RetroGFN: Diverse and Feasible Retrosynthesis using GFlowNets
read the original abstract
Single-step retrosynthesis aims to predict a set of reactions that lead to the creation of a target molecule, which is a crucial task in molecular discovery. Although a target molecule can often be synthesized with multiple different reactions, it is not clear how to verify the feasibility of a reaction, because the available datasets cover only a tiny fraction of the possible solutions. Consequently, the existing models are not encouraged to explore the space of possible reactions sufficiently. In this paper, we propose a novel single-step retrosynthesis model, RetroGFN, that can explore outside the limited dataset and return a diverse set of feasible reactions by leveraging a feasibility proxy model during the training. We show that RetroGFN achieves competitive results on standard top-k accuracy while outperforming existing methods on round-trip accuracy. Moreover, we provide empirical arguments in favor of using round-trip accuracy, which expands the notion of feasibility with respect to the standard top-k accuracy metric.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Margin-calibrated Classifier Guidance for Property-driven Synthesis Planning
Margin-calibrated classifier guidance via Sequence Completion Ranking raises multi-step retrosynthesis solve rates from 16.8% to 95.3% on USPTO-190 and unlocks previously unsolvable targets.
-
MMORF: A Multi-agent Framework for Designing Multi-objective Retrosynthesis Planning Systems
MMORF provides a modular multi-agent framework for multi-objective retrosynthesis planning, with MASIL and RFAS systems showing strong safety, cost, and success metrics on a new 218-task benchmark.
-
RETROSPECT: RETROsynthesis via Sequential Prediction, and Chemically Transformed-ranking
RETROSPECT reports 55.00% top-1 and 86.18% top-10 accuracy on USPTO-50K with a ChemAlign Transformer plus LambdaMART reranker reaching 59.4% top-1 on candidate pools using proposal scores and template statistics.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.