczek and A. Zee, “Appearance of Gauge Struc- ture in Simple Dynamical Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984), 2111-2114

    1984

  17. [25]

    General Setting for Berry’s Phase,

    J. Samuel and R. Bhandari, “General Setting for Berry’s Phase,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988), 2339-2342

    1988

  18. [26]

    Quantum kinematic ap- proach to the geometric phase. 1. General formalism,

    N. Mukunda and R. Simon, “Quantum kinematic ap- proach to the geometric phase. 1. General formalism,” Annals Phys. 228 (1993), 205-268

    1993

  19. [27]

    The Geometric Phase in Quantum Sys- tems Foundations, Mathematical Concepts, and Appli- cations in Molecular and Condensed Matter Physics

    A. Bohm, A. Mostafazadeh, H. Koizumi, Q. Niu, J. Zwanziger, “The Geometric Phase in Quantum Sys- tems Foundations, Mathematical Concepts, and Appli- cations in Molecular and Condensed Matter Physics”, Springer (2003), ISBN-13:978-3-642-05504-1

    2003

  20. [28]

    A simple Stokes-Line drawer for mathematica, https://www.sit.ac.jp/user/matsuda/img/EWKB1.zip

  21. [29]

    Nonadiabatic transitions and gauge structure

    K. Nakamura and S. A. Rice, “Nonadiabatic transitions and gauge structure”, Phys. Rev. A 49 R2217(1994)

    1994

  22. [30]

    Observation of the Geometric Amplitude Factor in an Optical System

    D. Bouwmeestert, G. P. Karman, N. H. Dekker, 15 C. A. Schrama, and J. P. Woerdman, “Observation of the Geometric Amplitude Factor in an Optical System”, Journal of Modern Optics 43(1996)10,2087-2103

    1996

  23. [31]

    Nonadiabatic nonlin- ear optics and quantum geometry ? Application to the twisted Schwinger effect

    S. Takayoshi, J. Wu and T. Oka, “Nonadiabatic nonlin- ear optics and quantum geometry ? Application to the twisted Schwinger effect”, SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 075

    2021

  24. [32]

    W. Yao, D. Xiao and Q. Nin, “Valley-dependent opto- electronics from inversion symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B 77 (2008) 235406

    2008

  25. [33]

    Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of M oS2 and other group-vi dechalcogenides

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu and W. Yao, “Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of M oS2 and other group-vi dechalcogenides”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 196802

    2012

  26. [34]

    Topological contribu- tion to the Bogoliubov coefficient for cosmological parti- cle production,

    D. J. H. Chung and N. Sudhir, “Topological contribu- tion to the Bogoliubov coefficient for cosmological parti- cle production,” Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) no.10, 105009

    2025

  27. [35]

    Nonadiabatic crossing of energy levels,

    C. Zener, “Nonadiabatic crossing of energy levels,” Pr oc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 137 (1932) 696

    1932

  28. [36]

    A theory of energy transfer. 2.,

    L. D. Landau, “A theory of energy transfer. 2.,” Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 2 (1932), 46

    1932

  29. [37]

    Adiabatic Perturbation of Discrete Spec - trum States

    A. M. Dykhne, “Adiabatic Perturbation of Discrete Spec - trum States”, JETP 14(1962) 941

    1962

  30. [38]

    Nonadiabatic transitions induced by a time-dpendent Hamiltonian in the semiclas- sical/adiabatic limit: The two-state case

    J. P. Davis and P. Pechukas, “Nonadiabatic transitions induced by a time-dpendent Hamiltonian in the semiclas- sical/adiabatic limit: The two-state case” J. Chem. Phys. 64 (1976) 3129

    1976

  31. [39]

    Quantum field theory on curved mani- folds,

    T. Matsuda, “Quantum field theory on curved mani- folds,” [arXiv:2501.09919 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Out-of-equilibrium crit- icalities in graphene superlattices,

    A. I. Berdyugin, N. Xin, H. Gao, S. Slizovskiy, Z. Dong, S. Bhattacharjee, P. Kumaravadivel, S. Xu, L. A. Pono- marenko and M. Holwill, et al. “Out-of-equilibrium crit- icalities in graphene superlattices,” Science 375 (2022) no.6579, 430-433

    2022

  33. [41]

    Exact WKB analysis of the vacuum pair production by time-dependent electric fields,

    H. Taya, T. Fujimori, T. Misumi, M. Nitta and N. Sakai, “Exact WKB analysis of the vacuum pair production by time-dependent electric fields,” JHEP 03 (2021), 082

    2021

  34. [42]

    Unified exact WKB frame- work for resonance – Zel’dovich/complex-scaling regu- larization and rigged Hilbert space,

    O. Morikawa and S. Ogawa, “Unified exact WKB frame- work for resonance – Zel’dovich/complex-scaling regu- larization and rigged Hilbert space,” [arXiv:2505.02301 [hep-th]]

  35. [43]

    Quantum Curves, Resurgence and Exact WKB,

    M. Alim, L. Hollands and I. Tulli, “Quantum Curves, Resurgence and Exact WKB,” SIGMA 19 (2023), 009

    2023

  36. [44]

    Exact WKB analysis for PT-symmetric quantum mechanics: Study of the Ai-Bender-Sarkar con- jecture,

    S. Kamata, “Exact WKB analysis for PT-symmetric quantum mechanics: Study of the Ai-Bender-Sarkar con- jecture,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.8, 085023

    2024

  37. [45]

    Exact-WKB Analysis of Two-level Floquet Systems,

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, N. Sueishi and H. Taya, “Exact-WKB Analysis of Two-level Floquet Systems,”

  38. [46]

    An elementary proof of the Voros connection formula for WKB solutions to the Airy equation with a large parameter

    T. Aoki, T. Suzuki and S. Uchida, “An elementary proof of the Voros connection formula for WKB solutions to the Airy equation with a large parameter”, arXiv:2205.02988

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Voros Coefficients at the Ori- gin and at the Infinity of the Generalized Hypergeo- metric Differential Equations with a Large Parameter

    T. Aoki and S. Uchida, “Voros Coefficients at the Ori- gin and at the Infinity of the Generalized Hypergeo- metric Differential Equations with a Large Parameter”, arXiv:2104.13751

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Signatures of the Schwinger mechanism assisted by a fast-oscillating elec- tric field,

    S. Villalba-Ch´ avez and C. M¨ uller, “Signatures of the Schwinger mechanism assisted by a fast-oscillating elec- tric field,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.11, 116018

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.