Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment

As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 31 of 31 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.07065.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2607.07065 v1

Coverage vector

measured 31 of 31 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z

measured 31 of 31 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

31 of 31 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact7
  • verified fuzzy24
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation d5459d1c-9c74-4bc1-99d7-dec14492188f · outbound

This paper cites How effective are machine learning and doubly robust estimators in incorporating high-dimensional proxies to reduce residual confounding? Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment How effective are machine learning and doubly robust estimators in incorporating high-dimensional proxies to reduce residual confounding? Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Reference 1

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.765909Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:98a3f16067f8367d69cb3b6bbf73473b8fbc67db56234cb6d36489db8f9e7b97

Observation 35ac8440-c40d-4ec9-a0f4-b572d4c04ba2 · outbound

This paper cites Can we train machine learning methods to outperform the high- dimensional propensity score algorithm? Epidemiology.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Can we train machine learning methods to outperform the high- dimensional propensity score algorithm? Epidemiology

Reference 2

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.763805Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:733506282965c02b337b447faf506b59e4a2197d8ca40c6c1ca59bc74090fa9b

Observation ee89245e-d0ee-437f-87a0-4e482bf9832f · outbound

This paper cites High-dimensional propensity score and its machine learning extensions in residual con- founding control.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment High-dimensional propensity score and its machine learning extensions in residual con- founding control

Reference 3

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.719123Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:deaf023044de03f316cc1f6b60a0cb792879134832e96fe3fa877d1b8f248deb

Observation aaa19cc4-8090-4e6f-9406-1f6fd9f7cb3a · outbound

This paper cites National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data, 2013–2018.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data, 2013–2018

Reference 4

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.721125Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:f1102d6e0e978d1a8a3706cb5c2f7dd995076df9e70ed637add70d5fb62ab594

Observation c29a22d6-7ade-4734-b924-61e357a362df · outbound

This paper cites Machine learning for improving high-dimensional proxy con- founder adjustment in healthcare database studies: An overview of the current literature.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Machine learning for improving high-dimensional proxy con- founder adjustment in healthcare database studies: An overview of the current literature

Reference 5

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.725206Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:8e11e12c9d2f8733041a79f5507577195627c1719be297331c9a7ad591c0b5a5

Observation a7b9f353-4529-4200-93f8-e2a0f0e9c698 · outbound

This paper cites Collaborative-controlled LASSO for constructing propensity score-based estimators in high-dimensional data.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Collaborative-controlled LASSO for constructing propensity score-based estimators in high-dimensional data

Reference 6

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.730942Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:097134a80c15668d014704f294a4bda5da9810b5a29e5ca817ba37708b1f1e45

Observation b32f26e7-f7fe-4711-a473-bf16764e4952 · outbound

This paper cites Targeted learning with an undersmoothed LASSO propen- sity score model for large-scale covariate adjustment in health-care database studies.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Targeted learning with an undersmoothed LASSO propen- sity score model for large-scale covariate adjustment in health-care database studies

Reference 7

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.732922Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:e484b6f58fc79f9f274fb272ce0fa92deb76ae734f4db05385694cd35852ec18

Observation 2defd4b3-6e43-48d6-b351-002b3ee43cfa · outbound

This paper cites Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference

Reference 8

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.748324Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:87550556045f663dc5312c57420eec92420110a8446d97d382e1c17a521b00fb

Observation eba8258c-b376-470d-9af2-970ab6807678 · outbound

This paper cites Covariate selection with group lasso and doubly robust estimation of causal effects.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Covariate selection with group lasso and doubly robust estimation of causal effects

Reference 9

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.759740Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:451be3ecd4f1cb1eb424981c4a42c79961abe03256874dfd02022149c8ec03e0

Observation 593f6b53-365e-43ba-bb26-b45fbd84056a · outbound

This paper cites The highly adaptive lasso estimator.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment The highly adaptive lasso estimator

Reference 10

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.767727Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:bc8012f12d36b776d53b04bd56a6506d10a3a870c078b763cab1248a86703588

Observation f05a6a0a-3dfe-42ce-a2ac-0b7f10bd0c61 · outbound

This paper cites Highly adaptive LASSO: Machine learning that provides valid nonparametric inference in realistic models.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Highly adaptive LASSO: Machine learning that provides valid nonparametric inference in realistic models

Reference 11

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.752923Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:82e08a094e128b9bd8f48a46e2ed832c0f22123309f7a494eefcfe37b409a12b

Observation e830c066-75f2-420a-85f8-feb7a01003d7 · outbound

This paper cites reader reaction to ‘outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference’ by shortreed and ertefaie (2017).

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment reader reaction to ‘outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference’ by shortreed and ertefaie (2017)

Reference 12

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:33.613234Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:9d0b94183732f634af0899e60c247f37bfe17485ec98d14eaa4e236ae5022c45

Observation 2d84d159-4aa4-4595-b295-8f35acf2b639 · outbound

This paper cites Flexible collaborative estimation of the average causal effect of a treatment using the outcome-highly-adaptive lasso.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Flexible collaborative estimation of the average causal effect of a treatment using the outcome-highly-adaptive lasso

Reference 13

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.757461Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:a81bf6abcaff1a60e73dc35a45c979813ea4fb75386f852b1dea522464f5f776

Observation 65dacb3c-6e62-420c-a4f7-d1cb5ec3c3a7 · outbound

This paper cites Robust inference on the average treatment effect using the outcome highly adaptive lasso.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Robust inference on the average treatment effect using the outcome highly adaptive lasso

Reference 14

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.755271Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:6c5af6fc71107a2055559472a5dfe284994bc24ada014963d2cb48ff03a1e927

Observation dd49766b-a5c4-42e4-94bc-7e7026790594 · outbound

This paper cites Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models

Reference 15

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.745935Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:5c89fed992c9c178f285aaed7077388503a7c07b100ef794a8c482c8ad2d198e

Observation 97deb67a-9b4d-436a-adb6-a45bc9a699d7 · outbound

This paper cites Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects

Reference 16

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.737497Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:9f7f9c9580da99ce2f9a110fe4a2418e001883eb0d8652e108da8ecf1f9495f1

Observation 16195d8d-202a-4c94-ab60-3c03e14b9dc4 · outbound

This paper cites Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption

Reference 17

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.741273Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:1394b5c9a121225e83e6951af7d7f0185a95b0c27037cc117d7c5c76cd609e6e

Observation 404d1c96-5ece-468a-ab27-f1efc11bf926 · outbound

This paper cites Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models

Reference 18

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.756401Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:da53566acd2650f2af6201fd7538b9fe6bd8cc85168a927d42e450ac982ae828

Observation 2691be4b-1e55-4f97-b5c8-bc8ad253c831 · outbound

This paper cites Targeted maximum likelihood learning.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Targeted maximum likelihood learning

Reference 19

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.761686Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:aab0e1bfab74fd86a6444edd96a46ecf9b5dd5f38fe7d567cdf75d8b1deb4ffb

Observation 450c32cc-0756-45bf-ada1-6f3ac9fee86c · outbound

This paper cites Targeted Learning: Causal Inference for Observational and Experimental Data.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Targeted Learning: Causal Inference for Observational and Experimental Data

Reference 20

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.736521Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:a54f20ed3ecc9e24771ae956b1e8553768428b558b9d64f74ad2f63e1010b127

Observation 1b345478-b391-4453-a349-32174412c256 · outbound

This paper cites Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse- Probability–Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse- Probability–Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects

Reference 21

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:33.623298Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:08302e4eb726e37ae538b0f4832d98a9dc4f301a80a06c07ad92f0a62f001db8

Observation bf3fdab4-dbec-4ea8-ba5c-be28af36d30b · outbound

This paper cites Why does obesity cause diabetes? Cell metabolism.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Why does obesity cause diabetes? Cell metabolism

Reference 22

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.744531Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:56a3cf4130180969b54ea8bf96902bd80752de48c0880d5814ad24b633953da3

Observation f55bdaf4-2dc5-4e35-9ce7-fe7644a0dc47 · outbound

This paper cites Plasmode simulation for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiologic methods in complex healthcare databases.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Plasmode simulation for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiologic methods in complex healthcare databases

Reference 23

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.750657Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:498e925eb4633683260df1967c8039f192191ca0a49923714fdd746f64ab4f60

Observation 1098b1e3-a69a-44bf-b830-a2a36eb5ac0a · outbound

This paper cites Regularized regression versus the high- dimensional propensity score for confounding adjustment in secondary database analyses.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Regularized regression versus the high- dimensional propensity score for confounding adjustment in secondary database analyses

Reference 24

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:33.613452Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:f64003f1d9f2e361c85dfa460b8f8ac2d3f763f8843c9d3907774dee1aef1654

Observation e54be667-15fa-4dd0-96e3-b146350f2c17 · outbound

This paper cites Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods

Reference 25

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.723374Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:76884dbe1175e6606444cae6279901c36fcf6d67a60ef0c4d107f20243e26e63

Observation e756decb-ad4a-41e6-9a30-82fe120e5a96 · outbound

This paper cites A cautionary note for plasmode simulation studies in the setting of causal inference.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment A cautionary note for plasmode simulation studies in the setting of causal inference

Reference 26

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.330795Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:921e1e627a2f53d630a71dc40bc4e6c60f391f9eabaeb65cff69a806bfb46662

Observation fe242822-86a2-42d7-b2f4-152a36a08ccf · outbound

This paper cites Rsimsum: Summarise results from monte carlo simulation studies.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Rsimsum: Summarise results from monte carlo simulation studies

Reference 27

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.729158Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:5669501cc4d809df039c74d2b729326ab82558fd3f18c126a21d18de4b7c856b

Observation fac13cce-36bb-40ad-b27b-9a451a03526f · outbound

This paper cites High-dimensional propen- sity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment High-dimensional propen- sity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data

Reference 28

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:33.617396Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:50f19ea976bfef48fd2dcf4e1f0052b0e04bd9b5f0a047d3fe54be884cd0bb2c

Observation 88f06adf-9c3d-41ae-8eb1-3203cfa3757e · outbound

This paper cites Covariate selection in high-dimensional propen- sity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Covariate selection in high-dimensional propen- sity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples

Reference 29

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:33.626306Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:2c30a575a88116dcdc8d7adfcfb293ceb06c1a4961448e3cc86455829efd5f85

Observation a84122f0-56dc-41b1-a838-02309f02bbfd · outbound

This paper cites Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes

Reference 30

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:33.620422Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:f3e04b0e50dd9c409d9cc2615860e8fa0b874d6688ced5131bd61d05f0dd2712

Observation 023e7d6b-2999-4109-87da-8cf29aee254d · outbound

This paper cites outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference.

Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference

Reference 31

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-07-09T20:56:34.717083Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z digest=sha256:e6ea18a0751a34a577cb6debfe2cf13cd05a8cdf6da3a106a0c8a2145cde6e3e

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.