Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 47 references

Observation of a core-excited dipole-bound state $\sim$1 eV above the electron detachment threshold in cryogenically cooled acetylacetonate

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sharp bands at 3.69 eV in cryogenically cooled acetylacetonate are assigned to a core-excited dipole-bound state about 1 eV above the electron detachment threshold.

desk verdict A careful cryogenic photodetachment study that likely sees a core-excited dipole-bound state in acetylacetonate, but the assignment leans on an asserted width criterion and the 'first ~1 eV' claim needs qualification. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16453 v1 pith:NUCV2PQX submitted 2024-11-25 physics.chem-ph

Rafael A Jara-Toro (IPR) , Martín Taccone (INFIQC) , Jordan Dezalay , Jennifer Noble (PIIM) , Gert von Helden (FHI) , Gustavo Pino (INFIQC) This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph PACS 33.80.Eh33.20.Kf
keywords core-exciteddipole-boundstatephotodetachmentspectroscopyacetylacetonateanioninternalconversionvibrationalFeshbachresonancecryogenicion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that the acetylacetonate anion, when cooled and probed by photodetachment, shows two sets of sharp resonances. The first, near 2.78 eV, is a dipole-bound state attached to the ground state of the neutral radical (D0-DBS). The second, starting at 3.69 eV, is assigned to a core-excited dipole-bound state (D1-DBS), in which the diffuse electron is bound to the first electronically excited state of the radical while carrying about 1 eV of excess energy above the detachment threshold. The surprise is that such a state can be observed at all, since it should autodetach almost instantly; the paper argues that its lifetime is set by a slow internal conversion to the D0-DBS, after which electron detachment becomes fast. If correct, this identifies a new relaxation channel that could matter for electron attachment and anion chemistry.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the core-excited dipole-bound state, a diffuse orbital electron bound by the dipole moment of an electronically excited neutral core. The specific states are the D0-DBS (electron bound to the radical ground state, dipole moment 2.5 D) and the D1-DBS (electron bound to the first excited radical state, dipole moment 4.4 D). The mechanism that makes the D1-DBS observable is internal conversion from D1-DBS to D0-DBS, a spin-allowed change in the neutral-core electron configuration that slows the two-electron detachment enough to produce narrow bands; vibronic Feshbach resonances above the D1 threshold may also detach through vibrationally induced autodetachment with Δv = -1.

What would settle it

Record a photoelectron spectrum of the cryogenically cooled anion at 3.69 eV. If the detached electron comes from the D0 continuum (electron kinetic energies consistent with production of ground-state radical), the D1-DBS/internal-conversion picture is supported; if the electron energies match production of the D1 excited radical, the bands are instead shape resonances of the S3/S4 valence states. Alternatively, scan the 3.7 eV region with higher resolution and measure the band widths: FWHM > 200 cm-1 would contradict the reported narrow resonances.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that sharp transitions at 3.69 eV in the photodetachment spectrum of cryogenically cooled acetylacetonate come from a core-excited dipole-bound state, labeled D1-DBS, associated with the first excited electronic state of the acetylacetonyl radical. The calculated adiabatic transition energy for the S0 → D1 path, 3.68 eV including zero-point correction, matches the observed 0-0 band at 3.69 eV, and the Franck-Condon simulation reproduces the vibrational progression. Because the D1-DBS lies about 0.92 eV above the estimated adiabatic detachment energy of 2.77–2.78 eV, ordinary shape-resonance decay would broaden the bands beyond recognition; the paper instead proposes that the electron detachment is a two-electron process: internal conversion from D1-DBS to D0-DBS changes the core electronic configuration from (n1, π2) to (n2, π1), and only then does the diffuse electron detach quickly. The measured 35 cm-1 width of the 0-0 band translates to a lower lifetime limit around a few tenths of a picosecond, consistent with internal-conversion control. This would be the first observation of a CE-DBS about 1 eV above the detachment threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The assignment of the 3.69 eV bands to a core-excited dipole-bound state rests on ruling out ordinary valence excited states (S3/S4) of the anion as the carriers, based on the expectation that shape resonances with ~1.1 eV excess energy are broader than 200 cm-1; the calculated S3/S4 energies (3.82 and 3.85 eV) sit within the stated ±0.2 eV uncertainty of the observed 3.69 eV, and no photoelectron spectrum was recorded to distinguish the two.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The D1-DBS assignment predicts that resonant excitation at 3.69 eV ultimately yields ground-state radical plus a free electron, so photoelectron kinetic energies should map to the D0 continuum, not the D1 continuum.
  • Vibrational Feshbach resonances above the D1 detachment threshold should open a competing channel that prepares electronically excited radicals, which could be tested by detecting the excited-state emission or by electron kinetic energy analysis.
  • The internal-conversion bottleneck implies that the D1-DBS lifetime varies among vibrational levels, with widths reflecting IC rates; level-specific pump-probe measurements could verify the trend.
  • Acetylacetonate's two dipole-bound states give a concrete system in which electron capture into an excited core state could precede internal conversion, connecting to dissociative electron attachment pathways.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the internal-conversion mechanism is general, other anions with polar excited neutral cores and a low-lying excited state might also show observable CE-DBSs far above threshold, provided the IC step is slow enough; searching for narrow bands in the same excess-energy window in related β-diketonates is a direct test.
  • Editorial inference: The paper's dismissal of the S3/S4 valence shape resonances relies on a linewidth expectation (>200 cm-1) that is not independently calibrated for this molecule; a photoelectron spectrum of the 3.69 eV bands would settle the assignment directly by showing whether the detached electron comes from the D0 or D1 continuum.
  • Editorial inference: The ~1 eV excess energy suggests that CE-DBSs could act as intermediate states for electron-driven chemistry in molecules that lack valence excited states, since the anion can store energy in the excited core while the diffuse electron waits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports photodetachment action spectroscopy of cryogenically cooled acetylacetonate anions (C5H7O2-) by detecting neutral photodetachment products, together with helium-nanodroplet infrared spectroscopy. The IR data are used to argue that only the most stable aT isomer is populated. In the UV-visible photodetachment spectrum, two groups of narrow resonances are observed: one near 2.782 eV, assigned to a ground-state dipole-bound state (D0-DBS), and one starting at 3.691 eV, assigned to a core-excited dipole-bound state (D1-DBS) attached to the first excited state of the rT radical. The assignment rests on a TD-DFT adiabatic transition energy of 3.68 eV for the S0 -> D1 transition of the neutral core, a Franck-Condon simulation of that transition, and a proposed dynamical mechanism in which internal conversion from D1-DBS to D0-DBS limits the autodetachment lifetime, yielding narrow resonances ~1 eV above the detachment threshold.

Significance. If the assignment is correct, the observation of a core-excited dipole-bound state with narrow transitions about 1 eV above the electron detachment threshold is a notable result: it would extend the small set of experimentally observed CE-DBSs and provide a concrete dynamical rationale (internal conversion to the D0-DBS) for why such a state can be seen at high excess energy. The paper has real strengths: the cryogenic photodetachment method, the independent IR-based isomer identification, and the consistency between the computed D1 energy (3.68 eV) and the observed band origin (3.69 eV) are all presented clearly. The authors also explicitly acknowledge that a photoelectron spectrum would be needed to unambiguously assign the resonances, and they disclose that the calculated S3/S4 valence states lie close in energy. The central claim is therefore plausible but not established beyond reasonable doubt; the main weakness is the dismissal of the S3/S4 valence shape-resonance alternative on the basis of an unquantified width criterion.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.B, paragraphs beginning 'These states correlate directly...' and 'Once more, these transitions could be…] The exclusion of the S3/S4 valence excited states as carriers of the 3.69 eV resonances is the load-bearing step for the D1-DBS assignment, and it rests on the assertion that ~1.1 eV excess energy in the D0 continuum necessarily produces shape resonances with FWHM > 200 cm-1. This width criterion is neither demonstrated nor referenced. Table II places the calculated Ead+ΔZPE of S3 and S4 at 3.82 and 3.85 eV, both within the paper's stated ±0.2 eV uncertainty of the observed 3.69 eV band origin, and the paper itself states that a photoelectron spectrum is needed to unambiguously assign the resonances. As written, the data are equally compatible with narrow S3/S4 shape resonances whose autodetachment width is suppressed by weak electronic coupling or by a temporary-anion barrier, and with the proposed D1-DBS. The authors should provide a quantitative estimate or a benchmark calculation for the expected autodetachment width of the S3/S4 states, or obtain experimental discrimination (for example, photoelectron imaging), before the CE-DBS assignment can be considered established.
  2. [Section IV.B and Section V (Conclusions)] The novelty claim in the abstract and conclusions - that this is the first observation of a CE-DBS lying ~1 eV above the ADE - is internally inconsistent with the paper's own statement in Section IV.B that the CH3NO2- 0-0 transition is found 0.92 eV above the estimated ADE. Since 0.92 eV is effectively ~1 eV, the paper appears to claim priority for a situation it already attributes to CH3NO2-. If the intended distinction is that aT is the first case with narrow, well-resolved transitions at that excess energy, or the first whose lifetime is set by internal conversion to a lower DBS, that distinction should be stated explicitly and supported. As written, the conclusion overstates the novelty relative to the paper's own discussion.
  3. [Section IV.B, Franck-Condon simulations (Figures 3 and 5)] The Franck-Condon simulations are presented as strong supporting evidence, but the agreement is only described qualitatively as 'very good' and no quantitative metric (e.g., a computed spectrum-to-experiment residual) is given. The simulations assume a 50 K rotational/vibrational temperature, and the sensitivity of the simulated band shape and intensity pattern to this parameter is not discussed. A quantitative comparison, or at least a display of the simulated spectrum at a second temperature, would strengthen the discrimination between the D1-DBS and the S3/S4 alternatives, since the latter's simulated spectrum is said to agree poorly but is relegated to the Supplementary Material.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IV.B] The text contains a broken cross-reference: '31-33,39Error! Bookmark not defined.' This should be corrected to the intended reference.
  2. [Section III.A] The phrase 'recorded with a resolution of 126 points/nm' is unclear; the unit likely should be points per cm-1 or per nm, and it should be stated consistently with the photon-energy axis.
  3. [Section IV.B] The sentence 'In the cases of of pyrazolide 16 and KI-17' has a duplicated 'of' and appears to have the reference numbers swapped: KI- is Ref. 16 and pyrazolide is Ref. 17.
  4. [Introduction] The term 'Aceylacetonate' is a typo for 'Acetylacetonate' in the first paragraph of the introduction.
  5. [Table I] The table heading says 'Calculates relative energy' and should read 'Calculated relative energy'.
  6. [Section II.A] The word 'accelleration' in the description of the Wiley-McLaren setup should be 'acceleration'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central D1-DBS assignment rests on an ab initio energy match and Franck-Condon comparison with no fitted parameters; the paper's self-citations are methodological, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The sharp resonances at 3.69 eV are an experimental observation, and the assignment to a core-excited D1-DBS is supported by a TD-DFT (CAM-B3LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ) calculation of the D1 state of the rT radical at Ead+ΔZPE = 3.68 eV, which is compared with the observed 3.69 eV origin without adjusting any parameter to the spectrum. The D1 dipole moment (4.4 D) is also a computed quantity, not extracted from the data. The Franck-Condon simulation for the S0 → D1 transition is generated from calculated geometries and vibrational modes and compared qualitatively with the observed band structure; it is not a fit to the experimental peak positions or intensities. The alternative assignment to S3 or S4 valence shape resonances is dismissed using an assumed bandwidth criterion for shape resonances (FWHM > 200 cm-1), even though the calculated S3/S4 energies (3.82 and 3.85 eV) lie within the paper's stated ±0.2 eV uncertainty of the observed 3.69 eV. This is a substantive scientific assumption and a limitation, and the paper explicitly concedes in Section IV.B that a photoelectron spectrum would be needed for unambiguous assignment. An unsupported or conditional assignment is not, however, a circular reduction: the conclusion is not defined in terms of the data, nor is any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The self-citations in the paper (refs. 31-33 and 39) are used to justify methodological uncertainty estimates and expected DBS binding energies from previous work on other anions; they do not assume the existence or energy of the acetylacetonate D1-DBS, so they are not load-bearing circular support. The binding-energy estimate of <10 cm-1 for the D0-DBS is also supported by external literature. A minor consistency caveat exists: the conclusion claims the first CE-DBS observed ~1 eV above the ADE, while the text notes CH3NO2- has its 00 transition 0.92 eV above the estimated ADE; this is a correctness concern, not circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained in the sense that the central assignment compares independent ab initio predictions with the measured spectrum, and no step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard dipole-bound-state theory, on the accuracy of TD-DFT transition energies, and on the assumption that only the aT isomer is present. No new fundamental entities are introduced. The only hand-chosen parameter is the 50 K temperature used in the Franck-Condon simulation, which is an experimental setting rather than a fit to the data.

free parameters (1)
  • rotational/vibrational temperature in Franck-Condon simulations = 50 K (chosen, not fitted)
    Chosen to represent the cryogenic trap temperature; affects the simulated band contour and the interpretation of the 2.74 eV onset as a hot band. Not fitted to the spectrum.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption A neutral core with dipole moment >= 2.5 D can support a dipole-bound state.
    Invoked in the Introduction and used in Section III.C to argue the aT radical (mu=2.5 D) and rC1/rC2 radicals can support DBSs; standard result from prior DBS literature.
  • domain assumption The dipole-bound electron has negligible effect on the neutral core geometry and vibrational frequencies.
    Used in Section IV.B to justify comparing Franck-Condon simulations of the S0 to rT(D1) detachment transition with the D1-DBS spectrum; cited to Refs 7 and 11.
  • domain assumption TD-DFT CAM-B3LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ transition energies are accurate to about +-0.2 eV for broad bands and +-0.1 eV for structured transitions.
    Used throughout Section IV to compare computed Ead values with the observed 2.78 eV and 3.69 eV band positions; the uncertainty is estimated from the authors' previous studies (Refs 31-33, 39).
  • domain assumption The aT isomer dominates the ion population in the photodetachment trap, as inferred from He-nanodroplet IR spectra.
    Section IV.A concludes only aT is populated based on IR in 90 K droplets, and this is carried over to the 50 K QIT; the authors acknowledge they cannot rule out aC1/aC2 contributions to the 2.74 eV onset.
  • domain assumption Shape resonances with about 1 eV excess energy have FWHM greater than 200 cm-1.
    Used in Section IV.B to dismiss the S3/S4 assignment for the 3.69 eV bands; stated as 'usually observed' for shape resonances but not derived or measured here.
  • standard math The Wigner threshold law describes the photodetachment onset.
    Used to describe the continuous background in the photodetachment spectrum (Ref 42).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of a core-excited dipole-bound state $\sim$1 eV above the electron detachment threshold in cryogenically cooled acetylacetonate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NUCV2PQX

@misc{pith2026241116453,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of a core-excited dipole-bound state $\sim$1 eV above the electron detachment threshold in cryogenically cooled acetylacetonate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NUCV2PQX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16453}
}
abstract

Dipole-bound states in anions exist when a polar neutral core binds an electron in a diffuse orbital through charge--dipole interaction. Electronically excited polar neutral cores can also bind an electron in a diffuse orbital to form Core-Excited Dipole-Bound States (CE-DBSs), which are difficult to observe because they usually lie above the electron detachment threshold, leading to very short lifetimes and, thus, unstructured transitions. We report here the photodetachment spectroscopy of cryogenically cooled acetylacetonate anion (C$_5$H$_7$O$_2^-$) recorded by detecting the neutral radical produced upon photodetachment and the infrared spectroscopy in He-nanodroplets. Two DBSs were identified in this anion. One of them lies close to the electron detachment threshold ($\sim$2.74 eV) and is associated with the ground state of the radical (D0-DBS). Surprisingly, the other DBS appears as resonant transitions at 3.69 eV and is assigned to the CE-DBS associated with the first excited state of the radical (D1-DBS). It is proposed that the resonant transitions of the D1-DBS are observed $\sim$1 eV above the detachment threshold because its lifetime is determined by the internal conversion to the D0-DBS, after which the fast electron detachment takes place.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16453 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. , recorded with a resolution of 126 points/nm. These peaks indicate the presence of resonances, either due to excited anionic states, E-VBS (S1, S2, …), or to DBSs. The first group of bands starts at 2.782 eV with a progression of 0.006 eV (48 cm-1 ) and an average full-width half-maximum (FWHM  15 cm-1 ). A second group of more intense bands appears at 3.691 eV with a FWHM = 35 cm-1 at the band origin. The onset a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cold-ion IR action spectra of C5H7O2 - anion inside He nanodroplets, generated from Zn(C5H7O2)2 (red) and pure acetylacetone (black) in the 900 - 1700 cm-1 region. The green line shows the same spectrum obtained with 85% attenuation of the FEL using acetylacetone as precursor. A zoom in (x 25) of this spectrum is also shown in green. Theoretical spectra for the aT (blue), aC1 (yellow) and aC2 (brown) isomers were ca… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ground-State Dipole-Bound Anions

    C. Desfrancois, H. A. Carime and J. P. Schermann, “Ground-State Dipole-Bound Anions”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10, 1339−1395 (1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Threshold Resonances in Electron Photodetachment Spectra. Structural Evidence for Dipole- Supported States,

    J. Marks, P. B. Comita and J. I. Brauman, “Threshold Resonances in Electron Photodetachment Spectra. Structural Evidence for Dipole- Supported States,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 3718−3719 (1985)

    work page 1985

  3. [3]

    Observation of Dipole -Bound States of Negative Ions ,

    K. R. Lykke, R. D. Mead and W. C. Lineberger, “Observation of Dipole -Bound States of Negative Ions ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2221−2224 (1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Autodetachment Spectroscopy and Dynamics of Vibrationally Excited Dipole -Bound States of H 2CCC−,

    K. Yokoyama, G. W. Leach, J. B. Kim, W. C. Lineberger, A. I. Boldyrev and M. Gutowski, “Autodetachment Spectroscopy and Dynamics of Vibrationally Excited Dipole -Bound States of H 2CCC−,” J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10706−10718 (1996)

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Photodetachment Spectroscopy of the C2nH− (n = 2−4) Anions in the Vicinity of Their Electron Detachment Threshold,

    T. Pino, M. Tulej, F. Guthe, M. Pachkov, and J. P. Maier, “Photodetachment Spectroscopy of the C2nH− (n = 2−4) Anions in the Vicinity of Their Electron Detachment Threshold,” J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6126−6131 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Photochemistry of Halide Ion −Molecule Clusters: Dipole - Bound Excited States and the Case for Asymmetric Solvation,

    C. E. H. Dessent, J. Kim and M. A. Johnson, “Photochemistry of Halide Ion −Molecule Clusters: Dipole - Bound Excited States and the Case for Asymmetric Solvation,” Acc. Chem. Res. 31, 527−534 (1998)

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    Probing Dipole -Bound States Using Photodetachment Spectroscopy and Resonant Photoelectron Imaging of Cryogenically Cooled Anions,

    Y. R. Zhang, D. F. Yuan and L. S. Wang, “Probing Dipole -Bound States Using Photodetachment Spectroscopy and Resonant Photoelectron Imaging of Cryogenically Cooled Anions,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 7368−7381 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Spectroscopy of Radicals, Clusters, and Transition States Using Slow Electron Velocity - Map Imaging of Cryogenically Cooled Anions,

    D. M. Neumark, “Spectroscopy of Radicals, Clusters, and Transition States Using Slow Electron Velocity - Map Imaging of Cryogenically Cooled Anions,” J. Phys. Chem. A 127, 4207−4223 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Observation of a Polarization-Assisted Dipole-Bound State,

    D. F. Yuan, Y. Liu, Y. R. Zhang and L. S. Wang, “Observation of a Polarization-Assisted Dipole-Bound State,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 5512−5522 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Probing the Critical Moment To Support Excited Diple-Bound States in Valence-Bound Anions,

    C. H. Qian, B. Z. Zhu and L. S. Wang, “Probing the Critical Moment To Support Excited Diple-Bound States in Valence-Bound Anions,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 6472−6477 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Role of Polarization Interactions in the Formation of Dipole-Bound States,

    Y. R. Zhang, D. F. Yuan, C. H. Qian, G. Z. Zhu and L. S. Wang, “Role of Polarization Interactions in the Formation of Dipole-Bound States,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 14952−14962 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Evidence of Electron Capture of an Outgoing Photoelectron Wave by a Nonvalence State in (C6F6)n,

    J. P. Rogers, C. S. Anstöter and J. R. R. Verlet, “Evidence of Electron Capture of an Outgoing Photoelectron Wave by a Nonvalence State in (C6F6)n,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 2504−2509 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Dipole-Supported Electronic Resonances Mediate Electron -Induced Amide Bond Cleavage ,

    Z. Li, M. Ryszka, M. M. Dawley, I. Carmichael, K. B. Bravaya and S. Ptasińska, “Dipole-Supported Electronic Resonances Mediate Electron -Induced Amide Bond Cleavage ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 073002 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Dipole-Supported Electronic Resonances Mediate Electron-Induced Amide Bond Cleavage,

    J. Fedor, Comment on “Dipole-Supported Electronic Resonances Mediate Electron-Induced Amide Bond Cleavage,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 199301 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Investigating Resonant Low -Energy Electron Attachment to Formamide: Dynamics of Model Peptide Bond Dissociation a nd Other Fragmentation Channels,

    G. Panelli, A. Moradmand, B. Griffin, K. Swanson, T. Weber, T. N. Rescigno, C. W. McCurdy, D. S. Slaughter and J. B. Williams, “Investigating Resonant Low -Energy Electron Attachment to Formamide: Dynamics of Model Peptide Bond Dissociation a nd Other Fragmentation Channels,” ...

    2021

  8. [16]

    Observation of an Excited Dipole-Bound State in a Diatomic Anion,

    Y. Lu, R. Tang and C. Ning, “Observation of an Excited Dipole-Bound State in a Diatomic Anion,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 5897−5902 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Observation of Core-Excited Dipole-Bound States,

    Y. R. Zhang, D. F. Yuan and L. S. Wang, “Observation of Core-Excited Dipole-Bound States,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 2124−2129 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Excited -state chemistry of the nitromethane anion mediated by the dipole-bound states revealed by photofragment action spectroscopy

    S. An, D. Kim, J. Kim and S. K. Kim, “Excited -state chemistry of the nitromethane anion mediated by the dipole-bound states revealed by photofragment action spectroscopy” Chem. Sci. 14, 12231 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Decay Dynamics of Nascent Acetonitrile and Nitro-Methane Dipole-Bound Anions Produced by Intracluster Charge-Transfer,

    M. A. Yandell, S. B. King and D. M. Neumark, “Decay Dynamics of Nascent Acetonitrile and Nitro-Methane Dipole-Bound Anions Produced by Intracluster Charge-Transfer,” J. Chem. Phys. 140, 184317 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Ultrafast Dynamics of Formation and Autodetachment of a Dipole-Bound State in an Open- Shell π-Stacked Dimer Anion,

    J. N: Bull, C. W. West and J. R. R. Verlet, “Ultrafast Dynamics of Formation and Autodetachment of a Dipole-Bound State in an Open- Shell π-Stacked Dimer Anion,” Chem. Sci. 7, 5352−5361 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Role of Nonvalence States in the Ultraf ast Dynamics of Isolated Anions,

    J. R. R. Verlet, C. S. Anstoter, J. N. Bull and J. P. Rogers, “Role of Nonvalence States in the Ultraf ast Dynamics of Isolated Anions,” J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 3507−3519 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Experimental Observation of the Resonant Doorways to Anion Chemistry: Dynamic Role of Dipole-Bound Feshbach Resonances in Dissociative Electron Attachment,

    D. H. Kang, J. Kim, H. J. Eun and S. K. Kim, “Experimental Observation of the Resonant Doorways to Anion Chemistry: Dynamic Role of Dipole-Bound Feshbach Resonances in Dissociative Electron Attachment,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 16077−16085 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Resonant Formation of DNA Strand Breaks by Low-Energy (3 to 20 eV) Electrons,

    B. Boudaiffa, P. Cloutier, D. Hunting, M. A. Huels and L. Sanche, “Resonant Formation of DNA Strand Breaks by Low-Energy (3 to 20 eV) Electrons,” Science 287, 1658−1660 (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    Vibrational Feshbach Resonances in Uracil and Thymine,

    P. D. Burrow, G. A. Gallup, A. M. Scheer, S. Denifl, S. Ptasinska, T. Märk and P. Scheier, “Vibrational Feshbach Resonances in Uracil and Thymine,” J. Chem. Phys. 124, 124310 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    Photodissociation Dynamics of the Iodide-Uracil (I−U) complex,

    W. L. Li, A. Kunin, E. Matthews, N. Yoshikawa, C. E. H. Dessent, D. M. Neumark, “Photodissociation Dynamics of the Iodide-Uracil (I−U) complex,” J. Chem. Phys. 145, 044319 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    The Possible Interstellar Anion CH2CN−: Spectroscopic Constants, Vibrational Frequencies, and Other Considerations,

    R. C. Fortenberry, T. D. Crawford and T. J. Lee, “The Possible Interstellar Anion CH2CN−: Spectroscopic Constants, Vibrational Frequencies, and Other Considerations,” Astrophys. J. 762, 121 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Velocity Map Imaging Spectroscopy of the Dipole-Bound State of CH 2CN−: Implications for the Diffuse Interstellar Bands,

    B. A. Laws, Z. D. Levey, T. W. Schmidt and S. T. Gibson, “Velocity Map Imaging Spectroscopy of the Dipole-Bound State of CH 2CN−: Implications for the Diffuse Interstellar Bands,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 18684−18692 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Photodetachment Spectrum of I -C3H2−: The role of Dipole-Bound States for Electron Attachment in Interstellar Clouds,

    F. Guthe, M. Tulej, M. V. Pachkov and J. P. Maier, “Photodetachment Spectrum of I -C3H2−: The role of Dipole-Bound States for Electron Attachment in Interstellar Clouds,” Astrophys. J. 555, 466−471 (2001)

    2001

  21. [29]

    Slow Photoelectron Velocity-Map Imaging of Cryogenically Cooled Anions,

    M. L. Weichman and D. M. Neumark, “Slow Photoelectron Velocity-Map Imaging of Cryogenically Cooled Anions,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 69, 101−124 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    High-Resolution Photoelectron Imaging and Resonant Photoelectron Spectroscopy via Noncovalently Bound Excited States of Cryogenically Cooled Anions,

    G. Z. Zhu and L. S. Wang, “High-Resolution Photoelectron Imaging and Resonant Photoelectron Spectroscopy via Noncovalently Bound Excited States of Cryogenically Cooled Anions,” Chem. Sci. 10, 9409– 9423 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Dissociative Photodetachment vs. Photodissociation of Aromatic Carboxylates: The Benzoate and Naphthoate Anions,

    G. A. Pino, R. A. Jara -Toro, J. P. Aranguren, C. Dedonder -Lardeux and C. Jouvet, “Dissociative Photodetachment vs. Photodissociation of Aromatic Carboxylates: The Benzoate and Naphthoate Anions,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 1797-1804 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Photodetachment of Deprotonated Aromatic Amino Acids: Stability of the dehydrogenated radical depends on deprotonation site,

    J. A. Noble, J. P. Aranguren -Abrate, C. Dedonder, C. Jouvet and G. A. Pino, “Photodetachment of Deprotonated Aromatic Amino Acids: Stability of the dehydrogenated radical depends on deprotonation site,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 21, 23346-23354 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Loss of CO 2 from Monodeprotonated Phthalic Acid upon Photodissociation and Dissociative Electron Detachment ,

    E. Marceca, J. A. Noble, C. Dedonder-Lardeux and C. Jouvet, “Loss of CO 2 from Monodeprotonated Phthalic Acid upon Photodissociation and Dissociative Electron Detachment ,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 125, 7406- 7413 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    IRMPD spectroscopy and quantum chemistry calculations on mono- and bimetallic complexes of acetylacetonate ligands with aluminum, iron, and ruthenium ions,

    N. Nieuwjaer, A. Beydoun, F. Lecomte, B. Manil, F. Cappelluti, L. Guidoni, D. Scuderi and C. Desfrançois, “IRMPD spectroscopy and quantum chemistry calculations on mono- and bimetallic complexes of acetylacetonate ligands with aluminum, iron, and ruthenium ions,” J. Chem. Phys...

    2020

  27. [35]

    Metal -ligand bond energies and solvation energies for gas -phase transition-metal tris(acetylacetonated) complexes and their negative ions

    P. Sharpe and D. E. Richardson “Metal -ligand bond energies and solvation energies for gas -phase transition-metal tris(acetylacetonated) complexes and their negative ions” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 8339 (1991)

    1991

  28. [36]

    Acetylacetonate (acac) Anion in the Gas Phase: Predicted Structures, Vibrational Spectra, and Photodetachment Energies,

    K. K. Irikura, “Acetylacetonate (acac) Anion in the Gas Phase: Predicted Structures, Vibrational Spectra, and Photodetachment Energies,” Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 185-187, 577–587 (1999)

    1999

  29. [37]

    Tautomerism and electronic spectroscopy of protonated 1 - and 2-aminonaphthalene,

    J. A. Noble, M. Broquier, G. Grégoire, S. Soorkia, G. A. Pino, E. Marceca, C. Dedonder-Lardeux and C. Jouvet, “Tautomerism and electronic spectroscopy of protonated 1 - and 2-aminonaphthalene,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 6134-6145 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. III. The atoms aluminum through argon

    D. E. Woon and T. H. Dunning, Jr., “ Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. III. The atoms aluminum through argon” J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1358 - 1371 (1993)

    1993

  31. [39]

    Influence of the N atom and its position on electron photodetachment of deprotonated indole and azaindole,

    J. A. Noble, E. Marceca, C. Dedonder and C. Jouvet, “Influence of the N atom and its position on electron photodetachment of deprotonated indole and azaindole,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 27290 – 27299 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Selective tautomer production and cryogenic ion spectroscopy of radical cations: the uracil and thymine cases

    F. L. Molina, M. Broquier, S. Soorkia, G. Grégoire and G. A. Pino “Selective tautomer production and cryogenic ion spectroscopy of radical cations: the uracil and thymine cases” J. Phys. Chem. A , 128, 3596 (2024) 41), Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G...

    2024

  33. [42]

    On the Behavior of Cross Sections Near Thresholds

    E. P. Wigner, “On the Behavior of Cross Sections Near Thresholds” Phys. Rev. 73, 1002−1009 (1948)

    1948

  34. [43]

    Electrons weakly bound to molecules by dipolar, quadrupolar or polarization forces

    H. Abdoul-Carime and D. Desfrancois “Electrons weakly bound to molecules by dipolar, quadrupolar or polarization forces” Eur. Phys. J. D 2, 149 (1998)

    1998

  35. [44]

    Probing the coupling of a dipole-bound electron with a molecular core,

    J. Czekner, L. F. Cheung, G. S. Kocheril and L. S. Wang, “Probing the coupling of a dipole-bound electron with a molecular core,” Chem. Sci., 10, 1386 – 1391 (2019)

    2019

  36. [45]

    Recapture of the Nonvalence Excess Electron into the Excited Valence Orbital Leads to the Chemical Bond Cleavage in the Anion,

    D. H. Kang, J. Kim and S. K. Kim, “Recapture of the Nonvalence Excess Electron into the Excited Valence Orbital Leads to the Chemical Bond Cleavage in the Anion,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 6383−6388 (2021)

    2021

  37. [46]

    Real-Time Autodetachment Dynamics of Vibrational Feshbach Resonances in a Dipole-Bound State,

    D. H. Kang, S. An and S. Kim, “Real-Time Autodetachment Dynamics of Vibrational Feshbach Resonances in a Dipole-Bound State,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 093001 (2020)

    2020

  38. [47]

    Resonant Photodetachment via Shape and Feshbach Resonances: pBenzoquinone Anions as a Model System,

    J. Schiedt and R. Weinkauf, “Resonant Photodetachment via Shape and Feshbach Resonances: pBenzoquinone Anions as a Model System,” J. Chem. Phys. 110, 304-314 (1999)

    1999

  39. [48]

    Propensity Rules for Vibration -Induced Electron Detachment of Anions

    J. Simons, “Propensity Rules for Vibration -Induced Electron Detachment of Anions” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 3971−3976 (1981)

    1981

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.