Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Is Earendel a Star?: Investigating the Sunrise Arc Using JWST Strong and Weak Gravitational Lensing Analyses

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.08879 v1 pith:NI2RBBU2 submitted 2025-04-11 astro-ph.GA

Is Earendel a Star?: Investigating the Sunrise Arc Using JWST Strong and Weak Gravitational Lensing Analyses

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords earendelstarmagnificationjwstmassstrong-lensingcandidatecluster
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The galaxy cluster WHL J013719.8-08284 at $z = 0.566$ exhibits a strong-lensing feature known as the Sunrise Arc, which hosts the candidate star Earendel at $z \approx 6.2$, the most distant star candidate observed to date. If this object is a star, or a system of a few stars, its apparent magnitude implies both extreme gravitational lensing magnification and unusually high luminosity. This study revisits Earendel's magnification, which, in previous literature, exhibits significant uncertainty across various lens models ($2\mu = 4{,}000$-$35{,}000$). We present an improved cluster mass reconstruction and a tighter constraint on Earendel's magnification using a joint strong- and weak-lensing analysis with JWST data. Our strong-lensing mass model, incorporating newly identified multiple-image systems from JWST imaging data and modifying the existing multiple-image assignment scheme, produces a root-mean-square (RMS) lens-plane scatter of less than $0.''3$. Additionally, our weak-lensing catalog achieves a source density of $\sim 100$ galaxies arcmin$^{-2}$, providing constraints on the mass profile beyond the strong-lensing regime. In our best-fit model, we estimate the magnification of Earendel to be $\mu = 43$-$67$, significantly lower than previously proposed and thus calling into question its classification as a star.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.