Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.00288 v2 pith:NUW4Z3TJ submitted 2021-01-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords counterfactualcounterfactualspolyjuiceanalysisgenerationimprovingmanualmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While counterfactual examples are useful for analysis and training of NLP models, current generation methods either rely on manual labor to create very few counterfactuals, or only instantiate limited types of perturbations such as paraphrases or word substitutions. We present Polyjuice, a general-purpose counterfactual generator that allows for control over perturbation types and locations, trained by finetuning GPT-2 on multiple datasets of paired sentences. We show that Polyjuice produces diverse sets of realistic counterfactuals, which in turn are useful in various distinct applications: improving training and evaluation on three different tasks (with around 70% less annotation effort than manual generation), augmenting state-of-the-art explanation techniques, and supporting systematic counterfactual error analysis by revealing behaviors easily missed by human experts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. UGCE: User-Guided Incremental Counterfactual Exploration

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    UGCE reuses and repairs an evolved population of counterfactuals when user constraints change, cutting runtime versus recomputing from scratch, though success rates drop on some datasets.

Pith tools