Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On The Quality Of Cryptocurrency Markets: Centralized Versus Decentralized Exchanges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.07386 v7 pith:NZM5K6NE submitted 2021-12-14 q-fin.TR

classification q-fin.TR
keywords qualitycostsmarketcausalcentralizeddecentralizeddeviationsdexs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We analyze the market quality of centralized crypto exchanges (CEXs) and decentralized blockchain-based venues (DEXs) using a unique and comprehensive dataset. Focusing on two fundamental aspects, transaction costs and deviations from the no-arbitrage condition, we estimate the causal effect of ``gas fees'' on DEX market quality. We show that these fixed costs impose a significant burden on relatively small trades and cause persistent arbitrage deviations. Conversely, DEXs offer more competitive transaction costs for larger trades, offering a more favorable environment for institutional investors. Furthermore, we provide causal evidence that innovations aimed at enhancing the flexibility of liquidity provision in DEX markets lead to sizeable improvements in market quality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Price Discovery in Cryptocurrency Markets

    q-fin.TR 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Using standard price discovery metrics on 2024 data, centralized exchanges lead Uniswap for ETH price discovery, and CME futures generally lead Binance spot for BTC.

Pith tools