pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09976 · v1 · pith:NVK7DVPHnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Too Heavy to Hide: Gamma-Ray Constraints on Annihilating Dark Matter beyond Unitarity

Abhishek Dubey , Deep Jyoti Das , Akash Kumar Saha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords dark matter annihilationgamma raysindirect detectionheavy dark mattercomposite dark matterunitarity boundair shower detectors
0
0 comments X

The pith

High-energy gamma-ray data set world-leading limits on dark matter annihilation for masses from 10^5 to 10^12 GeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts a model-agnostic search for heavy dark matter using upper limits on diffuse gamma rays from several ground-based detectors. It shows that these data can be used to set limits on annihilation cross sections for dark matter masses well beyond the usual unitarity bound, which applies if dark matter is point-like. If dark matter is composite, much heavier particles are possible, and this work tests that possibility with existing observations. A reader would care because it turns astrophysical measurements into particle physics constraints without new experiments. The results highlight how high-energy gamma-ray datasets can discover or rule out heavy dark matter in the near future.

Core claim

The central claim is that gamma-ray measurements and upper limits from Tibet ASγ, LHAASO, KASCADE-Grande, Pierre Auger Observatory, and Telescope Array enable probing new regions of parameter space and setting world-leading limits on the annihilation cross sections for dark matter with masses between 10^5 and 10^12 GeV, even when the thermal unitarity bound is relaxed for composite dark matter.

What carries the argument

Interpretation of high-energy diffuse gamma-ray upper limits from air shower detectors as constraints on dark matter annihilation cross sections for heavy masses.

If this is right

  • The allowed annihilation rates for heavy dark matter are now more tightly bounded by astrophysical data.
  • Composite dark matter models must satisfy these new cross section limits to remain viable.
  • Indirect detection via gamma rays extends to mass scales previously inaccessible by collider or direct detection methods.
  • Multiple independent detector datasets strengthen the robustness of the constraints.
  • Future gamma-ray observations could either detect a signal or further exclude parameter space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These limits could be combined with other indirect searches like neutrinos or cosmic rays for multi-messenger constraints.
  • If dark matter is not annihilating, these results do not apply, pointing to other production mechanisms for heavy particles.
  • The method could be applied to decaying dark matter scenarios with similar datasets.
  • Improved background modeling in gamma-ray astronomy would directly tighten these DM limits.

Load-bearing premise

The gamma-ray upper limits can be directly translated into dark matter annihilation constraints without dominant interference from astrophysical sources or large modeling uncertainties.

What would settle it

An independent measurement showing that the gamma-ray fluxes at the relevant energies are explained entirely by known astrophysical processes without room for dark matter contributions, or a detection of an excess exceeding the derived cross section limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09976 by Abhishek Dubey, Akash Kumar Saha, Deep Jyoti Das.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Constraints on DM annihilation cross section, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Gamma-ray flux Φ integrated above energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Upper limits on the dark matter annihilation cross-section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Constraints on DM annihilation cross section, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The measurement of high energy diffuse gamma rays by various ground-based air shower detectors have opened a new chapter for high energy particle physics and astrophysics. The broad range of viable dark matter candidates motivates extending indirect searches to heavier dark matter masses, opening new opportunities to uncover the nature of dark matter. If dark matter is composite rather than point-like, then the thermal unitarity bound can be relaxed, opening up the possibility of dark matter masses far beyond the electroweak scale. We perform a model agnostic search for heavy annihilating dark matter using the gamma-ray measurements and upper limits from Tibet AS$_\gamma$, LHAASO, KASCADE-Grande, Pierre Auger Observatory, and Telescope Array. These highest energy datasets enable us to probe new regions of parameter space and set world-leading limits on the annihilation cross sections for dark matter masses $10^5$--$10^{12}$ GeV. Our work highlights the power of high energy gamma-ray datasets in discovering heavy dark matter signatures in the near future.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a model-agnostic analysis that converts published diffuse gamma-ray upper limits from Tibet ASγ, LHAASO, KASCADE-Grande, Pierre Auger Observatory, and Telescope Array into constraints on the velocity-averaged annihilation cross section ⟨σv⟩ for dark matter masses between 10^5 and 10^12 GeV. It claims these datasets yield world-leading limits in this mass range, relaxing the thermal unitarity bound for composite dark matter candidates.

Significance. If the limits hold after proper background treatment, the result would usefully extend indirect detection reach to ultra-heavy dark matter using existing high-energy observatories and would motivate dedicated analyses with future data from these instruments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the listed detectors 'set world-leading limits on the annihilation cross sections' rests on treating published gamma-ray flux upper limits as direct DM-only constraints. At EeV energies the diffuse flux includes cosmic-ray-induced cascades, unresolved sources, and hadronic-interaction uncertainties; the manuscript provides no indication that these contributions have been subtracted or propagated as systematics when deriving ⟨σv⟩ bounds.
  2. [Abstract and introduction] The model-agnostic framing precludes appealing to a specific annihilation channel to suppress astrophysical backgrounds. Without an explicit demonstration (e.g., via sky-region selection or energy-bin analysis) that astrophysical contributions are sub-dominant in the bins used for the limits, the derived bounds on ⟨σv⟩ for m_DM = 10^5–10^12 GeV cannot be regarded as robust.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major concerns point by point below, clarifying our use of published upper limits and the conservative nature of the resulting bounds. We will incorporate revisions to improve clarity on these points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the listed detectors 'set world-leading limits on the annihilation cross sections' rests on treating published gamma-ray flux upper limits as direct DM-only constraints. At EeV energies the diffuse flux includes cosmic-ray-induced cascades, unresolved sources, and hadronic-interaction uncertainties; the manuscript provides no indication that these contributions have been subtracted or propagated as systematics when deriving ⟨σv⟩ bounds.

    Authors: Our analysis converts the published upper limits on the total diffuse gamma-ray flux directly into conservative upper bounds on the dark matter annihilation cross section. Because any astrophysical contribution would reduce the allowable dark matter flux, this procedure yields valid (though weaker) constraints without requiring background subtraction. We do not propagate additional systematics from hadronic interactions or unresolved sources, as that would necessitate a dedicated reanalysis beyond the scope of this model-agnostic study. We will revise the abstract to explicitly describe the limits as conservative bounds based on total-flux upper limits and add a brief discussion of the implications. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and introduction] The model-agnostic framing precludes appealing to a specific annihilation channel to suppress astrophysical backgrounds. Without an explicit demonstration (e.g., via sky-region selection or energy-bin analysis) that astrophysical contributions are sub-dominant in the bins used for the limits, the derived bounds on ⟨σv⟩ for m_DM = 10^5–10^12 GeV cannot be regarded as robust.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a model-agnostic approach cannot exploit channel-specific features for background rejection. The published limits already incorporate the experiments' best efforts to constrain the total flux; our conversion therefore provides indicative, conservative constraints on ultra-heavy dark matter that can guide future dedicated analyses. We do not perform new sky-region or energy-bin selections ourselves. We will add text in the introduction and a dedicated caveats section to emphasize the conservative character of the bounds and the value of follow-up work with these instruments. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: limits derived directly from external observatory datasets without self-referential fitting or definitional loops.

full rationale

The paper's central result consists of upper limits on dark matter annihilation cross sections obtained by interpreting published gamma-ray flux measurements and upper limits from independent experiments (Tibet ASγ, LHAASO, KASCADE-Grande, Pierre Auger, Telescope Array). No equations or steps in the provided text reduce a derived quantity to a parameter fitted from the same data, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on a self-citation whose content is itself unverified. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the paper relies on standard assumptions of indirect detection and publicly reported gamma-ray data. No free parameters, new particles, or ad-hoc entities are introduced in the provided text.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gamma rays observed by the listed detectors can be used to set model-agnostic upper limits on dark matter annihilation into standard-model final states.
    Implicit in the conversion of gamma-ray data into annihilation cross-section limits.
  • domain assumption The thermal unitarity bound on dark matter mass can be relaxed when dark matter is composite rather than elementary.
    Explicitly stated as the motivation for extending the search to 10^5--10^12 GeV.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5716 in / 1478 out tokens · 30380 ms · 2026-06-27T15:43:29.882679+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 61 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Bertone and D

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045002, [1605.04909]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Cirelli, A

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter, 2406.01705

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    L. E. Strigari,Galactic Searches for Dark Matter, Phys. Rept.531(2013) 1–88, [1211.7090]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Lisanti,Lectures on Dark Matter Physics, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp

    M. Lisanti,Lectures on Dark Matter Physics, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 399–446, 2017.1603.03797. DOI

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Lin,Dark matter models and direct detection,PoS 333(2019) 009, [1904.07915]

    T. Lin,Dark matter models and direct detection,PoS 333(2019) 009, [1904.07915]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions,Astrophys. J.159(1970) 379–403

    1970

  7. [7]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones et al.,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.648 (2006) L109–L113, [astro-ph/0608407]. [8]Planckcollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [1807.06209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Carney et al.,Snowmass2021 cosmic frontier white paper: Ultraheavy particle dark matter,SciPost Phys

    D. Carney et al.,Snowmass2021 cosmic frontier white paper: Ultraheavy particle dark matter,SciPost Phys. Core6(2023) 075, [2203.06508]. [10]LHAASOcollaboration, Z. Cao et al.,Constraints on Ultraheavy Dark Matter Properties from Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with LHAASO Observations, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 061001, [2406.08698]

    arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    I. V. Moskalenko, A. W. Strong and O. Reimer, Diffuse gamma-rays: Galactic and extragalactic diffuse emission,Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr.304(2004) 279, [astro-ph/0402243]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    S. R. Kelner, F. A. Aharonian and V. V. Bugayov, Energy spectra of gamma-rays, electrons and neutrinos produced at proton-proton interactions in the very high energy regime,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 034018, [astro-ph/0606058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    Kappes, J

    A. Kappes, J. Hinton, C. Stegmann and F. A. Aharonian,Potential Neutrino Signals from Galactic Gamma-Ray Sources,Astrophys. J.656(2007) 870–896, [astro-ph/0607286]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  12. [12]

    A. A. Abdo et al.,TeV Gamma-Ray Sources from a Survey of the Galactic Plane with Milagro,Astrophys. J. Lett.664(2007) L91–L94, [0705.0707]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    C. D. Dermer and G. Menon,High Energy Radiation from Black Holes: Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, and Neutrinos. 2009

    2009

  14. [14]

    Gupta,PeV gamma rays from interactions of ultra high energy cosmic rays in the Milky Way, Astroparticle Physics35(Mar., 2012) 503–507, [1110.5257]

    N. Gupta,PeV gamma rays from interactions of ultra high energy cosmic rays in the Milky Way, Astroparticle Physics35(Mar., 2012) 503–507, [1110.5257]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Lipari and S

    P. Lipari and S. Vernetto,Diffuse Galactic gamma ray flux at very high energy,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 043003, [1804.10116]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    I. V. Moskalenko, T. A. Porter and A. W. Strong, Attenuation of vhe gamma rays by the milky way interstellar radiation field,Astrophys. J. Lett.640 (2006) L155–L158, [astro-ph/0511149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [17]

    T. C. Weekes, M. F. Cawley, D. J. Fegan, K. G. Gibbs, A. M. Hillas, P. W. Kowk et al.,Observation of TeV Gamma Rays from the Crab Nebula Using the Atmospheric Cerenkov Imaging Technique, ApJ342 (July, 1989) 379

    1989

  18. [18]

    Capanema, A

    A. Capanema, A. Esmaili and P. D. Serpico,Where do IceCube neutrinos come from? Hints from the diffuse gamma-ray flux,JCAP02(2021) 037, [2007.07911]

    arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    T. M. Venters,Contribution to the Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background from the Cascades of very High Energy Gamma Rays from Blazars, ApJ710 (Feb., 2010) 1530–1540, [1001.1363]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    Vernetto and P

    S. Vernetto and P. Lipari,Absorption of very high energy gamma rays in the Milky Way,Phys. Rev. D 94(2016) 063009, [1608.01587]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    De Angelis, G

    A. De Angelis, G. Galanti and M. Roncadelli, Transparency of the Universe to gamma rays,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.432(2013) 3245–3249, [1302.6460]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Ruffini, G

    R. Ruffini, G. V. Vereshchagin and S. S. Xue,Cosmic absorption of ultra high energy particles,Astrophys. Space Sci.361(2016) 82, [1503.07749]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Sudoh and J

    T. Sudoh and J. F. Beacom,Where are Milky Way’s hadronic PeVatrons?,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 043002, [2209.03970]

    arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    F. W. Stecker,Cosmic gamma rays, vol. 249. 1971

    1971

  25. [25]

    D. Bose, V. R. Chitnis, P. Majumdar and A. Shukla, Galactic and extragalactic sources of very high energy gamma rays,Eur. Phys. J. ST231(2022) 27–66, [2201.06789]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Cardillo and A

    M. Cardillo and A. Giuliani,The LHAASO PeVatron Bright Sky: What We Learned,Appl. Sciences13 (2023) 6433, [2305.10526]

    arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Lipari and S

    P. Lipari and S. Vernetto,Resolved and unresolved Galactic gamma-ray sources,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063035, [2412.08861]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Ehlert, A

    D. Ehlert, A. van Vliet, F. Oikonomou and W. Winter, Constraints on the proton fraction of cosmic rays at the highest energies and the consequences for cosmogenic neutrinos and photons,JCAP02(2024) 022, [2304.07321]. [31]Tibet ASgammacollaboration, M. Amenomori et al., First Detection of sub-PeV Diffuse Gamma Rays from 9 the Galactic Disk: Evidence for Ub...

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    W. D. Apel, J. C. Arteaga-Vel´ azquez, K. Bekk, M. Bertaina, J. Bl¨ umer, H. Bozdog et al., KASCADE-Grande Limits on the Isotropic Diffuse Gamma-Ray Flux between 100 TeV and 1 EeV, ApJ 848(Oct., 2017) 1, [1710.02889]. [35]Telescope Arraycollaboration, R. U. Abbasi et al., Constraints on the diffuse photon flux with energies above10 18 eV using the surface...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Ishiwata, S

    K. Ishiwata, S. Matsumoto and T. Moroi,High Energy Cosmic Rays from the Decay of Gravitino Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 063505, [0805.1133]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  31. [31]

    Murase and J

    K. Murase and J. F. Beacom,Constraining Very Heavy Dark Matter Using Diffuse Backgrounds of Neutrinos and Cascaded Gamma Rays,JCAP10 (2012) 043, [1206.2595]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    Murase, R

    K. Murase, R. Laha, S. Ando and M. Ahlers,Testing the Dark Matter Scenario for PeV Neutrinos Observed in IceCube,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 071301, [1503.04663]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    Esmaili and P

    A. Esmaili and P. D. Serpico,Gamma-ray bounds from EAS detectors and heavy decaying dark matter constraints,JCAP10(2015) 014, [1505.06486]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Esmaili, S

    A. Esmaili, S. K. Kang and P. D. Serpico,IceCube events and decaying dark matter: hints and constraints,JCAP12(2014) 054, [1410.5979]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  35. [35]

    O. K. Kalashev and M. Y. Kuznetsov,Constraining heavy decaying dark matter with the high energy gamma-ray limits,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 063535, [1606.07354]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    O. E. Kalashev and M. Y. Kuznetsov,Heavy decaying dark matter and large-scale anisotropy of high-energy cosmic rays,JETP Lett.106(2017) 73–80, [1704.05300]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Kachelriess, O

    M. Kachelriess, O. E. Kalashev and M. Y. Kuznetsov, Heavy decaying dark matter and IceCube high energy neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 083016, [1805.04500]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Blanco and D

    C. Blanco and D. Hooper,Constraints on Decaying Dark Matter from the Isotropic Gamma-Ray Background,JCAP03(2019) 019, [1811.05988]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Ishiwata, O

    K. Ishiwata, O. Macias, S. Ando and M. Arimoto, Probing heavy dark matter decays with multi-messenger astrophysical data,JCAP01(2020) 003, [1907.11671]

    arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Alcantara, L

    E. Alcantara, L. A. Anchordoqui and J. F. Soriano, Hunting for superheavy dark matter with the highest-energy cosmic rays,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 103016, [1903.05429]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Cohen, K

    T. Cohen, K. Murase, N. L. Rodd, B. R. Safdi and Y. Soreq,γ-ray Constraints on Decaying Dark Matter and Implications for IceCube,Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 021102, [1612.05638]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Bhattacharya, A

    A. Bhattacharya, A. Esmaili, S. Palomares-Ruiz and I. Sarcevic,Update on decaying and annihilating heavy dark matter with the 6-year IceCube HESE data, JCAP05(2019) 051, [1903.12623]

    arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    O. E. Kalashev, M. Y. Kuznetsov and Y. V. Zhezher, Dark matter component decaying after recombination: constraints from diffuse gamma-ray and neutrino flux measurements,JCAP10(2019) 039, [1905.05170]

    arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    M. Y. Kuznetsov,Hadronically decaying heavy dark matter and high-energy neutrino limits,JETP Lett. 105(2017) 561–567, [1611.08684]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Sui and P

    Y. Sui and P. S. Bhupal Dev,A Combined Astrophysical and Dark Matter Interpretation of the IceCube HESE and Throughgoing Muon Events,JCAP 07(2018) 020, [1804.04919]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Chianese, D

    M. Chianese, D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. Miele, S. Morisi and O. Pisanti,Decaying dark matter at IceCube and its signature on High Energy gamma experiments,JCAP 11(2019) 046, [1907.11222]

    arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    T. N. Maity, A. K. Saha, A. Dubey and R. Laha, Search for dark matter using sub-PeVγ-rays observed by Tibet ASγ,2105.05680

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    L. A. Anchordoqui et al.,Hunting super-heavy dark matter with ultra-high energy photons,Astropart. Phys. 132(2021) 102614, [2105.12895]

    arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    Esmaili and P

    A. Esmaili and P. D. Serpico,First implications of Tibet ASγdata for heavy dark matter,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) L021301, [2105.01826]

    arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Chianese, D

    M. Chianese, D. F. G. Fiorillo, R. Hajjar, G. Miele and N. Saviano,Constraints on heavy decaying dark matter with current gamma-ray measurements,JCAP 11(2021) 035, [2108.01678]. [59]IceCubecollaboration, R. Abbasi et al.,Searches for connections between dark matter and high-energy neutrinos with IceCube,JCAP10(2023) 003, [2205.12950]. [60]LHAASOcollaborat...

    arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    C. A. Arg¨ uelles, D. Delgado, A. Friedlander, A. Kheirandish, I. Safa, A. C. Vincent et al.,Dark matter decay to neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 123021, [2210.01303]

    arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Aramaki et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: The landscape of cosmic-ray and high-energy photon probes of particle dark matter,2203.06894

    T. Aramaki et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: The landscape of cosmic-ray and high-energy photon probes of particle dark matter,2203.06894

    arXiv

  53. [53]

    Skrzypek, M

    B. Skrzypek, M. Chianese, C. A. Arg¨ uelles and C. Delgado Arg¨ uelles,Multi-messenger high-energy signatures of decaying dark matter and the effect of background light,JCAP01(2023) 037, [2205.03416]

    arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Hambye, M

    T. Hambye, M. Hufnagel and M. Lucca,Cosmological constraints on the decay of heavy relics into neutrinos, JCAP05(2022) 033, [2112.09137]

    arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Allahverdi, C

    R. Allahverdi, C. Arina, M. Chianese, M. Cicoli, F. Maltoni, D. Massaro et al.,Phenomenology of 10 superheavy decaying dark matter from string theory, JHEP02(2024) 192, [2312.00136]. [66]IceCubecollaboration, R. Abbasi et al.,Search for Dark Matter Decay in Nearby Galaxy Clusters and Galaxies with IceCube,PoSICRC2023(2023) 1378, [2308.04833]. [67]Pierre A...

    arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Sarmah, N

    P. Sarmah, N. Das, D. Borah, S. Chakraborty and P. Mehta,Constraining the superheavy dark matter origin of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays with the Amaterasu event,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083048, [2406.03174]

    arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    S. Das, J. A. Carpio and K. Murase,Probing superheavy dark matter through lunar radio observations of ultrahigh-energy neutrinos and the impacts of neutrino cascades,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083007, [2405.06382]

    arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Dekker, M

    A. Dekker, M. Chianese and S. Ando,Probing dark matter signals in neutrino telescopes through angular power spectrum,JCAP09(2020) 007, [1910.12917]

    arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    K. C. Y. Ng et al.,Sensitivities of KM3NeT on decaying dark matter,2007.03692

    arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    Deliyergiyev, A

    M. Deliyergiyev, A. Del Popolo and M. Le Delliou, Bounds from multimessenger astronomy on the superheavy dark matter,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063002, [2209.14061]

    arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    D. M. H. Leung and K. C. Y. Ng,Improving HAWC dark matter constraints with inverse-Compton emission,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 103021, [2312.08989]

    arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    S. Das, K. Murase and T. Fujii,Revisiting ultrahigh-energy constraints on decaying superheavy dark matter,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 103013, [2302.02993]

    arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Munbodh and S

    P. Munbodh and S. Profumo,Astrophysical constraints from synchrotron emission on very massive decaying dark matter,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 043014, [2405.00798]

    arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    D. Song, N. Hiroshima and K. Murase,Search for heavy dark matter from dwarf spheroidal galaxies: leveraging cascades and subhalo models,JCAP05 (2024) 087, [2401.15606]

    arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Liu, B.-Y

    T.-C. Liu, B.-Y. Zhu, Y.-F. Liang, X.-S. Hu and E.-W. Liang,Constraining the parameters of heavy dark matter and memory-burdened primordial black holes with DAMPE electron measurements,JHEAp47 (2025) 100375, [2503.13192]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Murase, Y

    K. Murase, Y. Narita and W. Yin,Superheavy dark matter from the natural inflation in light of the highest-energy astroparticle events,2504.15272

    arXiv

  67. [67]

    K. V. Berghaus, D. Hooper and E. R. Simon, Searching for superheavy decaying particles with ultra-high-energy neutrino observatories,JCAP07 (2025) 067, [2502.12238]. [81]LAT, HA WCcollaboration, A. Acharyya et al., Combined dark matter search towards dwarf spheroidal galaxies with Fermi-LAT, HAWC, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, and VERITAS,2508.20229

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Feldstein, A

    B. Feldstein, A. Kusenko, S. Matsumoto and T. T. Yanagida,Neutrinos at IceCube from Heavy Decaying Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 015004, [1303.7320]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    C. A. Arg¨ uelles, A. Diaz, A. Kheirandish, A. Olivares-Del-Campo, I. Safa and A. C. Vincent, Dark matter annihilation to neutrinos,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035007, [1912.09486]

    arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Chianese, D

    M. Chianese, D. F. G. Fiorillo, R. Hajjar, G. Miele, S. Morisi and N. Saviano,Heavy decaying dark matter at future neutrino radio telescopes,JCAP05(2021) 074, [2103.03254]

    arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Kohri, P

    K. Kohri, P. K. Paul and N. Sahu,Super heavy dark matter origin of the PeV neutrino event: KM3-230213A,2503.04464

    arXiv

  72. [72]

    Aloisio, A

    R. Aloisio, A. Ambrosone and C. Evoli,Constraining superheavy dark matter with the KM3-230213A neutrino event,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 043024, [2508.08779]

    arXiv 2026

  73. [73]

    Mukherjee, A

    D. Mukherjee, A. Halder, D. Majumdar and A. Bandyopadhyay,IceCube PeV neutrinos from heavy dark matter decay with 12 years HESE data, 2505.22204

    arXiv

  74. [74]

    Barman, A

    B. Barman, A. Das, P. Sarmah and R. K. SivaKumar, Constraining Gravitational Dark Matter with LHAASO and Fermi-LAT,2512.09997

    arXiv

  75. [75]

    Chianese, N

    M. Chianese, N. Saviano, S. Cesare, V. M. Grieco, V. Nasti, F. Spinnato et al.,Probing super-heavy dark matter with ultra-high-energy gamma rays, 2601.11703

    arXiv

  76. [76]

    Rocamora, P

    M. Rocamora, P. De La Torre Luque and M. A. S´ anchez-Conde,Constraints on Ultra-heavy DM from TeV-PeV gamma-ray diffuse measurements, 2509.09609

    arXiv

  77. [77]

    Griest and M

    K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski,Unitarity Limits on the Mass and Radius of Dark Matter Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.64(1990) 615

    1990

  78. [78]

    Smirnov and J

    J. Smirnov and J. F. Beacom,TeV-Scale Thermal WIMPs: Unitarity and its Consequences,Phys. Rev. D 100(2019) 043029, [1904.11503]

    arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Dalal and A

    N. Dalal and A. Kravtsov,Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063517, [2203.05750]

    arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    A. K. Saha, S. Bouri, A. Das, A. Dubey and R. Laha, Shedding Infrared Light on QCD Axion and ALP Dark Matter with JWST,2503.14582

    arXiv

Showing first 80 references.