Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Net and Hidden Spin-Valley Locking Enable Ultrahigh Hole Mobility in Covalent Bulk WN$_2$

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin-valley locking lifts WN2 hole mobility past 10,000 cm2/Vs in calculations

desk verdict The paper makes a solid computational case that hidden spin-valley locking can suppress intervalley scattering in a centrosymmetric bulk semiconductor; the main weaknesses are lack of error bars and the hand-wavy treatment of off-plane effects, not the central mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07097 v1 pith:NP4O6QNZ submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Rong-Tian Pang , Zhongjuan Han , Jiayi Gong , Jiangang He , Jin-Jian Zhou , Yugui Yao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spin-valleylockinghiddenspinpolarizationholemobilityelectron-phononscatteringintervalleytungstendinitridefirst-principlestransportcentrosymmetricsemiconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that two distinct forms of spin-valley locking can suppress the intervalley electron-phonon scattering that normally limits hole mobility, and it identifies bulk tungsten dinitride (WN2) in two hexagonal phases as a concrete realization. In non-centrosymmetric α-WN2, spin-orbit coupling splits the valence-band valleys by about 0.54 eV into opposite spin polarizations, so a phonon that would move a hole between valleys would have to flip its spin and is effectively forbidden. In centrosymmetric β-WN2, a hidden Zeeman-type spin texture with compensated, sector-resolved spins reverses between valleys and, through a shifted-mirror symmetry selection rule, suppresses the same intervalley channels. The result is predicted phonon-limited room-temperature hole mobilities above 10,000 cm2/Vs in α-WN2 and about 6,000 cm2/Vs in β-WN2, roughly an order of magnitude higher than without spin-orbit coupling. The paper claims this is the first demonstration that hidden spin polarization can actively protect charge transport in a centrosymmetric bulk semiconductor.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the valley spin textures and the symmetry selection rule that protects them. In α-WN2, the mechanism is net spin-valley locking: spin-orbit coupling splits the H/H′ valleys by $\Delta_{SOC} \approx 0.54$ eV with opposite spin, so intervalley transitions are spin-flip-like and forbidden because electron-phonon interactions conserve spin to leading order, while the energy cost of the spin-conserving transition exceeds the $\sim$0.14 eV maximum phonon energy. In β-WN2, the mechanism is hidden Zeeman-type spin polarization described by the effective valley Hamiltonian $H_\eta = E_0 I + \Delta_0\, \eta\, \tau_z s_z$, where $\eta$ labels the valley, $\tau_z$ the inversion-partner sector (A or B), and $s_z$ the out-of-plane spin. The selection rule comes from the shifted mirror $M_z = \{m_z|00\tfrac{1}{2}\}$: on the $k_z = \pi$ plane $M_z$ has eigenvalues $\pm i$, the two valleys carry opposite eigenvalues $-i$ and $+i$, and because the product of initial and final eigenvalues is $-1$ the intervalley electron-phonon vertex vanishes for mirror-even phonon branches. For in-plane deviations $\delta q_\parallel$ the symmetry remains exact; only out-of-plane deviations $\delta q_\perp$ break it, and since the rate depends on $|g|^2$ the leading correction is $\delta q_\perp^2$, which is negligible. The same covalent network that makes the lattice stiff also suppresses Fröhlich coupling (Born effective charges below 0.44$e$), leaving acoustic phonons with quadrupole interactions as the residual intravalley bottleneck.

What would settle it

A full spinor ab initio calculation of electron-phonon matrix elements that includes spin-flip terms would settle it directly: if spin-flip intervalley coupling at H and H′ is comparable to spin-conserving coupling, the order-of-magnitude mobility enhancement disappears. A direct experimental test is to measure the room-temperature hole mobility of phase-pure WN2 samples; values far below 10,000 cm2/Vs would contradict the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that both net and hidden spin-valley locking nearly eliminate intervalley electron-phonon scattering in bulk WN2, raising hole mobility by about an order of magnitude. In non-centrosymmetric α-WN2, the valence-band maximum sits at time-reversal-related H and H′ valleys with opposite out-of-plane spin; a direct intervalley transition would require a spin flip, and the spin-conserving alternative lands on a band 0.54 eV lower, beyond the highest phonon energy. In centrosymmetric β-WN2, inversion and time reversal keep every band doubly degenerate, but spin-orbit coupling creates a hidden Zeeman-type texture: each valley doublet has opposite spins on the two inversion-partner structural sectors, and this spin-sector association reverses between H and H′. A shifted mirror symmetry $M_z$ with eigenvalues $\pm i$ on the $k_z = \pi$ plane forbids intervalley scattering by mirror-even phonon branches, and the surviving mirror-odd branch is too high in energy to matter. With intervalley channels closed, the remaining intravalley scattering is weak because the stiff W–N/N–N covalent network keeps optical phonons high in energy and weakens Fröhlich coupling; the dominant acoustic contribution is the dynamical quadrupole interaction. These mechanisms yield ab initio phonon-limited room-temperature hole mobilities of about 10,600 cm2/Vs in-plane and 24,700 cm2/Vs out-of-plane for α-WN2, and about 6,000/5,300 cm2/Vs for β-WN2.

Load-bearing premise

The entire intervalley suppression relies on electron-phonon interactions conserving spin to leading order; if spin-flip components of the electron-phonon vertex are not negligible, the forbidden transitions reopen and the predicted mobility gain shrinks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In α-WN2, removing spin-orbit coupling cuts the hole mobility by more than a factor of eight because intervalley scattering returns; in β-WN2 the reduction is more than sevenfold.
  • Both WN2 phases are predicted to combine a sizable band gap (1.3 eV for α, 1.6 eV for β) with room-temperature hole mobilities that exceed the electron mobility of GaAs.
  • Hidden spin polarization works as a transport-protection mechanism: global spin compensation does not erase the role of local spin structure in carrier dynamics.
  • The residual intravalley scattering is dominated by long-range quadrupole interactions; including them lowers the predicted mobility by roughly a factor of five, so accurate transport predictions for this class require their inclusion.
  • A symmetry-based selection rule, not a material-specific cancellation, underlies the in-plane intervalley protection, so the mechanism should extend to other centrosymmetric crystals with the same symmetry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An untested screening implication is that other centrosymmetric crystals with the same screw symmetry and strong spin-orbit coupling should show similar intervalley suppression, because the selection rule is symmetry-based rather than material-specific.
  • The paper's mobilities are strictly phonon-limited; real samples will also scatter off charged impurities and defects, so experimental values should be expected to fall below these numbers unless samples are exceptionally clean.
  • A spin-resolved photoemission or tunneling experiment that can distinguish the two inversion-partner sectors in β-WN2 would directly image the hidden Zeeman texture and test the microscopic picture before transport measurements are available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper predicts ultrahigh phonon-limited room-temperature hole mobilities in two hexagonal phases of bulk WN2, α-WN2 (non-centrosymmetric, WC-type) and β-WN2 (centrosymmetric, NiAs-type). Using first-principles electron-phonon calculations with the Perturbo code, including long-range dipole and quadrupole corrections, the authors report in-plane/out-of-plane mobilities of about 10,600/24,700 cm2/Vs for α-WN2 and about 6,000/5,300 cm2/Vs for β-WN2. They attribute the high mobilities to a near-complete suppression of intervalley electron-phonon scattering: net spin-valley locking in α-WN2, and hidden (compensated) spin-valley locking in β-WN2, with the latter analyzed through a shifted-mirror symmetry Mz = {mz|00 1/2}. The central quantitative evidence is a with/without SOC comparison showing that SOC removes the dominant intervalley scattering and enhances mobility by factors of about eight (α) and seven (β). Intravalley scattering is shown to be dominated by acoustic phonons with an important quadrupole contribution, which reduces the α-WN2 mobility from about 53,500 to 10,600 cm2/Vs.

Significance. If the results hold, this work would be the first demonstration that hidden spin polarization can actively protect charge transport in a centrosymmetric bulk semiconductor, extending spin-valley engineering beyond the established non-centrosymmetric monolayer paradigm. The paper's strengths include a rigorous and gauge-invariant symmetry selection rule based on the shifted mirror Mz, a direct with/without SOC comparison that empirically supports the intervalley-suppression mechanism, and state-of-the-art computational methodology (Perturbo with dipole and quadrupole corrections, validation against DFPT, HSE06-corrected band energies). The predicted mobility values for a sizable-gap (1.3–1.6 eV) bulk semiconductor are unusually high and falsifiable. The main risks are the quantitative support for the off-plane intervalley suppression in β-WN2 and the unquantified 'spin conservation to leading order' premise in α-WN2; both are addressable with additional analysis of the existing calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Net and hidden SVL (β-WN2)] The paragraph beginning 'This protection is not confined to exact K' argues that an out-of-plane component δq⊥ breaks Mz and allows mirror-even amplitudes to reappear only at linear order, so the rate contribution is negligible because it scales as δq⊥^2. This scaling argument is incomplete for the intervalley scattering rate, which is an integral over the 3D energy-conserving manifold: the phase-space measure for δq⊥ is not small near zero, and integrating δq⊥^2 over the manifold yields a finite contribution of order δq^2 that is not parametrically suppressed unless the linear coefficient ∂g/∂δq⊥ is unusually small. The transport calculation in Fig. 2(c) already includes off-plane q points and numerically supports the suppression, but the manuscript does not provide the required quantitative decomposition (for example, the intervalley rate restricted to δq⊥=0 versus the full 3D rate, or the computed q⊥ dependence of the vertex). Please report such a decomposition explicitly, or soften the analytic claim and rely on the numerical result in Fig. 2(c).
  2. [Net and hidden SVL (α-WN2)] The suppression of intervalley scattering in α-WN2 is attributed to the premise that 'e-ph interactions conserve spin to leading order.' The paper does not quantify the spin-flip components of the electron-phonon vertex in the full spinor calculation. Since the e-ph matrix elements are computed with spinor wavefunctions that include SOC, spin is not a good quantum number, and the spin-flip fraction could in principle be sizeable. Please report a quantitative measure of the spin-flip contribution to the intervalley matrix elements (for example, the weight of minority-spin components in the relevant Bloch states times the vertex, or a comparison of intervalley rates computed with and without spin-flip terms). Without such a measure, the mechanism claim for net spin-valley locking rests on an unverified assumption, even though the with/without SOC comparison in Fig. 2(a) empirically shows the suppression.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1(e) and abstract] In Fig. 1(e) and the abstract/introduction, the computed mobilities should be explicitly labeled as phonon-limited, since the comparison against experimental total mobilities of other materials could otherwise be misleading.
  2. [Main text, crystal structure paragraph] The phrase 'slightly lower information enthalpy' should read 'formation enthalpy.'
  3. [Fig. 3(d)] The color scale for log(|g|) with values from 2 to >5 is difficult to read; consider using a diverging color map with a clear cutoff and adding a color bar with numeric labels.
  4. [Supplemental Material reference [57]] The manuscript relies heavily on the Supplemental Material for the off-plane intervalley scaling, validation of e-ph interpolation, and sector-resolved spin polarization; please ensure these items are presented with sufficient detail and that the SM is publicly available at the time of publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mobility and scattering rates are computed from ab initio electron-phonon matrix elements, and the spin-valley locking arguments are symmetry-based interpretations rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The central transport results are obtained by solving the Boltzmann transport equation with e-ph matrix elements computed from first principles and Wannier-interpolated in Perturbo; no target mobility value is used as an input. The effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) is a symmetry-motivated model used to interpret the band structure and sector-resolved spin texture, but it does not enter the transport calculation. The intervalley selection rule is derived from the shifted mirror symmetry M_z and is verified against the computed mode-resolved coupling strengths; the vanishing of mirror-even couplings at the high-symmetry point is a symmetry identity, not a fitted result. The with- versus without-SOC comparison is a physical decomposition of the same ab initio calculation, not a fitting or renaming of the output. Self-citations in the paper refer to methodological tools (Perturbo, prior applications of the same transport framework, dynamical quadrupole methods) that are externally validated and are not load-bearing uniqueness claims. The one genuinely questionable step, the claim that off-plane deviations restore mirror-even intervalley coupling only at order delta-q_perp^2 and therefore negligibly, is a completeness or quantitative-validity concern about the 3D phase-space integral, not a circularity: it does not reduce the conclusion to its own input. No circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims are computed from ab initio methods with no fitted mobility parameters. The main assumptions are the validity of DFT functionals, the BTE, and the physical approximations listed above. No new particles, mediators, or forces are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT with PBEsol gives accurate structures and phonons, and HSE06 gives accurate band gaps and band energies.
    The entire calculation relies on these exchange-correlation approximations; HSE06-corrected band energies enter the scattering-rate and transport calculations.
  • domain assumption Phonon-limited mobility computed from the Boltzmann transport equation is the relevant intrinsic mobility; other scattering sources (impurities, defects) are neglected.
    The reported mobilities are intrinsic phonon-limited values; real samples would exhibit lower mobilities due to extrinsic scattering.
  • domain assumption The two WN2 phases are dynamically stable and experimentally accessible under high pressure, as predicted in a prior study [41].
    The material has not been reported synthesized in these phases; the paper relies on Ref. [41] for phase stability and synthesis conditions.
  • domain assumption Electron-phonon interactions conserve spin to leading order.
    Stated in the main text as the basis for intervalley scattering suppression; the magnitude of spin-flip electron-phonon matrix elements is not quantified.
  • domain assumption Wannier interpolation faithfully reproduces DFPT electron-phonon matrix elements.
    The authors state they validated interpolated values against direct DFPT calculations, but the interpolation itself is an approximation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Net and Hidden Spin-Valley Locking Enable Ultrahigh Hole Mobility in Covalent Bulk WN$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NP4O6QNZ

@misc{pith2026260807097,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Net and Hidden Spin-Valley Locking Enable Ultrahigh Hole Mobility in Covalent Bulk WN$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NP4O6QNZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07097}
}
abstract

High carrier mobility at room temperature underpins high-performance electronics, yet high hole mobility remains rare in bulk semiconductors. Spin-valley locking can suppress intervalley scattering and enhance mobility, but it is limited to materials with broken inversion symmetry. Hidden spin polarization offers a possible route beyond this constraint, although whether its compensated spin textures could protect charge transport remains unclear. Using ab initio electron-phonon and transport calculations, we show that the two hexagonal phases of bulk WN$_2$ realize net and hidden spin-valley locking and exhibit ultrahigh room-temperature hole mobilities. In non-centrosymmetric $\alpha$-WN$_2$, a large valley spin splitting produces net spin-valley locking that nearly eliminates phonon-mediated intervalley scattering. In centrosymmetric $\beta$-WN$_2$, hidden Zeeman-type spin polarization yields a compensated, sector-resolved spin texture that reverses between valleys and suppresses intervalley scattering as effectively as the net locking does. The stiff W-N/N-N covalent network further keeps the remaining intravalley scattering weak. Our results establish hidden spin polarization as an effective transport-protection mechanism and extend spin-valley engineering to centrosymmetric bulk semiconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07097 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. N W (a) sh-WN2 (b)(b) (c) hcp-WN2 1 0 -1 Energy (eV) 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 Γ K H L H′ A/2 Mobility (cm ² V-1 s-1 ) (b) 2< S z > w/o SOC (b) (c) Γ K H L H′ A/2 Γ K H L A/2 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Energy (eV) SOC w/o SOC H′ Mobility (cm ² V-1 s-1 ) (c) -1 150 200 250 300 350 Temperature (K) 10⁴ 10⁵ Mobility (cm ² V-1 s-1 ) hcp-WN2, μc hcp-WN2, μa sh-WN2, μC sh-WN2, μa 2< S z > 1 2 3 4 (cm 2/Vs) μRT 200 300 (cm 2/Vs) μhole T (K) Band ga… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a,c) Thermally averaged total, intravalley, and intervalley [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Intravalley scattering and the quadrupole interactions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. A. del Alamo, Nanometre-scale electronics with III–V com- pound semiconductors, Nature479, 317 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Hautier, A

    G. Hautier, A. Miglio, G. Ceder, G.-M. Rignanese, and X.Gonze,Identificationanddesignprinciplesoflowholeeffec- tive mass p-type transparent conducting oxides, Nat. Commun. 4, 2292 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Z. M. Gibbs, F. Ricci, G. Li, H. Zhu, K. Persson, G. Ceder, G. Hautier, A. Jain, and G. J. Snyder, Effective mass and Fermi surface complexity factor from ab initio band structure calcula- tions, npj Comput. Mater.3, 8 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    J. S. Blakemore, Semiconducting and other major properties of gallium arsenide, J. Appl. Phys.53, R123 (1982)

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    C. M. Wolfe, G. E. Stillman, and W. T. Lindley, Electron Mo- bility in High-Purity GaAs, J. Appl. Phys.41, 3088 (1970)

    work page 1970

  6. [6]

    J.-J.ZhouandM.Bernardi,Abinitioelectronmobilityandpolar phononscatteringinGaAs,Phys.Rev.B94,201201(R)(2016). 6

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    T.-H. Liu, J. Zhou, B. Liao, D. J. Singh, and G. Chen, First- principles mode-by-mode analysis for electron-phonon scatter- ing channels and mean free path spectra in GaAs, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075206 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    J.Ma,A.S.Nissimagoudar,andW.Li,First-principlesstudyof electron and hole mobilities of Si and GaAs, Phys. Rev. B97, 045201 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Arakawa, K

    Y. Arakawa, K. Ueno, A. Kobayashi, J. Ohta, and H. Fujioka, Highholemobilityp-typeGaNwithlowresidualhydrogencon- centrationpreparedbypulsedsputtering,APLMater.4,086103 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Horita, S

    M. Horita, S. Takashima, R. Tanaka, H. Matsuyama, K. Ueno, M.Edo,T.Takahashi,M.Shimizu,andJ.Suda,Hall-effectmea- surements of metalorganic vapor-phase epitaxy-grown p-type homoepitaxialGaNlayerswithvariousMgconcentrations,Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.56, 031001 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    T.-H. Liu, B. Song, L. Meroueh, Z. Ding, Q. Song, J. Zhou, M.Li,andG.Chen,Simultaneouslyhighelectronandholemo- bilities in cubic boron-V compounds: BP, BAs, and BSb, Phys. Rev. B98, 081203 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    S.Yue,F.Tian,X.Sui,M.Mohebinia,X.Wu,T.Tong,Z.Wang, B.Wu,Q.Zhang,Z.Ren,et al.,Highambipolarmobilityincu- bicboronarseniderevealedbytransientreflectivitymicroscopy, Science377, 433 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    J. Shin, G. A. Gamage, Z. Ding, K. Chen, F. Tian, X. Qian, J.Zhou,H.Lee,J.Zhou,L.Shi,et al.,Highambipolarmobility in cubic boron arsenide, Science377, 437 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Isberg, J

    J. Isberg, J. Hammersberg, E. Johansson, T. Wikström, D. J. Twitchen, A. J. Whitehead, S. E. Coe, and G. A. Scarsbrook, High Carrier Mobility in Single-Crystal Plasma-Deposited Di- amond, Science297, 1670 (2002)

    2002

  7. [15]

    Palgrave,andD.O.Scanlon,EngineeringValenceBandDisper- sion for High Mobility p-Type Semiconductors, Chem

    B.A.D.Williamson,J.Buckeridge,J.Brown,S.Ansbro,R.G. Palgrave,andD.O.Scanlon,EngineeringValenceBandDisper- sion for High Mobility p-Type Semiconductors, Chem. Mater. 29, 2402 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    S.Poncé,D.Jena,andF.Giustino,RoutetoHighHoleMobility in GaN via Reversal of Crystal-Field Splitting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 096602 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    J.-C. Chen, A. Wang, C. F. C. Chang, J. E. Dill, H. G. Xing, E. Kioupakis, and F. Giustino, High hole mobility in AlN from negative crystal-field splitting, Appl. Phys. Lett.128, 012102 (2026)

    2026

  10. [18]

    Zhang, R

    C. Zhang, R. Wang, H. Mishra, and Y. Liu, Two-Dimensional Semiconductors with High Intrinsic Carrier Mobility at Room Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 087001 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Coupled Spin andValleyPhysicsinMonolayersofMoS 2 andOtherGroup-VI Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    C. J. Ciccarino, T. Christensen, R. Sundararaman, and P.Narang,DynamicsandSpin-ValleyLockingEffectsinMono- layer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Nano Lett.18, 5709 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    V.-A. Ha, S. Tiwari, and F. Giustino, Ultrahigh Hole Mobility in Monolayer WSe2 Enabled by Spin-Orbit Suppression of In- tervalley Scattering, Nano Lett.25, 14304 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. Liu, J.-W. Luo, A. J. Freeman, and A. Zunger, Hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric bulk crystals, Nat. Phys.10, 387 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Guan, J.-X

    S. Guan, J.-X. Xiong, Z. Wang, and J.-W. Luo, Progress of hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric crystals, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65, 237301 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    J.-X.Xiong,X.Zhang,L.-D.Yuan,andA.Zunger,Matterwith apparent and hidden spin physics, Matter9, 102674 (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    J. M. Riley, F. Mazzola, M. Dendzik, M. Michiardi, T.Takayama,L.Bawden,C.Granerød,M.Leandersson,T.Bal- asubramanian, M. Hoesch,et al., Direct observation of spin- polarizedbulkbandsinaninversion-symmetricsemiconductor, Nat. Phys.10, 835 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Zhang, J

    Y.Huang,A.Yartsev,S.Guan,L.Zhu,Q.Zhao,Z.Yao,C.He, L. Zhang, J. Bai, J.-W. Luo,et al., Hidden spin polarization in the centrosymmetric MoS2 crystal revealed via elliptically po- larized terahertz emission, Phys. Rev. B102, 085205 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Zhang, S

    K. Zhang, S. Zhao, Z. Hao, S. Kumar, E. F. Schwier, Y. Zhang, H. Sun, Y. Wang, Y. Hao, X. Ma,et al., Observation of Spin- Momentum-LayerLockinginaCentrosymmetricCrystal,Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 126402 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Monti, and B

    B.Arnoldi,S.L.Zachritz,S.Hedwig,M.Aeschlimann,O.L.A. Monti, and B. Stadtmüller, Revealing hidden spin polariza- tion in centrosymmetric van der Waals materials on ultrafast timescales, Nat. Commun.15, 3573 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Okuda, T

    T. Okuda, T. Shishidou, M. Nurmamat, K. Sumida, E. Schwier, K. Miyamoto, and M. Weinert, Unveiling the Hidden Spin- Polarized Bi(110) Surface States by Spin-Resolved Photoemis- sion, Phys. Rev. Lett.137, 056401 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Chakraborty, Y

    R. Chakraborty, Y. Dong, J. L. Shelton, K. Garden, L. Ro- manetz, M. P. Hautzinger, M. C. Beard, V. Blum, and D. B. Mitzi, Hidden spin-valley locking stabilizes nanosec- ond spin polarization in 2D perovskites, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10.1038/s41565-026-02238-6 (2026)

    2026 doi

  23. [31]

    Galazka, K

    Z. Galazka, K. Irmscher, M. Pietsch, S. Ganschow, D. Schulz, D. Klimm, I. M. Hanke, T. Schroeder, and M. Bickermann, Experimental Hall electron mobility of bulk single crystals of transparent semiconducting oxides, J. Mater. Res.36, 4746 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    M. B. Prince, Drift Mobilities in Semiconductors. I. Germa- nium, Phys. Rev.92, 681 (1953); B. Segall, M. R. Lorenz, and R. E. Halsted, Electrical Properties ofn-Type CdTe, Phys. Rev. 129, 2471 (1963); C. Jacoboni, C. Canali, G. Ottaviani, and A. Alberigi Quaranta, A review of...

    1953

  25. [33]

    R. O. Engh, S. R. Peterson, J. P. Thorne, and P. E. Petersen, High-purity, single-crystal InP grown by synthesis solute diffu- sion, Appl. Phys. Lett.38, 243 (1981)

    1981

  26. [34]

    H. Gu, G. Ren, T. Zhou, F. Tian, Y. Xu, Y. Zhang, M. Wang, J.Wang,andK.Xu,TheelectricalpropertiesofbulkGaNcrys- tals grown by HVPE, J. Cryst. Growth436, 76 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    D. A. Bandurin, A. V. Tyurnina, G. L. Yu, A. Mishchenko, V.Zólyomi,S.V.Morozov,R.K.Kumar,R.V.Gorbachev,Z.R. Kudrynskyi, S. Pezzini,et al., High electron mobility, quantum Hall effect and anomalous optical response in atomically thin InSe, Nat. Nanotechnol.12, 223 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Kimura, K

    T. Kimura, K. Matsumori, K. Oto, Y. Kanemitsu, and Y. Ya- mada, Observation of high carrier mobility in CH3NH3PbBr3 singlecrystalsbyACphoto-Hallmeasurements,Appl.Phys.Ex- press14, 041009 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Y.Zhao,Y.Pan,L.Chen,M.Cheng,L.Liu,L.Zhang,R.Zhang, X.Zhu,W.Song,X.Luo,et al.,P-typeelectricaltransportprop- erties and excellent Hall mobility of GaSb single crystal grown by Ga flux, Appl. Phys. Lett.125, 262101 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    J. Wu, H. Yuan, M. Meng, C. Chen, Y. Sun, Z. Chen, W. Dang, C. Tan, Y. Liu, J. Yin,et al., High electron mobility and quan- tum oscillations in non-encapsulated ultrathin semiconducting Bi2O2Se, Nat. Nanotechnol.12, 530 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Radisavljevic, A

    B. Radisavljevic, A. Radenovic, J. Brivio, V. Giacometti, and A.Kis,Single-layerMoS 2 transistors,Nat.Nanotechnol.6,147 (2011). 7

    2011

  32. [40]

    J. Pack, Y. Guo, Z. Liu, B. S. Jessen, L. Holtzman, S. Liu, M. Cothrine, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. G. Mandrus, et al., Charge-transfer contacts for the measurement of corre- lated states in high-mobility WSe2, Nat. Nanotechnol.19, 948 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    H. Wang, Q. Li, Y. Li, Y. Xu, T. Cui, A. R. Oganov, and Y. Ma, Ultra-incompressible phases of tungsten dinitride pre- dicted from first principles, Phys. Rev. B79, 132109 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring theDensity-GradientExpansionforExchangeinSolidsandSur- faces, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buon- giornoNardelli,M.Calandra,R.Car,C.Cavazzoni,D.Ceresoli, M.Cococcioni,et al.,AdvancedCapabilitiesforMaterialsMod- ellingwithQUANTUMESPRESSO,J.Phys.: Condens.Matter 29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuse- ria, Influence of the Exchange Screening Parameter on the Per- formance of Screened Hybrid Functionals, J. Chem. Phys.125, 224106 (2006)

    2006

  37. [45]

    G.KresseandJ.Furthmüller,EfficientIterativeSchemesforAb InitioTotal-EnergyCalculationsUsingaPlane-WaveBasisSet, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  38. [46]

    Lee, J.-J

    N.-E. Lee, J.-J. Zhou, L. A. Agapito, and M. Bernardi, Charge transportinorganicmolecularsemiconductorsfromfirstprinci- ples: Thebandlikeholemobilityinanaphthalenecrystal,Phys. Rev. B97, 115203 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    D. J. Abramovitch, J.-J. Zhou, J. Mravlje, A. Georges, and M.Bernardi,Combiningelectron-phononanddynamicalmean- field theory calculations of correlated materials: Transport in the correlated metal Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 093801 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    W. Hu, J. Gong, Y. Qiu, L. Yang, J.-J. Zhou, and Y. Yao, Phonons drive the topological phase transition in quasi-one- dimensional Bi4I4, Phys. Rev. B113, L201111 (2026)

    2026

  41. [49]

    J.-J. Zhou, J. Park, I.-T. Lu, I. Maliyov, X. Tong, and M. Bernardi, Perturbo: A software package for ab initio electron–phononinteractions,chargetransportandultrafastdy- namics, Comput. Phys. Commun.264, 107970 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    V.A.Jhalani,J.-J.Zhou,J.Park,C.E.Dreyer,andM.Bernardi, Piezoelectric Electron-Phonon Interaction from Ab Initio Dy- namical Quadrupoles: Impact on Charge Transport in Wurtzite GaN, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 136602 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    J.Park,J.-J.Zhou,V.A.Jhalani,C.E.Dreyer,andM.Bernardi, Long-range quadrupole electron-phonon interaction from first principles, Phys. Rev. B102, 125203 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Brunin, H

    G. Brunin, H. P. C. Miranda, M. Giantomassi, M. Royo, M. Stengel, M. J. Verstraete, X. Gonze, G.-M. Rignanese, and G. Hautier, Electron-Phonon beyond Fröhlich: Dynamical QuadrupolesinPolarandCovalentSolids,Phys.Rev.Lett.125, 136601 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    G.Brunin,H.P.C.Miranda,M.Giantomassi,M.Royo,M.Sten- gel, M. J. Verstraete, X. Gonze, G.-M. Rignanese, and G. Hau- tier, Phonon-limited electron mobility in Si, GaAs, and GaP with exact treatment of dynamical quadrupoles, Phys. Rev. B 102, 094308 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Sjakste, N

    J. Sjakste, N. Vast, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Wannier inter- polation of the electron-phonon matrix elements in polar semi- conductors: Polar-optical coupling in GaAs, Phys. Rev. B92, 054307 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    C.VerdiandF.Giustino,FröhlichElectron-PhononVertexfrom First Principles, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 176401 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  49. [57]

    See Supplemental Material at link for details on the compu- tational methods, phonon dispersions and band-edge proper- ties, validation of electron–phonon interpolation, the formula for thermally averaged scattering rates, sector-resolved spin po- larization and intervalley se...

  50. [58]

    Liu, W.-Y

    G.-B. Liu, W.-Y. Shan, Y. Yao, W. Yao, and D. Xiao, Three- bandtight-bindingmodelformonolayersofgroup-vibtransition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B88, 085433 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Guan, J.-W

    S. Guan, J.-W. Luo, S.-S. Li, and A. Zunger, Hidden Zeeman- type spin polarization in bulk crystals, Phys. Rev. B107, L081201 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    W. Wu, Y. Liu, S. Li, C. Zhong, Z.-M. Yu, X.-L. Sheng, Y. X. Zhao, and S. A. Yang, Nodal surface semimetals: Theory and material realization, Phys. Rev. B97, 115125 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu,et al., Crystal-symmetry-paired spin– valleylockinginalayeredroom-temperaturemetallicaltermag- net candidate, Nat. Phys.21, 760 (2025). [62]https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33154703

    2025 doi

  54. [63]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized Norm-Conserving Vanderbilt Pseu- dopotentials, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  55. [64]

    M. J. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Ver- straete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Comput. Phys. Com- mun.226, 39 (2018)

    2018

  56. [65]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally- localised wannierfunctions, Comput. Phys.Commun.178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  57. [66]

    Gonze, B

    X. Gonze, B. Amadon, G. Antonius, F. Arnardi, L. Baguet, et al., The Abinit project: Impact, environment and recent de- velopments, Comput. Phys. Commun.248, 107042 (2020)

    2020

  58. [67]

    M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. M. Perez-Mato, and H.Wondratschek,BilbaoCrystallographicServer.II.Represen- tations of crystallographic point groups and space groups, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A62, 115 (2006)

    2006

  59. [68]

    Elcoro, B

    L. Elcoro, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, J. Cano, C.Felser,B.A.Bernevig,D.Orobengoa,G.delaFlor,andM.I. Aroyo,Doublecrystallographicgroupsandtheirrepresentations on the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, J. Appl. Crystallogr.50, 1457 (2017)

    2017

  60. [69]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.