Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Learning Autoencoder Approach for Handwritten Arabic Digits Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1706.06720 v1 pith:NLKJXGR2 submitted 2017-06-21 cs.CV cs.NE

classification cs.CVcs.NE
keywords digitsarabichandwrittenrecognitionautoencoderimagesapproachlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a new unsupervised learning approach with stacked autoencoder (SAE) for Arabic handwritten digits categorization. Recently, Arabic handwritten digits recognition has been an important area due to its applications in several fields. This work is focusing on the recognition part of handwritten Arabic digits recognition that face several challenges, including the unlimited variation in human handwriting and the large public databases. Arabic digits contains ten numbers that were descended from the Indian digits system. Stacked autoencoder (SAE) tested and trained the MADBase database (Arabic handwritten digits images) that contain 10000 testing images and 60000 training images. We show that the use of SAE leads to significant improvements across different machine-learning classification algorithms. SAE is giving an average accuracy of 98.5%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SARD: A Large-Scale Synthetic Arabic OCR Dataset for Book-Style Text Recognition

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SARD is a new synthetic dataset of 843,622 Arabic book pages with ten fonts, plus baseline OCR benchmarks showing large differences between modern vision-language models and traditional engines.

Pith tools