Dimensional reduction for anyons in the average-field approximation

Qiyun Yang

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Dimensional reduction for anyons in the average-field approximation

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a 2D gas of almost-bosonic anyons in the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger mean-field model, when squeezed by a strong anisotropic harmonic trap, effectively behaves in the loose direction as a 1D quintic nonlinear Schrödinger

desk verdict Energy-level reduction to 1D quintic NLS is rigorously proven; the dynamics result hinges on an unproven uniform-in-ε Σ² well-posedness assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.03491 v2 pith:757R3QHT submitted 2025-11-05 math.AP cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gasmath-phmath.MP

Qiyun Yang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gasmath-phmath.MP MSC 35Q5535Q40

keywords anyonsChern-Simons-Schrödingermean-fieldapproximationdimensionalreductionquinticNLSanisotropictrapgroundstateenergyconfinement

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies abelian anyons at the almost-bosonic mean-field level, described by the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger (CSS) equation, under a strongly anisotropic harmonic trap that squeezes the gas in one direction. The main result is that the effective 1D model in the loose direction is the quintic defocusing NLS equation: the 2D ground-state energy equals the transverse oscillator energy plus the 1D quintic NLS energy in the limit ε→0, and, given a factorized initial state, the 2D dynamics converge to the product of the transverse ground state and the 1D quintic NLS solution. This gives a rigorous derivation of a confinement-induced dimensional reduction for a gauge-coupled nonlinear Schrödinger system. It also implies that the mean-field and dimensional-reduction limits do not commute, leaving an open critical regime between them.

What carries the argument

The key object is the gauge phase S(x,y) = arctan(y/x), whose gradient decomposes the magnetic vector potential as ∇S = A − T, where T is a vector field with a single non-vanishing component in x, given by a sign-function kernel. This gauge transformation simplifies the nonlocal CSS interaction into a local-looking term after integration against the transverse harmonic oscillator ground state u_ε. The decisive identities are the integrals of the function f(y) = ∫ sgn(y−ν)u_ε^2(ν)dν: ∫ f u_ε^2 = 0 and ∫ f^2 u_ε^2 = 1/3, which turn the x-current and gauge-field couplings into the quintic nonlinearity with coefficient π^2β^2. The same phase ansatz yields the energy upper bound, while the lower

What would settle it

Check whether the Σ^2 norm of the solution to the rescaled IVP (1.13) with a smooth initial datum remains bounded uniformly in ε on a fixed time interval; if it diverges (e.g., like 1/ε), Assumption 1.5 fails and the dynamics theorem collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the exact cancellation that occurs when the phase factor e^{-iβS[|φ|^2 u_ε^2]} is removed from the CSS dynamics: the singular magnetic vector potential A is replaced by a simpler field T whose only non-vanishing component is in the x direction and whose convolution with the transverse ground state produces a local quintic term. As a result, integrating out the tight y-direction leaves a closed 1D equation for φ, i∂_tφ = −∂_x^2φ + |x|^2φ + π^2β^2|φ|^4φ. The proof shows this limit rigorously at the level of ground-state energies (Theorem 1.2) and of time-dependent solutions (Theorem 1.6), the latter under an H^2 well-posedness assumption on the rescaled 2D dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The dynamics theorem depends on an unproved H^2 well-posedness assumption: the rescaled 2D initial-value problem must have a unique solution that is uniformly bounded in a weighted Sobolev space Σ^2 for all ε small; without this bound, the ε^{1/4} convergence rate is not justified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the energy theorem holds, the low-energy sector of the trapped 2D anyon gas is asymptotically described by the 1D quintic NLS, so any effective 1D theory for almost-bosonic anyons must reproduce the same energy functional to leading order.
Given the factorized initial data, the 2D dynamics remains within O(ε^{1/4}) in L2 of the product ansatz for times up to T0, which justifies the use of the product ansatz in quasi-1D cold-atom anyon experiments.
The ground states themselves converge to the product form in L^p on transverse strips of width √ε (Theorem 1.3), showing the reduction holds at the level of states as well as energies.
The dimensional reduction does not commute with the mean-field limit: the 1D quintic NLS retains the coupling β, whereas the many-body Tonks-Girardeau limit from previous work does not, so a critical intermediate regime is identified as an open problem.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step would be a systematic expansion in ε to compute correction terms (e.g., an effective mass renormalization or a quartic term) to the leading-order quintic NLS; this could be tested numerically against the full 2D model.
The same gauge-phase reduction may apply to other Chern-Simons-type couplings, such as non-abelian gauge fields or dipolar interactions, whenever the vector potential can be decomposed into a gradient plus a transverse sign-function kernel.
The critical regime where β is scaled with ε could be probed by joint asymptotics; a plausible guess is that an effective 1D model interpolates between the quintic NLS and the Tonks-Girardeau gas, but this remains to be derived.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read this if you care about the mean-field anyon to NLS limit. The paper proves a real theorem: the anisotropic confinement limit of the 2D Chern–Simons–Schrödinger ground state energy, minus the transverse oscillator energy, converges to the 1D quintic NLS energy. The upper bound is exact — the phase factor S[ρ] cancels the bad part of the gauge field and the y-integrations give the π²β² coefficient from identities like ∫f²u² = 1/3. The lower bound uses a gauge reduction, spectral decomposition, and weighted Sobolev compactness. It is coherent and detailed, and I did not find a circular step or any fitted parameter. That part stands.

The dynamics half is a conditional theorem. Theorem 1.6 assumes Assumption 1.5: uniform-in-ε Σ² well-posedness of the rescaled CSS equation. The paper is upfront that it is an assumption and cites [10] for confidence. But the assumption is central. Every estimate in Section 3 — projection error, anisotropic embeddings, the h_ε bound — uses the uniform Σ² bound. The stress-test note is right that this is structurally distinct from the dimensional reduction and is not proven. The fast harmonic-oscillator phase e^{-itH_y/ε} does not commute with the nonlinearity, so the uniform bound is not automatic from energy conservation. If that bound fails, the ε^{1/4} rate collapses. So the paper's advertised dynamical result is not yet an unconditional theorem.

The paper also sharpens the mean-field/dimensional-reduction non-commutation: the 1D limit depends on β whereas the TG gas limit does not. That is a nice conceptual point, and it connects to the earlier work [35,36].

Who is this for? Anyone working on dimensional reduction of gauge-coupled NLS-type systems, or on anyon mean-field limits. The energy theorem alone is worth a serious referee. The dynamics section is a conditional proof of a plausible result, and the assumption is clearly stated — a good referee will ask the author to prove it or weaken it. The paper deserves peer review, not desk rejection. I'd bring it to a reading group, though I'd flag the assumption before reading.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the 2D Chern–Simons–Schrödinger (CSS) mean-field anyon model with anisotropic trap V_ε = |x|^2 + ε^{-2} y^2. It proves that, after subtracting the transverse harmonic-oscillator energy e_ε = 1/ε, the ground-state energy converges to the energy of the 1D quintic defocusing NLS with potential |x|^2 and coupling π^2 β^2 (Theorem 1.2). It also proves, under Assumption 1.5 (a uniform-in-ε Σ² well-posedness bound for the rescaled IVP (1.13)), that the dynamics starting from the natural ansatz converges to the tensor product of the 1D NLS solution and the transverse ground state, with rate ε^{1/4} for the rescaled solution (Theorem 1.6). The energy proof combines an exact upper bound via gauge transformation and a lower bound via energy decoupling, localization, compactness, and weighted Sobolev spaces. The dynamics proof uses spectral projection onto the transverse ground state, estimates of the projection error and nonlinearity differences, and Strichartz estimates.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a rigorous derivation of a 1D effective model for confined almost-bosonic anyons, showing that the quintic NLS emerges as the low-energy limit. The energy result is unconditional and appears to be correct; the computations are transparent and involve no fitted parameters. The dynamics result is a detailed conditional proof that would become a theorem if Assumption 1.5 is proved. The paper also addresses the non-commutation of the mean-field and dimensional-reduction limits, as the 1D limit depends on β, unlike the Tonks–Girardeau limit of the many-body model. This is a useful contribution to the active area of dimensional reduction in interacting quantum systems.

major comments (1)

[Section 1.3, Assumption 1.5] This assumption is the linchpin of the dynamical result Theorem 1.6. It is used in Lemma 3.5 (via the conservation-of-energy estimate), Lemma 3.6 (anisotropic Sobolev embeddings), Proposition 3.4 (L^8 bound on φ_ε), and Proposition 3.7 (the h_ε estimate). No proof is provided; the text only cites [10] and states confidence. The singular term ε^{-1}H_y in (1.13) makes a uniform-in-ε Σ² bound nontrivial: standard local well-posedness for CSS may yield existence times or norms depending on ε, and the fast oscillator phase e^{-itH_y/ε} does not commute with the nonlinearity. If Assumption 1.5 fails, the ε^{1/4} convergence in Theorem 3.2/1.6 collapses, although Theorem 1.2 remains valid. I recommend that the authors either prove (a sufficient part of) Assumption 1.5, or explicitly mark Theorem 1.6 as conditional on an open problem and adjust the abstract accordingly.

minor comments (5)

[Section 2.2, Proposition 2.3] The proposition is stated for arbitrary real vector fields A, but the proof and the application (where A = βT has no y-component) require A_y = 0. As stated, the identity is false for general A because the y-cross terms do not cancel. Please add the hypothesis that the y-component of A vanishes, or correct the statement.
[Section 3.2, Lemma 3.5] The conservation of the energy functional \tilde E_ε^{2D} for the rescaled equation (1.13) is used without proof. This is standard but should be briefly justified or referenced, since the functional differs from the original energy after gauge transformation and rescaling.
[Theorem 1.6, final step] The convergence of the phase-correction term is attributed to the dominated convergence theorem, but the uniformity in t is not immediate. A short argument using |S| ≤ π/2 and the L^2 bounds above would make the proof complete.
[General] Typos and notation issues: 'Introduciton' in the table of contents; 'exponnent' in Appendix D; inconsistent use of \tilde φ_R vs \tilde φ_ε notations in Section 2.2.
[Lemma 3.6] The use of Sobolev embedding H^1(ℝ^2) ⊂ L^8(ℝ^2) is valid in two dimensions, but it would be helpful to state this explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the energy limit is an unconditional variational computation and the dynamics result is an explicitly conditional convergence theorem.

full rationale

The derivation chain in Theorem 1.2 is self-contained at the level of the claimed result. The upper bound uses the trial state (1.9) and exact identities (2.4), giving ∫ f u_ε² = 0 and ∫ f² u_ε² = 1/3, so the 1D quintic coefficient 1/3 π²β² is computed, not fitted; β and e_ε = 1/ε are inputs. The lower bound rewrites an arbitrary ground state through a gauge change and Proposition 2.3, localizes and rescales, then passes to the limit with compactness and Fatou, yielding liminf (E_ε^{2D} − e_ε) ≥ E^{1D}. No parameter is fitted and the lower bound does not assume the 1D limit. Proposition 2.3 is cited to the authors' earlier [36, Proposition 4.2], but it is a stated energy-decoupling identity used as a technical tool, not a self-citation used to establish the 1D limit; no uniqueness or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. For the dynamics, Theorem 1.6 is explicitly conditional on Assumption 1.5, which is stated as an assumption rather than proven. The estimates in Lemmas 3.5–3.6 and Propositions 3.4 and 3.7 use this uniform Σ² bound; if Assumption 1.5 fails, the ε^{1/4} convergence in Theorem 1.6 is unsupported. However, this is an unproven hypothesis/limitation, not a circular definition or a fitted input called a prediction. The initial datum is chosen in the ansatz form, but the theorem proves the propagation of that ansatz through projection estimates, Strichartz estimates, and Duhamel estimates, so the conclusion does not reduce by construction to the initial condition. No circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a derivation with no fitted constants: the 1D quintic NLS coefficients (1/3 and 2/3) are computed from exact moment identities of the transverse ground state; β is a fixed model input. The main unproved ingredient is Assumption 1.5 on uniform-in-ε H² well-posedness, plus standard background results and two imported lemmas from prior work ([32, Appendix A], [36, Prop 4.2]). No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper Assumption 1.5: the rescaled IVP (1.13) has a unique solution φ_ε ∈ C([0,T0],Σ²(ℝ²)) uniformly bounded in ε∈(0,ε0].
Underpins all estimates in Section 3.2 (Lemmas 3.5–3.6, Propositions 3.4, 3.7) and hence Theorem 1.6; the authors state they are confident based on [10] but do not prove it.
domain assumption Existence of L²-normalized minimizers for the 2D CSS energy functional (1.1).
Invoked at the start of Section 2.2 followed by a reference to [32, Appendix A]. Needed to define Ψ in the lower-bound proof.
domain assumption Energy decoupling identity (Proposition 2.3).
Borrowed from [36, Proposition 4.2]; used to decompose the 2D energy into the transverse harmonic oscillator energy and the effective 1D energy.
standard math Strichartz estimates for the 1D harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian H_x (Theorem D.2).
Imported from Cazenave [12]; used in the Duhamel argument in Section 3.2.
standard math Diamagnetic inequality, Sobolev embeddings, Jensen and Grönwall inequalities.
Used throughout Sections 2 and 3 as background tools.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dimensional reduction for anyons in the average-field approximation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/757R3QHT

@misc{pith2026251103491,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dimensional reduction for anyons in the average-field approximation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/757R3QHT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.03491}
}

abstract

We study abelian anyons at the mean-field/almost-bosonic level, whose dynamics are governed by the Chern-Simons-Schr\"odinger system. We consider the dimensional reduction of this 2D model by introducing an anisotropic trapping potential, and derive an effective 1D model after tracing out the tight confinement direction. The resulting effective dynamics in the loose confinement direction is captured by a quintic defocusing nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation. We rigorously establish this dimensional reduction process in the sense of ground state energies and time-dependent solutions, under an $H^2$ well-posedness assumption.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.03491 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Encoding a topological gauge theory on a ring-shaped Raman-coupled Bose gas
cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A ring-shaped Raman-coupled Bose gas is shown to encode the chiral BF topological gauge theory, with density-dependent magnetic flux producing quantized currents and chiral sound.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[10]

Nonlinearity, 8, 235-253, 1995

L.BERGÉ, A.DEBOUARD ANDJ.-C.SAUT,Blowinguptime-dependentsolutionsoftheplanarChern- Simons gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Nonlinearity, 8, 235-253, 1995

1995
[1]

AFTALION ANDX

A. AFTALION ANDX. BLANC,Reduced energy functionals for a three-dimensional fast rotat- ing Bose-Einstein condensate. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire, 25(2), 339-355, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.11.011

work page doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.11.011 2008
[2]

A.ATAEI,AsharpconditiononglobalwellposednessofChern–Simons–Schrödingerequation.Preprint,
[3]

ATAEI,Existence and uniqueness of solutions to Liouville equation

A. ATAEI,Existence and uniqueness of solutions to Liouville equation. Preprint, 2025. arXiv:2501.18234

arXiv 2025
[4]

ATAEI, T

A. ATAEI, T. GIRARDOT ANDD. LUNDHOLM,MicroscopicderivationofthestationaryChern-Simons- Schrödinger equation for almost-bosonic anyons. Preprint, 2025. arXiv:2504.17488

arXiv 2025
[5]

Preprint, 2024

A.ATAEI,D.LUNDHOLM,ANDD.-T.NGUYEN,AgeneralizedLiouvilleequationandmagneticstability. Preprint, 2024. arXiv:2404.09332

arXiv 2024
[6]

W. BAO, L. LETREUST ANDF. MÉHATS,Dimension reduction for anisotropic Bose-Einstein condensates in the strong interaction regime. Nonlinearity, 28(3), 755-772, 2015. doi:10.1088/0951- 7715/28/3/755

doi:10.1088/0951- 2015
[7]

W. BAO, L. LETREUST ANDF. MÉHATS,Dimension reduction for dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates inthestronginteractionregime.Kinet.Relat.Models,10(3),553-571,2017.doi:10.3934/krm.2017022

work page doi:10.3934/krm.2017022 2017

Show all 46 references

[8]

BENABDALLAH, F

N. BENABDALLAH, F. CASTELLA ANDF. MÉHATS,Time averaging for the strongly confined non- linearSchrödingerequation,usingalmost-periodicity.J.DifferentialEquations,245(1),154-200,2008. doi:10.1016/j.jde.2008.02.002

2008 doi
[9]

BENABDALLAH, F

N. BENABDALLAH, F. MÉHATS, C. SCHMEISER ANDR. M. WEISHÄUPL,The nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a strongly anisotropic harmonic potential. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 37(1), 189-199, 2005. doi:10.1137/040614554

2005 doi
[11]

BREZIS,Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations

H. BREZIS,Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations. Universitext, Springer, New York, 2010. ISBN: 978-0-387-70913-0

2010
[12]

CAZENAVE,Semilinear Schrödinger Equations

T. CAZENAVE,Semilinear Schrödinger Equations. Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Courant In- stitute of Mathematical Sciences and American Mathematical Society, New York–Providence, 2003. ISBN: 0-8218-3399-5

2003
[13]

C. S. CHISHOLM, A. FRÖLIAN, E. NERI, R. RAMOS, L. TARRUELL ANDA. CELI,Encoding a one- dimensional topological gauge theory in a Raman-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Res., 4(4), 043088, 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043088

2022 doi
[14]

CHITRA ANDD

R. CHITRA ANDD. SEN,Ground state of many anyons in a harmonic potential. Phys. Rev. B, 46, 10923-10930, 1992

1992
[15]

Europhys

M.CORREGGI,R.DUBOSCQ,N.ROUGERIE ANDD.LUNDHOLM,Vortexpatternsinthealmost-bosonic anyon gas. Europhys. Lett., 126, 20005, 2019

2019
[16]

M.CORREGGI,D.LUNDHOLM ANDN.ROUGERIE,Localdensityapproximationforthealmost-bosonic anyon gas. Anal. PDE, 10(5), 1169-1200, 2017. doi:10.2140/apde.2017.10.1169

2017 doi
[17]

DALIBARD, F

J. DALIBARD, F. GERBIER, G. JUZELI¯UNAS ANDP.ÖHBERG,Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys., 83, 1523, 2011

2011
[18]

M.J.EDMONDS,M.VALIENTE,G.JUZELI ¯UNAS,L.SANTOS ANDP.ÖHBERG,Simulatinganinteracting gauge theory with ultracold Bose gases. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 085301, 2013

2013
[19]

L. C. EVANS,Partial Differential Equations. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 19, 2nd edition, American Mathematical Society, 2010

2010
[20]

FOURNAIS ANDB

S. FOURNAIS ANDB. HELFFER,Spectral Methods in Surface Superconductivity. Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2010. ISBN: 978-0-8176-4796-4

2010
[21]

FRÖLIAN, C

A. FRÖLIAN, C. S. CHISHOLM, E. NERI, C. R. CABRERA, R. RAMOS, A. CELI ANDL. TARRUELL, Realizing a 1D topological gauge theory in an optically dressed BEC. Nature, 608, 293-297, 2022. 34 Q. YANG

2022
[22]

T.GIRARDOT,Averagefieldapproximationforalmostbosonicanyonsinamagneticfield.J.Math.Phys., 61, 071901, 2020

2020
[23]

GIRARDOT ANDJ

T. GIRARDOT ANDJ. LEE,DerivationoftheChern-Simons-Schrödingerequationfromthedynamicsof an almost bosonic-anyon gas. Preprint, 2024. arXiv:2412.13080

2024 arXiv
[24]

IACOVELLI, J

C. IACOVELLI, J. CABEDO, L. TARRUELL ANDA. CELI,Encoding a topological gauge theory on a ring-shaped Raman-coupled Bose gas. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2510.06089, 2025. arXiv:2510.06089

2025 arXiv
[25]

J. K. JAIN,Composite Fermions. Cambridge University Press, 2007

2007
[26]

KEEL ANDT

M. KEEL ANDT. TAO,Endpoint Strichartz estimates. Amer. J. Math., 120(5), 955-980, 1998

1998
[27]

KHARE,Fractional Statistics and Quantum Theory

A. KHARE,Fractional Statistics and Quantum Theory. 2nd edition, World Scientific, Singapore, 2005

2005
[28]

LEWIN,Describing lack of compactness in Sobolev spaces

M. LEWIN,Describing lack of compactness in Sobolev spaces. Master thesis, Variational Methods in Quantum Mechanics, France, 2010. hal-02450559v1

2010
[29]

E. H. LIEB, R. SEIRINGER, J. P. SOLOVEJ ANDJ. YNGVASON,The Mathematics of the Bose Gas and Its Condensation. Oberwolfach Seminars, Birkhäuser, 2005

2005
[30]

B. LIU, P. SMITH,ANDD. TATARU,Local wellposedness of Chern–Simons–Schrödinger.Int. Math. Res. Not., 23, 6341–6398, 2014. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnt101

2014 doi
[31]

LOPEZ ANDE

A. LOPEZ ANDE. FRADKIN,Fractional quantum Hall effect and Chern-Simons gauge theories. Phys. Rev. B, 44, 5246-5262, 1991. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.5246

1991 doi
[32]

LUNDHOLM ANDN

D. LUNDHOLM ANDN. ROUGERIE,The average field approximation for almost bosonic extended anyons. J. Stat. Phys., 161, 1236-1267, 2015

2015
[33]

LUNDHOLM ANDN

D. LUNDHOLM ANDN. ROUGERIE,EmergenceoffractionalstatisticsfortracerparticlesinaLaughlin liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 170401, 2016

2016
[34]

MÉHATS ANDC

F. MÉHATS ANDC. SPARBER,Dimension reduction for rotating Bose-Einstein conden- sates with anisotropic confinement. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 36(9), 5097-5118, 2016. doi:10.3934/dcds.2016021

2016 doi
[35]

Core, 6, 079, 2023

N.ROUGERIE ANDQ.YANG,Anyonsinatightwave-guideandtheTonks-Girardeaugas.SciPostPhys. Core, 6, 079, 2023. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.4.079

2023 doi
[36]

ROUGERIE ANDQ

N. ROUGERIE ANDQ. YANG,Dimensional reduction for a system of 2D anyons. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 25(11), 4987-5018, 2024. doi:10.1007/s00023-024-01417-2

2024 doi
[37]

ROUGERIE ANDQ

N. ROUGERIE ANDQ. YANG,1D quasi-solutions of the 2D Chern-Simons-Schrödinger system. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2508.21464, 2025. arXiv:2508.21464

2025
[38]

E. M. STEIN,Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions. Princeton Mathematical Series, Princeton University Press, Princeton (N.J.), 1970. ISBN: 978-0-691-08079-6

1970
[39]

VALENTÍ-ROJAS ANDP.ÖHBERG,A lower-dimensional remnant of flux attachment

G. VALENTÍ-ROJAS ANDP.ÖHBERG,A lower-dimensional remnant of flux attachment. Preprint, 2024. arXiv:2412.03346

2024 arXiv
[40]

G.VALENTÍ-ROJAS, N.WESTERBERG ANDP.ÖHBERG,Syntheticfluxattachment.Phys.Rev.Research, 2, 033453, 2020

2020
[41]

VISCONTI,Average-field approximation for very dilute almost-bosonic anyon gases

F. VISCONTI,Average-field approximation for very dilute almost-bosonic anyon gases. Preprint, 2025. arXiv:2507.01102

2025 arXiv
[42]

WILCZEK,Fractional Statistics and Anyon Superconductivity

F. WILCZEK,Fractional Statistics and Anyon Superconductivity. World Scientific, Singapore, 1990

1990
[43]

S. C. ZHANG,The Chern-Simons-Landau-Ginzburg theory of the fractional quantum Hall effect. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 6, 25-58, 1992. doi:10.1142/S0217979292000037

1992 doi
[44]

S. C. ZHANG, T. H. HANSSON ANDS. K. KIVELSON,Effective-field-theory model for the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 82-85, 1989. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.82

1989 doi
[45]

ZHANG, G

Y. ZHANG, G. J. SREEJITH, N. D. GEMELKE ANDJ. K. JAIN,Fractional angular momentum in cold atom systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 160404, 2014

2014
[46]

ZHANG, G

Y. ZHANG, G. J. SREEJITH ANDJ. K. JAIN,Creating and manipulating non-Abelian anyons in cold atom systems using auxiliary bosons. Phys. Rev. B, 92, 075116, 2015. DIMENSIONAL REDUCTION FOR ANYONS IN THE AVERAGE-FIELD APPROXIMATION 35 ECOLENORMALESUPÉRIEURE DELYON, UMPA (UMR 5669...

2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [10]

Nonlinearity, 8, 235-253, 1995

L.BERGÉ, A.DEBOUARD ANDJ.-C.SAUT,Blowinguptime-dependentsolutionsoftheplanarChern- Simons gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Nonlinearity, 8, 235-253, 1995

1995

[2] [1]

AFTALION ANDX

A. AFTALION ANDX. BLANC,Reduced energy functionals for a three-dimensional fast rotat- ing Bose-Einstein condensate. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire, 25(2), 339-355, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.11.011

work page doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.11.011 2008

[3] [2]

A.ATAEI,AsharpconditiononglobalwellposednessofChern–Simons–Schrödingerequation.Preprint,

[4] [3]

ATAEI,Existence and uniqueness of solutions to Liouville equation

A. ATAEI,Existence and uniqueness of solutions to Liouville equation. Preprint, 2025. arXiv:2501.18234

arXiv 2025

[5] [4]

ATAEI, T

A. ATAEI, T. GIRARDOT ANDD. LUNDHOLM,MicroscopicderivationofthestationaryChern-Simons- Schrödinger equation for almost-bosonic anyons. Preprint, 2025. arXiv:2504.17488

arXiv 2025

[6] [5]

Preprint, 2024

A.ATAEI,D.LUNDHOLM,ANDD.-T.NGUYEN,AgeneralizedLiouvilleequationandmagneticstability. Preprint, 2024. arXiv:2404.09332

arXiv 2024

[7] [6]

W. BAO, L. LETREUST ANDF. MÉHATS,Dimension reduction for anisotropic Bose-Einstein condensates in the strong interaction regime. Nonlinearity, 28(3), 755-772, 2015. doi:10.1088/0951- 7715/28/3/755

doi:10.1088/0951- 2015

[8] [7]

W. BAO, L. LETREUST ANDF. MÉHATS,Dimension reduction for dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates inthestronginteractionregime.Kinet.Relat.Models,10(3),553-571,2017.doi:10.3934/krm.2017022

work page doi:10.3934/krm.2017022 2017