Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Option Comparison Network for Multiple-choice Reading Comprehension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.03033 v1 pith:NU5IM5UI submitted 2019-03-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords optionmcrcoptionsreadingreasoningarticlebeforecompare
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multiple-choice reading comprehension (MCRC) is the task of selecting the correct answer from multiple options given a question and an article. Existing MCRC models typically either read each option independently or compute a fixed-length representation for each option before comparing them. However, humans typically compare the options at multiple-granularity level before reading the article in detail to make reasoning more efficient. Mimicking humans, we propose an option comparison network (OCN) for MCRC which compares options at word-level to better identify their correlations to help reasoning. Specially, each option is encoded into a vector sequence using a skimmer to retain fine-grained information as much as possible. An attention mechanism is leveraged to compare these sequences vector-by-vector to identify more subtle correlations between options, which is potentially valuable for reasoning. Experimental results on the human English exam MCRC dataset RACE show that our model outperforms existing methods significantly. Moreover, it is also the first model that surpasses Amazon Mechanical Turker performance on the whole dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DCMN+: Dual Co-Matching Network for Multi-choice Reading Comprehension

    cs.CL 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DCMN+ combines bidirectional passage-question-option matching with passage sentence selection and answer option interaction to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on five multiple-choice reading comprehension datasets.

  2. SG-Net: Syntax-Guided Machine Reading Comprehension

    cs.CL 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Masking self-attention to syntactic ancestors and averaging it with BERT attention improves SQuAD 2.0 exact match from 84.1 to 85.1 and RACE accuracy from 72.6 to 74.2.

Pith tools