Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Systematic search for stellar pulsators in the eclipsing binaries observed by Kepler

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports a complete visual census of stellar pulsators in the Kepler eclipsing-binary catalog, identifying 303 systems with oscillations, 163 of them new discoveries.

desk verdict A useful candidate catalog that roughly doubles the known pulsator-plus-eclipsing-binary overlap; the detection is visually screened and the DIT is not public, so treat the counts as candidates rather than confirmed systems. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06773 v1 pith:NTNZYK72 submitted 2019-08-19 astro-ph.SR

Patrick Gaulme , Joyce A. Guzik This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords eclipsingbinariesasteroseismologyKeplermissiondeltaScutipulsatorsgammaDoradusredgiantoscillationstidallyexcitedstellarpulsationcatalog
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper carries out the first systematic search for stellar pulsators across the entire sample of roughly 2,925 eclipsing binaries observed by the original Kepler mission. Using a custom visual inspection tool that removes eclipse and activity signals, the authors identify 303 systems whose light curves show oscillations, including 163 not previously reported as both binary and pulsator. The detections include about 149 potential delta Scuti stars, 115 gamma Doradus stars, 85 red-giant oscillators, and 59 tidally excited pulsators, with many systems falling into more than one category. The authors are candid that a substantial fraction of these are likely false positives caused by a background pulsator blended with the binary, so the catalog is a candidate list rather than a confirmed membership list. If the detections hold up, this nearly doubles the known population of pulsators in eclipsing binaries and provides a large benchmark sample for stellar evolution and asteroseismology.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the Data Inspection Tool (DIT), a set of ten automatically generated plots per system. It concatenates and normalizes the Kepler SAP and PDCSAP light curves, removes eclipses by clipping or by subtracting the folded orbital signal, and removes harmonics of the orbital period from the Fourier spectra. It then displays the power spectrum, an autocorrelation envelope (EACF) to catch solar-like oscillations, and an echelle diagram. Classification is made by eye from these plots; the tool does not compute a quantitative detection threshold or signal-to-noise criterion.

What would settle it

Re-run the same light curves through an automated pipeline with a strict significance criterion, such as requiring the highest oscillation peak to exceed five times the local noise after all orbital harmonics are removed, and count how many of the 303 systems survive; if most of the 163 new systems disappear, the census is dominated by processing artifacts. A faster check is to analyze the 13 sub-half-day-period candidates without any harmonic subtraction and see whether the oscillation peaks remain stable and coherent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a uniform, complete scan of the Kepler eclipsing-binary catalog reveals 303 systems with detectable stellar oscillations, 163 of which were not previously known to contain both a binary and a pulsator. The breakdown is 149 delta Scuti candidates (100 new), 115 gamma Doradus candidates (69 new), 85 red-giant oscillators (27 new), and 59 tidally excited oscillators (29 new), with overlap between classes. The authors stress that many systems are likely false positives, such as a pulsator whose light is blended with an unrelated eclipsing binary. What is new is the completeness of the search: one consistent method applied to the whole catalog, roughly doubling the known inventory of pulsating eclipsing binaries in the Kepler field.

Load-bearing premise

The screening rests on the assumption that a human eye looking at the DIT plots can reliably distinguish genuine stellar oscillations from residual artifacts of eclipse and activity removal, since the paper reports no quantitative detection threshold and describes its harmonic-removal step as 'rather gross.'

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The catalog roughly doubles the known number of pulsators in Kepler eclipsing binaries, from about 140 to 303 systems.
  • If confirmed, the 13 systems with orbital periods under 0.5 days that show delta Scuti or gamma Doradus oscillations would include the shortest-orbit pulsating binaries known.
  • Only about 15 to 19 red-giant/eclipsing-binary/double-lined spectroscopic systems are expected in the whole Kepler sample, setting a hard limit on the benchmark systems available to calibrate asteroseismic mass and radius scaling.
  • The sample shows no strong global correlation between dominant delta Scuti pulsation period and orbital period, contrary to earlier claims, though a weak trend appears for orbital periods between 0.6 and 3.2 days.
  • Several systems that look like tidally excited pulsators are actually blended binaries or other configurations; distinguishing these requires radial-velocity and imaging follow-up.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 163 new detections survive radial-velocity or pixel-level centroid checks, the true incidence of pulsation among Kepler eclipsing binaries is near 10 percent; if they do not, the census mainly measures the fraction of blended background pulsators.
  • The short-period systems with P<0.5 days are the sharpest test: if they are real and not blends, tidal locking and contact geometry do not suppress pulsation as strongly as assumed, which would challenge current binary-evolution models.
  • The absence of a strong Porb-Ppuls correlation in this large sample suggests that the earlier correlation may have been an artifact of selection effects in small, well-characterized samples rather than a physical relation.
  • Cross-matching the 303 candidates against Gaia astrometry would separate chance alignments from genuine companions, converting this candidate catalog into a clean benchmark sample without new spectroscopy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first systematic search for stellar pulsators in the full Kepler eclipsing-binary catalog. The authors developed a data inspection tool (DIT) that detrends eclipse and activity signals, computes power spectra, and produces a set of diagnostic plots. After visually inspecting 2875 of 2925 systems, they report 303 systems showing oscillations, of which 163 are claimed as new discoveries, broken down into δ Scuti, γ Doradus, red-giant, tidally excited, and other pulsators. The catalog, given in Table A.1, is intended to motivate follow-up studies and to identify benchmark systems for asteroseismology in binaries.

Significance. If the detections are reliable, this is a valuable community resource: it roughly doubles the number of known pulsators in Kepler eclipsing binaries and provides a first census against which future searches and models can be compared. The paper is honest about its main weakness—the dependence on visual inspection and the likely presence of false positives from blends—and it gives a detailed, searchable table with notes on individual systems. The authors also deserve credit for explicitly attempting to separate genuine oscillations from light-curve cleaning artifacts and for discussing borderline cases in the text, even though the lack of a quantitative detection criterion limits the reproducibility of the headline numbers.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3] The central claim of 303 detections (163 new) rests entirely on visual inspection of DIT plots, with no quantitative detection statistic, signal-to-noise threshold, or false-alarm rate. The authors themselves state in Section 3 that 'it can sometimes be difficult to distinguish the detection of oscillations from imperfect light curve cleaning' and in Section 2.2 that the harmonic-removal method 'is rather gross.' Entries in Table A.1 with notes such as 'low SNR osc.', 'sparse spectrum', and 'likely FP or triple' are counted equally with unambiguous detections in the totals. To make the 303/163 numbers reproducible and auditable, the authors should provide a per-system detection significance or a clear decision rule (e.g., minimum peak height in the amplitude spectrum, required number of independent peaks, or consistency between SAP and PDCSAP), and ideally a re-analysis of a random subset by an independent person. Without this, the catalog's headline counts cannot be independently verified.
  2. [Section 4.1] The classification boundary between γ Dor and δ Sct at ~50 μHz is heuristic and, for short-period binaries, lies directly in the range of orbital harmonics. Since the harmonic-removal procedure is described as 'rather gross' and can leave significant residuals, some of the low-frequency 'γ Dor' classifications could instead be residuals of imperfect eclipse/activity cleaning. The paper would be strengthened by a sanity check: for a sample of clearly non-pulsating EBs of similar orbital period, how often does the same visual procedure yield a false 'γ Dor' detection? Such a control experiment would directly address the false-positive concern that the authors themselves acknowledge.
  3. [Table A.1] Table A.1 contains duplicated entries: KIC 4142768 appears twice with identical parameters, and KIC 5560831 appears twice with slightly different notes. If both rows are counted in the 303 systems, the headline number is inflated. The authors should verify that all KIC numbers in the table are unique and correct the table accordingly. There are also apparent formatting errors in the table, such as '21.1221.12' for KIC 9786821 and '5.425.421.25' for KIC 12645761, which should be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3] The DIT is described as 'still under development' and not public. For a catalog paper whose reproducibility depends on this tool, the authors should either release the DIT or make available the diagnostic plots for all 303 detections so that readers can check the evidence.
  2. [Section 4.1] There is a numerical inconsistency: the abstract and Section 4.1 state 149 δ Sct stars, while the caption of Figure 6 says '148 δ Sct EB candidates.' Please reconcile.
  3. [Section 4.2] The text contains a typo: 'RB/EB/SB2s' should presumably be 'RG/EB/SB2s.' Minor language issues also appear elsewhere, e.g., 'is is 16 c/d' in Section 4.1 and 'sure be detected' in Section 4.2.
  4. [Section 3] The manual web-search method for identifying previously published systems is described as 'certainly not fully exhaustive.' It would be helpful to state how many of the 303 systems have no prior bibliographic identification at all, to clarify which systems are entirely new to the literature as opposed to newly identified as pulsators.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the 303/163 detection census is an observational result, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim ('we applied the DIT to the whole Kepler eclipsing binary database and identified 303 systems whose light curves display oscillations, including 163 new discoveries') is a catalog result produced by direct inspection of processed Kepler light curves. The load-bearing chain is: public Kepler SAP/PDCSAP light curves -> quarter normalization and gap-filling -> eclipse/activity removal (including subtraction of orbital harmonics) -> DIT plots -> two-author visual screening -> web/literature search -> Table A.1. No step fits a parameter and then re-predicts a quantity derived from that same fit. The only numerical classifications are heuristic frequency cuts (gamma Dor <~50 microHz, delta Sct >50 microHz); these are standard physical definitions used for labeling, not parameters fitted to the 303 systems, so they cannot make the census circular. The paper leans on the authors' own earlier papers for the preprocessing recipe ('The methods we use are described in Gaulme et al. (2013, 2014, 2016)'), but those citations supply data-reduction tools and previously characterized RG systems; the 163 'new' systems are defined by their absence from the prior literature, so the count logically cannot be an output of those citations. The paper itself concedes the detection boundary is uncertain ('it can sometimes be difficult to distinguish the detection of oscillations from imperfect light curve cleaning'; the harmonic-removal method 'is rather gross'), and no quantitative SNR threshold or false-alarm rate is reported. That is a reproducibility and verification risk, which belongs in a correctness assessment, not a circularity finding per the review rules. No equation or construction makes a claimed prediction equivalent to its input, and no uniqueness theorem or fitted value is imported through self-citation. Hence no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The catalog rests on four main assumptions: completeness of the input binary catalogs, validity of frequency-based pulsation classification, reliability of the visual detection method after light-curve cleaning, and completeness of the web-based literature search. None of these is independently verified within the paper, but the authors disclose the main weaknesses (especially false positives and non-exhaustive literature search).

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Villanova and Coughlin catalogs together provide a complete list of eclipsing binaries observed by the original Kepler mission.
    The authors use this to justify the phrase 'systematic search for stellar pulsators in the entire Kepler eclipsing binary catalog.' Invoked in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption Pulsation types can be assigned from frequency ranges and visual appearance of the Fourier spectrum without mode identification.
    The paper flags δ Sct (frequencies > 50 μHz), γ Dor (< 50 μHz), and tidal pulsators based on spectral morphology and effective temperature. Invoked in Section 4.1.
  • domain assumption The light-curve cleaning and eclipse-subtraction procedures do not introduce artifacts that are systematically mistaken for stellar oscillations.
    The detection method depends on this; the authors note the difficulty in Section 3 and the coarseness of harmonic removal in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption A web-engine-based literature search is sufficient to identify previously published pulsators in these systems.
    The count of 163 new discoveries depends on the completeness of this search; the authors state it is 'certainly not fully exhaustive' (Section 3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Systematic search for stellar pulsators in the eclipsing binaries observed by Kepler." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NTNZYK72

@misc{pith2026190806773,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Systematic search for stellar pulsators in the eclipsing binaries observed by Kepler},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NTNZYK72}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06773}
}
abstract

Eclipsing binaries (EBs) are unique targets for measuring precise stellar properties and constrain stellar evolution models. In particular, it is possible to measure at the percent level masses and radii of both components of a double-lined spectroscopic EB. Since the advent of high-precision photometric space missions (MOST, CoRoT, Kepler, BRITE, TESS), the use of stellar pulsation properties to infer stellar interiors and dynamics constitutes a revolution for low-mass star studies. The Kepler mission has led to the discovery of thousands of classical pulsators such as $\delta$ Scuti and solar-like oscillators (main sequence and evolved), but also almost 3000 EBs with orbital periods shorter than 1100 days. We report the first systematic search for stellar pulsators in the entire Kepler eclipsing binary catalog. The focus is mainly aimed at discovering $\delta$ Scuti, $\gamma$ Doradus, red giant, and tidally excited pulsators. We developed a data inspection tool (DIT) that automatically produces a series of plots from the Kepler light-curves that allows us to visually identify whether stellar oscillations are present in a given time series. We applied the DIT to the whole Kepler eclipsing binary database and identified 303 systems whose light curves display oscillations, including 163 new discoveries. A total of 149 stars are flagged as $\delta$ Scuti (100 from this paper), 115 stars as $\gamma$ Doradus (69 new), 85 stars as red giants (27 new), 59 as tidally excited oscillators (29 new). There is some overlap among these groups, as some display several types of oscillations. Despite many of these systems are likely to be false positives, i. e., when an EB light curve is blended with a pulsator, this catalog gathers a vast sample of systems that are valuable for a better understanding of stellar evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06773 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Orbital period histogram of the Villanova eclipsing binary sys￾tems. The y-axis sampling is the logarithm with base ten of the number of systems per step. Out of 2909 systems total, 2631 (i.e., 90.4 %) dis￾play an orbital period less than 50 days. 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effective temperatures of the Villanova eclipsing binaries. Tem￾peratures come from the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC) and are available for 2625 out of the 2909 systems (90.2 %). ever, the pointing was fine enough that a star repeatedly covered the same group of pixels every four quarters. Light curves are obtained by adding the pixels of the masks that were designed for every star of the field of view. For a given sta… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Eclipse light curve classification according to Matijevic et al. ˇ (2012) as a function of orbital period. The size of each bloc is adjusted to include 10 % of the total number of systems that were classified. The total number of classified systems is 2734 and each chunk consists of 273 ± 1 systems. The median orbital period is 2.30 days, while the 10 and 90 percentiles are 0.33 and 43.3 days respectively. The label… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Data inspection tool applied to the eclipsing binary system KIC 3851949, which includes a solar-like oscillator with νmax ≈ 120 µHz and depleted ` = 1 modes. Left column from top to bottom. Panel a: Kepler light curves as a function of time (days), where raw stands for…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of classical pulsators observed in the light curves of binary systems. Left is a 0.32-day orbit OC binary (KIC 8330092) displaying γ Dor and maybe Rossby modes at ν . 50 µHz and clear δ Sct oscillations above. Middle is the short period detached system KIC 685…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pulsation properties of the 148 δ Sct EB candidates identified in this work. Top: pulsation periods of oscillation spectra’s highest peak Ppuls as a function of orbital periods Porb. Bottom and left x- and y-axes are in the same units as in Liakos & Niarchos (2017). As…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Bona fide RG/EB that are possibly SB2 discovered in the present work. Top panels: Kepler light curves folded over the orbital period (black markers), with a rebinned version of if over 30 min bins. Bottom panels: power spectral density (PSD) as a function of frequency …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example of pulsators that either mimic tidal pulsators (KICs 8153568 and 6531496) or are actual tidal pulsators (KIC 11572363). In the cases of KIC 8153568 and 6531496 we do not plot a folded light curve but an extract of it over a little more than an orbital period (b…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top: light curve of KIC 8153568 from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The four systems in which we identify pulsations but where we have doubts about their nature (see Sect.4.3). KICs 5217733 and 6806632 could be either SPB or γ Dor/δ Sct. KIC 6889235 also known as KOI 74 is likely white dwarfs orbiting an A star with tidally excited os…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First and Comprehensive Study of V0757 Pup : $\gamma-$Doradus Pulsator in Detached Eclipsing Binary

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The primary star in the detached eclipsing binary V0757 Pup is a gamma Doradus pulsator with persistent frequencies near 0.79 and 0.98 cycles per day.

  2. Re-examining Super-Nyquist Frequencies of 68 $\delta$ Scuti Stars Utilizing the Kepler Long Cadence Photometry

    astro-ph.SR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Six frequencies in four delta Scuti stars are actually alias images of super-Nyquist signals, identified by re-analyzing Kepler long-cadence data with the sliding Lomb-Scargle periodogram.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    Aerts , C., Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., & Kurtz , D. W. 2010, Asteroseismology

    2010

  4. [4]

    2002, , 333, L35

    Aerts , C., Handler , G., Arentoft , T., et al. 2002, , 333, L35

    2002

  5. [5]

    & Soydugan , F

    Ali c avu s , F. & Soydugan , F. 2017, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1815, Turkish Physical Society 32nd International Physics Congress, 080003

    2017

  6. [6]

    J., Osborn , H

    Armstrong , D. J., Osborn , H. P., Brown , D. J. A., et al. 2014, , 444, 1873

    2014

  7. [7]

    2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Baglin , A., Auvergne , M., Barge , P., et al. 2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 253, IAU Symposium, ed. F. Pont , D. Sasselov , & M. J. Holman , 71--81

    2009

  8. [8]

    1973, , 23, 221

    Baglin , A., Breger , M., Chevalier , C., et al. 1973, , 23, 221

    1973

Show all 144 references
  1. [9]

    M., & Rappaport , S

    Balaji , B., Croll , B., Levine , A. M., & Rappaport , S. 2015, , 448, 429

    2015

  2. [10]

    Balona , L. A. 2014, , 443, 1946

    2014

  3. [11]

    Balona , L. A. 2015, , 447, 2714

    2015

  4. [12]

    A., Daszy \'n ska-Daszkiewicz , J., & Pamyatnykh , A

    Balona , L. A., Daszy \'n ska-Daszkiewicz , J., & Pamyatnykh , A. A. 2015, , 452, 3073

    2015

  5. [13]

    A., Joshi , S., Joshi , Y

    Balona , L. A., Joshi , S., Joshi , Y. C., & Sagar , R. 2013, , 429, 1466

    2013

  6. [14]

    A., Pigulski , A., De Cat , P., et al

    Balona , L. A., Pigulski , A., De Cat , P., et al. 2011, , 413, 2403

    2011

  7. [15]

    G., Hambleton , K., Vos , J., et al

    Beck , P. G., Hambleton , K., Vos , J., et al. 2014, , 564, A36

    2014

  8. [16]

    G., Hambleton , K., Vos , J., et al

    Beck , P. G., Hambleton , K., Vos , J., et al. 2015, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Vol. 101, The Space Photometry Revolution - CoRoT Symposium 3, Kepler KASC-7 Joint Meeting, 06004

    2015

  9. [17]

    R., Mosser , B., Huber , D., et al

    Bedding , T. R., Mosser , B., Huber , D., et al. 2011, , 471, 608

    2011

  10. [18]

    R., Murphy , S

    Bedding , T. R., Murphy , S. J., Colman , I. L., & Kurtz , D. W. 2015, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Vol. 101, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, 01005

    2015

  11. [19]

    J., Hekker , S., & Kuszlewicz , J

    Bell , K. J., Hekker , S., & Kuszlewicz , J. S. 2019, , 482, 616

    2019

  12. [20]

    & Schlichting , H

    Biersteker , J. & Schlichting , H. 2017, , 154, 164

    2017

  13. [21]

    2015, , 581, A77

    Bogn \'a r , Z., Lampens , P., Fr \'e mat , Y., et al. 2015, , 581, A77

    2015

  14. [22]

    2014, , 443, 3068

    Borkovits , T., Derekas , A., Fuller , J., et al. 2014, , 443, 3068

    2014

  15. [23]

    2016, , 455, 4136

    Borkovits , T., Hajdu , T., Sztakovics , J., et al. 2016, , 455, 4136

    2016

  16. [24]

    J., Koch , D., Basri , G., et al

    Borucki , W. J., Koch , D., Basri , G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977

    2010

  17. [25]

    J., Koch , D

    Borucki , W. J., Koch , D. G., Basri , G., et al. 2011, , 736, 19

    2011

  18. [26]

    M., Kurtz , D

    Bowman , D. M., Kurtz , D. W., Breger , M., Murphy , S. J., & Holdsworth , D. L. 2016, , 460, 1970

    2016

  19. [27]

    A., Guzik , J

    Bradley , P. A., Guzik , J. A., Miles , L. F., et al. 2015, , 149, 68

    2015

  20. [28]

    J., Miglio , A., et al

    Brogaard , K., Hansen , C. J., Miglio , A., et al. 2018, , 476, 3729

    2018

  21. [29]

    2011, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/530/A138

    Casagrande , L., Schoenrich , R., Asplund , M., et al. 2011, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/530/A138

    2011

  22. [30]

    2017, , 605, A111

    Ceillier , T., Tayar , J., Mathur , S., et al. 2017, , 605, A111

    2017

  23. [31]

    Chaplin , W. J. & Miglio , A. 2013, , 51, 353

    2013

  24. [32]

    S., et al

    Chiappini , C., Anders , F., Rodrigues , T. S., et al. 2015, , 576, L12

    2015

  25. [33]

    E., Pr s a , A., Stassun , K

    Conroy , K. E., Pr s a , A., Stassun , K. G., et al. 2014, , 147, 45

    2014

  26. [34]

    L., L \'o pez-Morales , M., Harrison , T

    Coughlin , J. L., L \'o pez-Morales , M., Harrison , T. E., Ule , N., & Hoffman , D. I. 2011, , 141, 78

    2011

  27. [35]

    Dal , H. A. & Sipahi , E. 2013, , 30, e016

    2013

  28. [36]

    2013, , 556, A56

    Debosscher , J., Aerts , C., Tkachenko , A., et al. 2013, , 556, A56

    2013

  29. [37]

    2011, , 529, A89

    Debosscher , J., Blomme , J., Aerts , C., & De Ridder , J. 2011, , 529, A89

    2011

  30. [38]

    & Bulut , \.I

    Demircan , O. & Bulut , \.I . 2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 496, Living Together: Planets, Host Stars and Binaries, ed. S. M. Rucinski , G. Torres , & M. Zejda , 395

    2015

  31. [39]

    L., Borkovits , T., et al

    Derekas , A., Kiss , L. L., Borkovits , T., et al. 2011, Science, 332, 216

    2011

  32. [40]

    P., Kjurkchieva , D

    Dimitrov , D. P., Kjurkchieva , D. P., & Iliev , I. K. 2017, , 469, 2089

    2017

  33. [41]

    Dodson-Robinson , S. E. 2012, , 752, 72

    2012

  34. [42]

    2013, , 763, L2

    Dong , S., Katz , B., & Socrates , A. 2013, , 763, L2

    2013

  35. [43]

    2015, , 815, 26

    Faigler , S., Kull , I., Mazeh , T., et al. 2015, , 815, 26

    2015

  36. [44]

    2013, , 556, A138

    Frandsen , S., Lehmann , H., Hekker , S., et al. 2013, , 556, A138

    2013

  37. [45]

    C., et al

    Garc \' a Hern \'a ndez , A., Moya , A., Su \'a rez , J. C., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints [ [arXiv] 1601.07374 ]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [46]

    & Guzik , J

    Gaulme , P. & Guzik , J. A. 2014, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 301, IAU Symposium, ed. J. A. Guzik , W. J. Chaplin , G. Handler , & A. Pigulski , 413--414

    2014

  39. [47]

    2014, , 785, 5

    Gaulme , P., Jackiewicz , J., Appourchaux , T., & Mosser , B. 2014, , 785, 5

    2014

  40. [48]

    2016, , 832, 121

    Gaulme , P., McKeever , J., Jackiewicz , J., et al. 2016, , 832, 121

    2016

  41. [49]

    L., et al

    Gaulme , P., McKeever , J., Rawls , M. L., et al. 2013, , 767, 82

    2013

  42. [50]

    V., Misra , R., & Ambika , G

    George , S. V., Misra , R., & Ambika , G. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1805.08351

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    R., Matson , R

    Gies , D. R., Matson , R. A., Guo , Z., et al. 2015, , 150, 178

    2015

  44. [52]

    R., & Matson , R

    Guo , Z., Gies , D. R., & Matson , R. A. 2017 a , , 851, 39

    2017

  45. [53]

    R., Matson , R

    Guo , Z., Gies , D. R., Matson , R. A., & Garc \' a Hern \'a ndez , A. 2016, , 826, 69

    2016

  46. [54]

    R., Matson , R

    Guo , Z., Gies , D. R., Matson , R. A., et al. 2017 b , , 837, 114

    2017

  47. [55]

    2018, , 473, 5165

    Hambleton , K., Fuller , J., Thompson , S., et al. 2018, , 473, 5165

    2018

  48. [56]

    W., Pr s a , A., et al

    Hambleton , K., Kurtz , D. W., Pr s a , A., et al. 2016, , 463, 1199

    2016

  49. [57]

    M., Kurtz , D

    Hambleton , K. M., Kurtz , D. W., Pr s a , A., et al. 2013, , 434, 925

    2013

  50. [58]

    2010, , 713, L187

    Hekker , S., Debosscher , J., Huber , D., et al. 2010, , 713, L187

    2010

  51. [59]

    G., Ukita , N., Kambe , E., & Konacki , M

    He miniak , K. G., Ukita , N., Kambe , E., & Konacki , M. 2015, , 813, L25

    2015

  52. [60]

    G., Ukita , N., Kambe , E., et al

    He miniak , K. G., Ukita , N., Kambe , E., et al. 2017 a , , 602, A30

    2017

  53. [61]

    G., Ukita , N., Kambe , E., et al

    He miniak , K. G., Ukita , N., Kambe , E., et al. 2017 b , , 468, 1726

    2017

  54. [62]

    G., Ukita , N., Kambe , E., et al

    He miniak , K. G., Ukita , N., Kambe , E., et al. 2016, , 461, 2896

    2016

  55. [63]

    & Soydugan , E

    Kahraman Ali c avu s , F. & Soydugan , E. 2014, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 301, Precision Asteroseismology, ed. J. A. Guzik , W. J. Chaplin , G. Handler , & A. Pigulski , 433--434

    2014

  56. [64]

    2017, , 470, 915

    Kahraman Ali c avu s , F., Soydugan , E., Smalley , B., & Kub \'a t , J. 2017, , 470, 915

    2017

  57. [65]

    2014, , 570, A41

    Kallinger , T., De Ridder , J., Hekker , S., et al. 2014, , 570, A41

    2014

  58. [66]

    Katsova , M. M. & Nizamov , B. A. 2018, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 58, 899

    2018

  59. [67]

    2016, , 151, 68

    Kirk , B., Conroy , K., Pr s a , A., et al. 2016, , 151, 68

    2016

  60. [68]

    & Bedding , T

    Kjeldsen , H. & Bedding , T. R. 1995, , 293, 87

    1995

  61. [69]

    & Atanasova , T

    Kjurkchieva , D. & Atanasova , T. 2016, , 49, 17

    2016

  62. [70]

    2016, , 152, 189

    Kjurkchieva , D., Vasileva , D., & Dimitrov , D. 2016, , 152, 189

    2016

  63. [71]

    2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 70, 90

    Kouzuma , S. 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 70, 90

    2018

  64. [72]

    W., Hambleton , K

    Kurtz , D. W., Hambleton , K. M., Shibahashi , H., Murphy , S. J., & Pr s a , A. 2015 a , , 446, 1223

    2015

  65. [73]

    W., Shibahashi , H., Murphy , S

    Kurtz , D. W., Shibahashi , H., Murphy , S. J., Bedding , T. R., & Bowman , D. M. 2015 b , , 450, 3015

    2015

  66. [74]

    S., North , T

    Kuszlewicz , J. S., North , T. S. H., Chaplin , W. J., et al. 2019, , 487, 14

    2019

  67. [75]

    W., Hong , K., & Hinse , T

    Lee , J. W., Hong , K., & Hinse , T. C. 2015, , 149, 93

    2015

  68. [76]

    W., Hong , K., Kim , S.-L., & Koo , J.-R

    Lee , J. W., Hong , K., Kim , S.-L., & Koo , J.-R. 2016 a , , 460, 4220

    2016

  69. [77]

    W., Hong , K., Kim , S.-L., & Koo , J.-R

    Lee , J. W., Hong , K., Kim , S.-L., & Koo , J.-R. 2017, , 835, 189

    2017

  70. [78]

    W., Kim , S.-L., Hong , K., et al

    Lee , J. W., Kim , S.-L., Hong , K., et al. 2016 b , , 151, 25

    2016

  71. [79]

    W., Kim , S.-L., Hong , K., Lee , C.-U., & Koo , J.-R

    Lee , J. W., Kim , S.-L., Hong , K., Lee , C.-U., & Koo , J.-R. 2014, , 148, 37

    2014

  72. [80]

    2013, , 557, A79

    Lehmann , H., Southworth , J., Tkachenko , A., & Pavlovski , K. 2013, , 557, A79

    2013

  73. [81]

    2017, , 607, A85

    Liakos , A. 2017, , 607, A85

    2017

  74. [82]

    2018, , 616, A130

    Liakos , A. 2018, , 616, A130

    2018

  75. [83]

    & Niarchos , P

    Liakos , A. & Niarchos , P. 2017, , 465, 1181

    2017

  76. [84]

    2014, , 562, A109

    Lillo-Box , J., Barrado , D., Moya , A., et al. 2014, , 562, A109

    2014

  77. [85]

    C., Vyhmeister , K., Hawley , S

    Lurie , J. C., Vyhmeister , K., Hawley , S. L., et al. 2017, , 154, 250

    2017

  78. [86]

    2014, , 563, A59

    Maceroni , C., Lehmann , H., da Silva , R., et al. 2014, , 563, A59

    2014

  79. [87]

    & Hambleton , K

    Manuel , J. & Hambleton , K. 2018, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 231, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#231, 146.01

    2018

  80. [88]

    Marcadon , F., Appourchaux , T., & Marques , J. P. 2018, , 617, A2

    2018

  81. [89]

    2017, , 154, 64

    Masuda , K. 2017, , 154, 64

    2017

  82. [90]

    A., et al

    Matijevi c , G., Pr s a , A., Orosz , J. A., et al. 2012, , 143, 123

    2012

  83. [91]

    A., Gies , D

    Matson , R. A., Gies , D. R., Guo , Z., & Williams , S. J. 2017, , 154, 216

    2017

  84. [92]

    J., Jackiewicz , J., & McKeever , J

    McNamara , B. J., Jackiewicz , J., & McKeever , J. 2012, , 143, 101

    2012

  85. [93]

    M., Angelou , G

    Mirouh , G. M., Angelou , G. C., Reese , D. R., & Costa , G. 2019, , 483, L28

    2019

  86. [94]

    & Appourchaux , T

    Mosser , B. & Appourchaux , T. 2009, , 508, 877

    2009

  87. [95]

    C., Garc \' a Hern \'a ndez , A., & Mendoza , M

    Moya , A., Su \'a rez , J. C., Garc \' a Hern \'a ndez , A., & Mendoza , M. A. 2017, , 471, 2491

    2017

  88. [96]

    J., Bedding , T

    Murphy , S. J., Bedding , T. R., Niemczura , E., Kurtz , D. W., & Smalley , B. 2015, , 447, 3948

    2015

  89. [97]

    J., Moe , M., Kurtz , D

    Murphy , S. J., Moe , M., Kurtz , D. W., et al. 2018, , 474, 4322

    2018

  90. [98]

    J., Smalley , B., et al

    Niemczura , E., Murphy , S. J., Smalley , B., et al. 2015, , 450, 2764

    2015

  91. [99]

    J., et al

    Niemczura , E., Poli \'n ska , M., Murphy , S. J., et al. 2017, , 470, 2870

    2017

  92. [100]

    Orosz , J. A. 2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 496, Living Together: Planets, Host Stars and Binaries, ed. S. M. Rucinski , G. Torres , & M. Zejda , 55

    2015

  93. [101]

    & Dal , H

    \"O zdarcan , O. & Dal , H. A. 2017, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 34, e017

    2017

  94. [102]

    D., Reed , M

    Pablo , H., Kawaler , S. D., Reed , M. D., et al. 2012, , 422, 1343

    2012

  95. [103]

    H., An , D., Molenda- \.Z akowicz , J., et al

    Pinsonneault , M. H., An , D., Molenda- \.Z akowicz , J., et al. 2012, , 199, 30

    2012

  96. [104]

    2018, Modeling and Analysis of Eclipsing Binary Stars; The theory and design principles of PHOEBE

    Pr s a , A. 2018, Modeling and Analysis of Eclipsing Binary Stars; The theory and design principles of PHOEBE

    2018

  97. [105]

    W., et al

    Pr s a , A., Batalha , N., Slawson , R. W., et al. 2011, , 141, 83

    2011

  98. [106]

    F., Devinney , E

    Pr s a , A., Guinan , E. F., Devinney , E. J., et al. 2008, , 687, 542

    2008

  99. [107]

    2014, , 437, 132

    Ramsay , G., Brooks , A., Hakala , P., et al. 2014, , 437, 132

    2014

  100. [108]

    2013, , 768, 33

    Rappaport , S., Deck , K., Levine , A., et al. 2013, , 768, 33

    2013

  101. [109]

    2015, , 803, 82

    Rappaport , S., Nelson , L., Levine , A., et al. 2015, , 803, 82

    2015

  102. [110]

    L., Gaulme , P., McKeever , J., et al

    Rawls , M. L., Gaulme , P., McKeever , J., et al. 2016, , 818, 108

    2016

  103. [111]

    R., Winn , J

    Ricker , G. R., Winn , J. N., Vanderspek , R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003

    2015

  104. [112]

    F., Borucki , W

    Rowe , J. F., Borucki , W. J., Koch , D., et al. 2010, , 713, L150

    2010

  105. [113]

    F., Coughlin , J

    Rowe , J. F., Coughlin , J. L., Antoci , V., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 217, 16

    2015

  106. [114]

    W., Murphy , S

    Saio , H., Kurtz , D. W., Murphy , S. J., Antoci , V. L., & Lee , U. 2018, , 474, 2774

    2018

  107. [115]

    L., Jessen-Hansen , J., Shetrone , M

    Sandquist , E. L., Jessen-Hansen , J., Shetrone , M. D., et al. 2016, , 831, 11

    2016

  108. [116]

    2016, , 587, A64

    Santerne , A., Moutou , C., Tsantaki , M., et al. 2016, , 587, A64

    2016

  109. [117]

    & Kurtz , D

    Shibahashi , H. & Kurtz , D. W. 2012, , 422, 738

    2012

  110. [118]

    2016, , 829, 34

    Shporer , A., Fuller , J., Isaacson , H., et al. 2016, , 829, 34

    2016

  111. [119]

    & Dal , H

    Sipahi , E. & Dal , H. A. 2014, , 26, 62

    2014

  112. [120]

    W., Pr s a , A., Welsh , W

    Slawson , R. W., Pr s a , A., Welsh , W. F., et al. 2011, , 142, 160

    2011

  113. [121]

    Smullen , R. A. & Kobulnicky , H. A. 2015, , 808, 166

    2015

  114. [122]

    2013, , 557, A119

    Southworth , J. 2013, , 557, A119

    2013

  115. [123]

    2015, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Vol

    Southworth , J. 2015, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Vol. 101, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, 04001

    2015

  116. [124]

    2011, , 414, 2413

    Southworth , J., Zima , W., Aerts , C., et al. 2011, , 414, 2413

    2011

  117. [125]

    2017, , 467, 4663

    Sowicka , P., Handler , G., Debski , B., et al. 2017, , 467, 4663

    2017

  118. [126]

    2006, , 370, 2013

    Soydugan , E., Soydugan , F., Demircan , O., & \.I bano g lu , C. 2006, , 370, 2013

    2006

  119. [127]

    1990, Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO), 19, 52

    Szatmary , K. 1990, Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO), 19, 52

    1990

  120. [128]

    2018, , 478, 4669

    Theme l , N., Hekker , S., Southworth , J., et al. 2018, , 478, 4669

    2018

  121. [129]

    E., Everett , M., Mullally , F., et al

    Thompson , S. E., Everett , M., Mullally , F., et al. 2012, , 753, 86

    2012

  122. [130]

    2019, , 67, 40

    Turner , G. 2019, , 67, 40

    2019

  123. [131]

    & Holaday , J

    Turner , G. & Holaday , J. 2015, Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO), 43, 40

    2015

  124. [132]

    & Maynard , A

    Turner , G. & Maynard , A. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1604.04867

    2016 arXiv

  125. [133]

    D., Chandrasekaran , H., Jenkins , J

    Twicken , J. D., Chandrasekaran , H., Jenkins , J. M., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7740, , 77401U

    2010

  126. [134]

    2011, , 534, A125

    Uytterhoeven , K., Moya , A., Grigahc \`e ne , A., et al. 2011, , 534, A125

    2011

  127. [135]

    2015 a , , 574, A17

    Van Reeth , T., Tkachenko , A., Aerts , C., et al. 2015 a , , 574, A17

    2015

  128. [136]

    2015 b , , 218, 27

    Van Reeth , T., Tkachenko , A., Aerts , C., et al. 2015 b , , 218, 27

    2015

  129. [137]

    F., Orosz , J

    Welsh , W. F., Orosz , J. A., Aerts , C., et al. 2011, , 197, 4

    2011

  130. [138]

    2015, IAU General Assembly, 22, 2256344

    Yakut , K. 2015, IAU General Assembly, 22, 2256344

    2015

  131. [139]

    2017 a , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17, 22

    Zhang , J., Qian , S.-B., & He , J.-D. 2017 a , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17, 22

    2017

  132. [140]

    2017 b , Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 69, 49

    Zhang , J., Qian , S.-B., Wang , S.-M., Wu , Y., & Jiang , L.-Q. 2017 b , Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 69, 49

    2017

  133. [141]

    B., Fu , J

    Zhang , X. B., Fu , J. N., Liu , N., Luo , C. Q., & Ren , A. B. 2017 c , , 850, 125

    2017

  134. [142]

    B., Luo , Y

    Zhang , X. B., Luo , Y. P., Wang , K., & Luo , C. Q. 2015, , 150, 37

    2015

  135. [143]

    Zhou , A. Y. 2010, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1002.2729

    2010 arXiv

  136. [144]

    K., Thompson , S

    Zimmerman , M. K., Thompson , S. E., Mullally , F., et al. 2017, , 846, 147

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.