Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Constructing Taxonomies from Pretrained Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.12813 v2 pith:NS4PKKU6 submitted 2020-10-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords wordnetconstructinggraphsubtreestaskenglishlanguagelanguages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a method for constructing taxonomic trees (e.g., WordNet) using pretrained language models. Our approach is composed of two modules, one that predicts parenthood relations and another that reconciles those predictions into trees. The parenthood prediction module produces likelihood scores for each potential parent-child pair, creating a graph of parent-child relation scores. The tree reconciliation module treats the task as a graph optimization problem and outputs the maximum spanning tree of this graph. We train our model on subtrees sampled from WordNet, and test on non-overlapping WordNet subtrees. We show that incorporating web-retrieved glosses can further improve performance. On the task of constructing subtrees of English WordNet, the model achieves 66.7 ancestor F1, a 20.0% relative increase over the previous best published result on this task. In addition, we convert the original English dataset into nine other languages using Open Multilingual WordNet and extend our results across these languages.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Leveraging Large Language Models for Generating Research Topic Ontologies: A Multi-Disciplinary Study

    cs.DL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned open-weight LLMs classify research-topic relationships with up to 93.5% F1 on a new multi-disciplinary benchmark, and cross-domain transfer loses only about 5 points.

  2. Benchmarking Resource-Efficient LLMs for Research Topic Ontology Generation in the Biomedical Field

    cs.DL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning small open-source LLMs on a new MeSH-derived benchmark (MeSH-Rel-4K) raises semantic-relation classification F1 by 34.1 points on average, reaching 91.6% for gemma-2-9b.

Pith tools