Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 72 references

Multi-RIS-Empowered Communication Systems: Capacity Analysis and Optimization

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that the sum mutual information of a multi-user MIMO link with multiple RISs is asymptotically Gaussian, with closed-form mean and variance, accurate down to $10^{-3}$ outage for moderate system sizes.

desk verdict Useful decoupling and outage approximation, but the variance formula (14) is invalid as printed—it gives a complex value in the no-RIS limit—so the paper needs correction before its central statistical claim can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16767 v1 pith:NUISC4JU submitted 2025-07-22 cs.IT cs.ETeess.SPmath.IT

Aris L. Moustakas , George C. Alexandropoulos This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITcs.ETeess.SPmath.IT MSC 94A1594A4060B20
keywords reconfigurableintelligentsurfacesMIMOmultipleaccesschannelcapacityregionoutageprobabilitylarge-systemanalysisstatisticalstateinformationRISphaseoptimizationGaussianapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to give a closed-form statistical description of a wireless uplink in which several multi-antenna users talk to one multi-antenna receiver through several reconfigurable intelligent surfaces, programmable reflectors that shape the radio environment. Its central claim is that the total mutual information of this channel is asymptotically Gaussian, so the outage probability can be computed from just its mean and variance, which the paper derives in closed form. The authors also show numerically that this Gaussian approximation stays accurate down to outage probabilities of $10^{-3}$ even for modest antenna counts and metasurface sizes. If the claim holds, system designers can dimension such links and optimize the surfaces from channel covariance statistics alone, without instantaneous channel estimates or brute-force simulation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the asymptotic sum-MI expression (10), together with the fixed-point scalar parameters $t_{dm}, r_{dm}, t_{1k}, r_{1km}, t_{2km}, r_{2km}$ defined by the trace equations below it, and the variance formula (14), which is the negative log-determinant of the matrix $\boldsymbol{\Lambda}$ in (15). The key structural fact is that each RIS phase matrix $\boldsymbol{\Phi}_k$ appears only inside $\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{km} = \mathbf{S}_{t,km}^{1/2} \boldsymbol{\Phi}_k^\dagger \mathbf{S}_{r,k} \boldsymbol{\Phi}_k \mathbf{S}_{t,km}^{1/2}$, within its own log-determinant, which decouples the optimization into one problem per RIS and makes the gradient updates in (29) and (31) depend only on local covariance knowledge. The vanishing-angle-spread reduction to rank-one matrices $\mathbf{S}_{t,m}=N_s\mathbf{u}_m\mathbf{u}_m^\dagger$ and $\mathbf{S}_r=N_s\mathbf{v}\mathbf{v}^\dagger$ produces the scalar figure of merit $\kappa_m(\boldsymbol{\Phi}) = \mathbf{v}^\dagger\boldsymbol{\Phi}\mathbf{u}_m$, which turns the phase design into aligning each RIS element's phase with the wave-vector differences $\Delta \mathbf{q}_m$.

What would settle it

Run Monte Carlo for the sum-MI at, for example, $N_t=4$, $N_r=8$, $N_s=400$ with correlated RIS-side channels and compute the empirical fourth cumulant: if it does not shrink relative to the square of the variance as $N_t$ increases, or if the Gaussian fit to the outage curve breaks down above $10^{-3}$, the central Gaussianity claim is wrong. A second check is whether the variance from Eq. (14) matches the Monte Carlo variance when the RIS phases are not the identity, since the optimization results inherit any error in the fixed-point equations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that in the limit where antenna counts and RIS element counts grow at fixed ratios, the ergodic sum mutual information of a Kronecker-correlated MIMO multiple-access channel with multiple RISs has an asymptotically Gaussian distribution whose mean is given by Eq. (10) and whose variance is given by Eq. (14), a negative log-determinant of a $(2M+4MK)$-dimensional matrix. Because the higher cumulants are asserted to vanish, outage probabilities follow from the two moments, and the Gaussian law is confirmed by Monte Carlo simulations down to $10^{-3}$ for systems as small as $N_t=4$, $N_r=8$ or $12$, and $N_s=400$ or $900$. The same asymptotic expressions reveal that the RIS phase matrices enter only through the sandwich combinations $\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{km} = \mathbf{S}_{t,km}^{1/2} \boldsymbol{\Phi}_k^\dagger \mathbf{S}_{r,k} \boldsymbol{\Phi}_k \mathbf{S}_{t,km}^{1/2}$ in separate log-determinant terms, so each RIS can be optimized independently using only the covariance matrices of the channels impinging on and leaving it. The optimization gains are largest when those covariance matrices are highly correlated, namely at small angle spread, and the capacity region of the multi-user system is obtained by maximizing the weighted sum of these asymptotic expressions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that all fluctuations of the sum mutual information beyond its mean and variance disappear as the antenna and RIS element counts grow, so the Gaussian approximation becomes exact; the paper asserts this without proof, and the fixed-point equations that feed the mean and variance are themselves taken as given from earlier work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Outage probabilities for block-fading multi-RIS MIMO links can be read off from the Gaussian law with the closed-form mean and variance, matching Monte Carlo down to $10^{-3}$ for moderate sizes.
  • RIS phase profiles can be optimized per surface, in parallel, from statistical covariance matrices only, and the semi-optimal largest-eigenvalue method performs as well as full gradient ascent in the tested regimes.
  • The benefit of statistical RIS optimization grows as the angle spread shrinks, so the technique is most valuable for the correlated channels expected at higher carrier frequencies.
  • Coarse phase quantization retains most of the gain: 1-bit quantization still gives significant improvement and 2-bit is nearly optimal.
  • The ergodic capacity region of the MIMO-MAC-RIS system is obtained by sweeping the priority vector $\boldsymbol{\mu}$ in the weighted asymptotic sum-MI, with optimized RIS phases changing the usual pentagon into a curved boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test that goes beyond the paper is to compute the fourth cumulant of the sum-MI directly for small $N_t$ and check whether it decays relative to the variance as $N_t$ grows; that would separate a genuine large-system theorem from a numerical coincidence.
  • The per-RIS decoupling suggests a distributed deployment rule: each surface can be configured from its own local impinging and outgoing covariance estimates, so the result could extend to networks where surfaces are managed by different nodes without sharing full channel state.
  • Because the Gaussian approximation gives the full outage curve from two moments, a further extension would be to use it for finite-blocklength or delay-constrained metrics, where tail probabilities rather than ergodic averages are what matter.
  • If the covariance matrices are imperfectly estimated, the semi-optimal method's reliance on the leading eigenvectors of $\mathbf{S}_{r,k}$ and $\mathbf{S}_{t,km}$ may be more robust than the full gradient method, and this is testable by adding estimation noise to the covariances.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The chapter studies an uplink MIMO multiple-access channel assisted by multiple reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs). It imports from the authors' prior work [69] a large-system closed-form expression for the ergodic sum mutual information, states an asymptotic variance formula and an asymptotic Gaussianity result for the sum-MI, and uses these to approximate outage probabilities and to motivate two RIS phase-optimization schemes, one semi-optimal and one gradient-based. Numerical sections compare the analytic ergodic rates and the Gaussian outage approximation with Monte Carlo simulations, reporting good agreement for moderate antenna and RIS sizes. The central advertised contributions are the variance formula (14), the Gaussian approximation for outage, and the statistically driven RIS optimization methodology.

Significance. If the statistical results are correct, the chapter would provide a computationally efficient performance characterization of multi-RIS MIMO-MAC systems, including outage probabilities and capacity-region boundaries, together with a decoupled RIS optimization procedure that uses only channel covariance information. The ergodic-rate comparisons and the demonstrated optimization gains for small angle spread are valuable engineering results, and the Monte Carlo validation in Fig. 5 is a strength in principle. However, the validity of the central statistical claim is not established as written because the variance formula (14) fails an elementary positive-definiteness check. The optimization sections are less affected, but the outage and Gaussianity claims, which are the chapter's distinctive contribution, rest on an expression that cannot be correct in its present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (14)] The variance formula Var(I) = -log det(Lambda) is not a valid positive real variance. In the specialization K=0, M=1, N_t=N_r=N, R_d=T_d=I, and Q=rho I, the fixed-point equations above (14) give r_d=(-1+sqrt(1+4rho))/2 and t_d=1/(1+r_d). With the definitions in (16)-(24), Lambda in (15) reduces to [[-r_d^2, -1],[-1, -t_d^2]], whose determinant is r_d^2 t_d^2 - 1 < 0 for every rho>0. Hence -log det(Lambda) is not real-valued, and on the principal branch its real part is negative, so it cannot equal the variance of the mutual information. The diagonal blocks defined in (16)-(24) are non-positive and the off-diagonal -I blocks persist for K>=1, so this is not an artifact of the K=0 limit. This invalidates the variance input to the Gaussian outage approximation in Fig. 5 unless a corrected expression, with a derivation, is supplied.
  2. [Section 3.2, paragraph after Eq. (14)] The statement that all higher cumulants of the sum-MI vanish in the large-N_t limit, and the subsequent claim that the sum-MI is asymptotically jointly Gaussian, are asserted without proof or a precise theorem statement. This Gaussianity is the load-bearing step that converts the two moments into the outage approximation used in Fig. 5 and into the outage capacity-region discussion at the end of Section 3.2. The authors should either provide the argument or state exactly which theorem from [65] or [70], under which conditions, implies the result.
  3. [Section 3.2, Eq. (10)] The main asymptotic mean expression (10) and the fixed-point equations (10)-(13) are imported from the authors' own [69] without derivation or a precise statement of the asymptotic regime. Because the variance and optimization results inherit any error in these equations, the chapter should state the exact assumptions under which (10) is the correct limit, and ideally include enough of the derivation that the variance calculation can be checked independently. This is a self-containedness and correctness-risk concern, not a claim that the prior result is wrong.
  4. [Section 5, Fig. 5] The Monte Carlo agreement shown in Fig. 5 cannot, as it stands, corroborate Eq. (14), because the printed formula does not produce a real positive variance in the no-RIS limit. If the simulations or the analytic curves used a corrected version of (14), the authors need to state that corrected expression explicitly; otherwise the reader cannot reproduce the figure from the text.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, Fig. 2 caption] The caption states that the crosses are obtained with the fully-optimal methodology of Section 5, but Section 5 is the numerical-results section; the fully-optimal gradient method is described in Section 4.2.
  2. [Section 2.3] The channel-model paragraph cites "[60, 60, 61]", duplicating reference [60]; one of the two citations should be removed or replaced.
  3. [Section 4.1, Eq. (32)] Equation (32) has a typographical error in the exponent: the expression e(q_r - q_t,km) x_n is missing the imaginary unit and should read e^{i(q_r - q_t,km) x_n}.
  4. [Algorithm 1, line 11] The convergence condition in Algorithm 1 contains two identically zero terms, |t_dm^(i)-t_dm^(i)| and |t1,km^(i-1)-t1,km^(i-1)|; these are likely intended to be |t_dm^(i)-t_dm^(i-1)| and |t1,km^(i)-t1,km^(i-1)|, respectively.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new variance and Gaussian-outage claims are checked against independent Monte Carlo simulations, and the self-cited mean formula is background with falsifiable numerical support.

full rationale

The chapter's load-bearing new results are the asymptotic variance (14) and the Gaussian approximation for the outage distribution, displayed in Fig. 5. These are not derived by defining the target quantity in terms of itself: Var(I) is stated as a limiting formula, and the Gaussian curves are obtained by inserting the analytic mean (10) and variance (14) into a Gaussian CDF, then compared with Monte Carlo evaluations of the exact sum-MI (5). No parameter is fitted to the simulated CDF, so there is no fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction pattern. The mean expression (10) is imported from the authors' own prior work [69], and the rank-one phase-optimization approximation is imported from [54]; these are genuine self-citations. However, they are not circular in the sense of reducing a claim to its own input: (10) is a previously published theorem, and Section 5 tests it against independent Monte Carlo realizations of the channel model in Fig. 2, while the [54] approximation is explicitly reconfirmed by the same numerical study rather than merely asserted. The statement in Section 3.2 that 'all higher moments can be shown to vanish' is an omitted proof, and the skeptic's observation that Lambda in (15) may fail positive definiteness in the M=1, K=0 limit is a correctness concern about (14), not a demonstration that (14) is definitionally equal to its inputs. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation whose content is unverified here. Hence the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The chapter's new results rest on a small set of imported structural results. The main mean expression (10) and its fixed points are quoted from the authors' own TWC 2024 paper; the variance formula (14) is stated without derivation; the Gaussianity is asserted from an unproven claim about cumulants. No new physical entities are introduced, and no constants are fitted to data beyond a gradient step size. The numerical validation against Monte Carlo is the main independent check.

free parameters (1)
  • Gradient ascent step size epsilon = not specified
    Hand-chosen in Eqs. (29) and (31) to ensure convergence of the RIS phase optimization; it does not affect the capacity formula but affects whether the stated optimum is reached.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper All higher cumulants of the sum-MI vanish in the large-system limit, so the distribution is Gaussian and the variance (14) characterizes outages.
    Asserted in Section 3.2 after Eq. (14) without proof; it is the key premise for the Gaussian approximation and the optimization objectives.
  • domain assumption The fixed-point equations (10)-(13) give the correct asymptotic mean sum-MI for the multi-RIS MIMO-MAC.
    Imported from self-cited [69] without derivation in this chapter; all subsequent variance and optimization results inherit this.
  • domain assumption Kronecker product correlation model (3) with independent zero-mean complex Gaussian channel matrices.
    Section 2.3; standard model used in [54, 62].
  • domain assumption RIS reflection coefficients have unit modulus; phases can be adjusted continuously (quantization treated after optimization).
    Section 2.2; standard RIS model used in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper In the vanishing angle-spread limit, the correlation matrices S_tm and S_r are unit rank, so the semi-optimal optimization is based on steering vectors.
    Section 4.1, Eqs. (25)-(27); an approximation that is exact only at zero AS, used to justify the fast algorithm.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-RIS-Empowered Communication Systems: Capacity Analysis and Optimization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NUISC4JU

@misc{pith2026250716767,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-RIS-Empowered Communication Systems: Capacity Analysis and Optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NUISC4JU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16767}
}
read the original abstract

In this chapter, using statistical physics methods, asymptotic closed-form expressions for the mean and variance of the mutual information for a multi-antenna transmitter-receiver pair in the presence of multiple Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RISs) are presented. While nominally valid in the large-system limit, it is shown that the derived Gaussian approximation for the mutual information can be quite accurate, even for modest-sized antenna arrays and metasurfaces. The above results are particularly useful when fast-fading conditions are present, which renders channel estimation challenging. The derived analysis indicates that, when the channel close to an RIS is correlated, for instance due to small angle spread which is reasonable for wireless systems with increasing carrier frequencies, the communication link benefits significantly from statistical RIS optimization, resulting in gains that are surprisingly higher than the nearly uncorrelated case. More importantly, the presented novel asymptotic properties of the correlation matrices of the impinging and outgoing signals at the RISs can be deployed to optimize the metasurfaces without brute-force numerical optimization. The numerical investigation demonstrates that, when the desired reflection from any of the RISs departs significantly from geometrical optics, the metasurfaces can be optimized to provide robust communication links, without significant need for their optimal placement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16767 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The considered MIMO-MAC-RIS communication system comprising [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The ergodic sum-MI performance in nats per channel use for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The ergodic sum-MI performance in nats per channel use in the presence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ergodic capacity region for the case of 𝑀 = 2 TXs and 𝐾 = 1 RIS, with incoming signal azimuth angles from each TX set to 𝜙in,1 = 45◦ and 𝜙in,2 = −45◦ , considering the angle spread values 𝜎 = 4 ◦ and 𝜎 = 15◦ . The blue and black curves correspond to an RIS with 𝑁𝑠 = 40…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The cumulative distribution of the sum-MI performance in nats with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [69]

    MIMO MAC empowered by reconfigurable intelli- gent surfaces: Capacity region and large system analysis,

    A. L. Moustakas and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “MIMO MAC empowered by reconfigurable intelli- gent surfaces: Capacity region and large system analysis,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 19 245–19 258, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [65]

    Multiaccess fading channels Part I: Polymatroid structure, optimal resource allocation and throughput capacities,

    D. N. Tse and S. V. Hanly, “Multiaccess fading channels Part I: Polymatroid structure, optimal resource allocation and throughput capacities,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory , vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2796–2815, Nov. 1998

    work page 1998

  3. [70]

    MIMO capacity through correlated channels in the presence of correlated interferers and noise: A (not so) large N analysis,

    A. L. Moustakas, S. H. Simon, and A. M. Sengupta, “MIMO capacity through correlated channels in the presence of correlated interferers and noise: A (not so) large N analysis,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2545–2561, Oct. 2003

    work page 2003

  4. [1]

    Holographic MIMO communications: Theoretical foundations, enabling technologies, and future directions,

    T. Gong, P. Gavriilidis, R. Ji, C. Huang, G. C. Alexandropoulos, L. Wei, M. Debbah, H. V. Poor, and C. Yuen, “Holographic MIMO communications: Theoretical foundations, enabling technologies, and future directions,” IEEE Commun. Surveys & Tuts., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 196–257, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [2]

    Toward the metaverse realization in 6G: Orchestration of RIS-enabled smart wireless environments via digital twins,

    A. Masaracchia, D. Van Huynh, G. C. Alexandropoulos, B. Canberk, O. A. Dobre, and T. Q. Duong, “Toward the metaverse realization in 6G: Orchestration of RIS-enabled smart wireless environments via digital twins,” IEEE Internet of Things Mag. , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 22–28, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [3]

    Edge artificial intelligence for 6G: Vision, enabling technologies, and applications,

    K. B. Letaief et al. , “Edge artificial intelligence for 6G: Vision, enabling technologies, and applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5–36, Jan. 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [4]

    Over-the-air edge inference via end-to-end metasurfaces-integrated artificial neural networks,

    K. Stylianopoulos, P. Di Lorenzo, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Over-the-air edge inference via end-to-end metasurfaces-integrated artificial neural networks,” arXiv preprint:2504.00233, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  8. [5]

    Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable AI meta-surfaces: an idea whose time has come,

    M. Di Renzo, M. Debbah, D.-T. Phan-Huy, A. Zappone, M.-S. Alouini, C. Yuen, V. Sciancalepore, G. C. Alexandropoulos, J. Hoydis, H. Gacanin, J. de Rosny, A. Bounceu, G. Lerosey, and M. Fink, “Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable AI meta-surfaces: an idea whose time has come,” EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Net., vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 1–20, May 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 72 references
  1. [6]

    RIS-enabled smart wireless environments: Deployment scenarios, network architecture, bandwidth and area of influence,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos et al., “RIS-enabled smart wireless environments: Deployment scenarios, network architecture, bandwidth and area of influence,”EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. and Netw., vol. 2023, no. 1, pp. 1–38, Oct. 2023

    2023

  2. [7]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces and metamaterials: The potential of wave propagation control for 6G wireless communications,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, G. Lerosey, M. Debbah, and M. Fink, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces and metamaterials: The potential of wave propagation control for 6G wireless communications,” IEEE ComSoc TCCN Newslett., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–37, Jun. 2020

    2020

  3. [8]

    Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless communications: A tutorial,

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, B. Zheng, C. You, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless communications: A tutorial,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3313–3351, May 2021

    2021

  4. [9]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for RIS/IRS-aided wireless systems,

    C. Pan, G. Zhou, K. Zhi, S. Hong, T. Wu, Y. Pan, H. Ren, M. Di Renzo, A. L. Swindlehurst, R. Zhang, and A. Y. Zhang, “An overview of signal processing techniques for RIS/IRS-aided wireless systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. , vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 883–917, Aug. 2022

    2022

  5. [10]

    Active RIS versus passive RIS: Which is superior with the same power budget?

    K. Zhi, C. Pan, H. Ren, K. K. Chai, and M. Elkashlan, “Active RIS versus passive RIS: Which is superior with the same power budget?” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1150–1154, May 2022

    2022

  6. [11]

    A new RIS architecture with a single power amplifier: Energy efficiency and error performance analysis,

    R. A. Tasci et al., “A new RIS architecture with a single power amplifier: Energy efficiency and error performance analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 44 804–44 815, Apr. 2022. 22 A. L. Moustakas and G. C. Alexandropoulos

    2022

  7. [12]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for rich scattering wireless com- munications: Recent experiments, challenges, and opportunities,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos et al., “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for rich scattering wireless com- munications: Recent experiments, challenges, and opportunities,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 28–34, Jun. 2021

    2021

  8. [13]

    Near-field hierarchical beam management for RIS-enabled millimeter wave multi-antenna systems,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, V. Jamali, R. Schober, and H. V. Poor, “Near-field hierarchical beam management for RIS-enabled millimeter wave multi-antenna systems,” in Proc. IEEE Sensor Array Multichannel Signal Process. Workshop, 2022, pp. 460–464

    2022

  9. [14]

    Reconfigurable, intelligent, and sustainable wireless environments for 6G smart connectivity,

    E. Calvanese Strinati, G. C. Alexandropoulos, H. Wymeersch, B. Denis, V. Sciancalepore, R. D’Errico, A. Clemente, D.-T. Phan-Huy, E. D. Carvalho, and P. Popovski, “Reconfigurable, intelligent, and sustainable wireless environments for 6G smart connectivity,” IEEE Commun. Mag.,...

    2021

  10. [15]

    Reconfigurable intel- ligent surfaces for energy efficiency in wireless communication,

    C. Huang, A. Zappone, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. Debbah, and C. Yuen, “Reconfigurable intel- ligent surfaces for energy efficiency in wireless communication,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 4157–4170, Aug. 2019

    2019

  11. [16]

    Wideband multi-user MIMO communications with frequency selective riss: Element response modeling and sum-rate maximization,

    K. D. Katsanos et al. , “Wideband multi-user MIMO communications with frequency selective riss: Element response modeling and sum-rate maximization,” in Proc. IEEE ICC , Seoul, South Korea, May 2022

    2022

  12. [17]

    Distributed sum-rate maximization of cellular communications with multiple reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces,

    ——, “Distributed sum-rate maximization of cellular communications with multiple reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces,” in Proc. IEEE SPAWC, Oulu, Finland, Jul. 2022

    2022

  13. [18]

    The interference broadcast channel with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: A cooperative sum-rate maximization approach,

    K. D. Katsanos, P. Di Lorenzo, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “The interference broadcast channel with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: A cooperative sum-rate maximization approach,” inProc. IEEE Int. Workshop Signal Process. Adv. Wireless Commun. , 2024, pp. 551–555

    2024

  14. [19]

    Low-to-zero-overhead IRS recon- figuration: Decoupling illumination and channel estimation,

    V. Jamali, G. C. Alexandropoulos, R. Schober, and H. V. Poor, “Low-to-zero-overhead IRS recon- figuration: Decoupling illumination and channel estimation,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 932–936, 2022

    2022

  15. [20]

    Multi-RIS-empowered multiple access: A distributed sum-rate maximization approach,

    K. D. Katsanos, P. D. Lorenzo, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Multi-RIS-empowered multiple access: A distributed sum-rate maximization approach,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1324–1338, 2024

    2024

  16. [21]

    Leveraging RIS-enabled smart signal propagation for solving infeasible localization problems,

    K. Keykhosravi, B. Denis, G. C. Alexandropoulos, Z. S. He, A. Albanese, V. Sciancalepore, and H. Wymeersch, “Leveraging RIS-enabled smart signal propagation for solving infeasible localization problems,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 20–28, Jun. 2023

    2023

  17. [22]

    RISs and sidelink communications in smart cities: The key to seamless lo- calization and sensing,

    H. Chen, H. Kim, M. Ammous, G. Seco-Granados, G. C. Alexandropoulos, S. Valaee, and H. Wymeersch, “RISs and sidelink communications in smart cities: The key to seamless lo- calization and sensing,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 140–146, 2023

    2023

  18. [23]

    Localization via multiple reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces equipped with single receive RF chains,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, I. Vinieratou, and H. Wymeersch, “Localization via multiple reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces equipped with single receive RF chains,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1072–1076, 2022

    2022

  19. [24]

    Position aided beam alignment for millimeter wave backhaul systems with large phased arrays,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Position aided beam alignment for millimeter wave backhaul systems with large phased arrays,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Comp. Adv. Multi-Sensor Adaptive Process. , Curac ¸ao, Dutch Antilles, 2017

    2017

  20. [25]

    3D local- ization with a single partially-connected receiving RIS: Positioning error analysis and algorithmic design,

    J. He, A. Fakhreddine, C. Vanwynsberghe, H. Wymeersch, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “3D local- ization with a single partially-connected receiving RIS: Positioning error analysis and algorithmic design,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 13 190–13 202, 2023

    2023

  21. [26]

    STAR-RIS-enabled simultaneous indoor and outdoor 3D localization: Theoretical analysis and algorithmic estimation,

    J. He, A. Fakhreddine, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “STAR-RIS-enabled simultaneous indoor and outdoor 3D localization: Theoretical analysis and algorithmic estimation,” IET Signal Process. , vol. 17, no. 4, p. e12209, 2023

    2023

  22. [27]

    Next generation reconfigurable metasurfaces: When wave propagation control meets computing,

    B. Yang et al. , “Next generation reconfigurable metasurfaces: When wave propagation control meets computing,” IEEE Wireless Commun., early access, 2023

    2023

  23. [28]

    Holographic metasurfaces enabling wave computing for 6G: Status overview, challenges, and future research trends,

    Z. R. Omam, H. Taghvaee, A. Araghi, M. Garc´ıa-Fernandez, G. ´Alvarez Narciandi, G. C. Alexan- dropoulos, O. Yurduseven, and M. Khalily, “Holographic metasurfaces enabling wave computing for 6G: Status overview, challenges, and future research trends,”arXiv preprint:2501.05173, 2025

    2025

  24. [29]

    Safeguarding MIMO communications with reconfigurable meta- surfaces and artificial noise,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos et al., “Safeguarding MIMO communications with reconfigurable meta- surfaces and artificial noise,” in Proc. IEEE ICC, Montreal, Canada, Jun. 2021

    2021

  25. [30]

    Counteracting eaves- dropper attacks through reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: A new threat model and secrecy rate optimization,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, K. D. Katsanos, M. Wen, and D. B. Da Costa, “Counteracting eaves- dropper attacks through reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: A new threat model and secrecy rate optimization,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Society , vol. 4, pp. 1285–1302, 2023. Multi-RIS-Empowe...

    2023

  26. [31]

    Spatial secrecy spectral efficiency optimization enabled by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    K. D. Katsanos and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Spatial secrecy spectral efficiency optimization enabled by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” in Proc. European Signal Process. Conf. , 2023, pp. 1539–1543

    2023

  27. [32]

    Integrated sensing and communications with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: From signal modeling to processing,

    S. P. Chepuri, N. Shlezinger, F. Liu, G. C. Alexandropoulos, S. Buzzi, and Y. C. Eldar, “Integrated sensing and communications with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: From signal modeling to processing,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 41–62, Sep. 2023

    2023

  28. [33]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces-assisted multiuser MIMO uplink transmission with partial CSI,

    L. You et al., “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces-assisted multiuser MIMO uplink transmission with partial CSI,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 5613–5627, Sep. 2021

    2021

  29. [34]

    Intelligent reflecting surfaces: Sum-rate optimization based on statistical position information,

    A. Abrardo et al. , “Intelligent reflecting surfaces: Sum-rate optimization based on statistical position information,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 7121–7136, Oct. 2021

    2021

  30. [35]

    Energy-efficient wireless communications with distributed reconfigurable intelli- gent surfaces,

    Z. Yang et al., “Energy-efficient wireless communications with distributed reconfigurable intelli- gent surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 665–679, Jan. 2022

    2022

  31. [36]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface empowered device-to-device communication underlaying cellular networks,

    G. Yang et al., “Reconfigurable intelligent surface empowered device-to-device communication underlaying cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., to appear, 2021

    2021

  32. [37]

    Sum-rate maximization for multi-reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted device- to-device communications,

    Y. Cao et al., “Sum-rate maximization for multi-reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted device- to-device communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 7283–7296, Nov. 2021

    2021

  33. [38]

    Sum-rate maximization of RIS-aided multi-user MIMO systems with statistical CSI,

    H. Zhang et al., “Sum-rate maximization of RIS-aided multi-user MIMO systems with statistical CSI,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 4788–4801, Jul. 2023

    2023

  34. [39]

    Achievable rate optimization of the RIS-aided near-field wideband uplink,

    Y. Cheng et al., “Achievable rate optimization of the RIS-aided near-field wideband uplink,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., to appear, 2023

    2023

  35. [40]

    Massive access of static and mobile users via reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Protocol design and performance analysis,

    X. Cao, B. Yang, C. Huang, G. C. Alexandropoulos, C. Yuen, Z. Han, H. V. Poor, and L. Hanzo, “Massive access of static and mobile users via reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Protocol design and performance analysis,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1253–1269, 2022

    2022

  36. [41]

    Phase configuration learning in wireless networks with multiple reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos et al., “Phase configuration learning in wireless networks with multiple reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, Taipei, Taiwan, Dec. 2020

    2020

  37. [42]

    Pervasive machine learning for smart radio environments enabled by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, K. Stylianopoulos, C. Huang, C. Yuen, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Pervasive machine learning for smart radio environments enabled by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1494–1525, Sep. 2022

    2022

  38. [43]

    Capacity and optimal resource allocation for IRS-assisted multi-user communication systems,

    X. Mu et al., “Capacity and optimal resource allocation for IRS-assisted multi-user communication systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 3771–3786, Jun. 2021

    2021

  39. [44]

    Ergodic achievable rate analysis and optimization of RIS-assisted millimeter-wave mimo communication systems,

    R. Li et al., “Ergodic achievable rate analysis and optimization of RIS-assisted millimeter-wave mimo communication systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 972–985, Feb. 2023

    2023

  40. [45]

    On the maximum achievable sum-rate of the RIS-aided MIMO broadcast channel,

    N. S. Perovi ´c et al., “On the maximum achievable sum-rate of the RIS-aided MIMO broadcast channel,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 6316–6331, 2022

    2022

  41. [46]

    Fundamental limits of intelligent reflecting surface aided multiuser broadcast channel,

    G. Chen and Q. Wu, “Fundamental limits of intelligent reflecting surface aided multiuser broadcast channel,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 5904–5919, Oct. 2023

    2023

  42. [47]

    Performance analysis of large intelligent surfaces (LISs): Asymptotic data rate and channel hardening effects,

    M. Jung et al., “Performance analysis of large intelligent surfaces (LISs): Asymptotic data rate and channel hardening effects,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 2052–2065, Mar. 2020

    2020

  43. [48]

    Asymptotic max-min SINR analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted MISO systems,

    Q. Nadeem et al. , “Asymptotic max-min SINR analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted MISO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 7748–7764, Dec. 2020

    2020

  44. [49]

    Interference analysis in reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted multiple-input multiple-output systems,

    J. Liu et al. , “Interference analysis in reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted multiple-input multiple-output systems,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, Toronto, Canada, Jun. 2021

    2021

  45. [50]

    Performance analysis of RIS-aided systems with practical phase shift and ampli- tude response,

    Y. Zhang et al., “Performance analysis of RIS-aided systems with practical phase shift and ampli- tude response,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 4501–4511, May 2021

    2021

  46. [51]

    Intelligent reflecting surface: Practical phase shift model and beamform- ing optimization,

    S. Abeywickrama et al., “Intelligent reflecting surface: Practical phase shift model and beamform- ing optimization,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 5849–5863, Sep. 2020

    2020

  47. [52]

    IRS-assisted high-speed train communications: Outage probability minimization with statistical CSI,

    M. Gao, B. Ai, Y. Niu, Z. Han, and Z. Zhong, “IRS-assisted high-speed train communications: Outage probability minimization with statistical CSI,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Commun. , Montreal, Canada, Jun. 2021

    2021

  48. [53]

    Capacity analysis and rate maximization design in RIS-aided uplink multi-user MIMO,

    W. Jiang and H. D. Schotten, “Capacity analysis and rate maximization design in RIS-aided uplink multi-user MIMO,” in Proc. IEEE WCNC, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Mar. 2023, pp. 1–6. 24 A. L. Moustakas and G. C. Alexandropoulos

    2023

  49. [54]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces and capacity optimization: A large system analysis,

    A. L. Moustakas, G. C. Alexandropoulos, and M. Debbah, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces and capacity optimization: A large system analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 8736–8750, Dec. 2023

    2023

  50. [55]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for wireless communications: Overview of hardware designs, channel models, and estimation techniques,

    M. Jian, G. C. Alexandropoulos, E. Basar, C. Huang, R. Liu, Y. Liu, and C. Yuen, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for wireless communications: Overview of hardware designs, channel models, and estimation techniques,” Intell. Converged Netw., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Mar. 2022

    2022

  51. [56]

    A hardware architecture for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces with minimal active elements for explicit channel estimation,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos and E. Vlachos, “A hardware architecture for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces with minimal active elements for explicit channel estimation,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP , Barcelona, Spain, May 2020

    2020

  52. [57]

    Channel estimation with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces– A general framework,

    A. L. Swindlehurst, G. Zhou, R. Liu, C. Pan, and M. Li, “Channel estimation with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces– A general framework,”Proc. IEEE, pp. 1–27, May 2022

    2022

  53. [58]

    Channel estimation with hybrid reconfigurable intelligent metasurfaces,

    H. Zhang, N. Shlezinger, G. C. Alexandropoulos, A. Shultzman, I. Alamzadeh, M. F. Imani, and Y. C. Eldar, “Channel estimation with hybrid reconfigurable intelligent metasurfaces,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 2441–2456, Apr. 2023

    2023

  54. [59]

    Power scaling law analysis and phase shift optimization of RIS-aided massive MIMO systems with statistical CSI,

    K. Zhi, C. Pan, H. Ren, and K. Wang, “Power scaling law analysis and phase shift optimization of RIS-aided massive MIMO systems with statistical CSI,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 3558–3574, May 2022

    2022

  55. [60]

    New results for the multivariate Nakagami-𝑚 fading model with arbitrary correlation matrix and applications,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, N. C. Sagias, F. I. Lazarakis, and K. Berberidis, “New results for the multivariate Nakagami-𝑚 fading model with arbitrary correlation matrix and applications,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 245–255, 2009

    2009

  56. [61]

    Analytic framework for the effective rate of MISO fading channels,

    M. Matthaiou, G. C. Alexandropoulos, H. Q. Ngo, and E. G. Larsson, “Analytic framework for the effective rate of MISO fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1741–1751, 2012

    2012

  57. [62]

    Communication through a diffusive medium: Coherence and capacity,

    A. L. Moustakas et al., “Communication through a diffusive medium: Coherence and capacity,” Science, vol. 287, pp. 287–290, Jan. 2000

    2000

  58. [63]

    Hybrid reconfigurable intelligent metasurfaces: Enabling simultaneous tunable reflections and sensing for 6G wireless communications,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, N. Shlezinger, I. Alamzadeh, M. F. Imani, H. Zhang, and Y. C. Eldar, “Hybrid reconfigurable intelligent metasurfaces: Enabling simultaneous tunable reflections and sensing for 6G wireless communications,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. , vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–...

    2024

  59. [64]

    Gaussian multiaccess channels with ISI: Capacity region and multiuser water-filling,

    R. S. Cheng and S. Verd´ u, “Gaussian multiaccess channels with ISI: Capacity region and multiuser water-filling,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 773–785, May 1993

    1993

  60. [66]

    Optimum power and rate allocation strategies for multiple access fading channels,

    S. Vishwanath, S. A. Jafar, and A. Goldsmith, “Optimum power and rate allocation strategies for multiple access fading channels,” in Proc. IEEE VTC-Spring, vol. 4, Rhodes, Greece, May 2001

    2001

  61. [67]

    Capacity limits of MIMO channels,

    A. Goldsmith, S. A. Jafar, N. Jindal, and S. Vishwanath, “Capacity limits of MIMO channels,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 684–702, Jun. 2003

    2003

  62. [68]

    Iterative water-filling for Gaussian vector multiple- access channels,

    W. Yu, W. Rhee, S. Boyd, and J. M. Cioffi, “Iterative water-filling for Gaussian vector multiple- access channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 145–152, Jan. 2004

    2004

  63. [71]

    Information geometry and alternating minimization procedures,

    I. Csisz ´ar and G. Tusn ´ady, “Information geometry and alternating minimization procedures,” Statist. Decisions, vol. 1, pp. 205–237, Dec. 1984

    1984

  64. [72]

    Capacity characterization for intelligent reflecting surface aided MIMO communication,

    S. Zhang and R. Zhang, “Capacity characterization for intelligent reflecting surface aided MIMO communication,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1823–1838, Aug. 2020

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.