Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Coherence, Homotopy and 2-Theories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv math/0007033 v1 pith:NJ2GIAN7 submitted 2000-07-06 math.CT math.QA

Coherence, Homotopy and 2-Theories

classification math.CT math.QA
keywords theoriesstructurecategorycoherencebiequivalencecategorieshomotopymodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

2-Theories are a canonical way of describing categories with extra structure. 2-theory-morphisms are used when discussing how one structure can be replaced with another structure. This is central to categorical coherence theory. We place a Quillen model category structure on the category of 2-theories and 2-theory-morphisms where the weak equivalences are biequivalences of 2-theories. A biequivalence of 2-theories (Morita equivalence) induces and is induced by a biequivalence of 2-categories of algebras. This model category structure allows one to talk of the homotopy of 2-theories and discuss the universal properties of coherence.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Controlled theories, categorification, and homotopification

    math.CT 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Controlled theories yield functorial Lawvere 2-theories and simplicial Lawvere theories, producing a new model of ∞-groups and a candidate for infinite loop spaces.

  2. Controlled theories, categorification, and homotopification

    math.CT 2026-07 reject novelty 7.0

    Controlled theories are claimed to yield functorial categorifications and homotopifications, but the central 'strong augmentation' theorem is false for the paper's main examples and Proposition 6.18 asserts Ωmon(n,1) ...