Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Spectroscopic signature of anisotropic order parameter in Kagome lattice superconductor LaRh$_3$B$_2$

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Point-contact spectroscopy of the Kagome superconductor LaRh$_3$B$_2$ shows an anisotropic superconducting energy gap with low-lying quasiparticle states.

desk verdict First PCAR spectra on LaRh3B2 with a plausible but under-supported anisotropy claim; Gamma does too much work. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19666 v1 pith:NPNXB7TS submitted 2025-04-28 cond-mat.supr-con

Mona Garg , Nikhlesh S. Mehta , Ghulam Mohmad , Savita Chaudhary , Yogesh Singh , Goutam Sheet This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords kagomelatticesuperconductorsLaRh3B2point-contactAndreevreflectionspectroscopysuperconductingenergygapanisotropicorderparameterBlonder-Tinkham-Klapwijkmodelunconventionalsuperconductivitylow-lyingquasiparticlestates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy to measure the superconducting energy gap of the Kagome metal LaRh$_3$B$_2$ directly at the material's surface. It argues that although bulk probes look consistent with a conventional isotropic gap, the spectra themselves carry signatures of anisotropy: Andreev reflection is anomalously suppressed, the gap extracted at different surface points varies, the average gap is smaller than bulk estimates, and the effective broadening parameter is unusually large. The conclusion is that the superconducting order parameter in LaRh$_3$B$_2$ is anisotropic, with incomplete gap formation along some momentum directions. If correct, this places a nominally weakly correlated Kagome superconductor among anisotropic-pairing systems and sharpens the question of how the Kagome lattice shapes superconducting pairing.

What carries the argument

The central object is point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy analyzed with the Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk (BTK) model, extended with a broadening parameter $\Gamma$. Two identities do the argument's work: the gap measured by a ballistic contact is a Fermi-surface average weighted by the density of states and the Fermi velocity along the injection direction, $\langle\Delta\rangle = \langle\Delta_{\mathbf{k}}N_{\mathbf{k}}\mathbf{v}_{\mathbf{k}}\cdot\hat{n}\rangle_{FS}/\langle N_{\mathbf{k}}\mathbf{v}_{\mathbf{k}}\cdot\hat{n}\rangle_{FS}$, so a strongly anisotropic gap yields a small measured average; and the broadening parameter is taken to encode the spread of gap values, $\Gamma/\Delta \propto \sqrt{\sum_i(\Delta_i - \langle\Delta\rangle)^2}$, so a large $\Gamma$ becomes evidence for a momentum-space distribution of gap amplitudes.

What would settle it

Perform point-contact Andreev reflection on a single crystal of LaRh$_3$B$_2$ with the current direction aligned along known crystallographic axes and compare the fitted gap and broadening parameter across orientations; under the anisotropic-order-parameter claim the effective gap should vary systematically with direction and the large $\Gamma$ should shrink when an explicit momentum-dependent gap model is fitted, whereas a $\Gamma$ dominated by contact quality or quasiparticle lifetime would show no such systematic correlation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that direct spectroscopic probing of the superconducting state of LaRh$_3$B$_2$ reveals an anisotropic superconducting order parameter rather than the isotropic gap that indirect bulk measurements would suggest. Concretely, the conductance spectra show only 6% to 25% of the Andreev reflection enhancement that a conventional superconductor would show, the gap values extracted from single-gap BTK fits to 13 spectra spread from about 0.22 meV to 0.44 meV with a median of 0.33 meV (below the bulk estimate of roughly 0.52 meV), the ratio $\Delta(0)/k_BT_c \approx 1.43$ falls below the weak-coupling BCS value, and the gap-versus-temperature curve deviates from BCS behavior. The paper interprets the combination as incomplete superconducting gap formation, at least along certain momentum directions, with low-lying quasiparticle states and a momentum-dependent gap amplitude that varies from facet to facet of the polycrystalline surface.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the large broadening parameter $\Gamma$ extracted from the BTK fits is caused mainly by a spread of gap values across momentum space, rather than by quasiparticle lifetimes, interface roughness, two-level fluctuations, or non-ballistic transport at the contact; if $\Gamma$ originates in those other sources, the quantitative case for an anisotropic order parameter loses its main support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the order parameter is anisotropic, the measured $2\Delta/k_BT_c$ ratio understates the largest gap; the bulk-scale gap estimates may correspond to the directions with full pairing, while directions with small or absent gaps dominate the averaged spectrum.
  • Low-lying quasiparticle states implied by incomplete gap formation should show up as residual power-law contributions to specific heat and penetration depth at low temperature, consistent with the reported fraction of electrons that do not enter the superconducting condensate.
  • On a polycrystal, facet-to-facet variation of the fitted $\Delta$ is the expected consequence: each contact samples a different crystallographic direction, so spectra taken on differently oriented crystallites should display a spread of effective gaps.
  • The upward curvature of the upper critical field near $T_c$, already noted in the bulk characterization, is the kind of behavior an anisotropic single-gap or multigap superconductor exhibits, so the spectroscopic claim and the bulk $H_{c2}$ data point in the same direction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive extension would be to fit the same spectra with an explicit momentum-dependent gap model, such as a two-gap or directionally modulated $\Delta_{\mathbf{k}}$, instead of an isotropic gap plus a large $\Gamma$; under the anisotropic picture the model should reproduce the high-bias deviations with a smaller $\Gamma$, and the extracted gap directions should track the crystallographic orient
  • If the anisotropy is intrinsic to the Kagome Fermi surface, the same spectroscopic approach should transfer to other members of the $RT_3X_2$ family, with the degree of Andreev suppression and the width of the gap distribution serving as a comparative measure of how strongly each compound's pairing depends on momentum.
  • An alternative reading of the same data, in which the large $\Gamma$ and the suppressed Andreev enhancement come from contact quality, disorder, or non-ballistic transport rather than from gap anisotropy, could be tested by making contacts with very different resistances on the same surface: an intrinsic gap spread would persist, while an extrinsic broadening would vary from contact to contact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports point-contact Andreev reflection (PCAR) spectroscopy on the kagome-lattice superconductor LaRh3B2 using Ag tips at 0.48 K. The authors find that the zero-bias conductance enhancement is much smaller than the ideal doubling expected from Andreev reflection, extract superconducting gaps from modified BTK fits with parameters Δ, Γ, and Z, and observe a distribution of Δ across different surface contacts, a low average Δ(0)/kBTc of about 1.43, and a large broadening parameter Γ. They also report magnetic-field and temperature dependence of the spectra and compare the extracted Δ(T) with the BCS prediction. On this basis, they conclude that the superconducting order parameter in LaRh3B2 is anisotropic and that the gap is incomplete, at least along certain momentum directions.

Significance. If established, this result would be significant because it would provide direct spectroscopic evidence for an anisotropic superconducting order parameter in a kagome-lattice superconductor that is believed to be weakly correlated, and it would contrast with bulk measurements suggesting conventional isotropic pairing. The paper has real strengths: it presents direct PCAR spectra from multiple contacts, includes field- and temperature-dependent control measurements, and makes reasonable checks for ballistic transport and contact heating. However, the central claim currently rests on interpreting the phenomenological fit parameters, especially Γ, rather than on fitting an explicit anisotropic gap model or performing a control experiment. The reported anomaly in the Andreev enhancement is not shown to be independent of the moderate Z and large Γ values already used in the fits, so the quantitative support for anisotropy needs substantial strengthening.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, paragraph following Figs. 1(a–d)] The claim of an 'anomalous suppression' of Andreev reflection is not independent of the fitting procedure. The spectra are simultaneously described with barrier strengths Z = 0.31–0.52 and broadening Γ comparable to Δ, and the BTK model with these parameters already predicts zero-bias enhancements well below the ideal factor of 2. The observed 6–25% enhancement is therefore a natural consequence of the fitted Z and Γ, not an additional piece of evidence for incomplete gap formation. The authors should show the BTK prediction for their fitted parameters and compare that quantitatively with the '200%' benchmark.
  2. [Section III, paragraph containing the Γ/Δ relation] The quantitative link between the fitted broadening Γ and momentum-space gap anisotropy is an assumption, not a demonstrated result. The expression Γ/Δ ∝ sqrt(Σ_i(Δ_i−⟨Δ⟩)^2) is stated without derivation and is used to interpret Γ as measuring a distribution of gap amplitudes, but Γ is a free parameter in a single-gap BTK fit that also absorbs quasiparticle lifetime, interface roughness, two-level fluctuations, and non-ballistic transport—sources the paper itself lists. Across the 14 spectra the fitted Γ/Δ varies from about 0.24 to 1.17, so Γ is not shown to be an intrinsic property, and no confidence intervals or goodness-of-fit measures are given. Without a control experiment or an explicitly anisotropic fit, the observation of a large Γ cannot by itself validate the anisotropy claim.
  3. [Section IV and the discussion of facet-to-facet variation] The paper never fits an anisotropic order parameter model. The text concedes that no second gap was resolved, and the distribution of Δ across different surface locations on a polycrystal is equally compatible with contact-to-contact variations in barrier quality, local disorder, or non-ballistic effects as with a k-space-dependent gap. Because the crystallographic orientation of each contact is not determined and the measured Δ is a Fermi-surface average weighted by the unknown contact direction, the gap histogram by itself cannot establish that the gap is small along particular momentum directions. A testable anisotropic model—for example, a two-gap or momentum-averaged BTK calculation with controlled parameters—is needed to support the conclusion.
  4. [Section III, Fig. 3(b)] The deviation of the fitted Δ(T) from the BCS curve is presented as evidence of anisotropy, but the points are shown without error bars and the temperature-dependent fits use the same freely varying Γ. With only few points, no quantitative measure of the deviation, and no test of whether a conventional BCS form with a different Δ(0) or with a temperature-dependent Γ can describe the data, this comparison is not sufficient to discriminate an anisotropic order parameter from fitting degeneracy. The authors should provide confidence bounds on Δ(T) and fit the full spectra with a model that allows the gap and broadening to vary in a controlled way.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 1(f) and text] The main text states that Figure 1(f) shows a distribution of Δ obtained from 14 spectra, while the caption says 13 independent point-contact spectra; this inconsistency should be reconciled.
  2. [Figure 2(a)] The axis label '3 KG' should be '3 kG', and the label '0 G' is inconsistent with the use of kG elsewhere on the same axis.
  3. [Figures 1 and S1/S2] The unit 'W' in the fit annotations stands for ohms but should be typeset as Ω; for example, 'RC = 4.9 W' should read 'R_C = 4.9 Ω'.
  4. [Section III, text after Figure 1] The sentence 'In real experiments, this factor is measured to be slightly less than 2' is misleading in context, because the reported spectra show enhancements of 6–25%, far below 'slightly less than 2'; the discrepancy needs to be acknowledged and quantified in the text.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The anisotropy conclusion leans on the fitted BTK broadening parameter Γ: the large fitted Γ is reinterpreted, via a self-cited proportionality, as a momentum-space gap distribution, making that line of evidence a fit parameter renamed as a prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III, paragraph beginning 'The idea of an anisotropic order parameter...' (after the average-gap equation)]
    "The idea of an anisotropic order parameter in LaRh3B2 is further validated by the observation of an unreasonably high value of Γ, the effective broadening parameter. Γ accounts not only for the broadening of PCAR spectrum due to quasiparticle lifetime but also for the variation of gap function sensed by the injected current, i.e. Γ/∆ ∝ sqrt(Σ_i(∆i−⟨∆⟩)²). Therefore, a large distribution of the gap amplitude in the momentum space leads to a large Γ in PCAR experiments[41]."

    In the modified BTK fits, Γ is a free parameter (along with Δ and Z) that can absorb quasiparticle lifetime, interfacial barrier, two-level fluctuations, non-ballistic transport, and model error—the paper itself enumerates these sources. The paper then takes the large fitted Γ as the quantitative validation of a momentum-space gap distribution through the quoted proportionality. No anisotropic gap model is fitted, and no control experiment or error analysis separates Γ's competing origins; fitted Γ/Δ varies from about 0.24 to about 1.17 across the reported spectra. The anisotropy evidence is therefore the fitted broadening parameter reinterpreted as the predicted gap distribution, i.e., a fit parameter called a prediction.

full rationale

The bulk of the paper is a standard PCAR study: spectra are fitted with the BTK model, and the resulting Δ distribution, Δ(T), and Δ(H) are reported. Those observations are legitimate raw/fitted outputs and are not circular. The low average Δ is compared with bulk estimates from reference [30], which is a separate published measurement by overlapping authors but is not derived from the present fits, so it does not itself create circularity. The concern is the decisive Γ argument: the paper's quantitative link between the fitted broadening and a momentum-space distribution of gap values is an interpretive attribution, supported by a self-cited relation, with no anisotropic model or control. Because the central anisotropy claim leans on this fitted-parameter reinterpretation for its main quantitative support, the derivation is partially circular. This is a partial circularity, not a complete reduction: other observations (Δ spread, Δ(T) deviation) remain as independent, if weaker, indicators.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests entirely on fitted BTK parameters (Delta, Gamma, Z) and on literature-derived relations that connect those parameters to gap anisotropy. There are no independent measurements of the Fermi surface projection or the momentum-resolved gap, and no anisotropic gap model is fitted to the data. The paper thus adds an interpretation of the fits more than a self-contained derivation.

free parameters (3)
  • Superconducting gap Delta per spectrum = 0.22 to 0.44 meV, median 0.33 meV
    Fitted to each PCAR spectrum using modified BTK theory. The variation of Delta across contacts is the primary evidence for anisotropic gap, but the values are fit outputs, not independently measured quantities.
  • Broadening parameter Gamma per spectrum = 0.06 to 0.30 meV
    Fitted to each spectrum. The large Gamma is presented as evidence of a momentum distribution of gap amplitudes, but Gamma also encodes quasiparticle lifetime, interface effects, and other non-anisotropic broadening sources.
  • Barrier strength Z per spectrum = 0.315 to 0.52
    Fitted to each spectrum. Z is moderate and, together with Gamma, reduces the Andreev reflection enhancement from the ideal 200 percent to the observed 6 to 25 percent, undermining the claim that the suppression is anomalous.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The point contacts are in the ballistic transport regime, so the measured conductance is a direct spectroscopic probe of the superconductor.
    The authors justify this using contact diameter estimates from Wexler's formula and the temperature independence of the normal state resistance, but ballisticity is not directly verified. The low Andreev enhancement could alternatively indicate diffusive or thermal contact regimes.
  • domain assumption The modified BTK model with a single isotropic gap and broadening parameter Gamma is the correct model for these spectra.
    The fits use this model, and deviations from it at high bias are interpreted as evidence of anisotropy. No anisotropic gap model is fitted to confirm that it would improve the fits.
  • domain assumption The relation Gamma/Delta proportional to sqrt(sum_i (Delta_i - <Delta>)^2) connects the fitted broadening to a momentum-space gap distribution.
    This relation is cited from reference [41] and is used to argue that the large fitted Gamma indicates a wide distribution of gap amplitudes. The connection assumes that Gamma has no other comparable sources, which is not established.
  • domain assumption The measured gap is the Fermi-velocity-weighted average over the sampled Fermi surface, as given by the formula for <Delta>.
    This is a standard formulation for anisotropic gaps in PCAR, but applying it to a polycrystalline sample requires the assumption that each point contact samples a distinct momentum direction, which is not checked with crystallographic orientation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectroscopic signature of anisotropic order parameter in Kagome lattice superconductor LaRh$_3$B$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NPNXB7TS

@misc{pith2026250419666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectroscopic signature of anisotropic order parameter in Kagome lattice superconductor LaRh$_3$B$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NPNXB7TS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19666}
}
abstract

The physics of the Kagome metal LaRh$_3$B$_2$ along with its superconductivity below 2.6 K, unlike other popular Kagome metals, is not known to be significantly influenced by the electron correlations. While the indirect techniques to probe the bulk superconducting properties of LaRh$_3$B$_2$ indicate a conventional isotropic order parameter, we show that the direct spectroscopic determination of the superconducting energy gap reveals an anomalous suppression of Andreev reflection between LaRh$_3$B$_2$ and a normal metal. This observation hints to the presence of incomplete superconducting gap formation, at least along certain momentum directions, and consequent low-lying quasiparticle states. An analysis of multiple Andreev reflection spectra captured at different points on the surface of LaRh$_3$B$_2$ reveals a distribution of the superconducting energy gap which is consistent with an anisotropic superconducting order parameter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19666 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a-d) Conductance spectra obtained in the ballistic regime (solid circles) and correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Magnetic field (H) dependence of the conductance spectra (colored circles) with BTK fit (black lines) at 0.48 K. (b) Variation of superconducting gap (∆) with magnetic field. 0.7 mV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Temperature(T) dependence of the conductance spectra (colored circles) with BTK fit (black lines) at 0 kG. (b) Variation of superconducting gap (∆) with temperature. shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    Raychaudhuri, D

    P. Raychaudhuri, D. Jaiswal-Nagar, G. Sheet, S. Ramakrishnan, H. Takeya, Physical Review Letters 93, 156802 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [1]

    D. F. Liu, A. J. Liang, E. K. Liu, Q. N. Xu, Y. W. Li, C. Chen, D. Pei, W. J. Shi, S. K. Mo, P. Dudin, T. Kim, C. Cacho, G. Li, Y. Sun, L. X. Yang, Z. K. Liu, S. S. P. Parkin, C. Felser and Y. L. Chen, Magnetic Weyl semimetal phase in a Kagom´ e crystal,Science 365, 1282 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    M. Kang, L. Ye, S. Fang, J.-S. You, A. Levitan, M. Han, J. I. Facio, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, M. K. Chan, R. D. McDonald, D. Graf, K. Kaznatcheev, E. Vescovo, D. C. Bell, E. Kaxiras, J. Van Den Brink, M. Richter, M. Prasad Ghimire, J. G. Checkelsky and R. Comin, Dirac fermions and flat bands in the ideal kagome metal FeSn, Nature Materials 1...

    work page 2020

  4. [3]

    Z. Liu, M. Li, Q. Wang, G. Wang, C. Wen, K. Jiang, X. Lu, S. Yan, Y. Huang, D. Shen, J.-X. Yin, Z. Wang, Z. Yin, H. Lei and S. Wang, Orbital-selective Dirac fermions and extremely flat bands in frustrated kagome-lattice metal CoSn, Nature Communications 11, 4002 (2020). 11

    work page 2020

  5. [4]

    J. W. Cable, N. Wakabayashi and P. Radhakrishna, Magnetic excitations in the triangular antiferromagnets Mn3Sn and Mn 3Ge, Physical Review B 48, 6159 (1993)

    work page 1993

  6. [5]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antifer- romagnet at room temperature, Nature 527, 212 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [6]

    Z. Hou, W. Ren, B. Ding, G. Xu, Y. Wang, B. Yang, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, E. Liu, F. Xu, W. Wang, G. Wu, X. Zhang, B. Shen and Z. Zhang, Observation of Various and Spontaneous Magnetic Skyrmionic Bubbles at Room Temperature in a Frustrated Kagome Magnet with Uniaxial Magnetic Anisotropy, Advanced Materials 30, 1706306 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [7]

    W. Ma, X. Xu, J.-X. Yin, H. Yang, H. Zhou, Z.-J. Cheng, Y. Huang, Z. Qu, F. Wang, M. Z. Hasan, S. Jia, Rare Earth Engineering in RMn 6Sn6 ( R = Gd-Tm, Lu) Topological Kagome Magnets, Physical Review Letters 126, 246602 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 44 references
  1. [8]

    C. M. Pasco, I. El Baggari, E. Bianco, L. F. Kourkoutis and T. M. McQueen, Tunable Magnetic Transition to a Singlet Ground State in a 2D van der Waals Layered Trimerized Kagom´ e Magnet, ACS Nano 13, 9457 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Zheng, Y

    G. Zheng, Y. Zhu, S. Mozaffari, N. Mao, K.-W. Chen, K. Jenkins, D. Zhang, A. Chan, H. W. S. Arachchige, R. P. Madhogaria, M. Cothrine, W. R. Meier, Y. Zhang, D. Mandrus, L. Li, Quantum oscillations evidence for topological bands in kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, Journal of Physics: Co...

    2024

  3. [10]

    Zhang, Z

    X. Zhang, Z. Liu, Q. Cui, Q. Guo, N. Wang, L. Shi, H. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Dong, J. Sun, Z. Dun and J. Cheng, Electronic and magnetic properties of intermetallic kagome magnets RV6Sn6 (R = Tb-Tm), Physical Review Materials 6, 105001 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    Guguchia, D

    Z. Guguchia, D. J. Gawryluk, S. Shin, Z. Hao, C. Mielke III, D. Das, I. Plokhikh, L. Liborio, J. K. Shenton, Y. Hu, V. Sazgari, M. Medarde, H. Deng, Y. Cai, C. Chen, Y. Jiang, A. Amato, M. Shi, M. Z. Hasan, J.-X. Yin, R. Khasanov, E. Pomjakushina, H. Luetkens, Nature Communica...

    2023

  5. [12]

    S. N. Guin, P. Vir, Y. Zhang, N. Kumar, S. J. Watzman, C. Fu, E. Liu, K. Manna, W. Schnelle, J. Gooth, C. Shekhar, Y. Sun and C. Felser, Hidden magnetism uncovered in a charge ordered bilayer kagome material ScV 6Sn6, Advanced Materials 31, 1806622 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    Zhang, L

    X. Zhang, L. Jin, X. Dai and G. Liu, Topological Type-II Nodal Line Semimetal and Dirac Semimetal State in Stable Kagome Compound Mg 3Bi2, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, 4814 (2017). 12

    2017

  7. [14]

    E. Liu, Y. Sun, N. Kumar, L. Muechler, A. Sun, L. Jiao, S.-Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. Liang, Q. Xu, J. Kroder, V. S¨ uß, H. Borrmann, C. Shekhar, Z. Wang, C. Xi, W. Wang, W. Schnelle, S. Wirth, Y. Chen, S. T. B. Goennenwein and C. Felser, Magnetic Weyl semimetal phase in a Kagom´ e c...

    2018

  8. [15]

    S.-H. Lee, H. Kikuchi, Y. Qiu, B. Lake, Q. Huang, K. Habicht and K. Kiefer, Quantum- spin-liquid states in the two-dimensional kagome antiferromagnets ZnxCu4−x(OD)6Cl2, Nature Materials 6,853 (2007)

    2007

  9. [16]

    H. Zhao, H. Li, B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, T. Park, M. Ye, Z. Wang, L. Balents, S. D. Wilson, I. Zeljkovic, Cascade of correlated electron states in the kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5, Nature 599, 216 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    H. Chen, H. Yang, B. Hu, Z. Zhao, J. Yuan, Y. Xing, G. Qian, Z. Huang, G. Li, Y. Ye, S. Ma, S. Ni, H. Zhang, Q. Yin, C. Gong, Z. Tu, H. Lei, H. Tan, S. Zhou, C. Shen, X. Dong, B. Yan, Z. Wang and H.-J. Gao, Roton pair density wave in a strong-coupling kagome superconductor, Na...

    2021

  11. [18]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. Teicher, Y. Hu, J. L. Zuo, P. M. Sarte, E. C. Schueller, A. M. Abeykoon, M. J. Krogstad, S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, R. Seshadri, L. Balents, J. He and S. D. Wilson, CsV3Sb5: A Z2 Topological Kagome Metal with a Superconducting Ground State, Physical Review Le...

    2020

  12. [19]

    F. H. Yu, T. Wu, Z. Y. Wang, B. Lei, W. Z. Zhuo, J. J. Ying and X. H. Chen, Concurrence of anomalous Hall effect and charge density wave in a superconducting topological kagome metal, Physical Review B 104, L041103 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    X. Wen, F. Yu, Z. Gui, Y. Zhang, X. Hou, L. Shan, T. Wu, Z. Xiang, Z. Wang, J. Ying and X. Chen, Emergent superconducting fluctuations in compressed kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5, Science Bulletin 68, 259 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    X. Wu, T. Schwemmer, T. M¨ uller, A. Consiglio, G. Sangiovanni, D. Di Sante, Y. Iqbal, W. Hanke, A. P. Schnyder, M. M. Denner, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert and R. Thomale, Nature of Unconventional Pairing in the Kagome Superconductors AV 3Sb5(A = K, Rb, Cs), Physical Review Lette...

    2021

  15. [22]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, J.-K. Kim, B. R. Ortiz, S. H. Ryu, J. Kim, J. Yoo, G. Sangiovanni, D. Di Sante, B.-G. Park, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, S. D. Wilson, J.-H. Park and R. Comin, Twofold van Hove singularity and origin of charge order in topological 13 kag...

    2022

  16. [23]

    Okubo, M

    T. Okubo, M. Yamada, A. Thamizhavel, S. Kirita, Y. Inada, R. Settai, H. Harima, K. Takegahara, A. Galatanu, E. Yamamoto and Y. Nuki, Unique Fermi surfaces with quasi-one- dimensional character in CeRh 3B2 and LaRh 3B2, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15, L721 (2003)

    2003

  17. [24]

    Gui and R

    X. Gui and R. J. Cava, LaIr 3Ga2: A Superconductor Based on a Kagome Lattice of Ir, Chemistry of Materials 34,2824 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    C. Gong, S. Tian, Z. Tu, Q. Yin, Y. Fu, R. Luo and H. Lei, Superconductivity in Kagome Metal YRu3Si2 with Strong Electron Correlations, Chinese Physics Letters 39, 087401 (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    Y. Wang, H. Wu, G. T. McCandless, J. Y. Chan and M. N. Ali, Quantum states and inter- twining phases in kagome materials, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 635 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    Rauchschwalbe, W

    U. Rauchschwalbe, W. Lieke, F. Steglich, C. Godart, L. C. Gupta and R. D. Parks, Super- conductivity in a Mixed-valent System:CeRu 3Si2, Physical Review B 30, 444 (1984)

    1984

  21. [28]

    Mielke, Y

    C. Mielke, Y. Qin, J.-X. Yin, H. Nakamura, D. Das, K. Guo, R. Khasanov, J. Chang, Z. Q. Wang, S. Jia, S. Nakatsuji, A. Amato, H. Luetkens, G. Xu, M. Z. Hasan and Z. Guguchia, Nodeless kagome superconductivity in LaRu 3Si2, Physical Review Materials 5, 034803 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    S. Li, B. Zeng, X. Wan, J. Tao, F. Han, H. Yang, Z. Wang and H.-H. Wen, Anomalous properties in the normal and superconducting states of LaRu3Si2, Physical Review B 84, 214527 (2011)

    2011

  23. [30]

    Chaudhary, Shama, J

    S. Chaudhary, Shama, J. Singh, A. Consiglio, D. Di Sante, R. Thomale and Y. Singh, Role of electronic correlations in the kagome-lattice superconductor LaRh 3B2, Physical Review B 107, 085103 (2023)

    2023

  24. [31]

    Das and G

    S. Das and G. Sheet, A modular point contact spectroscopy probe for sub-Kelvin applications, Review of Scientific Instruments 90, 103903 (2019)

    2019

  25. [32]

    A. G. M. Jansen, A. P. V. Gelder and P. Wyder, Point-contact spectroscopy in metals,Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 13, 6073 (1980)

    1980

  26. [33]

    G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham and T. M. Klapwijk, Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion, Phys. Rev. B 25 4515 (1982)

    1982

  27. [34]

    J. Wei, G. Sheet and V. Chandrasekhar, Possible microscopic origin of large broadening pa- rameter in point Andreev reflection spectroscopy, Applied Physics Letters 97, 062507 (2010). 14

    2010

  28. [35]

    Plecen´ ık, M

    A. Plecen´ ık, M. Grajcar, ˇS. Beˇ naˇ cka, P. Seidel, and A. Pfuch Finite-quasiparticle-lifetime effects in the differential conductance of Bi2Sr2CaCu2Oy/Au junctions, Phys. Rev. B 49 10016 (1994)

    1994

  29. [36]

    Sheet, S

    G. Sheet, S. Mukhopadhyay and P. Raychaudhuri, Role of critical current on the point-contact Andreev reflection spectra between a normal metal and a superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 69 134507 (2004)

    2004

  30. [37]

    Kumar and G

    R. Kumar and G. Sheet, Nonballistic transport characteristics of superconducting point con- tacts, Physical Review B 104, 094525 (2021)

    2021

  31. [38]

    Y. Iida, S. Souma, T. Sato, T. Takahashi, M. Yamada, T. Okubo, T. Shiromoto, Y. Inada, R. Settai and Y. Onuki, High-resolution angle-resolved photoemission study of LaRh 3B2, Physica B: Condensed Matter 351, 271 (2004)

    2004

  32. [39]

    Harima and K

    H. Harima and K. Takegahara, Band structure calculation and Fermi surfaces for LaRh 3B2, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 272-276 475 (2004)

    2004

  33. [40]

    Aslam, S

    M. Aslam, S. Gayen, A. Singh, M. Tanaka, T. Yamaki, Y. Takano and G. Sheet, Anisotropic superconductivity in La(O,F)BiSeS crystals revealed by field-angle dependent Andreev reflec- tion spectroscopy, Solid State Communications 264 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    V. N. Zavaritsky, V. V. Kabanov and A. S. Alexandrov, Universal upper critical field of unconventional superconductors, Europhysics Letters (EPL) 60, 127 (2002)

    2002

  35. [43]

    Z. X. Shi, M. Tokunaga, T. Tamegai, Y. Takano, K. Togano, H. Kito and H. Ihara, Out-of- plane and in-plane anisotropy of upper critical field in MgB 2, Physical Review B 68, 104513 (2003). 15 Supporting Information Spectroscopic signature of anisotropic order parameter in Kago...

    2003

  36. [44]

    Wexler, The size effect and the non-local Boltzmann transport equation in orifice and disk geometry, Proceedings of the Physical Society 89, 927 (1966)

    G. Wexler, The size effect and the non-local Boltzmann transport equation in orifice and disk geometry, Proceedings of the Physical Society 89, 927 (1966). 4

    1966

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.