REVIEW 1 cited by
Physical limit to concentration sensing amid spurious ligands
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
To adapt their behaviour in changing environments, cells sense concentrations by binding external ligands to their receptors. However, incorrect ligands may bind nonspecifically to receptors, and when their concentration is large, this binding activity may interfere with the sensing of the ligand of interest. Here, I derive analytically the physical limit to the accuracy of concentration sensing amid a large number of interfering ligands. A scaling transition is found when the mean bound time of correct ligands is twice that of incorrect ligands. I discuss how the physical bound can be approached by a cascade of receptor states generalizing kinetic proof-reading schemes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
You ain't seen nothing, and yet: Future biochemical concentrations can be predicted with surprisingly high accuracy
Bayesian inference over a known class of monotonically saturating concentration profiles gives relative estimation error 1/(a√N), better than the Poisson 1/√N limit when the early rise rate is a nonlinear function of ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.