Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards Detecting LLMs Hallucination via Markov Chain-based Multi-agent Debate Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.03075 v1 pith:NQMVYO56 submitted 2024-06-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords verificationchain-basedhallucinationmarkovmulti-agentprocessclaimsdebate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The advent of large language models (LLMs) has facilitated the development of natural language text generation. It also poses unprecedented challenges, with content hallucination emerging as a significant concern. Existing solutions often involve expensive and complex interventions during the training process. Moreover, some approaches emphasize problem disassembly while neglecting the crucial validation process, leading to performance degradation or limited applications. To overcome these limitations, we propose a Markov Chain-based multi-agent debate verification framework to enhance hallucination detection accuracy in concise claims. Our method integrates the fact-checking process, including claim detection, evidence retrieval, and multi-agent verification. In the verification stage, we deploy multiple agents through flexible Markov Chain-based debates to validate individual claims, ensuring meticulous verification outcomes. Experimental results across three generative tasks demonstrate that our approach achieves significant improvements over baselines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CortexDebate: Debating Sparsely and Equally for Multi-Agent Debate

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CortexDebate prunes the multi-agent debate graph every round using a McKinsey-style trust score per directed link, reporting accuracy gains over full-debate baselines on eight datasets with shorter per-agent contexts.

  2. Combining GPT and Code-Based Similarity Checking for Effective Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection

    cs.SE 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SimilarGPT pairs GPT-4 with embedding-based code similarity and a three-role debate to detect smart contract vulnerabilities, claiming improved recall and lower false positives.

Pith tools