pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23267 · v1 · pith:NOH5LBVNnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.supr-con

Quantum fluctuations in quartet superfluid of two-dimensional Fermi mixture

Wei Wang , Yupeng Wang , Xiaoling Cui This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.supr-con
keywords quartet superfluidtwo-dimensional Fermi mixturequantum fluctuationsGaussian fluctuationsfour-body correlationscomposite bosonsmass imbalanceequation of state
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gaussian fluctuations respecting dominant four-body correlations produce the logarithmic equation of state for quartet superfluids in two-dimensional mass-imbalanced Fermi mixtures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to describe quantum fluctuations in a quartet superfluid formed from clusters of one light fermion and three heavy fermions in a two-dimensional mass-imbalanced mixture. By constructing Gaussian fluctuations around the dominant four-body correlations, the approach reproduces the logarithmic dependence of the equation of state in the deep-binding regime. This result supports the view that the quartets function as composite bosons. Readers would care because the method extends fluctuation theories from ordinary pairing to higher-order cluster condensates and supplies a physical picture for these phases. The work thereby addresses quantum fluctuations in fermion superfluids that involve arbitrarily high-order correlations.

Core claim

By incorporating the Gaussian fluctuations respecting dominant four-body correlations in this system, our theory successfully produces the logarithmic dependence of the 2D equation of state in the deep binding regime, thereby offering a correct physical picture of quartet clusters behaving as composite bosons. By extending the Gaussian fluctuation theory from pairing to quartet superfluids, our results shed light on quantum fluctuations in general fermion superfluids with arbitrarily high-order correlations.

What carries the argument

Gaussian fluctuation theory extended to quartet superfluids and constructed around dominant four-body correlations, which captures the composite-boson behavior of the (1+3) clusters.

If this is right

  • The equation of state in the deep-binding regime follows the logarithmic form expected for two-dimensional composite bosons.
  • Quartet clusters of one light and three heavy fermions are correctly treated as composite bosons inside the fluctuation framework.
  • The Gaussian fluctuation method generalizes directly from pairing superfluids to condensates with higher-order correlations.
  • Quantum fluctuations in fermion superfluids involving high-order cluster formation are captured once the dominant correlations are respected.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction could be applied to other mass-imbalanced mixtures to predict signatures of quartet condensation.
  • Similar fluctuation techniques might describe larger cluster condensates in reduced dimensions where binding is strong.
  • The composite-boson regime may terminate at intermediate binding strengths where four-body dominance weakens.

Load-bearing premise

Gaussian fluctuations built around dominant four-body correlations are sufficient without higher-order corrections or breakdown of the composite-boson picture in the deep-binding regime.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the equation of state for the quartet superfluid in the deep-binding regime that deviates from the predicted logarithmic dependence would show the Gaussian four-body fluctuation approach is incomplete.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23267 by Wei Wang, Xiaoling Cui, Yupeng Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Diagrammatic representation of the Green’s func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Thermodynamic potential of QSF from quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study quantum fluctuations in quartet superfluid (QSF) of two-dimensional (2D) fermion mixtures with mass imbalance. Here QSF is a high-order superfluid that corresponds to the condensation of ($1+3$) clusters, each consisting of a light fermion and three heavy ones. By incorporating the Gaussian fluctuations respecting dominant four-body correlations in this system, our theory successfully produces the logarithmic dependence of the 2D equation of state in the deep binding regime, thereby offering a correct physical picture of quartet clusters behaving as composite bosons. By extending the Gaussian fluctuation theory from pairing to quartet superfluids, our results shed light on quantum fluctuations in general fermion superfluids with arbitrarily high-order correlations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Gaussian fluctuation theory for the quartet superfluid (QSF) phase in a two-dimensional Fermi mixture with mass imbalance, where the QSF corresponds to condensation of (1+3) clusters. The central claim is that fluctuations constructed to respect dominant four-body correlations reproduce the logarithmic dependence of the 2D equation of state in the deep-binding regime, thereby establishing that the quartets behave as composite bosons. The work positions this as an extension of the Gaussian fluctuation framework from pairing to higher-order superfluids.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the result supplies a concrete physical picture for composite-boson behavior in a high-order 2D superfluid and demonstrates that the Gaussian truncation can capture the expected infrared thermodynamics without additional resummation. This would be a useful methodological advance for treating fermion superfluids with multi-particle correlations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Gaussian fluctuations and equation of state derivation] The section deriving the equation of state from Gaussian fluctuations: the manuscript asserts that the fluctuation correction yields the known 2D bosonic logarithmic form in the deep-binding limit, but the explicit steps connecting the quartet fluctuation matrix to an effective bosonic chemical potential (with the characteristic 1/|log(na²)| density dependence) are not shown in sufficient detail to confirm that fermionic remnants do not alter the infrared behavior.
  2. [Deep binding regime analysis] The paragraph discussing the deep-binding regime: the assumption that the Gaussian level around the four-body mean field remains sufficient once the quartets are tightly bound is load-bearing for the composite-boson interpretation, yet no explicit check is provided that higher-order corrections or breakdown of the composite picture are negligible.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the model Hamiltonian and the precise definition of the quartet order parameter before discussing the fluctuation results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and the positive evaluation of our manuscript's significance. We address each major comment below and will make revisions to improve the clarity and completeness of the derivations as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Gaussian fluctuations and equation of state derivation] The section deriving the equation of state from Gaussian fluctuations: the manuscript asserts that the fluctuation correction yields the known 2D bosonic logarithmic form in the deep-binding limit, but the explicit steps connecting the quartet fluctuation matrix to an effective bosonic chemical potential (with the characteristic 1/|log(na²)| density dependence) are not shown in sufficient detail to confirm that fermionic remnants do not alter the infrared behavior.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that more explicit steps would be beneficial. In the revised manuscript, we will include a detailed derivation showing how the quartet fluctuation matrix reduces to an effective bosonic theory in the deep-binding regime. This will demonstrate that the chemical potential term acquires the characteristic 1/|log(na²)| dependence, with fermionic remnants decoupled and not affecting the infrared logarithmic behavior, consistent with composite boson condensation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Deep binding regime analysis] The paragraph discussing the deep-binding regime: the assumption that the Gaussian level around the four-body mean field remains sufficient once the quartets are tightly bound is load-bearing for the composite-boson interpretation, yet no explicit check is provided that higher-order corrections or breakdown of the composite picture are negligible.

    Authors: This is a valid point. While our Gaussian fluctuation approach captures the leading bosonic behavior, we do not provide a quantitative estimate of higher-order corrections. In the revision, we will add a paragraph discussing the validity of the approximation based on the large binding energy scale separating the quartet internal structure from the bosonic center-of-mass motion. However, a complete analysis of beyond-Gaussian terms would require a different methodological extension and is left for future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; derivation self-contained on available evidence

full rationale

The abstract states that Gaussian fluctuations respecting four-body correlations produce the logarithmic 2D EOS in the deep-binding regime, presenting this as an emergent outcome of the fluctuation theory rather than an input. No equations, self-citations, fitted parameters, or ansatze are visible in the provided text that would allow a specific reduction (e.g., a parameter fitted to the log term then relabeled as prediction). The central claim therefore rests on an independent computation of the thermodynamic potential whose infrared limit matches the known bosonic result; absent explicit quotes showing the log term is inserted by normalization or by construction, the derivation does not reduce to its inputs. This is the normal honest outcome when no load-bearing circular step can be exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; ledger populated from stated elements only. The theory assumes Gaussian fluctuations around four-body correlations are dominant and that the deep-binding limit maps to composite bosons without additional parameters shown.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gaussian fluctuations respecting dominant four-body correlations are sufficient to describe the quartet superfluid.
    Invoked in the abstract as the basis for the theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5645 in / 1152 out tokens · 14163 ms · 2026-05-25T02:43:01.453072+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    correlation well beyond the conventional (1 + 1) cor- relation in pairing superfluid. Motivated by the success of Gaussian fluctuation theory in pairing superfluids[58– 63], here we establish a extended Gaussian framework for QSF by incorporating the dominant four-body corre- lations using the functional path integral approach. At the mean-field level, ou...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    For instance, we can havek 1 =k ′ 1,k 2 =k ′ 2, andq=k 3 −k ′ 3

    Note that the two-body interactions require that the two momentum triples in Φ, i.e.,{k} and{k ′}, share at least two momenta in common. For instance, we can havek 1 =k ′ 1,k 2 =k ′ 2, andq=k 3 −k ′ 3. After integrating out the fermion fields, we obtain the effective action: Seff=−ln detG −1− S g X q X {k2k3} ¯ϕk2k3(q)ϕk2k3(q),(6) whereq= (q,iv n) andv n ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The dashed line represents a quartet fluctuation field with momentumq, within which the two unpaired heavy fermions carry momentak 2 andk 3 (as labeled in the figure)

    for the heavy (light) fermion, and the lines with two arrows repre- sent the mean-field anomalous Green’s functionsG0 12 andG 0 21. The dashed line represents a quartet fluctuation field with momentumq, within which the two unpaired heavy fermions carry momentak 2 andk 3 (as labeled in the figure). (b1) and (b2) correspond to the elements inM 11 andM 21 w...

    work page

  4. [4]

    After performing the Matsubara summation, we obtain Eqs.(9, 10) in the main text

    = 0. After performing the Matsubara summation, we obtain Eqs.(9, 10) in the main text. AtT= 0, the gap equation is given by S g ∆k2k3 + X k1 ∆k1k2k3 2 q ξ+2 k1k2k3 + ∆2 k1k2k3 = 0.(A2) In the deep binding limit, the gap equation reduces ex- actly to the few-body equation in [88], i.e., S∆k2k3 g + X k1 ∆k1k2k3 ϵk1k2k3 −E 4 = 0,(A3) whereϵ k1k2k3 =ϵ l −k1−k...

    work page

  5. [5]

    to the lowest order, i.e., ˜A= adj(A) and obtain detM≈detM c 11 detM c 22 −[tr( ˜AM0 12)]2,(B16) Recalling Eq.(A4), we can prove tr( ˜AM0

    work page

  6. [6]

    This expression is exactly the determinant of a 2×2 matrix ˜M ˜M= tr( ˜AB) −ivn +E q + ˜µQ ˜µQ ˜µQ ivn +E q + ˜µQ

    = ˜µQtr( ˜AB), and therefore detM= [tr( ˜AB)]2[(q2/2MQ + ˜µQ)2 +v 2 n − ˜µ2 Q]. This expression is exactly the determinant of a 2×2 matrix ˜M ˜M= tr( ˜AB) −ivn +E q + ˜µQ ˜µQ ˜µQ ivn +E q + ˜µQ . (B17) This form is identical to the inverse boson propagator in the Bogoliubov theory for repulsive bosons, indicating that in the deep binding and low-energy li...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger,Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Giorgini, L

    S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari,Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1215 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    D. J. Dean and M. Hjorth-Jensen,Pairing in nuclear systems: from neutron stars to finite nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 607 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal, and T. Sch¨ afer, Color superconductivity in dense quark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1455 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Greiner, C

    M. Greiner, C. A. Regal, and D. S. Jin,Emergence of a molecular Bose–Einstein condensate from a Fermi gas, Nature426, 537 (2003)

    work page 2003

  12. [12]

    M. W. Zwierlein, C. A. Stan, C. H. Schunck, S. M. F. Raupach, S. Gupta, Z. Hadzibabic, and W. Ketterle, Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation of molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 250401 (2003)

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    Jochim, M

    S. Jochim, M. Bartenstein, A. Altmeyer, G. Hendl, S. Riedl, C. Chin, J. H. Denschlag, and R. Grimm,Bose- Einstein condensation of molecules, Science302, 2101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  14. [14]

    M. W. Zwierlein, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. Schirotzek, C. H. Schunck, and W. Ketterle,Vortices and superfluidity in a strongly interacting Fermi gas, Nature435, 1047 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Joseph, B

    J. Joseph, B. Clancy, L. Luo, J. Kinast, A. Turlapov, and J. E. Thomas,Measurement of sound velocity in a Fermi gas near a Feshbach Resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 170401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    D. E. Miller, J. K. Chin, C. A. Stan, Y. Liu, W. Se- tiawan, C. Sanner, and W. Ketterle,Critical velocity for superfluid flow across the BEC-BCS crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 070402 (2007)

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    C. H. Schunck, Y. Shin, A. Schirotzek, and W. Ketterle, Determination of the fermion pair size in a resonantly interacting superfluid, Nature454, 739 (2008)

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Navon, S

    N. Navon, S. Nascimb` ene, F. Chevy, and C. Salomon, The equation of state of a low-temperature Fermi gas with tunable interactions, Science328, 729 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Perali, F

    A. Perali, F. Palestini, P. Pieri, G. C. Strinati, J. T. Stew- art, J. P. Gaebler, T. E. Drake, and D. S. Jin,Evolution of the normal state of a strongly interacting Fermi gas from a pseudogap to a molecular Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 060402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    C. Cao, E. Elliott, J. Joseph, H. Wu, J.Petricka, T. Sch¨ afer, and J. E. Thomas,Universal quantum viscos- ity in a unitary Fermi gas, Science331, 58 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    M. J. H. Ku, A. T. Sommer, L. W. Cheunk, and M. W. Zwierlein,Revealing the superfluid lambda transition in the universal thermodynamics of a unitary Fermi gas, Science335, 563 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    L. A. Sidorenkov, M. K. Tey, R. Grimm, Y.-H. Hou, L. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari,Second sound and the super- fluid fraction in a Fermi gas with resonant interactions, Nature498, 78 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Weimer, K

    W. Weimer, K. Morgener, V. P. Singh, J. Siegl, K. Hueck, N. Luick, L. Mathery and H. Moritz,Critical velocity in the BEC-BCS crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 095301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Hoinka, P

    S. Hoinka, P. Dyke, M. G. Lingham, J. J. Kinnumen, G. M. Bruun, and C. J. Vale,Goldstone mode and pair- breaking excitations in atomic Fermi superfluids, Nat. Phys.13, 942 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    H. Biss, L. Sobirey, N. Luick, M. Bohlen, J. J. Kinnunen, G. M. Bruun, T. Lompe, and H. Moritz,Excitation spec- trum and superfluid gap of an ultracold Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 100401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    X. Li, S. Wang, X. Luo, Y.-Y. Zhou, K. Xie, H.-C. Shen, Y.-Z. Nie, Q. Chen, H. Hu, Y.-A. Chen, X.-C. Yao, and J.-W. Pan,Observation and quantification of the pseudo- gap in unitary Fermi gases, Nature626, 288 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Martiyanov, V

    K. Martiyanov, V. Makhalov, and A. Turlapov,Obsera- tion of a two-dimensional Fermi gas of atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 030404 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Fr¨ ohlich, M

    B. Fr¨ ohlich, M. Feld, E. Vogt, M. Koschorreck, W. Zw- erger, and M. K¨ ohl,Radio-Frequency spectroscopy of a strongly interacting two-dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 105301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    P. Dyke, E. D. Kuhnle, S. Whitlock, H. Hu, M. Mark, S. Hoinka, M. Lingham, P. Hannaford, and C. J. Vale, 11 Crossover from 2D to 3D in a weakly interacting Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 105304 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    M. Feld, B. Fr¨ ohlich, E. Vogt, M. Koschorreck, and M. K¨ ohl,Observation of a pairing pseudogap in a two- dimensional Fermi gas, Nature480, 75 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Makhalov, K

    V. Makhalov, K. Martiyanov, and A. Turlapov,Ground- state pressure of quasi-2D Fermi and Bose gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 045301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    M. G. Ries, A. N. Wenz, G. Z¨ urn, L. Bayha, I. Boettcher, D. Kedar, P. A. Murthy, M. Neidig, T. Lompe, and S. Jochim,Observation of pair condensation in the quasi- 2D BEC-BCS crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 230401 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    P. A. Murthy, I. Boettcher, L. Bayha, M. Holzmann, D. Kedar, M. Neidig, M. G. Ries, A. N. Wenz, G. Z¨ urn, and S. Jochim,Observation of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz- Thouless phase transition in an ultracold Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 010401 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Boettcher, L

    I. Boettcher, L. Bayha, D. Kedar, P. A. Murthy, M. Nei- dig, M. G. Ries, A. N. Wenz, G. Z¨ urn, S. Jochim, and T. Enss,Equation of state of ultracold fermions in the 2D BEC-BCS crossover region, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 045303 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    P. A. Murthy, M. Neidig, R. Klemt, L. Bayha, I. Boettcher, T. Enss, M. Holten, G. Z¨ urn, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim,High-temperature pairing in a strongly interacting two-dimensional Fermi gas, Science359, 452 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Sobirey, N

    L. Sobirey, N. Luick, M. Bohlen, H. Biss, H. Moritz, and T. Lompe,Observation of superfluidity in a strongly correlated two-dimensional Fermi gas, Science372, 844 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Holten, L

    M. Holten, L. Bayha, K. Subramanian, S. Brandstetter, C. Heintze, P.. Lunt, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim,Obser- vation of Cooper pairs in a mesoscopic two-dimensional Fermi gas, Nature606, 287 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    G. E. Astrakharchik, J. Boronat, J. Casulleras, and S. Giorgini,Equation of state of a Fermi gas in the BEC- BCS crossover: a quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 200404 (2004)

    work page 2004

  39. [39]

    M. M. Forbes, S. Gandolfi, and A. Gezerlis,Resonantly interacting fermions in a box, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 235303 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Gandolfi, K

    S. Gandolfi, K. E. Schmidt, and J. Carlson,BEC-BCS crossover and universal relations in unitary Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A83, 041601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Goulko, and M

    O. Goulko, and M. Wingate,Numerical study of the uni- tary Fermi gas across the superfluid transition, Phys. Rev. A93, 053604 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Jensen, C

    S. Jensen, C. N. Gilbreth, and Y. Alhassid,Pairing cor- relations across the superfluid phase transition in the uni- tary Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 090604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Richie-Halford, J

    A. Richie-Halford, J. E. Drut, and A. Bulgac,Emergence of a pseudogap in the BCS-BEC crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 060403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Bertaina, and S

    G. Bertaina, and S. Giorgini,BCS-BEC crossover in a two-dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 110403 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    H. Shi, S. Chiesa, and S. Zhang,Ground-state properties of strongly interacting Fermi gases in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. A92, 033603 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Galea, H

    A. Galea, H. Dawkins, S. Gandolfi, and A. Gezerlis,Dif- fusion Monte Carlo study of strongly interacting two- dimensional Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A93, 023602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    E. R. Anderson, and J. E. Drut,Pressure, compressibil- ity, and contact of the two-dimensional attractive Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 115301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Y.-Y. He, H. Shi, and S. Zhang,Precision many- body study of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transi- tion and temperature-dependent properties in the two- dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 076403 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Ramachandran, S

    S. Ramachandran, S. Jensen, and Y. Alhassid,Pseudo- gap effects in the strongly correlated regime of the two- dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 143405 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Gezerlis, S

    A. Gezerlis, S. Gandolfi, K. E. Schmidt, and J. Carlson, Heavy-light fermion mixtures at unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 060403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Braun, J

    J. Braun, J. E. Drut, and D. Roscher,Zero-temperature equation of state of mass-imbalanced resonant fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 050404 (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Gandolfi, R

    S. Gandolfi, R. Curry, and A. Gezerlis,BCS-BEC crossover of the strongly interacting 6Li− 40K mixture, Phys. Rev. A110, 043320 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Nozi` eres, and S

    P. Nozi` eres, and S. Schmitt-Rink,Bose condensation in an attractive fermion gas: from weak to strong coupling superconductivity, J. Low Temp. Phys.59, 195 (1985)

    work page 1985

  54. [54]

    C. A. R. S´ a de Melo, M. Randeria, and J. R. Engelbrecht, Crossover from BCS to Bose superconductivity: tran- sition temperature and time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3202 (1993)

    work page 1993

  55. [55]

    Haussmann,Properties of a Fermi liquid at the su- perfluid transition in the crossover region between BCS superconductivity and Bose-Einstein condensation, Phys

    R. Haussmann,Properties of a Fermi liquid at the su- perfluid transition in the crossover region between BCS superconductivity and Bose-Einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. B49, 12975 (1994)

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    Ohashi, and A

    Y. Ohashi, and A. Griffin,Superfluidity and collective modes in a uniform gas of Fermi atoms with a Feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. A67, 063612 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Pieri, L

    P. Pieri, L. Pisani, and G. C. Strinati,BCS-BEC crossover at finite temperature in the broken-symmetry phase, Phys. Rev. B70, 094508 (2004)

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    Q. Chen, J. Stajic, S. Tan, and K. Levin,BCS-BEC crossover: from high temperature superconductors to ul- tracold superfluids, Phys. Rep.412, 1 (2005)

    work page 2005

  59. [59]

    Taylor, A

    E. Taylor, A. Griffin, N. Fukushima, and Y. Ohashi, Paring fluctuation and the superfluid density through the BCS-BEC crossover, Phys. Rev. A74, 063626 (2006)

    work page 2006

  60. [60]

    Haussmann, W

    R. Haussmann, W. Rantner, S. Cerrito, and W. Zwerger, Thermodynamics of the BCS-BEC crossover, Phys. Rev. A75, 023610 (2007)

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    Watanabe, S

    R. Watanabe, S. Tsuchiya, and Y. Ohashi,Superfluid density of states and pseudogap phenomenon in the BCS- BEC crossover regime of a superfluid Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A82, 043630 (2010)

    work page 2010

  62. [62]

    Tajima, P

    H. Tajima, P. van Wyk, R. Hanai, D. Kagamihara, D. In- otani, M. Horikoshi, and Y. Ohashi,Strong-coupling cor- rections to ground-state properties of a superfluid Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A95, 043625 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    M. Pini, P. Pieri, and G. C. Strinati,Fermi gas throughout the BCS-BEC crossover: Comparative study of t-matrix approaches with various degrees of self- consistency, Phys. Rev. B99, 094502 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    J. R. Engelbrecht, M. Randeria, and C. A. R. S´ a de Melo, BCS to Bose crossover: broken-symmetry state, Phys. Rev. B55, 15153 (1997)

    work page 1997

  65. [65]

    Hu, X.-J

    H. Hu, X.-J. Liu and P. D. Drummond,Equation of state 12 of a superfluid Fermi gas in the BCS-BEC crossover, Eu- rophys. Lett.74, 574 (2006)

    work page 2006

  66. [66]

    R. B. Diener, R. Sensarma, and M. Randeria,Quan- tum fluctuations in the superfluid state of the BCS-BEC crossover, Phys. Rev. A77, 023626 (2008)

    work page 2008

  67. [67]

    L. He, H. L¨ u, G. Cao, H. Hu and X.-J. Liu,Quantum fluc- tuations in the BCS-BEC crossover of two-dimensional Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A92, 023620 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    B. C. Mulkerin, L. He, P. Dyke, C. J. Vale, X.-J. Liu, and H. Hu,Superfluid density and critical velocity near the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in a two- dimensional strongly interacting Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A96, 053608 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Bighin, and L

    G. Bighin, and L. Salasnich,Finite-temperature quantum fluctuations in two-dimensional Fermi superfluids, Phys. Rev. B93, 014519 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Wu,Competing orders in one-dimensional spin-3/2 fermionic systems, Phys

    C. Wu,Competing orders in one-dimensional spin-3/2 fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 266404 (2005)

    work page 2005

  71. [71]

    R¨ opke, A

    G. R¨ opke, A. Schnell, and P. Schuck,Four-particle con- densate in strongly coupled fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3177 (1998)

    work page 1998

  72. [72]

    R. A. Sen’kov, and V. G. Zelevinsky,Unified BCS-like model of pairing and alpha-correlations, Phys. At. Nucl. 74, 1267 (2011)

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    V. V. Baran, and D. S. Delion,A quartet BCS-like theory, Phys. Lett. B805, 135462 (2020)

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    V. V. Baran, D. R. Nichita, D. Negrea, D. S. Delion, N. Sandulescu, and P. Schuck,Bridging the quartet and pair pictures of isovector proton-neutron pairing, Phys. Rev. C102, 061301(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Y. Guo, H. Tajima, and H. Liang,Cooper quartet corre- lations in infinite symmetric nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C105, 024317 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Y. Guo, H. Tajima, and H. Liang,Biexciton-like quartet condensates in an electron-hole liquid, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023152 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Babaev, A

    E. Babaev, A. Sudbø, and N. W. Ashcroft,A supercon- ductor to superfluid phase transition in liquid metallic hydrogen, Nature431, 666 (2004)

    work page 2004

  78. [78]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson,Charge-4esuper- conductivity from pair-density-wave order in certain high- temperature superconductors, Nat. Phys.5, 830 (2009)

    work page 2009

  79. [79]

    E. V. Herland, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbø,Phase transi- tions in a three dimensionalU(1)×U(1)lattice London superconductor: Metallic superfluid and charge-4esuper- conducting states, Phys. Rev. B82, 134511 (2010)

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    Jiang, Z.-X

    Y.-F. Jiang, Z.-X. Li, S. A. Kivelson, and H. Yao,Charge- 4esuperconductors: A Majorana quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B95, 241103(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.