Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Precision Spectroscopy of Antiprotonic Atoms for Investigation of Low-energy Antinucleon-nucleus Interactions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Antiprotonic calcium x-rays measured with a superconducting microcalorimeter could pin down the isovector term of the antiproton–nucleus optical potential.

desk verdict A well-motivated proposal for TES-based antiprotonic Ca spectroscopy to pin down b1; the physics case is solid but the O(1) eV precision claim is not yet quantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08759 v2 pith:NJVIMEIK submitted 2025-01-15 nucl-ex physics.atom-ph

Takashi Higuchi , Hiroyuki Fujioka This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-exphysics.atom-ph
keywords antiprotonicatomsstrong-interactionshiftstransition-edgesensorTESmicrocalorimeterisovectorparameteropticalpotentialcalciumisotopesneutron-antineutronoscillations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a high-precision x-ray spectroscopy experiment on antiprotonic calcium atoms to tighten the optical potential that governs low-energy antiproton–nucleus interactions. The central idea is to measure the $6h\to 5g$ transition in several calcium isotopes with a transition-edge-sensor microcalorimeter, whose 50–70 eV resolution near 120 keV would resolve the fine-structure doublet and bring strong-interaction shift uncertainties down to about 1 eV, while also making the strong-interaction width directly measurable. Because $^{40}\mathrm{Ca}$ has equal numbers of neutrons and protons, comparing it with the other isotopes isolates the isovector parameter $b_1$ of the optical potential. The authors argue that a finite $b_1$, already suggested by a reanalysis of existing data, would refine the model and reduce uncertainties in antineutron–nucleus scattering lengths relevant to neutron–antineutron oscillation searches.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $s$-wave optical potential, written as $$2\mu V_{\mathrm{opt}}(r) = -4\pi \left(1+\frac{\mu}{M}\frac{A-1}{A}\right)\left[ b_0(\rho_n(r)+\rho_p(r)) + b_1(\rho_n(r)-\rho_p(r))\right],$$ in which $b_0$ and $b_1$ are the isoscalar and isovector couplings and $\rho_n$, $\rho_p$ are the neutron and proton density distributions. The trick of the proposal is to choose calcium isotopes: $^{40}\mathrm{Ca}$ has $N=Z$, so the $b_1$ term drops out and the isotope dependence of the measured shifts and widths isolates $b_1$. The experimental machinery that makes this practical is a multi-pixel transition-edge sensor (TES) microcalorimeter with a tin absorber, expected to give 50–70 eV FWHM around the 120 keV transition energy, sufficient to resolve the 235 eV fine-structure doublet and to see the roughly 35 eV natural line width.

What would settle it

Measure the $6h\to 5g$ spectrum of antiprotonic $^{40}$Ca and $^{48}$Ca with a TES detector in the proposed parasitic run: if the line positions cannot be extracted to about 1 eV, or if the 235 eV fine-structure separation is not resolved, the claimed $O(1)$ eV shift precision and the resulting $b_1$ refinement are falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that a TES-based measurement of the $6h\to 5g$ x-ray transition in antiprotonic calcium can remove the degeneracy that has kept the isovector parameter $b_1$ poorly constrained. With the assumed 50–70 eV detector resolution, the 235 eV fine-structure separation between the $6h_{11/2}\to 5g_{9/2}$ and $6h_{9/2}\to 5g_{7/2}$ lines becomes resolvable; because this doublet spacing is insensitive to the strong interaction, it provides an internal calibration check. The isotope-dependent strong-interaction shifts between $^{40}\mathrm{Ca}$ and $^{48}\mathrm{Ca}$, measured to $O(1)$ eV rather than the 10–30 eV uncertainties of earlier data, would be interpreted with the optical potential of Eq. (1), using the known calcium nucleon density distributions as fixed inputs rather than fit parameters. This is the step that would allow $b_0$ and $b_1$ to be extracted more reliably than the global fit that currently leaves $b_1$ consistent with zero.

Load-bearing premise

The precision claim rests on the assumption that a tin-absorber TES microcalorimeter will actually achieve 50–70 eV resolution near 120 keV and collect enough antiprotonic calcium x-rays in a parasitic run to bring shift uncertainties down to about 1 eV.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Shift uncertainties near 1 eV and direct width measurements across the calcium isotope chain would turn $b_1$ from a loosely constrained fit parameter into a measured quantity.
  • The strong-interaction-insensitive 235 eV fine-structure splitting can be used as an in-situ calibration and systematic check for the detector.
  • A more accurate optical potential would allow sharper tests of the low-energy antineutron–nucleus annihilation cross-section data, where current calculations underestimate the measured values by factors of 2 to 4.
  • Since the antineutron–nucleus potential is obtained from the antiproton potential by isospin rotation, an improved $b_1$ reduces the uncertainty in the antineutron scattering lengths needed by next-generation neutron–antineutron oscillation searches.
  • The experiment is designed to fit into a parasitic run at an existing low-energy antiproton facility, so the added precision would not require new accelerator infrastructure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same detector-and-doublet strategy could be applied to other hadronic atoms with resolvable fine structure, making the calcium case a template rather than a one-off.
  • Restricting the analysis to $^{40}\mathrm{Ca}$ and $^{48}\mathrm{Ca}$, the two doubly magic isotopes at the ends of the chain, would give the largest isovector lever arm and the smallest nucleon-density model dependence; the paper does not isolate this comparison.
  • A direct width measurement would provide a clean handle on the imaginary part of the optical potential, which shift data alone constrain only weakly.
  • A pre-run simulation of the $6h\to 5g$ line shape with 50 eV resolution, marginalizing over current nucleon-density uncertainties, could quantify the expected $b_1$ sensitivity before beam time is committed; the paper does not include such an estimate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a high-precision x-ray spectroscopy measurement of antiprotonic calcium atoms, using a transition-edge sensor (TES) microcalorimeter, with the goal of improving the determination of the isovector parameter b1 of the antiproton-nucleus optical potential. The authors argue that calcium isotopes have well-studied nucleon distributions, that 40Ca provides a natural N=Z reference, and that a TES resolution of 50-70 eV would resolve the fine structure of the 6h to 5g transition, thereby allowing direct measurement of strong-interaction widths and O(1) eV precision on strong-interaction shifts. The paper also connects improved knowledge of the antinucleon-nucleus optical potential to the sensitivity of future neutron-antineutron oscillation searches. No experimental data are reported; the manuscript is a proposal based on the reanalysis of existing PS209 data and on detector-development literature.

Significance. If the central quantitative claims are established, the proposal would address a known limitation of the global optical-potential fit: the correlation between b1 and assumptions about nucleon density distributions. The choice of calcium isotopes is well motivated, the connection to the Yoshimura et al. reanalysis is concrete, and the link to neutron-antineutron oscillation searches gives the work broader impact. The paper is also honest about its proposal status and cites the relevant detector and nuclear-structure literature. However, the significance currently rests on unquantified feasibility statements: the claimed O(1) eV precision and the claimed ability to extract strong-interaction widths from 35 eV natural lines using a 50-70 eV FWHM detector are asserted rather than demonstrated, and no propagation of the proposed measurements to b1 is provided. The physics idea is sound and timely, but the paper needs quantitative support before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, paragraph containing 'O(1) eV precision'] The central quantitative claim that a TES detector will provide O(1) eV precision for the strong-interaction shift measurements is not supported by any count-rate, background, or systematic-error estimate. The paper states the natural line width is about 35 eV, the TES resolution is 50-70 eV FWHM, and the PS209 shift uncertainties were 10-30 eV, and then concludes that O(1) eV precision will be achieved. For a Gaussian-dominated line with a FWHM near 60 eV, a centroid statistical error of 1 eV requires on the order of several hundred detected counts even with negligible background, and the paper gives no yield per stopped antiproton, no expected number of stopped antiprotons in a parasitic AD/ELENA run, and no background level. Without these inputs, the O(1) eV claim is unsupported.
  2. [Section 3, 'The target transition is found ideal also in view of TES application'] The claim that a TES detector will allow direct determination of the strong-interaction widths is not developed quantitatively. The natural width is about 35 eV and the detector response is 50-70 eV FWHM, so extracting the Lorentzian width from the measured line shape requires deconvolution and precise knowledge of the TES line shape, energy-scale nonlinearity, and background at approximately 120 keV. The manuscript does not provide or cite a detector-response model or a fitting simulation demonstrating that a 35 eV width can be recovered at the desired precision. This is a load-bearing point for the proposal and must be addressed with a realistic simulation or a quantitative reference to measured TES line-shape performance at this energy.
  3. [Section 3 and Conclusion, b1 extraction] The paper claims that the proposed measurements will lead to a more accurate extraction of b0 and b1, but it does not show how the proposed shifts and widths propagate into the optical-potential parameters. There is no sensitivity or covariance analysis connecting the anticipated experimental uncertainties to b1 and b0, nor is there a discussion of how the uncertainties in the calcium nucleon density distributions, which enter as inputs, affect the final parameter errors. In particular, the strong-interaction shifts are sensitive to the peripheral tail of the density, and the cited charge-radius and neutron-skin measurements may not fully constrain that tail. The authors should quantify, at least approximately, the expected improvement in b1 relative to the recent reanalysis by Yoshimura et al., using the proposed O(1) eV shifts and direct widths as inputs.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, text near Figure 1] There is a typo: 'derector' should be 'detector' in the sentence beginning 'As seen in Figure 1, the fine structure can be resolved with a TES derector.'
  2. [Equation (1)] The notation used in the optical potential, such as the meaning of mu, M, and A, is standard but not explicitly defined in the text; a brief definition of all symbols would improve readability.
  3. [Figure 1] The caption and text should clarify that the predicted spectra are computed within the same optical-potential framework whose b1 parameter the experiment is intended to constrain; this is acceptable for an illustration, but an explicit statement would avoid any impression of circularity.
  4. [Section 3, 'width of about 35 eV'] The phrase 'with a width of about 35 eV' should specify whether this is the natural width, the strong-interaction width, or the total width, since the later discussion of deconvolution depends on this distinction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the proposal is a forward-looking experimental design; simulated spectra use existing PS209 parameters only for illustration, not as evidence for the target b1 extraction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: adopt the standard optical potential of Eq. (1) with b0 and b1 from a global fit to antiprotonic-atom data; argue that b1 is poorly constrained by nucleon-density uncertainties; propose TES x-ray spectroscopy of antiprotonic calcium isotopes to measure strong-interaction shifts and widths; and use well-studied calcium density distributions as fixed inputs to extract b0 and b1 more accurately. Each step has independent content. The 'predicted spectra' in Fig. 1 set the signal position using the PS209-measured shift of 33 eV, but the figure is a detector-resolution illustration, not a claim that the proposed measurement will reproduce that value from the model. The O(1) eV precision statement follows from the assumed 50–70 eV TES resolution and the known natural width of about 35 eV; it is a feasibility estimate, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The cited reanalysis by Yoshimura et al. [27] is by different authors and is not a self-citation. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the result. Therefore the paper is not circular; any concerns about unsupported rate or background modeling are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on a standard optical potential whose parameters and folding range come from earlier global fits, on theoretical nucleon densities for Ca, and on cited TES detector performance. No new entities are introduced. The main unverified input is the achievable detector resolution and event rate in a parasitic beam setting.

free parameters (3)
  • b0 (isoscalar optical potential parameter) = 1.0(1) + 1.3(1)i fm
    Taken from the global fit of Friedman, Gal and Mares (2005); used to compute the expected pbar-Ca spectra in Fig. 1.
  • b1 (isovector optical potential parameter) = 0 fm in the current global fit; a finite value is indicated by the reanalysis of Yoshimura et al.
    The central target of the proposed measurement; simulated spectra and the isotope-difference argument depend on this parameter.
  • Gaussian folding parameter = 0.85 fm
    Finite interaction range parameter from the same global fit; part of the optical potential model used for the predicted spectra.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The optical potential of Eq. (1) with complex b0 and b1 describes low-energy antiproton-nucleus interactions.
    Standard formalism from hadronic atom analyses; used throughout Sections 1 and 3.
  • domain assumption Nucleon density distributions of calcium isotopes from DFT and ab initio methods are accurate enough to serve as inputs rather than fit parameters.
    Section 3 bullet on calcium; relies on refs. [22-26].
  • domain assumption A TES detector with a tin absorber achieves 50-70 eV FWHM resolution near 120 keV.
    Section 3, based on refs. [34,35]; not demonstrated in the proposed exact setup.
  • domain assumption The isospin transform of the pbar-nucleus optical potential to the nbar-nucleus potential is valid for low-energy applications.
    Section 2, used to connect the proposed measurement to neutron-antineutron oscillation searches.
  • domain assumption The 6h-5g fine structure with 235 eV separation is insensitive to the strong interaction and can be used for calibration and systematics checks.
    Section 3, taken from the analysis of Yoshimura et al. [27].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Precision Spectroscopy of Antiprotonic Atoms for Investigation of Low-energy Antinucleon-nucleus Interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NJVIMEIK

@misc{pith2026250108759,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Precision Spectroscopy of Antiprotonic Atoms for Investigation of Low-energy Antinucleon-nucleus Interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NJVIMEIK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08759}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a high-precision x-ray spectroscopy experiment of antiprotonic atoms to advance the understanding of low-energy antinucleon-nucleus interactions. The current leading model of antiproton-nucleus interactions is based on an optical potential with parameters derived from a global fit to antiprotonic atom x-ray data across the periodic table. However, the isovector parameter of this potential remains poorly constrained due to uncertainties in nucleon distributions of the nuclei. To address this, we propose to use calcium isotopes with well-studied nucleon distributions to minimize these uncertainties. A superconducting microcalorimeter detector will provide a resolution of 50-70 eV in the energy range of interest, allowing high precision determination of the isotope-dependent strong-interaction shifts and widths. The outcomes of the proposed experiment can be used to refine the model of antinucleon-nucleus interactions and provide critical data for future experiments searching for neutron-antineutron oscillations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08759 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Predicted spectra of the 6ℎ → 5𝑔 transitions of 𝑝¯ 48Ca atoms. The black dashed line represents a spectrum with a typical resolution of an HPGe detector such as used by the PS209 experiment [28]. The blue solid line represents the one expected by a 50-eV resolution TES detector, where the fine structure is resolved. The magnitude of the strong-interaction shift of 33 eV expected from the PS209 result is also indicat… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Batty, E

    C.J. Batty, E. Friedman and A. Gal,Strong interaction physics from hadronic atoms, Physics Report 287 (1997) 385

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Friedman and A

    E. Friedman and A. Gal,In-medium nuclear interactions of low-energy hadrons,Physics Reports452 (2007) 89

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Friedman, A

    E. Friedman, A. Gal and J. Mareš,Antiproton–nucleus potentials from global fits to antiprotonic X-rays and radiochemical data, Nuclear Physics A761 (2005) 283 [0504030]

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Trzcińska, J

    A. Trzcińska, J. Jastrze ¸bski, T. Czosnyka, T. von Egidy, K. Gulda, F. Hartmann et al., Information on antiprotonic atoms and the nuclear periphery from the PS209 experiment, Nuclear Physics A692 (2001) 176

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Janouin, M.C

    S. Janouin, M.C. Lemaire, D. Garreta, P. Birien, G. Bruge, D.M. Drake et al.,Optical-model analysis of antiproton-nucleus elastic scattering at 50 and 180 MeV,Nuclear Physics, Section A451(1986) 541. 5 Precision Spectroscopy of ... Low-energy Antinucleon–nucleus Interaction Takashi Higuchi

    work page 1986

  6. [6]

    Antineutron and antiproton nuclear interactions at very low energies

    E. Friedman,Antineutron and antiproton nuclear interactions at very low energies, Nuclear Physics A925 (2014) 141 [1402.3968]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Antinucleon-nucleus interaction near threshold from the Paris $\bar NN$ potential

    E. Friedman, A. Gal, B. Loiseau and S. Wycech,Antinucleon-nucleus interaction near threshold from the Paris𝑁 ¯𝑁 potential, Nuclear Physics A943 (2015) 101 [1506.06965]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    Astrua, E

    M. Astrua, E. Botta, T. Bressani, D. Calvo, C. Casalegno, A. Feliciello et al., Antineutron–nucleus annihilation cross sections below 400 MeV/c, Nuclear Physics A697 (2002) 209

    work page 2002

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Lee and C.-Y

    T.-G. Lee and C.-Y. Wong,Optical model potential analysis of¯𝑛𝐴 and𝑛𝐴 interactions, Physical Review C97(2018) 054617 [1803.01820]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Protasov, V

    K.V. Protasov, V. Gudkov, E.A. Kupriyanova, V.V. Nesvizhevsky, W.M. Snow and A.Y. Voronin,Theoretical analysis of antineutron-nucleus data needed for antineutron mirrors in neutron-antineutron oscillation experiments,Physical Review D102 (2020) 075025 [2009.11467]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bianconi, M

    A. Bianconi, M. Corradini, M. Hori, M. Leali, E. Lodi Rizzini, V. Mascagna et al., Measurement of the antiproton-nucleus annihilation cross section at 5.3 MeV,Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics704 (2011) 461

    2011

  4. [12]

    Aghai-Khozani, A

    H. Aghai-Khozani, A. Bianconi, M. Corradini, R. Hayano, M. Hori, M. Leali et al., Measurement of the antiproton–nucleus annihilation cross-section at low energy,Nuclear Physics A970 (2018) 366

    2018

  5. [13]

    Aghai-Khozani, D

    H. Aghai-Khozani, D. Barna, M. Corradini, D. De Salvador, R.S. Hayano, M. Hori et al., Limits on antiproton-nuclei annihilation cross sections at ~125 keV,Nuclear Physics A1009 (2021) 122170

    2021

  6. [14]

    Phillips II, W.M

    D.G. Phillips II, W.M. Snow, K. Babu, S. Banerjee, D.V. Baxter, Z. Berezhiani et al., Neutron-antineutron oscillations: Theoretical status and experimental prospects, Physics Reports612 (2016) 1 [1410.1100]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Baldo-Ceolin, P

    M. Baldo-Ceolin, P. Benetti, T. Bitter, F. Bobisut, E. Calligarich, R. Dolfini et al.,A new experimental limit on neutron-antineutron oscillations, Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields63(1994) 409

    1994

  8. [16]

    K. Abe, C. Bronner, Y. Hayato, M. Ikeda, S. Imaizumi, H. Ito et al.,Neutron-antineutron oscillation search using a 0.37 megaton-years exposure of Super-Kamiokande,Physical Review D103 (2021) 012008

    2021

  9. [17]

    Nesvizhevsky, V

    V.V. Nesvizhevsky, V. Gudkov, K.V. Protasov, W.M. Snow and A.Y. Voronin,Experimental Approach to Search for Free Neutron-Antineutron Oscillations Based on Coherent Neutron and Antineutron Mirror Reflection,Physical Review Letters122 (2019) 221802 [1810.04988]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Gudkov, V.V

    V. Gudkov, V.V. Nesvizhevsky, K.V. Protasov, W.M. Snow and A.Y. Voronin,A new approach to search for free neutron-antineutron oscillations using coherent neutron propagation in gas, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and 6 Precision Spectroscopy of ... Lo...

    2020

  11. [19]

    Kerbikov,The effect of collisions with the wall on neutron-antineutron transitions, Physics Letters B795 (2019) 362 [1810.02153]

    B.O. Kerbikov,The effect of collisions with the wall on neutron-antineutron transitions, Physics Letters B795 (2019) 362 [1810.02153]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Shima,NEWS Colloquium, RCNP, Osaka University, 2023

    T. Shima,NEWS Colloquium, RCNP, Osaka University, 2023. https://www.rcnp.osaka-u.ac.jp/Divisions/np1-c/NEWS/slide/NEWS2301-Shima.pdf

    2023

  13. [21]

    Friedman and A

    E. Friedman and A. Gal,Realistic calculations of nuclear disappearance lifetimes induced by𝑛𝑛 oscillations, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 16002

    2008

  14. [22]

    Naito, T

    T. Naito, T. Oishi, H. Sagawa and Z. Wang,Comparative study on charge radii and their kinks at magic numbers, Physical Review C107(2023) 054307 [2209.02857]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Hagen, A

    G. Hagen, A. Ekström, C. Forssén, G.R. Jansen, W. Nazarewicz, T. Papenbrock et al., Neutron and weak-charge distributions of the48Canucleus, Nature Physics12(2016) 186

    2016

  16. [24]

    Zenihiro, H

    J. Zenihiro, H. Sakaguchi, S. Terashima, T. Uesaka, G. Hagen, M. Itoh et al.,Direct determination of the neutron skin thicknesses in40,48Ca from proton elastic scattering at 𝐸 𝑝 = 295 MeV, 1810.11796

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Matsuzaki, S

    M. Matsuzaki, S. Tagami and M. Yahiro,Neutron skin thickness of208Pb, 116,120,124Sn, and 40Ca determined from reaction cross sections of4He scattering, Physical Review C104 (2021) 1

    2021

  18. [26]

    Adhikari, H

    D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, K.A. Aniol, D.S. Armstrong, T. Averett et al., Precision Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Factor of48Ca,Physical Review Letters 129 (2022) 42501 [2205.11593]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Yoshimura, S

    K. Yoshimura, S. Yasunaga, D. Jido, J. Yamagata-Sekihara and S. Hirenzaki,Interrelation between ¯𝑝-Ca Atom Spectra and Nuclear Density Profiles, 2408.14760

  20. [28]

    Hartmann, R

    F.J. Hartmann, R. Schmidt, B. Ketzer, T. von Egidy, S. Wycech, R. Smolańczuk et al., Nucleon density in the nuclear periphery determined with antiprotonic x rays: Calcium isotopes, Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics65 (2002) 143061

    2002

  21. [29]

    Ullom and D.A

    J.N. Ullom and D.A. Bennett,Review of superconducting transition-edge sensors for x-ray and gamma-ray spectroscopy,Superconductor Science and Technology28(2015) 084003

    2015

  22. [30]

    Hashimoto, S

    T. Hashimoto, S. Aikawa, T. Akaishi, H. Asano, M. Bazzi, D.A. Bennett et al., Measurements of Strong-Interaction Effects in Kaonic-Helium Isotopes at Sub-eV Precision with X-Ray Microcalorimeters,Physical Review Letters128 (2022) 112503

    2022

  23. [31]

    Okumura, T

    T. Okumura, T. Azuma, D.A. Bennett, I. Chiu, W.B. Doriese, M.S. Durkin et al., Proof-of-Principle Experiment for Testing Strong-Field Quantum Electrodynamics with Exotic Atoms: High Precision X-Ray Spectroscopy of Muonic Neon, Physical Review Letters 130 (2023) 173001

    2023

  24. [32]

    N. Paul, G. Bian, T. Azuma, S. Okada and P. Indelicato,Testing Quantum Electrodynamics with Exotic Atoms,Physical Review Letters126 (2021) 173001 [2011.09715]. 7 Precision Spectroscopy of ... Low-energy Antinucleon–nucleus Interaction Takashi Higuchi

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Baptista, S

    G. Baptista, S. Rathi, M. Roosa, Q. Senetaire, J. Sommerfeldt, T. Azuma et al.,Towards Precision Spectroscopy of Antiprotonic Atoms for Probing Strong-field QED, inProceedings of International Conference on Exotic Atoms and Related Topics and Conference on Low Energy Antiproto...

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Noroozian, J.A

    O. Noroozian, J.A. Mates, D.A. Bennett, J.A. Brevik, J.W. Fowler, J. Gao et al., High-resolution gamma-ray spectroscopy with a microwave-multiplexed transition-edge sensor array, Applied Physics Letters103 (2013) [1310.7287]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Saito, S

    T.Y. Saito, S. Okada, Y. Toyama, T. Azuma, G. Baptista, D.T. Becker et al.,Application of Hard X-Ray and Gamma-Ray TES Microcalorimeter at Accelerator Facility, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity(2025) 1

    2025

  28. [36]

    Eisenberg and D

    Y. Eisenberg and D. Kessler,On the𝜇-mesonic atoms, Il Nuovo Cimento19(1961) 1195. 8

    1961

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.