Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 116 references

Chiral Tube Algebras I: Topological Defect Lines, Twisted Modules, and Finite Gauging

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Pith's one-line read Chiral tube algebras extend ordinary chiral algebras to defect Hilbert spaces and survive finite gauging as non-local currents.

desk verdict Solid, constructive framework that cleanly unifies chiral algebras with TDL tube algebras and tracks them through gauging; examples check out against modular data. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07786 v1 pith:NYR3EGR7 submitted 2026-07-08 hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath.CTmath.QA

classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elmath.CTmath.QA
keywords chiraltubealgebrastopologicaldefectlinestwistedmodulesfinitegaugingorbifoldsWKac-Moodysuperconformal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Two-dimensional conformal field theories have two distinct notions of symmetry: chiral algebras built from local holomorphic currents, and topological defect lines that can twist boundary conditions and map between sectors. This paper unifies them by defining chiral tube algebras. These algebras are generated by lasso operators that insert chiral currents (local or attached to defects) around topological defect lines. The construction extends the action of a chiral algebra from the ordinary local Hilbert space to every defect Hilbert space twisted by topological lines, and it allows non-local currents to map between different defect spaces. Because finite gauging typically turns local currents into non-local ones, the same framework describes what a chiral algebra becomes after orbifolding or bosonization. Concrete examples for W3, su(2)1 Kac-Moody, and N=1 superconformal algebras show that the irreducible modules of the resulting chiral tube algebras are isomorphic to the familiar twisted modules of the parent algebras, and that these modules systematically organize both local and defect spectra.

What carries the argument

Lasso operators: contour integrals of (possibly non-local) chiral currents that cross vertical topological defect lines, with projectors onto eigenspaces when needed; these operators generate the chiral tube algebra and close as twisted or untwisted copies of the parent mode algebra.

What would settle it

In any of the worked examples (three-state Potts, SU(2)1 WZW, tricritical Ising), compute an explicit defect partition function or OPE that cannot be decomposed into the claimed twisted modules of the chiral tube algebra, or find a monodromy that produces an algebra that fails to close.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Chiral tube algebras, generated by lasso operators of local and non-local chiral currents on topological defect lines, extend ordinary chiral algebras to all defect Hilbert spaces and provide the natural image of those algebras under finite gauging; their irreducible modules are isomorphic to (un)twisted modules of the parent chiral algebras and organize the full local-plus-defect spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

Topological defect lines act on the chiral currents by automorphisms (or hypergroup actions) that preserve the operator product algebra, so mode monodromies are well-defined and the twisted algebras close without new anomalies.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces chiral tube algebras as a unifying structure that extends ordinary chiral algebras (VOAs) to act on defect Hilbert spaces twisted by topological defect lines (TDLs) and that incorporates non-local chiral currents attached by TDLs. The generators are lasso operators built from (possibly non-local) chiral currents and projectors onto TDL eigenspaces; their mode algebras close as (twisted) parent algebras, and the irreducible modules are isomorphic to ordinary or twisted modules of the parent chiral algebra. These modules organize both local and defect spectra, including after finite gauging/orbifolding or bosonization. The framework is developed in detail for the W3 algebra (three-state Potts and its Z2 orbifold, the tetracritical Ising model), the su(2)1 Kac-Moody algebra (SU(2)1 WZW and its ZN orbifolds, realized as compact bosons), and the N=1 superconformal algebra (N=1 minimal model and its bosonization, the tricritical Ising model). Explicit monodromies, projectors, mode expansions, commutation relations, characters, and modular S-transformed defect partition functions are matched throughout.

Significance. If the constructions hold, the paper supplies a clean, constructive language that simultaneously (i) describes how chiral algebras act on TDL-twisted sectors, (ii) tracks the image of a chiral algebra under finite gauging when currents become non-local, and (iii) prepares the ground for intrinsically non-local fractional-spin currents (promised for a sequel). The strength of the work lies in the concrete, checkable examples: mode algebras are derived step-by-step, normal-ordering ambiguities are fixed (Appendix C), spectral flow is recovered independently (Appendix B and §3.1.2), and the resulting modules reproduce known character decompositions and defect partition functions obtained by modular transformation. No free parameters or fitted data are introduced. The framework therefore offers a practical organizational tool for rational CFTs with non-invertible symmetries and a natural bridge between VOA theory and fusion-category symmetry.

minor comments (5)
  1. Table 1 lists the mathematical structure of chiral tube algebras as “???”. A short remark in the introduction or outlook on the expected categorical structure (e.g., relation to vertex tensor categories or tube algebras of fusion categories) would help readers place the new object.
  2. In §1.3 the parenthetical remark that TDLs act by automorphisms (or more generally hypergroup actions) is used throughout §§2–4. A single sentence citing the relevant literature on hypergroup actions on VOAs would make the standing assumption fully explicit.
  3. Notation for projectors and lasso operators is consistent within each section but varies slightly across sections (P±, P˜C±, PQ,L, Pη,±, PN,±i). A brief global notation paragraph or a table of symbols would improve readability.
  4. Appendix A sketches the generalization to other Virasoro minimal models. The claim that the story “should work” for W(2,h) algebras is plausible but left as an outline; a pointer to which modular invariants are expected to produce local versus non-local currents would be useful.
  5. A few typographical items: “Walgebras” appears without space or math mode in several places; the arXiv identifier in the header is 2607.07786 while the abstract banner shows the same; minor spacing inconsistencies around ± and half-integer indices appear in mode expansions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: constructions are definitional and modules are checked against independent modular data.

full rationale

The paper defines chiral tube algebras constructively via lasso operators built from known TDL actions and monodromies of (local or non-local) chiral currents (e.g. (1.29), (1.35)–(1.38), (2.48)–(2.50), (3.14), (3.54), (4.20)–(4.21)). The resulting mode algebras close as (twisted) parent algebras by direct computation from OPEs and projectors; the isomorphism of their modules to (un)twisted modules of the parent chiral algebras is verified by matching independent modular data (defect partition functions (2.39)–(2.41), (2.51)–(2.59), (3.43)–(3.44), (3.64)–(3.65), (4.15), (4.30)–(4.31)), not assumed by construction. Spectral flow and twisted Sugawara coefficients are derived from modular properties and commutation relations (App. B, C), not fitted. Self-citations are limited to a companion paper on fractional currents and standard literature; none is load-bearing for the central claims. No fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors force the results. The derivation is self-contained against external modular benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The work rests on standard 2d CFT and fusion-category axioms plus the definitional introduction of chiral tube algebras; no free parameters are fitted and the only invented entity is the algebraic structure itself, which is given concrete realizations in known models.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Unitary compact 2d CFTs possess a well-defined local Hilbert space dual to local operators via state-operator correspondence, and TDLs define defect Hilbert spaces.
    Invoked throughout §1 and used to interpret lasso operators; standard in the TDL literature cited.
  • domain assumption TDLs that preserve a chiral algebra act by automorphisms (or hypergroup actions) of that algebra, inducing monodromy shifts of mode numbers.
    Stated in §1.3; required for the twisted mode expansions (1.27)–(1.28) and all subsequent examples.
  • domain assumption Finite abelian gauging reshuffles local and defect operators according to the dual quantum symmetry, turning charged chiral currents into non-local operators attached by dual TDLs.
    Used in §§2.2, 3.2, 4; standard orbifold lore (Dixon et al., Vafa).
  • standard math The modular S-matrix of Virasoro/W3/su(2)1/N=1 characters correctly computes defect partition functions via Verlinde-type formulae.
    Employed in §§2.1.5, 2.2.4, 3.1.3, 4.3 to verify module content.
invented entities (1)
  • chiral tube algebra independent evidence
    purpose: Unifying algebraic structure generated by lasso operators of (non-)local chiral currents that acts simultaneously on local and defect Hilbert spaces.
    Defined in §1.3 and constructed explicitly for three families; independent evidence is the matching of known twisted characters and defect partition functions, which are external modular data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral Tube Algebras I: Topological Defect Lines, Twisted Modules, and Finite Gauging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NYR3EGR7

@misc{pith2026260707786,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral Tube Algebras I: Topological Defect Lines, Twisted Modules, and Finite Gauging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NYR3EGR7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07786}
}
abstract

Chiral algebras and topological defect lines (TDLs) represent two complementary notions of symmetry in 2d conformal field theories. In this paper, we introduce chiral tube algebras to unify and extend these two notions. Chiral tube algebras generalize chiral algebras in two ways. First, they extend the action of chiral algebras beyond the local Hilbert space to include defect Hilbert spaces twisted by TDLs. Second, they allow for non-local chiral currents attached by TDLs and thus can map between different defect Hilbert spaces, analogous to the tube algebras of TDLs. Since local chiral currents can become non-local after finite gauging, chiral tube algebras provide a natural framework for describing the image of chiral algebras under such gauging. We illustrate this framework through a variety of examples that generalize familiar chiral algebras, including Kac-Moody algebras, $\mathcal{W}$ algebras, superconformal algebras, and their orbifolds/bosonizations. We construct their irreducible modules, which are isomorphic to twisted modules of the corresponding chiral algebras, and use them to organize local and defect Hilbert spaces. In a subsequent paper, we will study chiral tube algebras generated by non-local chiral currents with fractional spins, which have no counterparts in chiral algebras.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07786 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The left figure is the interpretation of a TDL as an operator acting on the local [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The commutative diagram among fermionic theories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B241(1984) 333

  2. [2]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Infinite Additional Symmetries in Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory,Theor. Math. Phys.65(1985) 1205

  3. [3]

    E. P. Verlinde,Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B300(1988) 360. 67

  4. [4]

    V. B. Petkova and J. B. Zuber,Generalized twisted partition functions,Phys. Lett. B 504(2001) 157 [hep-th/0011021]

  5. [5]

    Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 070601 [cond-mat/0404051]

  6. [6]

    Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory,Nucl. Phys. B763(2007) 354 [hep-th/0607247]

  7. [7]

    The Virtue of Defects in 4D Gauge Theories and 2D CFTs

    N. Drukker, D. Gaiotto and J. Gomis,The Virtue of Defects in 4D Gauge Theories and 2D CFTs,JHEP06(2011) 025 [1003.1112]

  8. [8]

    Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain

    A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang et al., Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain,Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(2007) 160409 [cond-mat/0612341]

Show all 116 references
  1. [9]

    Aasen, R

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong and P. Fendley,Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,J. Phys. A49(2016) 354001 [1601.07185]

  2. [10]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa,On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,JHEP03(2018) 189 [1704.02330]

  3. [11]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin,Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,JHEP01(2019) 026 [1802.04445]

  4. [12]

    Ocneanu,Chirality for operator algebras,Subfactors (Kyuzeso, 1993)(1994) 39

    A. Ocneanu,Chirality for operator algebras,Subfactors (Kyuzeso, 1993)(1994) 39

  5. [13]

    Y.-H. Lin, M. Okada, S. Seifnashri and Y. Tachikawa,Asymptotic density of states in 2d CFTs with non-invertible symmetries,JHEP03(2023) 094 [2208.05495]

  6. [14]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02(2015) 172 [1412.5148]

  7. [15]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych and V. Ostrik,Tensor categories, vol. 205. American Mathematical Soc., 2015, 10.1090/surv/205

  8. [16]

    Oshikawa and I

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck,Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional Ising model with a defect line,Nucl. Phys. B495(1997) 533 [cond-mat/9612187]. 68

  9. [17]

    H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier,Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. Part 1,Phys. Rev.60(1941) 252

  10. [18]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore and A. Grigoletto,Representation theory for categorical symmetries,2305.17165

  11. [19]

    D. E. Evans and Y. Kawahigashi,On Ocneanu’s theory of asymptotic inclusions for subfactors, topological quantum field theories and quantum doubles,Int. J. Math.6 (1995) 205

  12. [20]

    Izumi,The structure of sectors associated with Longo-Rehren inclusions

    M. Izumi,The structure of sectors associated with Longo-Rehren inclusions. I: General theory,Commun. Math. Phys.213(2000) 127

  13. [21]

    Mueger,From subfactors to categories and topology II: The quantum double of tensor categories and subfactors,J

    M. Mueger,From subfactors to categories and topology II: The quantum double of tensor categories and subfactors,J. Pure Appl. Algebra180(2001) 159 [math/0111205]

  14. [22]

    Kong, X.-G

    L. Kong, X.-G. Wen and H. Zheng,Boundary-bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers,1502.01690

  15. [23]

    Kong, X.-G

    L. Kong, X.-G. Wen and H. Zheng,Boundary-bulk relation in topological orders, Nucl. Phys. B922(2017) 62 [1702.00673]

  16. [24]

    Pulmann, P

    J. Pulmann, P. ˇSevera and F. Valach,A nonabelian duality for (higher) gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.25(2021) 241 [1909.06151]

  17. [25]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion category symmetry. Part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases,JHEP04(2024) 132 [1912.02817]

  18. [26]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen,Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020) 033417 [1912.13492]

  19. [27]

    Lichtman, R

    T. Lichtman, R. Thorngren, N. H. Lindner, A. Stern and E. Berg,Bulk anyons as edge symmetries: Boundary phase diagrams of topologically ordered states,Phys. Rev. B104(2021) 075141 [2003.04328]

  20. [28]

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang and H. Zheng,Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020) 043086 [2005.14178]. 69

  21. [29]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp,Orbifold groupoids,JHEP02(2021) 132 [2008.05960]

  22. [30]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley and R. S. K. Mong,Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,2008.08598

  23. [31]

    Apruzzi, F

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.402(2023) 895 [2112.02092]

  24. [32]

    I. M. Burbano, J. Kulp and J. Neuser,Duality defects in E 8,JHEP10(2022) 186 [2112.14323]

  25. [33]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen,Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle,Phys. Rev. B107(2023) 155136 [2203.03596]

  26. [34]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore and C. Teleman,Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,2209.07471

  27. [35]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori and Y. Zheng,Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects, Commun. Math. Phys.404(2023) 1021 [2209.11062]

  28. [36]

    Turaev and O

    V. Turaev and O. Viro,State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols, Topology31(1992) 865

  29. [37]

    J. W. Barrett and B. W. Westbury,Invariants of piecewise linear three manifolds, Trans. Am. Math. Soc.348(1996) 3997 [hep-th/9311155]

  30. [38]

    Kirillov, Jr

    A. Kirillov, Jr. and B. Balsam,Turaev-Viro invariants as an extended TQFT, 1004.1533

  31. [39]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki,Generalized charges, part II: Non-invertible symmetries and the symmetry TFT,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 098 [2305.17159]

  32. [40]

    Gromov,Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra,Phys

    A. Gromov,Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra,Phys. Rev. X9(2019) 031035 [1812.05104]

  33. [41]

    P. Sala, J. Lehmann, T. Rakovszky and F. Pollmann,Dynamics in Systems with Modulated Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 170601 [2110.08302]. 70

  34. [42]

    Gorantla, H

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,Global dipole symmetry, compact Lifshitz theory, tensor gauge theory, and fractons,Phys. Rev. B106(2022) 045112 [2201.10589]

  35. [43]

    S. D. Pace, G. Delfino, H. T. Lam and ¨O. M. Aksoy,Gauging modulated symmetries: Kramers-Wannier dualities and non-invertible reflections,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 021 [2406.12962]

  36. [44]

    S. D. Pace, ¨O. M. Aksoy and H. T. Lam,Spacetime symmetry-enriched SymTFT: From LSM anomalies to modulated symmetries and beyond,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 007 [2507.02036]

  37. [45]

    Apruzzi, N

    F. Apruzzi, N. Dondi, I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, H. T. Lam and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs for Continuous Spacetime Symmetries,2509.07965

  38. [46]

    Bischoff,Generalized Orbifold Construction for Conformal Nets,Rev

    M. Bischoff,Generalized Orbifold Construction for Conformal Nets,Rev. Math. Phys. 29(2016) 1750002 [1608.00253]

  39. [47]

    Bischoff, S

    M. Bischoff, S. Del Vecchio and L. Giorgetti,Quantum operations on conformal nets, Rev. Math. Phys.35(2023) 2350007 [2204.14105]

  40. [48]

    Riesen,Fusion rings acting on vertex operator algebras: First steps,Contemporary Mathematics813(2025) 61

    A. Riesen,Fusion rings acting on vertex operator algebras: First steps,Contemporary Mathematics813(2025) 61

  41. [49]

    Dong, S.-H

    C. Dong, S.-H. Ng, L. Ren and F. Xu,Generalized Symmetries From Fusion Actions, 2508.13063

  42. [50]

    Gannon and B

    T. Gannon and B. C. Rayhaun,Hypergroup Symmetry in Relative Quantum Field Theories and Chiral Algebras,2606.05279

  43. [51]

    C. Dong, H. Li and G. Mason,Twisted representations of vertex operator algebras, Math. Ann.310(1998) 571 [q-alg/9509005]

  44. [52]

    L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, C. Vafa and E. Witten,Strings on Orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B261(1985) 678

  45. [53]

    L. J. Dixon, D. Friedan, E. J. Martinec and S. H. Shenker,The Conformal Field Theory of Orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B282(1987) 13

  46. [54]

    Dijkgraaf, C

    R. Dijkgraaf, C. Vafa, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde,The Operator Algebra of Orbifold Models,Commun. Math. Phys.123(1989) 485. 71

  47. [55]

    Vafa,Quantum Symmetries of String Vacua,Mod

    C. Vafa,Quantum Symmetries of String Vacua,Mod. Phys. Lett. A4(1989) 1615

  48. [56]

    Tachikawa,On gauging finite subgroups,SciPost Phys.8(2020) 015 [1712.09542]

    Y. Tachikawa,On gauging finite subgroups,SciPost Phys.8(2020) 015 [1712.09542]

  49. [57]

    Benini, C

    F. Benini, C. C´ ordova and P.-S. Hsin,On 2-Group Global Symmetries and their Anomalies,JHEP03(2019) 118 [1803.09336]

  50. [58]

    Hsin and H

    P.-S. Hsin and H. T. Lam,Discrete theta angles, symmetries and anomalies,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 032 [2007.05915]

  51. [59]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori and Y. Zheng,Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 111601 [2111.01141]

  52. [60]

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.402(2023) 489 [2204.09025]

  53. [61]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Lorentzian dynamics and factorization beyond rationality,JHEP10(2021) 125 [2012.01429]

  54. [62]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion category symmetry. Part II. Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond,JHEP07(2024) 051 [2106.12577]

  55. [63]

    Antinucci, C

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati and G. Rizi,Defect Conformal Manifolds from Phantom Noninvertible Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 211602 [2505.09668]

  56. [64]

    Delmastro, A

    D. Delmastro, A. Sharon and Y. Zheng,Non-local conserved currents and continuous non-invertible symmetries,JHEP11(2025) 072 [2507.22976]

  57. [65]

    Ambrosino, I

    F. Ambrosino, I. Runkel and G. M. T. Watts,Non-local charges from perturbed defects via SymTFT in 2d CFT,J. Phys. A58(2025) 425401 [2504.05277]

  58. [66]

    Ambrosino, I

    F. Ambrosino, I. Runkel and G. M. T. Watts,Translation invariant defects as an extension of topological symmetries,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A41(2026) 2648001 [2511.02007]

  59. [67]

    Y. Choi, H. Ha, D. Kim, Y. Kusuki, S. Ohyama and S. Ryu,Higher structures on boundary conformal manifolds: Higher Berry phase and boundary conformal field theory,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 106005 [2507.12525]. 72

  60. [68]

    Furuta, Y

    Y. Furuta, Y. Kusuki and T. Onagi,Transmission coefficients from phantom currents,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 045008 [2511.00356]

  61. [69]

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Parafermionic Currents in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory and Selfdual Critical Points in Z(n) Invariant Statistical Systems,Sov. Phys. JETP62(1985) 215

  62. [70]

    Benjamin, H

    N. Benjamin, H. T. Lam and C. Luo,Chiral Tube Algebras II: Non-local Fractional Currents (to appear), 2026

  63. [71]

    Huang and J

    Y.-Z. Huang and J. Lepowsky,A Theory of tensor products for module categories for a vertex operator algebra. 1.,Sel. Math., New Ser.1(1995) 699 [hep-th/9309076]

  64. [72]

    Huang and J

    Y.-Z. Huang and J. Lepowsky,A theory of tensor products for module categories for a vertex operator algebra. 2.,Sel. Math., New Ser.1(1995) 757 [hep-th/9309159]

  65. [73]

    Huang and J

    Y.-Z. Huang and J. Lepowsky,A Theory of tensor products for module categories for a vertex operator algebra. 3.,J. Pure Appl. Algebra100(1995) 141 [q-alg/9505018]

  66. [74]

    Huang and J

    Y.-Z. Huang and J. Lepowsky,Tensor products of modules for a vertex operator algebra and vertex tensor categories,hep-th/9401119

  67. [75]

    Huang,A Theory of tensor products for module categories for a vertex operator algebra

    Y.-Z. Huang,A Theory of tensor products for module categories for a vertex operator algebra. 4.,J. Pure Appl. Algebra100(1995) 173 [q-alg/9505019]

  68. [76]

    Huang and J

    Y.-Z. Huang and J. Lepowsky,Tensor categories and the mathematics of rational and logarithmic conformal field theory,J. Phys. A46(2013) 494009 [1304.7556]

  69. [77]

    Schwimmer and N

    A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg,Comments on the N=2, N=3, N=4 Superconformal Algebras in Two-Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B184(1987) 191

  70. [78]

    Bouwknegt and K

    P. Bouwknegt and K. Schoutens,W symmetry in conformal field theory,Phys. Rept. 223(1993) 183 [hep-th/9210010]

  71. [79]

    Ho-Kim and H

    Q. Ho-Kim and H. B. Zheng,Twisted Conformal Field Theories WithZ(3) Invariance,Phys. Lett. B212(1988) 71

  72. [80]

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Conformal quantum field theory models in two dimensions having Z3 symmetry,Nucl. Phys. B280(1987) 644. 73

  73. [81]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997, 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

  74. [82]

    Perez-Lona,Discrete torsion in gauging non-invertible symmetries,J

    A. Perez-Lona,Discrete torsion in gauging non-invertible symmetries,J. Geom. Phys.210(2025) 105423 [2406.02676]

  75. [83]

    Panaite, M

    F. Panaite, M. D. Staic and F. Van Oystaeyen,Pseudosymmetric braidings, twines and twisted algebras,J. Pure Appl. Algebra214(2010) 867 [0801.2055]

  76. [84]

    Etingof, D

    P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, V. Ostrik and E. Meir,Fusion categories and homotopy theory,Quantum Topol.1(2010) 209 [0909.3140]

  77. [85]

    Diatlyk, C

    O. Diatlyk, C. Luo, Y. Wang and Q. Weller,Gauging non-invertible symmetries: topological interfaces and generalized orbifold groupoid in 2d QFT,JHEP03(2024) 127 [2311.17044]

  78. [86]

    Goddard and D

    P. Goddard and D. I. Olive,Kac-Moody and Virasoro Algebras in Relation to Quantum Physics,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A1(1986) 303

  79. [87]

    Fuchs, M

    J. Fuchs, M. R. Gaberdiel, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,Topological defects for the free boson CFT,J. Phys. A40(2007) 11403 [0705.3129]

  80. [88]

    Friedan, Z

    D. Friedan, Z. Qiu and S. H. Shenker,Superconformal Invariance in Two-Dimensions and the Tricritical Ising Model,Phys. Lett. B151(1985) 37

  81. [89]

    Gliozzi, J

    F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk and D. I. Olive,Supersymmetry, Supergravity Theories and the Dual Spinor Model,Nucl. Phys. B122(1977) 253

  82. [90]

    Karch, D

    A. Karch, D. Tong and C. Turner,A Web of 2d Dualities:Z 2 Gauge Fields and Arf Invariants,SciPost Phys.7(2019) 007 [1902.05550]

  83. [91]

    Ji, S.-H

    W. Ji, S.-H. Shao and X.-G. Wen,Topological Transition on the Conformal Manifold, Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020) 033317 [1909.01425]

  84. [92]

    M. F. Atiyah,Riemann surfaces and spin structures,Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure4(1971) 47

  85. [93]

    Boyle Smith and Y

    P. Boyle Smith and Y. Zheng,Backfiring bosonisation,JHEP03(2026) 221 [2403.03953]. 74

  86. [94]

    Z.-C. Gu, Z. Wang and X.-G. Wen,Classification of two-dimensional fermionic and bosonic topological orders,Phys. Rev. B91(2015) 125149 [1010.1517]

  87. [95]

    Aasen, E

    D. Aasen, E. Lake and K. Walker,Fermion condensation and super pivotal categories,J. Math. Phys.60(2019) 121901 [1709.01941]

  88. [96]

    Chang, J

    C.-M. Chang, J. Chen and F. Xu,Topological defect lines in two dimensional fermionic CFTs,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 216 [2208.02757]

  89. [97]

    Kikuchi,Emergent SUSY in two dimensions,2204.03247

    K. Kikuchi,Emergent SUSY in two dimensions,2204.03247

  90. [98]

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys.123(1989) 177

  91. [99]

    Huang,Rigidity and modularity of vertex tensor categories,Commun

    Y.-Z. Huang,Rigidity and modularity of vertex tensor categories,Commun. Contemp. Math.10(2008) 871 [math/0502533]

  92. [100]

    Copetti,Defect charges, gapped boundary conditions, and the symmetry TFT, JHEP04(2026) 055 [2408.01490]

    C. Copetti,Defect charges, gapped boundary conditions, and the symmetry TFT, JHEP04(2026) 055 [2408.01490]

  93. [101]

    Cordova, N

    C. Cordova, N. Holfester and K. Ohmori,Representation theory of solitons,JHEP06 (2025) 001 [2408.11045]

  94. [102]

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun and Y. Zheng,Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States,Commun. Math. Phys.407(2026) 62 [2409.02159]

  95. [103]

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun and Y. Zheng,Noninvertible Symmetry-Resolved Affleck-Ludwig-Cardy Formula and Entanglement Entropy from the Boundary Tube Algebra,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 251602 [2409.02806]

  96. [104]

    Bhardwaj, C

    L. Bhardwaj, C. Copetti, D. Pajer and S. Schafer-Nameki,Boundary SymTFT, SciPost Phys.19(2025) 061 [2409.02166]

  97. [105]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli and B. C. van Rees,Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.336(2015) 1359 [1312.5344]

  98. [106]

    Cordova, D

    C. Cordova, D. Gaiotto and S.-H. Shao,Surface Defects and Chiral Algebras,JHEP 05(2017) 140 [1704.01955]. 75

  99. [107]

    Rastelli, B

    L. Rastelli, B. C. Rayhaun, M. Sacchi and G. Zafrir, 2 + 2 = 4,2601.00058

  100. [108]

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 125016 [2111.01139]

  101. [109]

    Kaidi, G

    J. Kaidi, G. Zafrir and Y. Zheng,Non-invertible symmetries ofN= 4 SYM and twisted compactification,JHEP08(2022) 053 [2205.01104]

  102. [110]

    Bashmakov, M

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, A. Hasan and J. Kaidi,Non-invertible symmetries of class S theories,JHEP05(2023) 225 [2211.05138]

  103. [111]

    Shao and S

    S.-H. Shao and S. Zhong,Where non-invertible symmetries end: twist defects for electromagnetic duality,JHEP01(2026) 118 [2509.21279]

  104. [112]

    Fluder and J

    M. Fluder and J. Song,Four-dimensional Lens Space Index from Two-dimensional Chiral Algebra,JHEP07(2018) 073 [1710.06029]

  105. [113]

    Blumenhagen, M

    R. Blumenhagen, M. Flohr, A. Kliem, W. Nahm, A. Recknagel and R. Varnhagen,W algebras with two and three generators,Nucl. Phys. B361(1991) 255

  106. [114]

    H. G. Kausch and G. M. T. Watts,A Study of W algebras using Jacobi identities, Nucl. Phys. B354(1991) 740

  107. [115]

    Benjamin, E

    N. Benjamin, E. Dyer, A. L. Fitzpatrick and S. Kachru,Universal Bounds on Charged States in 2d CFT and 3d Gravity,JHEP08(2016) 041 [1603.09745]

  108. [116]

    Benjamin, H

    N. Benjamin, H. Ooguri, S.-H. Shao and Y. Wang,Twist gap and global symmetry in two dimensions,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 106026 [2003.02844]. 76

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.