Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Reservoir-Engineered Low-Threshold Quantum Energy Storage

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a dissipatively coupled charger–battery pair, after eliminating a fast lossy mediator, crosses a stability threshold and charges exponentially under bounded drive, with about 61% lower critical pump power than a coher

desk verdict The body is a clean linear-stability analysis, but the abstract's pump-power and two-photon claims don't survive contact with the model. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.20569 v2 pith:NLGFWOBQ submitted 2025-11-25 quant-ph

Borhan Ahmadi , André H. A. Malavazi , Pawe{l} Mazurek , Pawe{l} Horodecki , Shabir Barzanjeh This is my paper
classification quant-ph PACS 03.65.Yz
keywords quantumbatteryreservoirengineeringexceptionalpointstabilitythresholddissipativecouplingadiabaticeliminationexponentialchargingopensystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that a quantum battery can be charged exponentially fast using only passive reservoir engineering — a lossy auxiliary mode mediating the interaction between charger and storage — without any gain medium or non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. The key claim is that eliminating the fast mediator yields a two-mode drift matrix whose eigenvalues can develop a positive growth rate above a pump-dependent threshold. Below threshold the battery energy saturates; at the exceptional point it grows polynomially; above threshold it grows exponentially, and the paper reports that this broken regime is reached at about 61% lower critical pump power than a coherent beam-splitter benchmark. If true, this gives a completely positive, thermodynamically consistent route to fast, pump-efficient, and coherently extractable quantum energy storage.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective two-mode drift matrix H_r = [[δ_r − iγ_a, i], [i, −δ_r − iγ_b]], obtained by adiabatically eliminating a fast, lossy mediator mode c that is coupled to the charger and battery through shared reservoirs. The off-diagonal entries are purely imaginary, encoding a dissipative coupling; the diagonal contains detunings and renormalized damping rates that include negative interference terms from the eliminated mode. The eigenvalues λ± = −i(α + γ_b) ± i√(1 + (α + iδ_r)²) control the dynamics: when Re[−iλ₊] changes sign, the system crosses from stable saturation to exponential growth, and at the special point where the eigenvalues and eigenvectors coalesce, the dyn

What would settle it

Run the full three-mode Lindblad master equation with finite mediator damping κ_c and check whether the exponential growth rate matches 2(|Ω| − γ) and whether the threshold pump amplitude coincides with the reduced model's prediction as κ_c is varied; if the transition shifts, smears, or disappears when the adiabatic condition is not strongly satisfied, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that reservoir engineering alone — no gain medium, no non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, and no carefully balanced loss — can realize exceptional-point physics in a fully passive open quantum system, and that this yields a practical fast-charging regime for quantum batteries. In the reduced two-mode description, the drift matrix has eigenvalues that violate the stability condition above a pump-dependent threshold; below threshold the battery occupation saturates, at the exceptional point it grows polynomially, and above threshold it grows exponentially as e^{2(|Ω|−γ)t}. For the parameters studied, entering this broken regime requires roughly 61% less critical pump power than a c

Load-bearing premise

The whole reduced two-mode description—including the broken-regime threshold and the exponential growth rate—rests on the mediator mode being so lossy that it can be adiabatically eliminated; if the mediator is not much faster than the charger and battery, the two-mode model and the claimed 61% power saving may not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Charging can be made exponential in time by crossing a pump-induced stability threshold, with growth rate set by 2(|Ω| − γ), while remaining within a completely positive, trace-preserving open-system description.
  • The threshold pump power is about 61% lower than a coherent beam-splitter benchmark at equal effective coupling, opening a pump-power window in which the dissipative battery charges exponentially while the coherent benchmark remains below threshold.
  • In the broken regime, growth is dominated by a seed-selected coherent displacement of the battery, so a large fraction of the stored energy is directly extractable by a displacement operation rather than locked in incoherent fluctuations.
  • A simple safety protocol is available: applying a detuning pulse at a critical time t_crit shifts the system back to the stable phase and locks in the stored energy, with the critical time set by the net gain 2(|Ω| − γ).
  • The mechanism is compatible with optomechanical, superconducting, and magnonic platforms, all of which have the engineered reservoirs needed to realize the dissipative coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves charging efficiency and extractable work (ergotropy) unquantified; a natural extension is to check what fraction of the exponentially stored energy becomes usable work once the drive is switched off and the system is decoupled.
  • Because the instability is linear, any real device will saturate through nonlinearities or pump depletion; the practical promise therefore depends on how precisely the exponential phase can be arrested near a target energy, which the safety-protocol discussion begins but does not fully model.
  • The dissipative-interference mechanism belongs to the same physical family as optomechanical backaction and reservoir-engineered amplification, so the broken-regime idea may transfer to quantum-limited amplification or enhanced sensing without gain media — a connection the paper mentions but does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a three-mode open quantum system consisting of a charger a, a battery b, and a strongly damped mediator c, with a linear coherent drive on a. After adiabatic elimination of c, the authors obtain a two-mode drift matrix H_r (Eq. 2) whose eigenvalues can enter a 'broken' phase where the battery occupation grows exponentially (Eq. 7). The paper claims this realizes a 'pump-induced' stability threshold, and that the dissipative architecture reaches the broken regime at about 61% lower critical pump power than a coherent beam-splitter benchmark, with the full three-mode Lindblad model confirming the reduced description.

Significance. The linear-algebra derivation is clean and internally consistent: the eigenvalue calculation (Eqs. 20–21), the exact solution (Eq. 30), and the stability classification are correct and parameter-free. The idea of using dissipative interference rather than explicit gain to create a broken-phase charging regime is worth exploring for quantum batteries. However, the manuscript's headline claims are not supported by the model. The stability boundary is independent of the drive amplitude, so the notion of a 'critical pump power' is undefined, and the 61% comparison with an unspecified benchmark cannot be verified. These are load-bearing problems, not presentation issues.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; The Model (Eqs. 1, 2, 8, 21)] The abstract's central claim of a 'pump-induced stability threshold' is contradicted by the model. The drive amplitude E appears only in the inhomogeneous term (E_r,0) of Eq. (1)/(17); the drift matrix H_r (Eq. 2) contains no E_r, and the eigenvalues (Eq. 21) depend only on δ_r, α, and γ_b. The boundary Re[-iλ_+]=0 shown in Fig. 3 is therefore independent of the pump amplitude. For any fixed parameter set the system is either stable or unstable for all drive strengths, so a 'critical pump power' is not a well-defined quantity and the 61% power reduction quoted in the abstract has no meaning in this model. In addition, the abstract describes a 'two-photon-driven charger,' but Eq. (8) contains only a linear drive E(â†+â); no parametric (two-photon) term appears anywhere.
  2. [Abstract; entire manuscript] The coherent beam-splitter charger–battery benchmark used for the 61% comparison is never defined, derived, or referenced in the main text or the Supplementary Materials. There is no statement of its Hamiltonian, its effective coupling, its loss rates, or how 'equal effective coupling' is enforced. Without this benchmark the quantitative claim cannot be reproduced or checked. This is not a minor omission: it is the advertised quantitative advantage of the protocol.
  3. [Supplementary Eq. (13); Abstract] The abstract states that 'the full three-mode Lindblad model confirms the reduced description in the fast-mediator regime,' but no numerical or analytical confirmation involving the full three-mode dynamics appears anywhere in the manuscript or supplementary material. Only the adiabatic-elimination condition (κ_c+Γ_c ≫ κ_{a,b}+Γ_{a,b}, |δ_{a,b}|) is stated. The reader cannot assess the validity of the reduction, especially when the effective damping γ_j can become negative. Please provide a direct comparison between the full three-mode master equation and the reduced two-mode model, or remove the confirmation claim.
  4. [The Model (Eq. 2); Conclusion] The paper consistently claims complete positivity and trace preservation, but after adiabatic elimination only first-moment equations are given. The explicit reduced two-mode Lindblad master equation and its dissipators are never written down, so the complete positivity of the effective dynamics is not demonstrated. This is particularly important because the effective damping rates γ_j contain negative contributions proportional to -|μ|²Γ_eff (Eq. 2), which are claimed to lead to exponential growth. A derivation of the effective GKSL generator and a check of its positivity is needed to substantiate the central physical claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption vs. main text] The caption of Fig. 3 states 'fixed (c) γ_b = 1.5,' but the main text says 'for three fixed values ... (c) γ_b = 2.5.' Please reconcile.
  2. [References] References [51] and [59] are the same work (Metelmann and Clerk, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)). Duplicate entries should be merged.
  3. [Figure numbering] The Model section says 'Figure 4 shows the schematic of the system,' but the schematic appears in the Introduction as Fig. 1. Please renumber or cross-reference consistently.
  4. [Eq. (3)] The denominator 'Π_λ Δ_λ' in Eq. (3) is ambiguous; the prefactor should be written more clearly, and the use of absolute values around the bracket should be checked against the definitions.
  5. [Notation] The drive amplitude is denoted E in the main text and ε in the Supplementary Materials. Please use a single symbol throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the reduced two-mode dynamics, stability boundary, and exponential-growth formula are derived self-consistently from the stated linear model; the advertised pump-power advantage is unsupported but not circular.

full rationale

The paper's analytical chain is a straight calculation from a stated linear open-system model: the master equation (9) is supplemented with the adiabatic elimination of c (Eq. 13), yielding the two-mode drift matrix H_r (Eq. 18) with eigenvalues (Eq. 21), from which b(t) and E_B(t)=|b(t)|^2 are computed (Eqs. 3, 30, and asymptotic Eq. 7). No parameter is fitted to the output, no measured datum enters the model, and no derived quantity is used as an input to its own derivation. The exponential-growth behavior follows mathematically from the sign of Re[-iλ_+], not from a redefinition. The exceptional-point condition Ω=0 is a genuine eigenvalue/eigenvector coalescence. The self-citations present (e.g., [25], [43], [44]) are contextual references to the authors' other battery work and are not load-bearing; the dissipative-interaction construction is referenced to the independent Metelmann-Clerk work [59]. Thus no circular step is established. I flag separately, as non-circular correctness/verifiability concerns: the abstract's 'pump-induced stability threshold' and 'about 61% less critical pump power' are not supported by the model, since the drive amplitude E_r appears only in the inhomogeneous source of Eq. (1)/(17) and not in the eigenvalues of H_r (Eq. 21); the 'coherent beam-splitter benchmark' is nowhere defined; the full three-mode numerical confirmation is not shown; and the abstract's 'two-photon-driven charger' label is inconsistent with the linear drive E(â†+â) in Eq. (8). These are internal-consistency and support problems, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation has no fitted parameters; all predictions follow analytically from the stated linear master equation. The main external support is the standard adiabatic-elimination and reservoir-engineering framework (Metelmann–Clerk). The 61% benchmark comparison is not part of the visible derivation.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The auxiliary mode c relaxes much faster than a and b (κ_c + Γ_c ≫ κ_{a,b}+Γ_{a,b}, |δ_{a,b}|), justifying adiabatic elimination.
    This is the fast-mediator assumption used to derive the reduced two-mode model (Supplementary Eq. 13).
  • domain assumption Markovian, zero-temperature reservoirs; the master equation is Lindblad and the dynamics are linear (first moments close).
    The master equation (9) assumes Markovian reservoirs; the linear form is used for the Heisenberg–Langevin equations.
  • domain assumption The jump operators for the shared reservoirs have the specific form z_m = p_m m + p_c^{(m)} c with |μ_cj|=1 after rescaling.
    The specific dissipative coupling structure is the basis for the effective Hamiltonian; the rescaling to |μ|=1 is stated in the main text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reservoir-Engineered Low-Threshold Quantum Energy Storage." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NLGFWOBQ

@misc{pith2026251120569,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reservoir-Engineered Low-Threshold Quantum Energy Storage},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NLGFWOBQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.20569}
}
abstract

Fast charging of quantum batteries requires amplification of the energy transferred to a storage mode without uncontrolled gain or phenomenological non-Hermitian dynamics. Inspired by broken/unbroken dynamical regimes, we introduce a reservoir-engineered quantum battery in which a two-photon-driven charger and a battery mode are coupled through a lossy dissipative mediator. Eliminating the fast mediator yields a reduced two-mode Lindblad model with a complex dissipative coupling and renormalized damping rates. Its drift matrix has a pump-induced stability threshold: below threshold the seeded response is bounded, whereas above threshold a weak seed excites a growing mode and the battery occupation increases exponentially. Compared with a coherent beam-splitter charger--battery benchmark at equal effective coupling, the dissipative architecture reaches this broken regime at a lower pump amplitude. For the parameters studied here, this corresponds to about \(61\%\) less critical pump power and opens a pump-power window in which dissipative charging is exponential while the coherent benchmark remains below threshold. In the broken dissipative regime, the growth is dominated by a seed-selected coherent battery displacement rather than incoherent fluctuation buildup, so a large fraction of the stored energy is directly extractable by a displacement operation. The broken-regime boundary is a dynamical stability threshold, not generally an exceptional point, and the full three-mode Lindblad model confirms the reduced description in the fast-mediator regime. Our results give a completely positive route to pump-efficient, low-threshold, and coherently addressable quantum energy storage using engineered reservoirs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.20569 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Schematic of the dissipative quantum battery. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the eigenval [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a)-(c) Phase diagrams illustrating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Schematic representation of the charging process. The charger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a)-(c) Real and (b)-(d) imaginary parts of the eigenvalues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Finite-Time Optomechanical Cooling by Multi-Exceptional-Point Braiding

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Encircling two exceptional points with an optimized detuning path cools an optomechanical resonator to a lower final occupation than any matched non-enclosing or single-EP protocol in this model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical45, 444016 (2012)

    2012

  2. [2]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nature Physics14, 11 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity– time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Na- ture Materials18, 783 (2019). 11

    2019

  5. [5]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, A. Alù, S. A. Mann, N. Nefed- kin, V. Peano, and P. Rabl, Nonreciprocity in quantum technology (2025), arXiv:2508.03945

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    W. Chen, Ş. K. O ¸zdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an op- tical microcavity, Nature548, 192 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alù, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    J.-H. Park, A. Ndao, W. Cai, L. Hsu, A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Y.-H. Lo, and B. Kanté, Symmetry-breaking- inducedplasmonicexceptionalpointsandnanoscalesens- ing, Nature Physics16, 462 (2020)

    2020

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    W. Tang, X. Jiang, K. Ding, Y.-X. Xiao, Z.-Q. Zhang, C. T. Chan, and G. Ma, Exceptional nexus with a hybrid topological invariant, Science370, 1077 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    H. Zhou, C. Peng, Y. Yoon, C. W. Hsu, K. A. Nelson, L. Fu, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Soljačić, and B. Zhen, Observationofbulkfermiarcandpolarizationhalfcharge from paired exceptional points, Science359, 1009 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    C. E. Rüter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics, Nature Physics6, 192 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Feng, Y.-L

    L. Feng, Y.-L. Xu, W. S. Fegadolli, M.-H. Lu, J. E. B. Oliveira, V. R. Almeida, Y.-F. Chen, and A. Scherer, Ex- perimental demonstration of a unidirectional reflection- less parity–time metamaterial at optical frequencies, Na- ture Materials12, 108 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    L. Feng, Z. J. Wong, R.-M. Ma, Y. W. Wang, and X. Zhang, Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking, Science346, 972 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Hodaei, M.-A

    H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Parity-time– symmetric microring lasers, Science346, 975 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    W. R. Sweeney, C. W. Hsu, S. Rotter, and A. D. Stone, Perfectly absorbing exceptional points and chiral ab- sorbers, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 093901 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    C. Wang, W. R. Sweeney, A. D. Stone, and L. Yang, Co- herentperfectabsorptionatanexceptionalpoint,Science 373, 1261 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    H. Xu, D. Mason, L. Jiang, and J. Harris, Topological energy transfer in an optomechanical system with excep- tional points, Nature537, 80 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the excep- tional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics 15, 1232 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Yu and C

    X. Yu and C. Zhang, Quantum parameter estimation of non-hermitian systems with optimal measurements, Phys. Rev. A108, 022215 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Alicki and M

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Entanglement boost for ex- tractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E87, 042123 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Camposeo, T

    A. Camposeo, T. Virgili, F. Lombardi, G. Cerullo, D. Pisignano, and M. Polini, Quantum batteries: A materials science perspective, Advanced Materials37, 2415073 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Campaioli, S

    F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, J. Q. Quach, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, Colloquium: Quantum batteries, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 031001 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    S.Gherardini, F.Campaioli, F.Caruso,andF.C.Binder, Stabilizing open quantum batteries by sequential mea- surements, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013095 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    A. H. Malavazi, R. Sagar, B. Ahmadi, and P. R. Dieguez, Two-time weak-measurement protocol for ergotropy pro- tection in open quantum batteries, PRX Energy4, 023011 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Ahmadi, A

    B. Ahmadi, A. B. Ravichandran, P. Mazurek, S. Barzan- jeh, and P. Horodecki, Harnessing environmental noise for quantum energy storage, arXiv:2510.06384 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    J. Q. Quach, K. E. McGhee, L. Ganzer, D. M. Rouse, B.W.Lovett, E.M.Gauger, J.Keeling, G.Cerullo, D.G. Lidzey, and T. Virgili, Superabsorption in an organic mi- crocavity: Toward a quantum battery, Science Advances 8, 3160 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    J. Q. Quach and W. J. Munro, Using dark states to charge and stabilize open quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Appl.14, 024092 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Yang, Y.-H

    X. Yang, Y.-H. Yang, M. Alimuddin, R. Salvia, S.-M. Fei, L.-M. Zhao, S. Nimmrichter, and M.-X. Luo, Battery capacity of energy-storing quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 030402 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Ferraro, M

    D. Ferraro, M. Campisi, G. M. Andolina, V. Pellegrini, and M. Polini, High-power collective charging of a solid- state quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 117702 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    R. R. Rodríguez, B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, S. Barzanjeh, R. Alicki, and P. Horodecki, Catalysis in charging quan- tum batteries, Phys. Rev. A107, 042419 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Rinaldi, R

    D. Rinaldi, R. Filip, D. Gerace, and G. Guarnieri, Re- liable quantum advantage in quantum battery charging, Phys. Rev. A112, 012205 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Salvia, M

    R. Salvia, M. Perarnau-Llobet, G. Haack, N. Brunner, and S. Nimmrichter, Quantum advantage in charging cavity and spin batteries by repeated interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013155 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    R. R. Rodríguez, B. Ahmadi, G. Suárez, P. Mazurek, S. Barzanjeh, and P. Horodecki, Optimal quantum con- trol of charging quantum batteries, New Journal of Physics26, 043004 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Yang and F.-Q

    F.-M. Yang and F.-Q. Dou, Wireless energy transfer in a non-hermitian quantum battery, Phys. Rev. A112, 042205 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    T. K. Konar, L. G. C. Lakkaraju, and A. Sen (De), Quan- tum battery with non-hermitian charging, Phys. Rev. A 109, 042207 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Z.-G. Lu, G. Tian, X.-Y. Lü, and C. Shang, Topological quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 180401 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Zhang, X.-K

    X.-L. Zhang, X.-K. Song, and D. Wang, Quantum battery in the heisenberg spin chain models with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction, Advanced Quantum Technologies7, 2400114 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Barra, Dissipative charging of a quantum battery, Phys

    F. Barra, Dissipative charging of a quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 210601 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    F. T. Tabesh, F. H. Kamin, and S. Salimi, Environment- mediated charging process of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. A102, 052223 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Ghosh, T

    S. Ghosh, T. Chanda, S. Mal, and A. Sen(De), Fast charging of a quantum battery assisted by noise, Phys. Rev. A104, 032207 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Mayo and A

    F. Mayo and A. J. Roncaglia, Collective effects and quan- tum coherence in dissipative charging of quantum batter- ies, Phys. Rev. A105, 062203 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Xu, H.-J

    K. Xu, H.-J. Zhu, G.-F. Zhang, and W.-M. Liu, Enhanc- ing the performance of an open quantum battery via en- vironment engineering, Phys. Rev. E104, 064143 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Ahmadi, P

    B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, P. Horodecki, and S. Barzanjeh, Nonreciprocal quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 12 210402 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Ahmadi, P

    B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, S. Barzanjeh, and P. Horodecki, Superoptimal charging of quantum batteries via reservoir engineering: Arbitrary energy transfer unlocked, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 024010 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Shastri, C

    R. Shastri, C. Jiang, G.-H. Xu, B. Prasanna Venkatesh, and G. Watanabe, Dephasing enabled fast charging of quantum batteries, npj Quantum Information11, 9 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    M.-L. Hu, T. Gao, and H. Fan, Efficient wireless charging of a quantum battery, Phys. Rev. A111, 042216 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    A. H. Malavazi, B. Ahmadi, P. Horodecki, and P. R. Dieguez, Charge-preserving operations in quantum bat- teries, arXiv:2510.25549 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Zakavati, S

    S. Zakavati, S. Salimi, and B. Arash, Optimizing the chargingofopenquantumbatteriesusinglongshort-term memory-driven reinforcement learning, arXiv:2504.19840 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum reser- voir engineering with laser cooled trapped ions, Physical Review Letters77, 4728 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    Müller, K

    M. Müller, K. Hammerer, Y. Zhou, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Quantum state preparation via engineered dis- sipation in open quantum systems, Science351, 273 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Physical Review X5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Using interference to en- gineer nonclassical states of light and mechanics, Nature Physics12, 1093 (2016)

    2016

  45. [53]

    L. D. Toth, N. R. Bernier, A. Nunnenkamp, A. K. Fe- ofanov, and T. J. Kippenberg, A dissipative quantum reservoir for microwave light using a mechanical oscil- lator, Nat Phys13, 787 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Barzanjeh, M

    S. Barzanjeh, M. Wulf, M. Peruzzo, M. Kalaee, P. B. Dieterle, O. Painter, and J. M. Fink, Mechanical on- chip microwave circulator, Nature Communications8, 953 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Kerckhoff, K

    J. Kerckhoff, K. Lalumière, B. J. Chapman, A. Blais, and K. W. Lehnert, On-chip superconducting microwave circulator from synthetic rotation, Phys. Rev. Appl.4, 034002 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    B. J. Chapman, E. I. Rosenthal, J. Kerckhoff, B. A. Moores, L. R. Vale, J. A. B. Mates, G. C. Hilton, K. La- lumière, A. Blais, and K. W. Lehnert, Widely tunable on-chip microwave circulator for superconducting quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. X7, 041043 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Y.-P. Wang, J. W. Rao, Y. Yang, P.-C. Xu, Y. S. Gui, B. M. Yao, J. Q. You, and C.-M. Hu, Nonreciprocity and unidirectionalinvisibilityincavitymagnonics,Phys.Rev. Lett.123, 127202 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    M. Kim, A. Tabesh, T. Zegray, S. Barzanjeh, and C.- M. Hu, Nonreciprocity in cavity magnonics at millikelvin temperature, Journal of Applied Physics135(2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    Y.-X. Wang, C. Wang, and A. A. Clerk, Quantum non- reciprocal interactions via dissipative gauge symmetry, PRX Quantum4, 010306 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Reservoir-Engineered Exceptional Points for Quantum Energy Storage

    and to reservoir-engineered amplifiers [5, 59] where dissipative and coherent interactions combine to produce effective negative damping of a collective mode. Now we can calculate the energy stored in the bat- tery by solving Eq. (1), leading to (see Supplementary Materials) E...

    2021

  54. [62]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  55. [63]

    E. X. DeJesus and C. Kaufman, Routh-hurwitz criterion in the examination of eigenvalues of a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations, Phys. Rev. A35, 5288 (1987)

    1987

  56. [64]

    Breuer, F

    H.-P. Breuer, F. Petruccione,et al.,The theory of open quantum systems(Oxford University, Oxford, 2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.