Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Mixed finite element and TPSA finite volume methods for linearized elasticity and Cosserat materials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13273 v1 pith:NLV452TL submitted 2024-09-20 math.NA cs.NA

Mixed finite element and TPSA finite volume methods for linearized elasticity and Cosserat materials

classification math.NA cs.NA
keywords finitecosseratelasticitymethodstressvariablesequationsmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cosserat theory of elasticity is a generalization of classical elasticity that allows for asymmetry in the stress tensor by taking into account micropolar rotations in the medium. The equations involve a rotation field and associated "couple stress" as variables, in addition to the conventional displacement and Cauchy stress fields. In recent work, we derived a mixed finite element method (MFEM) for the linear Cosserat equations that converges optimally in these four variables. The drawback of this method is that it retains the stresses as unknowns, and therefore leads to relatively large saddle point system that are computationally demanding to solve. As an alternative, we developed a finite volume method in which the stress variables are approximated using a minimal, two-point stencil (TPSA). The system consists of the displacement and rotation variables, with an additional "solid pressure" unknown. Both the MFEM and TPSA methods are robust in the incompressible limit and in the Cauchy limit, for which the Cosserat equations degenerate to classical linearized elasticity. We report on the construction of the methods, their a priori properties, and compare their numerical performance against an MPSA finite volume method.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.