REVIEW 1 cited by
URSABench: Comprehensive Benchmarking of Approximate Bayesian Inference Methods for Deep Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While deep learning methods continue to improve in predictive accuracy on a wide range of application domains, significant issues remain with other aspects of their performance including their ability to quantify uncertainty and their robustness. Recent advances in approximate Bayesian inference hold significant promise for addressing these concerns, but the computational scalability of these methods can be problematic when applied to large-scale models. In this paper, we describe initial work on the development ofURSABench(the Uncertainty, Robustness, Scalability, and Accu-racy Benchmark), an open-source suite of bench-marking tools for comprehensive assessment of approximate Bayesian inference methods with a focus on deep learning-based classification tasks
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence for Robust Network Intrusion Detection: From Scratch to Transfer Learning
Reusing a frozen pretrained autoencoder, retrained clustering, and fine-tuned XGBoost on ACI-IoT-2023 outperforms FcNN and 1D-CNN with about half the training data, and metamodel-based UQ outperforms score-based UQ on...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.