Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Let's practice what we preach: Planning and interpreting simulation studies with design and analysis of experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.13737 v1 pith:NWJ5F67O submitted 2021-11-26 stat.ME

Let's practice what we preach: Planning and interpreting simulation studies with design and analysis of experiments

classification stat.ME
keywords analysisdesignsimulationstudiesexperimentsfactorialmethodsplanning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Statisticians recommend the Design and Analysis of Experiments (DAE) for evidence-based research but often use tables to present their own simulation studies. Could DAE do better? We outline how DAE methods can be used to plan and analyze simulation studies. Tools for planning include fishbone diagrams, factorial and fractional factorial designs. Analysis is carried out via ANOVA, main-effect and interaction plots and other DAE tools. We also demonstrate how Taguchi Robust Parameter Design can be used to study the robustness of methods to a variety of uncontrollable population parameters.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.