Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Encoding a topological gauge theory on a ring-shaped Raman-coupled Bose gas

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Raman-coupled Bose gas in a ring trap can realize the chiral BF topological gauge theory, with its own density supplying a magnetic flux that quantizes angular momentum and splits left- and right-moving sound.

desk verdict Well-executed extension of chiral BF encoding to a ring; the core mapping is plausible and the numerics support it, but the higher-band correction that explains the density shifts is asserted rather than shown — a referee should ask for that comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.06089 v3 pith:NK44KNEU submitted 2025-10-07 cond-mat.quant-gas

Claudio Iacovelli , Josep Cabedo , Leticia Tarruell , Alessio Celi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords chiralBFtheorytopologicalgaugedensity-dependentfieldRaman-coupledBose-EinsteincondensateringtrappersistentcurrentssoundvelocityChern-Simonsdimensionalreduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that a ring-shaped, Raman-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate can act as a laboratory realization of a one-dimensional topological gauge theory, the chiral BF theory, on a space with nontrivial topology. The theory is derived by dimensionally reducing Chern-Simons theory on a disk to the ring, where the gauge field acquires a winding mode that carries integer magnetic flux even with no matter. The authors encode the resulting Hamiltonian into a form in which the matter density itself acts as a magnetic flux, and they show that the lower-band physics of a Raman-dressed two-component gas reproduces that encoded Hamiltonian. If correct, the proposal gives a concrete way to observe topological features—quantized persistent currents and chiral sound—that were invisible in previous experiments of the same interactions on a line.

What carries the argument

The central object is the encoded Hamiltonian (26), where the angular component of the gauge field is the sum of a topological winding $\omega/r_0$ and a density-dependent piece $\lambda n/2$. It is obtained from the chiral BF Lagrangian by the Faddeev-Jackiw constrained-quantization procedure plus a Jordan-Wigner phase redefinition; the local conservation law $\partial_\phi B = r_0 \kappa n$ ties the BF field B to the density, so that integrating B turns the gauge degrees of freedom into an ordinary current-density interaction. On the BEC side, the carrying mechanism is the Taylor expansion of the lower dressed band around a center momentum $m_0$: the band curvature defines an effective mass $M^*$, the

What would settle it

Prepare the proposed ring-shaped potassium Raman BEC and measure ground-state angular momentum $Q$ as a function of density: if the stepwise drops in $Q$ do not occur at the flux values $\tilde{\omega} = r_0 \lambda \langle n \rangle /2 + \omega$ (with $\lambda$, $r_0$, $n$ measured independently), the density-dependent flux claim fails. Alternatively, create a small density dip and track the two sound fronts: equality of left and right velocities at nonzero density would rule out the chiral current-density coupling that carries the mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, stated in Section IV, is that a two-component Bose gas in a ring trap, dressed by a Laguerre-Gauss Raman transition that transfers angular momentum to the atoms, maps onto the encoded chiral BF Hamiltonian (26) once the single-particle problem is truncated to the lower dressed band and expanded to first order in the small momentum parameter. In this mapping, the static gauge potential $A_S(m_0)$ plays the role of the topological winding field $\omega/r_0$, and the chiral interaction strength $\lambda = 2 M^* g_1 / \Omega$ generates a density-dependent gauge field $\lambda n/2$. The paper therefore states that, to that level of approximation, the Raman-dressed gas experiences

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the Raman coupling opens a band gap large enough and the condensate's momentum spread narrow enough that projecting onto the lower dressed band and keeping only first order in the small-momentum expansion is accurate; the paper's own numerics show deviations growing with density, which it assigns to higher-band scattering.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The gas density becomes a tunable magnetic-flux knob: changing the atom number at fixed beam parameters scans the flux continuously, so the ring acts as a flux-controlled quantum device.
  • The ground-state angular momentum is self-generated: no external rotation is needed, and each unit of density-induced flux drives a unit step in the winding, i.e. a persistent current that screens the flux.
  • Chiral sound velocities V_+ and V_- offer a direct dynamical signature of the chiral BF theory; measuring their difference as a function of density tests the current-density coupling \lambda.
  • Because r0 A_S is not quantized while \omega is, the proposal distinguishes the topological winding contribution from the density-dependent one, and predicts twisted boundary conditions with phase A = -\lambda N/2 for the underlying Bose field.
  • The numerical benchmarks set realistic parameters (potassium atoms, 2\ell = 40 or 80 Laguerre-Gauss modes) where the signatures should be visible before higher-band corrections become noticeable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-ring mapping holds, an array of weakly coupled such rings could emulate a two-dimensional density-dependent (Chern-Simons-like) magnetic field, because the intra-ring flux is set by local density; the paper's concluding remarks gesture in this direction but do not develop it.
  • The density-dependent shift between the Raman-gas numerics and the chiral BF model, quantified in Appendix B, could be used as a quantitative probe of band coupling: a precision measurement of Q(n) and V_\pm(n) versus density would let the coefficient of the n^2 correction to the flux be extracted experimentally.
  • The twisted-boundary phase A = -\lambda N/2 suggests that the same setup, with a second species or internal-state-dependent coupling, could be a platform for non-Abelian or density-dependent statistics in one dimension; the paper notes this possibility without constructing a concrete protocol.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a scheme to realize the chiral BF topological gauge theory on a ring using a Raman-coupled two-component Bose gas in a ring-shaped trap. The authors first derive the chiral BF action on a ring as a gauge-invariant boundary extension of Chern–Simons theory on a disk (Sec. II and Appendix A), then apply the Faddeev–Jackiw procedure to obtain an encoded Hamiltonian with a density-dependent gauge field λn/2 and a static topological field ω/r0 (Sec. III). In Sec. IV they map the lower band of a Laguerre–Gauss Raman-coupled BEC onto this Hamiltonian, with effective parameters (M*, A_S, g0, g1, λ) derived rather than fitted. Section V benchmarks the mapping numerically by comparing ground-state angular momentum and chiral sound velocities of the effective model (52) with the full two-component model (42). The central claim is that the Raman-dressed gas experiences the same density-dependent magnetic flux as the chiral BF theory, with quantized current jumps and chiral sound velocities as observable signatures.

Significance. The analytic derivation is a genuine strength: the dimensional reduction from Chern–Simons on a disk to chiral BF on a ring is careful and self-contained, and the Faddeev–Jackiw encoding is a first-principles route to the density-dependent gauge field. The effective parameters are not fitted, and the numerical benchmarks compare the effective model to the microscopic two-component Hamiltonian rather than only to the analytic derivation. The proposed observables—quantized angular-momentum jumps and chiral sound velocities—are concrete and experimentally accessible. If the mapping holds, this would significantly extend the line-geometry realization of Ref. [25] to a non-trivial topology and provide a route to observing topological gauge-theory effects in cold-atom rings. The main weakness is that the validation is incomplete in the density regime where the effective model deviates from the full model: the higher-band correction is asserted to explain the deviations, but the quantitative comparison is not shown.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B / Sec. V] The deviations visible in Figs. 2–3 are attributed to interband scattering, and Eq. (B9) is said to be "in agreement with the flux retrieved by the numerical results," but no comparison between (B9) and the full two-component model (42) is shown. This is the only quantitative support for the explanation of the density-dependent shifts in the Q-jump positions and sound velocities. Without a direct overlay of the corrected flux (or corrected Q-jump positions and V±) against the full-model results, the discrepancy is not actually explained. Please add this comparison, or alternatively temper the claim and explicitly state the density range over which the lower-band model (52) is quantitatively accurate.
  2. [Sec. IV, after Eq. (52)] The identification A_S = ω/r0 is central to the claim that the atomic Hamiltonian realizes the chiral BF Hamiltonian (26), yet the text immediately concedes that r0A_S is not integer-valued while ω is. The topological winding sector of the ring theory relies on integer ω. The manuscript should state whether the experimental parameters can enforce r0A_S ∈ Z, and if not, explain what remains of the topological winding claim. Without this, the paper's central phrase "topological gauge theory" is not fully supported by the mapping.
  3. [Sec. V] The validity of the mapping rests on the smallness of qℓ/(r²Ω̃) and of the interband coupling relative to the band gap Ω̃. The numerical section does not report the values of these dimensionless parameters for the densities shown in Figs. 2–3. Since the deviations grow with density, an estimate (or table) of these parameters for the simulated points is needed to judge whether the observed discrepancies are consistent with the neglected higher-order terms.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] Misspelling: "Fadeev-Jackiw" should be "Faddeev-Jackiw".
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The phrase "zero A_S (40)" is ambiguous; specify the parameter choice that makes A_S = 0 (e.g., m0 = 0 and δ = 0).
  3. [Sec. V / Appendix B] The symbol n is used both for the mean 1D density and for the upper/lower band densities n± in Appendix B. Please distinguish these consistently.
  4. [Eq. (38)] The text says the expansion is carried "up to third order," but the displayed expression contains terms up to second order in q, with A_S containing a q² term. Please reconcile the wording.
  5. [Eq. (B6)] The symbol Q is used for the condensate quasi-momentum and also for the ground-state angular momentum elsewhere in the paper; rename one to avoid confusion.
  6. [General] Minor grammar: "three-body losses" should be hyphenated as "three-body losses" throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective mapping is derived from the microscopic model and benchmarked by consistency checks; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The chiral BF Hamiltonian (26) is obtained from the chiral BF Lagrangian via the Faddeev-Jackiw encoding; the Lagrangian itself is derived from Chern-Simons theory with an explicitly added boundary BF term required by gauge invariance, not by assuming the target Hamiltonian. The Raman-coupled effective Hamiltonian (52) is derived from the microscopic two-component Hamiltonian (42) under stated approximations (lower-band truncation and small-momentum expansion), with parameters M*, A_S, g0, g1, and lambda computed analytically from the band structure and scattering lengths rather than fitted to the observables. The numerical benchmarks in Figs. 2-3 compare the effective lower-band model to the full two-component model from which it was derived; this is a consistency check rather than an independent experimental falsification, but it does not make the derivation circular. The higher-band correction in Appendix B, Eq. (B9), is an analytic estimate, and the claim that it agrees with numerics is not quantitatively displayed; however, missing verification is a support/correctness issue, not a circularity. Self-citations [25,31] provide the established Raman-coupled platform and linear-geometry formulation, but the ring-specific derivation is re-derived in the text and does not rest on those citations. No step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mapping rests on the Chern-Simons/boundary-condition framework and the lower-band projection; these are standard field-theory tools and stated physical assumptions, respectively. No parameters are fitted to data.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Boundary conditions ∂_r J_r = 0 and (∂_r + iA_r)Ψ = 0 on the ring
    Imposed in Section II (around Eq. 11) and Appendix A to eliminate bulk terms in the dimensional reduction from disk to ring; physically justified by tight radial confinement but not guaranteed in the experiment.
  • domain assumption Lower-band projection and first-order Taylor expansion in qℓ/(r²Ω̃)
    Used in Section IV (Eqs. 38–52) to map the Raman-coupled gas to the chiral BF Hamiltonian; validity requires large band gap and small momentum spread, and deviations are seen at higher densities (Appendix B).
  • standard math Flux attachment condition ε^ij ∂_i A_j = κ n (or =0) from Chern-Simons theory
    Standard conservation law of Chern-Simons theory (Eqs. 1, 14) taken from Refs. [17,18], used to encode the gauge field in terms of density.
  • standard math Faddeev-Jackiw quantization and Jordan-Wigner transformation
    Standard methods used in Section III (Eqs. 17–23) to obtain the encoded Hamiltonian and anyonic field representation.
  • domain assumption Bogoliubov mean-field ansatz for excitations
    Used in Appendix C (Eqs. C4–C9) to derive the spectrum (53); assumes weak interactions and a well-defined condensate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Encoding a topological gauge theory on a ring-shaped Raman-coupled Bose gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NK44KNEU

@misc{pith2026251006089,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Encoding a topological gauge theory on a ring-shaped Raman-coupled Bose gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NK44KNEU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.06089}
}
read the original abstract

Topological gauge theories constitute a framework for understanding strongly correlated quantum matter in terms of weakly interacting composite degrees of freedom. Their topological properties become evident when these theories are realized on a space of non-trivial topology. Here, we propose a scheme to realize a one-dimensional topological gauge theory, the so-called chiral BF theory, on a ring geometry. We obtain such a theory by dimensionally reducing Chern-Simons theory on a disk to the chiral BF theory defined on the ring. Then, we encode the theory into a Hamiltonian with a coupling between angular momentum and density, and we propose and numerically benchmark its realization in an optically-dressed Bose gas confined in a ring-shaped trap. There, the topological properties of the underlying theory manifest themselves through a magnetic flux variable that is density-dependent. We quantify such density-dependent magnetic flux in terms of the ground-state angular momentum and the chiral properties of the system through a Bogoliubov analysis. Our proposal enables the observation of topological features of the chiral BF theory that become manifest due to the non-trivial topology of the ring geometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.06089 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Chiral BF theory on a ring: derivation from Chern-Simons theory, experimental scheme and signatures. a) A winding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Density-dependent angular momentum. a) The density-dependent magnetic flux ˜ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Chiral sound velocities. a) Time evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dimensional reduction for anyons in the average-field approximation

    math.AP 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 2D Chern–Simons–Schrödinger anyon model in a strong anisotropic trap is rigorously shown to reduce to the 1D quintic NLS model, at the level of energies and, conditionally, of dynamics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [25]

    Realizing a 1D topological gauge theory in an optically dressed BEC,

    A. Fr¨ olian, C. S. Chisholm, E. Neri, C. R. Cabrera, R. Ramos, A. Celi, and L. Tarruell,“Realizing a 1D topological gauge theory in an optically dressed BEC,” Nature608, 293 (2022)

    2022

  2. [1]

    Hern´ an, P

    O. Hern´ an, P. Sylvie, and V. Andr´ es,Geometric and Topological Methods for Quantum Field Theory(Cam- bridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  3. [2]

    Topological field theory,

    D. Birmingham, M. Blau, M. Rakowski, and G. Thompson,“Topological field theory,”Phys. Rep. 209, 129 (1991)

    1991

  4. [3]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, and V. Ahufinger,Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating quantum many- body systems(Oxford University Press, 2012)

    2012

  5. [4]

    A gauge theory of one-dimensional anyons,

    S. J. Rabello,“A gauge theory of one-dimensional anyons,”Phys. Lett. B363, 180 (1995)

    1995

  6. [5]

    1D Generalized Statistics Gas: A Gauge Theory Approach,

    S. J. Benetton Rabello,“1D Generalized Statistics Gas: A Gauge Theory Approach,”Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4007 (1996)

    1996

  7. [6]

    Anyons and Chiral Solitons on a Line,

    U. Aglietti, L. Griguolo, R. Jackiw, S.-Y. Pi, and D. Seminara,“Anyons and Chiral Solitons on a Line,” Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4406 (1996)

    1996

  8. [7]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory(Addison-Wesley, Reading, U.S.A., 1995)

    1995

Show all 102 references
  1. [8]

    ’t Hooft,50 Years of Yang-Mills Theory(World Sci- entific, 2005)

    G. ’t Hooft,50 Years of Yang-Mills Theory(World Sci- entific, 2005)

    2005

  2. [9]

    W. N. Cottingham and D. A. Greenwood,An Introduc- tion to the Standard Model of Particle Physics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  3. [10]

    Theory and phenomenology of CP viola- tion,

    T. Mannel,“Theory and phenomenology of CP viola- tion,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.167, 115 (2007)

    2007

  4. [11]

    Z. F. Ezawa,Quantum Hall Effects(World Scientific, 2000)

    2000

  5. [12]

    Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, 2nd ed

    E. Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  6. [13]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phases of Matter(Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phases of Matter(Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    Quantum Mechanics of Fractional-Spin Particles,

    F. Wilczek,“Quantum Mechanics of Fractional-Spin Particles,”Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 957 (1982)

    1982

  8. [15]

    Composite-fermion approach for the frac- tional quantum Hall effect,

    J. K. Jain,“Composite-fermion approach for the frac- tional quantum Hall effect,”Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 199 (1989)

    1989

  9. [16]

    Effective- Field-Theory Model for the Fractional Quantum Hall ef- fect,

    S. C. Zhang, T. H. Hansson, and S. Kivelson,“Effective- Field-Theory Model for the Fractional Quantum Hall ef- fect,”Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 82 (1989)

    1989

  10. [17]

    Classical and quantal nonrel- ativistic Chern-Simons theory,

    R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi,“Classical and quantal nonrel- ativistic Chern-Simons theory,”Phys. Rev. D42, 3500 (1990)

    1990

  11. [18]

    Anyon quantum mechanics and Chern-Simons theory,

    R. Iengo and K. Lechner,“Anyon quantum mechanics and Chern-Simons theory,”Phys. Rep.213, 179 (1992)

    1992

  12. [19]

    A Nonrelativistic Chiral Soliton in One Di- mension,

    R. Jackiw,“A Nonrelativistic Chiral Soliton in One Di- mension,”J. Nonlinear Math. Phys.4, 261 (1997)

    1997

  13. [20]

    Chiral solitons from dimensional reduction of Chern–Simons gauged non- linear Schr¨ odinger equation: classical and quantum as- pects,

    L. Griguolo and D. Seminara,“Chiral solitons from dimensional reduction of Chern–Simons gauged non- linear Schr¨ odinger equation: classical and quantum as- pects,”Nucl. Phys. B516, 467–498 (1998)

    1998

  14. [21]

    Exact Solution of DoubleδFunction Bose Gas through an Interacting Anyon Gas,

    A. Kundu,“Exact Solution of DoubleδFunction Bose Gas through an Interacting Anyon Gas,”Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1275 (1999)

    1999

  15. [22]

    Bosonic continuum the- ory of one-dimensional lattice anyons,

    M. Bonkhoff, K. J¨ agering, S. Eggert, A. Pelster, M. Thorwart, and T. Posske,“Bosonic continuum the- ory of one-dimensional lattice anyons,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 163201 (2021)

    2021

  16. [23]

    Ground-state prop- erties of hard-core anyons in one-dimensional optical lattices,

    Y. Hao, Y. Zhang, and S. Chen,“Ground-state prop- erties of hard-core anyons in one-dimensional optical lattices,”Phys. Rev. A79, 043633 (2009)

    2009

  17. [24]

    Statistically induced phase transitions and anyons in 1D optical lattices,

    T. Keilmann, S. Lanzmich, I. McCulloch, and M. Roncaglia,“Statistically induced phase transitions and anyons in 1D optical lattices,”Nat. Commun.2, 361 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Re- alization of one-dimensional anyons with arbitrary sta- tistical phase,

    J. Kwan, P. Segura, Y. Li, S. Kim, A. V. Gorshkov, A. Eckardt, B. Bakkali-Hassani, and M. Greiner,“Re- alization of one-dimensional anyons with arbitrary sta- tistical phase,”Science386, 1055 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Observing anyonization of bosons in a quantum gas,

    S. Dhar, B. Wang, M. Horvath, A. Vashisht, Y. Zeng, M. B. Zvonarev, N. Goldman, Y. Guo, M. Landini, and H.-C. N¨ agerl,“Observing anyonization of bosons in a quantum gas,”Nature642, 53–57 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum Hall effects,

    X.-G. Wen,“Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum Hall effects,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. B6, 1711 (1992)

    1992

  21. [29]

    G. V. Dunne, inAspects topologiques de la physique en basse dimension. Topological aspects of low dimensional systems, edited by A. Comtet, T. Jolicœur, S. Ouvry, and F. David (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999)

    1999

  22. [30]

    (Constrained) quantization without tears,

    R. Jackiw,“(Constrained) quantization without tears,” , arXiv:hep-th/9306075

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Encoding a one-dimensional topo- logical gauge theory in a raman-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate,

    C. S. Chisholm, A. Fr¨ olian, E. Neri, R. Ramos, L. Tar- ruell, and A. Celi,“Encoding a one-dimensional topo- logical gauge theory in a raman-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate,”Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043088 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Simulating an Interacting Gauge The- ory with Ultracold Bose Gases,

    M. J. Edmonds, M. Valiente, G. Juzeli¯ unas, L. Santos, and P. ¨Ohberg,“Simulating an Interacting Gauge The- ory with Ultracold Bose Gases,”Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 085301 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Quantized vortices in interacting gauge theories,

    S. Butera, M. Valiente, and P. ¨Ohberg,“Quantized vortices in interacting gauge theories,”J. Phys. B49, 015304 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Observation of Persistent Flow of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Toroidal Trap,

    C. Ryu, M. F. Andersen, P. Clad´ e, V. Natarajan, K. Helmerson, and W. D. Phillips,“Observation of Persistent Flow of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Toroidal Trap,”Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 260401 (2007)

    2007

  27. [35]

    Quantized supercurrent decay in an annular Bose-Einstein condensate,

    S. Moulder, S. Beattie, R. P. Smith, N. Tammuz, and Z. Hadzibabic,“Quantized supercurrent decay in an annular Bose-Einstein condensate,”Phys. Rev. A86, 013629 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    Persistent Currents in Spinor Condensates,

    S. Beattie, S. Moulder, R. J. Fletcher, and Z. Hadz- ibabic,“Persistent Currents in Spinor Condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 025301 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    Hysteresis in a quantized superfluid ‘atomtronic’ circuit,

    S. Eckel, J. G. Lee, F. Jendrzejewski, N. Murray, C. W. Clark, C. J. Lobb, W. D. Phillips, M. Edwards, and G. K. Campbell,“Hysteresis in a quantized superfluid ‘atomtronic’ circuit,”Nature506, 200 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Hypersonic Bose-Einstein condensates in acceler- ator rings,

    S. Pandey, H. Mas, G. Drougakis, P. Thekkeppatt, V. Bolpasi, G. Vasilakis, K. Poulios, and W. von Klitz- ing,“Hypersonic Bose-Einstein condensates in acceler- ator rings,”Nature570, 205 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Supersonic rotation of a superfluid: A long-lived dy- namical ring,

    Y. Guo, R. Dubessy, M. de Go¨ er de Herve, A. Kumar, T. Badr, A. Perrin, L. Longchambon, and H. Perrin, “Supersonic rotation of a superfluid: A long-lived dy- namical ring,”Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 025301 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Quantum 13 interference of currents in an atomtronic SQUID,

    C. Ryu, E. C. Samson, and M. G. Boshier,“Quantum 13 interference of currents in an atomtronic SQUID,”Nat. Commun.11, 3338 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Roadmap on Atomtronics: State of the art and perspective,

    L. Amicoet al., “Roadmap on Atomtronics: State of the art and perspective,” A VS Quantum Sci.3, 039201 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Collo- quium: Atomtronic circuits: From many-body physics to quantum technologies,

    L. Amico, D. Anderson, M. Boshier, J.-P. Brantut, L.- C. Kwek, A. Minguzzi, and W. von Klitzing, “Collo- quium: Atomtronic circuits: From many-body physics to quantum technologies,” Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 041001 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Detecting Chiral Edge States in the Hofstadter Optical Lattice,

    N. Goldman, J. Beugnon, and F. Gerbier,“Detecting Chiral Edge States in the Hofstadter Optical Lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 255303 (2012)

    2012

  36. [44]

    Spectroscopy of edge and bulk collective modes in fractional Chern insulators,

    F. Binanti, N. Goldman, and C. Repellin,“Spectroscopy of edge and bulk collective modes in fractional Chern insulators,”Phys. Rev. Res.6, L012054 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms,

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P.¨Ohberg, and I. B. Spiel- man,“Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms,” Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 126401 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Spin–orbit-coupled Bose–Einstein condensates,

    Y.-J. Lin, K. Jim´ enez-Garc ´ ıa, and I. B. Spielman, “Spin–orbit-coupled Bose–Einstein condensates,”Na- ture471, 83 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    Bose-Einstein condensates with Spin-Orbit Interaction,

    T.-L. Ho and S. Zhang,“Bose-Einstein condensates with Spin-Orbit Interaction,”Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 150403 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    Spin–orbit coupling in quantum gases,

    V. Galitski and I. B. Spielman,“Spin–orbit coupling in quantum gases,”Nature494, 49 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    Synthetic Partial Waves in Ultracold Atomic Col- lisions,

    R. A. Williams, L. J. LeBlanc, K. Jim´ enez-Garc ´ ıa, M. C. Beeler, A. R. Perry, W. D. Phillips, and I. B. Spiel- man,“Synthetic Partial Waves in Ultracold Atomic Col- lisions,”Science335, 314 (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    Spin–Orbital-Angular-Momentum Cou- pled Bose-Einstein Condensates,

    H.-R. Chen, K.-Y. Lin, P.-K. Chen, N.-C. Chiu, J.-B. Wang, C.-A. Chen, P. Huang, S.-K. Yip, Y. Kawaguchi, and Y.-J. Lin,“Spin–Orbital-Angular-Momentum Cou- pled Bose-Einstein Condensates,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 113204 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Rotating Atomic Quantum Gases with Light-Induced Azimuthal Gauge Potentials and the Observation of the Hess-Fairbank Effect,

    P.-K. Chen, L.-R. Liu, M.-J. Tsai, N.-C. Chiu, Y. Kawaguchi, S.-K. Yip, M.-S. Chang, and Y.-J. Lin, “Rotating Atomic Quantum Gases with Light-Induced Azimuthal Gauge Potentials and the Observation of the Hess-Fairbank Effect,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 250401 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Ground-State Phase Diagram of a Spin-Orbital- Angular-Momentum Coupled Bose-Einstein Conden- sate,

    D. Zhang, T. Gao, P. Zou, L. Kong, R. Li, X. Shen, X.-L. Chen, S.-G. Peng, M. Zhan, H. Pu, and K. Jiang, “Ground-State Phase Diagram of a Spin-Orbital- Angular-Momentum Coupled Bose-Einstein Conden- sate,”Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 110402 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    P. A. Griffiths and J. Harris,Principles of algebraic geometry(Wiley New York, 1978)

    1978

  46. [54]

    Lectures on the Quantum Hall effect,

    D. Tong,“Lectures on the Quantum Hall effect,” arXiv:1606.06687

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Di- mensional reduction in anyon systems,

    T. H. Hansson, J. M. Leinaas, and J. Myrheim,“Di- mensional reduction in anyon systems,”Nucl. Phys. B 384, 559–580 (1992)

    1992

  48. [56]

    Dimensional Reduction of Two-Dimensional Anyons to a One-Dimensional Interacting Bose Gas,

    D. Sen,“Dimensional Reduction of Two-Dimensional Anyons to a One-Dimensional Interacting Bose Gas,” arXiv:cond-mat/9412013

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Reduction of Anyons to One Dimension and Calogero–Sutherland-type Models,

    R. Vathsan,“Reduction of Anyons to One Dimension and Calogero–Sutherland-type Models,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A13, (1998)

    1998

  50. [58]

    Quantum fluctu- ations of the Chern–Simons theory and dynamical di- mensional reduction,

    I. Andri´ c, V. Bardek, and L. Jonke,“Quantum fluctu- ations of the Chern–Simons theory and dynamical di- mensional reduction,”Phys. Rev. D59, 107702 (1999)

    1999

  51. [59]

    Anyons in a tight wave- guide and the Tonks-Girardeau gas,

    N. Rougerie and Q. Yang,“Anyons in a tight wave- guide and the Tonks-Girardeau gas,”SciPost Phys. Core 6, 079 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Dimensional reduction for a system of 2D anyons,

    N. Rougerie and Q. Yang,“Dimensional reduction for a system of 2D anyons,”Ann. Henri Poincar´ e25, 4987– 5018 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    1D quasi-solutions of the 2D Chern-Simons-Schr¨ odinger system,

    N. Rougerie and Q. Yang,“1D quasi-solutions of the 2D Chern-Simons-Schr¨ odinger system,”arXiv:2508.21464

  54. [62]

    Dimensional reduction for anyons in the average-field approximation,

    Q. Yang,“Dimensional reduction for anyons in the average-field approximation,”arXiv:2511.03491

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Topological gauge fields and the composite particle du- ality,

    G. Valent ´ ı-Rojas, A. J. Baker, A. Celi, and P.¨Ohberg, “Topological gauge fields and the composite particle du- ality,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023128 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    A Lower-Dimensional Remnant of Flux Attachment,

    G. Valent ´ ı-Rojas and P.¨Ohberg,“A Lower-Dimensional Remnant of Flux Attachment,”arXiv:2412.03346

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer,

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt,“Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer,”Na- ture534, 516 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    U(1) Wilson lattice gauge the- ories in digital quantum simulators,

    C. Muschik, M. Heyl, E. Martinez, T. Monz, P. Schindler, B. Vogell, M. Dalmonte, P. Hauke, R. Blatt, and P. Zoller,“U(1) Wilson lattice gauge the- ories in digital quantum simulators,”New J. Phys.19, 103020 (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    Series ex- pansions for the massive Schwinger model in Hamilto- nian lattice theory,

    C. J. Hamer, Z. Weihong, and J. Oitmaa,“Series ex- pansions for the massive Schwinger model in Hamilto- nian lattice theory,”Phys. Rev. D56, 55 (1997)

    1997

  60. [68]

    Generating macroscopic-quantum-superposition states in momen- tum and internal-state space from Bose-Einstein con- densates with repulsive interactions,

    J. Higbie and D. M. Stamper-Kurn,“Generating macroscopic-quantum-superposition states in momen- tum and internal-state space from Bose-Einstein con- densates with repulsive interactions,”Phys. Rev. A69, 053605 (2004)

    2004

  61. [69]

    Raman processes and effective gauge potentials,

    I. B. Spielman,“Raman processes and effective gauge potentials,”Phys. Rev. A79, 063613 (2009)

    2009

  62. [70]

    Spin-Orbital-Angular-Momentum Cou- pled Bose-Einstein Condensates,

    H.-R. Chen, K.-Y. Lin, P.-K. Chen, N.-C. Chiu, J.-B. Wang, C.-A. Chen, P. Huang, S.-K. Yip, Y. Kawaguchi, and Y.-J. Lin,“Spin-Orbital-Angular-Momentum Cou- pled Bose-Einstein Condensates,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 113204 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Periodically Dressed Bose-Einstein Condensate: A Superfluid with an Anisotropic and Variable Critical Velocity,

    J. Higbie and D. M. Stamper-Kurn,“Periodically Dressed Bose-Einstein Condensate: A Superfluid with an Anisotropic and Variable Critical Velocity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 090401 (2002)

    2002

  64. [72]

    Spin–orbital-angular- momentum coupling in Bose-Einstein condensates,

    K. Sun, C. Qu, and C. Zhang,“Spin–orbital-angular- momentum coupling in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A91, 063627 (2015)

    2015

  65. [73]

    Kleinert,Multivalued Fields(World Scientific, 2008)

    H. Kleinert,Multivalued Fields(World Scientific, 2008)

    2008

  66. [74]

    Dynamical preparation of stripe states in spin-orbit-coupled gases,

    J. Cabedo, J. Claramunt, and A. Celi,“Dynamical preparation of stripe states in spin-orbit-coupled gases,” Phys. Rev. A104, L031305 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    Excited-state quantum phase transitions in spin-orbit-coupled Bose gases,

    J. Cabedo and A. Celi,“Excited-state quantum phase transitions in spin-orbit-coupled Bose gases,”Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043215 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    Interaction Control and Bright Solitons in Coherently Coupled Bose-Einstein Condensates,

    J. Sanz, A. Fr¨ olian, C. S. Chisholm, C. R. Cabrera, and L. Tarruell,“Interaction Control and Bright Solitons in Coherently Coupled Bose-Einstein Condensates,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 013201 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    XMDS2: Fast, scalable simulation of coupled stochastic partial differential equations,

    G. R. Dennis, J. J. Hope, and M. T. Johnsson, “XMDS2: Fast, scalable simulation of coupled stochastic partial differential equations,”Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 201 (2013)

    2013

  70. [78]

    Magnetic-field dependence 14 of Raman coupling in alkali-metal atoms,

    R. Wei and E. J. Mueller,“Magnetic-field dependence 14 of Raman coupling in alkali-metal atoms,”Phys. Rev. A87, 042514 (2013)

    2013

  71. [79]

    Optimal Persistent Currents for Interact- ing Bosons on a Ring with a Gauge Field,

    M. Cominotti, D. Rossini, M. Rizzi, F. Hekking, and A. Minguzzi,“Optimal Persistent Currents for Interact- ing Bosons on a Ring with a Gauge Field,”Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 025301 (2014)

    2014

  72. [80]

    Chiral currents in Bose-Einstein condensates subject to current-density interactions,

    M. Arazo, M. Guilleumas, R. Mayol, V. Delgado, and A. Mu˜ noz Mateo,“Chiral currents in Bose-Einstein condensates subject to current-density interactions,” Phys. Rev. A108, 053302 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    Bloch oscillations of a soliton in a one-dimensional quantum fluid,

    F. Rabec, G. Chauveau, G. Brochier, S. Nascimb` ene, J. Dalibard, and J. Beugnon,“Bloch oscillations of a soliton in a one-dimensional quantum fluid,”Nat. Phys. 21, 1541-1547 (2025)

    2025

  74. [82]

    Syn- thetic flux attachment,

    G. Valent ´ ı-Rojas, N. Westerberg, and P.¨Ohberg,“Syn- thetic flux attachment,”Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033453 (2020)

    2020

  75. [83]

    Floquet Flux Attachment in Cold Atomic Systems,

    H. Kamal, J. Kemp, Y.-C. He, Y. Fuji, M. Aidelsburger, P. Zoller, and N. Y. Yao,“Floquet Flux Attachment in Cold Atomic Systems,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 163403 (2024)

    2024

  76. [84]

    Quantum Simulation of an Extra Dimension,

    O. Boada, A. Celi, J. I. Latorre, and M. Lewenstein, “Quantum Simulation of an Extra Dimension,”Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 133001 (2012)

    2012

  77. [85]

    Syn- thetic Gauge Fields in Synthetic Dimensions,

    A. Celi, P. Massignan, J. Ruseckas, N. Goldman, I. B. Spielman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and M. Lewenstein,“Syn- thetic Gauge Fields in Synthetic Dimensions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 043001 (2014)

    2014

  78. [86]

    Syn- thetic dimensions for topological and quantum phases,

    J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo, U. Bhattacharya, A. Celi, R. W. Chhajlany, T. Grass, M. P lodzie´ n, D. Rakshit, T. Sala- mon, P. Stornati, L. Tarruell, and M. Lewenstein,“Syn- thetic dimensions for topological and quantum phases,” Commun. Phys.7, 143 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    Observation of chiral edge states with neutral fermions in synthetic Hall rib- bons,

    M. Mancini, G. Pagano, G. Cappellini, L. Livi, M. Rider, J. Catani, C. Sias, P. Zoller, M. Inguscio, M. Dalmonte, and L. Fallani,“Observation of chiral edge states with neutral fermions in synthetic Hall rib- bons,”Science349, 1510 (2015)

    2015

  80. [88]

    Visualizing edge states with an atomic Bose gas in the quantum Hall regime,

    B. K. Stuhl, H.-I. Lu, L. M. Aycock, D. Genkina, and I. B. Spielman,“Visualizing edge states with an atomic Bose gas in the quantum Hall regime,”Science349, 1514 (2015)

    2015

  81. [89]

    Synthetic Dimensions and Spin- Orbit Coupling with an Optical Clock Transition,

    L. F. Livi, G. Cappellini, M. Diem, L. Franchi, C. Cli- vati, M. Frittelli, F. Levi, D. Calonico, J. Catani, M. In- guscio, and L. Fallani,“Synthetic Dimensions and Spin- Orbit Coupling with an Optical Clock Transition,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 220401 (2016)

    2016

  82. [90]

    Spin–orbit-coupled fermions in an optical lattice clock,

    S. Kolkowitz, S. L. Bromley, T. Bothwell, M. L. Wall, G. E. Marti, A. Koller, X. Zhang, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye,“Spin–orbit-coupled fermions in an optical lattice clock,”Nature542, 66 (2017)

    2017

  83. [91]

    Realization of an atomic quantum Hall system in four dimensions,

    J.-B. Bouhiron, A. Fabre, Q. Liu, Q. Redon, N. Mittal, T. Satoor, R. Lopes, and S. Nascimbene,“Realization of an atomic quantum Hall system in four dimensions,” Science384, 223 (2024)

    2024

  84. [92]

    Laughlin ’s Topological Charge Pump in an Atomic Hall Cylinder,

    A. Fabre, J.-B. Bouhiron, T. Satoor, R. Lopes, and S. Nascimbene,“Laughlin ’s Topological Charge Pump in an Atomic Hall Cylinder,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 173202 (2022)

    2022

  85. [93]

    Obser- vation of universal Hall response in strongly interacting fermions,

    T.-W. Zhou, G. Cappellini, D. Tusi, L. Franchi, J. Par- ravicini, C. Repellin, S. Greschner, M. Inguscio, T. Gia- marchi, M. Filippone, J. Catani, and L. Fallani,“Obser- vation of universal Hall response in strongly interacting fermions,”Science381, 427 (2023)

    2023

  86. [94]

    Anyon Hubbard Model in One-Dimensional Optical Lattices,

    S. Greschner and L. Santos,“Anyon Hubbard Model in One-Dimensional Optical Lattices,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 053002 (2015)

    2015

  87. [95]

    Ground-state prop- erties of anyons in a one-dimensional lattice,

    G. Tang, S. Eggert, and A. Pelster,“Ground-state prop- erties of anyons in a one-dimensional lattice,”New J. Phys.17, 123016 (2015)

    2015

  88. [96]

    Floquet Realization and Signatures of One-Dimensional Anyons in an Optical Lattice,

    C. Str¨ ater, S. C. L. Srivastava, and A. Eckardt,“Floquet Realization and Signatures of One-Dimensional Anyons in an Optical Lattice,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 205303 (2016)

    2016

  89. [97]

    Ground-state properties of the one-dimensional unconstrained pseudo-anyon Hubbard model,

    W. Zhang, S. Greschner, E. Fan, T. C. Scott, and Y. Zhang,“Ground-state properties of the one-dimensional unconstrained pseudo-anyon Hubbard model,”Phys. Rev. A95, 053614 (2017)

    2017

  90. [98]

    Probing the exchange statistics of one-dimensional anyon models,

    S. Greschner, L. Cardarelli, and L. Santos,“Probing the exchange statistics of one-dimensional anyon models,” Phys. Rev. A97, 053605 (2018)

    2018

  91. [99]

    Quantum simulation of non-trivial topology,

    O. Boada, A. Celi, J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Laguna, J. I. Latorre, and M. Lewenstein,“Quantum simulation of non-trivial topology,”New J. Phys.17, 045007 (2015)

    2015

  92. [100]

    Correlation functions of one-dimensional anyonic fluids,

    P. Calabrese and M. Mintchev,“Correlation functions of one-dimensional anyonic fluids,”Phys. Rev. B75, 233104 (2007)

    2007

  93. [101]

    Cold atom dynamics in non-Abelian gauge fields,

    A. Jacob, P. Ohberg, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and L. Santos, “Cold atom dynamics in non-Abelian gauge fields,” Appl. Phys. B89, 439–445 (2007)

    2007

  94. [102]

    DiBenedetto,Partial Differential Equations: Second Edition, Cornerstones (Birkh¨ auser Boston, 2009)

    E. DiBenedetto,Partial Differential Equations: Second Edition, Cornerstones (Birkh¨ auser Boston, 2009). Appendix A: The dimensional reduction In this Section, we detail some passages for the dimensional reduction procedure. The total derivative produced byL CS due to a local ...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.