REVIEW 1 cited by
Uncertainty in Measurements of Distance
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Ng and van Dam have argued that quantum theory and general relativity give a lower bound of L^{1/3} L_P^{2/3} on the uncertainty of any distance, where L is the distance to be measured and L_P is the Planck length. Their idea is roughly that to minimize the position uncertainty of a freely falling measuring device one must increase its mass, but if its mass becomes too large it will collapse to form a black hole. Here we show that one can go below the Ng-van Dam bound by attaching the measuring device to a massive elastic rod. Relativistic limitations on the rod's rigidity, together with the constraint that its length exceeds its Schwarzschild radius, imply that zero-point fluctuations of the rod give an uncertainty greater than or equal to L_P.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Salecker-Wigner-Karolyhazy Gedankenexperiment in light of the self-gravity
A heuristic argument that a clock's own gravity stops its wave-packet from spreading, reducing the minimum length-measurement uncertainty from the Karolyhazy scale l_P^(2/3) l^(1/3) to the Planck length.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.