Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 121 references

Nonparametric learning of stochastic differential equations from sparse and noisy data

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fully unidirectional hopping makes the $p$ complex bands of a non-Hermitian chain exactly the $p$-th roots of the parent band; with an SSH parent, the single-particle levels equal those of free parafermions in Baxter's clock model.

desk verdict The submission metadata is a different paper entirely; the actual text is a solid, checkable p-th-root non-Hermitian SSH construction whose one load-bearing claim—free-parafermion equivalence—is asserted rather than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11597 v1 pith:O3M5IQ5M submitted 2025-08-15 stat.ML cs.LGmath.PRstat.ME

Arnab Ganguly , Riten Mitra , Jinpu Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification stat.MLcs.LGmath.PRstat.ME
keywords non-HermitianSSHmodelcomplexchiralsymmetryunidirectionalhoppingfreeparafermionsBaxterclocksquare-rootHamiltonianexceptionalpointstight-bindinglattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a simple modification of a Hermitian tight-binding model — replacing one hopping direction with fully unidirectional hopping and enlarging the unit cell to $p$ orbitals — produces a non-Hermitian model whose $p$ complex bands are completely determined by the parent band: each band is a $p$-th root of the parent's $|h(k)|^2$, up to constants. The load-bearing identity is that the $p$-th power of the Bloch Hamiltonian is a scalar matrix, $(H^{(m,n)}(k,1))^p=\gamma^{p-2}|h(k)|^2 I_p$, so the spectrum needs no further calculation. When the parent is the SSH chain, the paper further claims that the position-space Hamiltonian coincides, up to rescaling, with the matrices of a free-parafermion construction, giving the same single-particle energy levels as Baxter's clock model — a concrete bridge from an ordinary fermionic chain to parafermion physics. The paper then charts the transition as hopping becomes partially unidirectional, showing how time-reversal and sublattice symmetries force the real Hermitian spectrum to evolve into a complex one, with exceptional points at edges, solitons, and graphene's Dirac point. A reader should care because the construction turns spectral design into a power identity and yields checkable predictions — including a square-root non-Hermitian graphene — in platforms where near-unidirectional hopping is achievable.

What carries the argument

The central object is the complex chiral symmetry $ZHZ^{-1}=\omega H$ with $Z=\mathrm{diag}(1,\omega,\dots,\omega^{p-1})$, $\omega=\exp(2\pi i/p)$; $H^{(m,n)}(k,1)$ is a generalized permutation matrix — one non-zero entry per row and column, a single $k$-dependent element $h(k)$ or $h^*(k)$, the rest constant $\gamma$ hoppings. The workhorse identity is $(H^{(m,n)}(k,1))^p=\gamma^{p-2}|h(k)|^{2}I_p$, fixing the $p$ complex bands as the distinct $p$-th roots of a real factor set entirely by the parent band. A second load-bearing element is the Sec. II.D assertion that the open-boundary matrices $H^{(1,p-1)}$ coincide, up to rescaling, with the free-parafermion matrices $M_n$, transferring Bax

What would settle it

Diagonalize the open-boundary chain $H^{(1,p-1)}$ for $p=3$ or $p=4$ with a small number of unit cells and compare every eigenvalue of the $pL\times pL$ matrix — zero modes, algebraic multiplicities, and edge-state degeneracies included — against the single-particle spectrum of the free-parafermion Hamiltonian built from the $M_n$ matrices with matched couplings; any mismatch in the finite-size level pattern or its scaling with $L$ would falsify Eq. (12). A more direct check: compare the matrix in Eq. (11) with $M_n$ element by element to confirm the asserted identity, which the paper does not

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Central claim: from a Hermitian bipartite parent, $p$ orbitals per cell plus fully unidirectional hopping $\gamma$ gives a Bloch matrix whose $p$-th power is a scalar, $(H^{(m,n)}(k,1))^p=\gamma^{p-2}|h(k)|^2 I_p$. Hence the $p$ complex bands are fixed by the parent band alone: the distinct solutions of $(\epsilon_j)^p=\gamma^{p-2}|h(k)|^2$ times the $p$-th roots of unity. For an SSH parent this becomes $(\epsilon_j^{(p)})^p=\gamma^{p-2}(\epsilon_j^{\mathrm{SSH}})^2$, and the paper asserts that the position-space matrices $H^{(1,p-1)}$ are, up to rescaling, the matrices $M_n$ of the free-parafermion construction, so the single-particle levels match free parafermions in Baxter's clock model.

Load-bearing premise

The headline equivalence to free parafermions rests on the assertion in Sec. II.D that the position-space matrices $H^{(1,p-1)}$ of Eqs. (10)-(11) are the same as the matrices $M_n$ in the free-parafermion construction up to rescaling of the hoppings; this isomorphism is stated rather than proven, and it is the entire bridge between the tight-binding chain and the claim that the single-particle energy levels match Baxter's clock model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the construction is right, any Hermitian bipartite parent yields a non-Hermitian $p$-band model whose entire complex spectrum is fixed by the parent's $|h(k)|$ plus the constants $\gamma$, $t$, $J$ — the $p$ bands are $p$-th roots of the parent band.
  • For an SSH parent, the open-boundary chain $H^{(1,p-1)}$ has exactly the single-particle energy levels of free parafermion solutions of Baxter's clock model, so fermionic tight-binding chains and topolectrical-circuit simulations can reproduce that integrable model's single-particle spectrum and topology.
  • Fully unidirectional hopping produces defective eigenvalues (algebraic multiplicity $p$, geometric multiplicity two) at edges, solitons, and graphene's Dirac point; near the Dirac exceptional point the response power diverges as $|\epsilon|^{-2n}$ and a loop around it acquires Berry phase $\pi$.
  • Partial unidirectionality $(0<u<1)$ interpolates between the Hermitian limit and the $p$-th-root spectrum: under time-reversal symmetry energies are real or come in complex-conjugate pairs, and for even $p$ sublattice symmetry forces energies onto the real and imaginary axes.
  • Because the chain is built from fermion operators, the many-body spectrum and statistics differ from parafermions even though single-particle levels coincide — the paper says so explicitly, making the equivalence a single-particle statement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the $p$-th-root identity is effectively a spectral-design rule — choose a parent band $|h(k)|$ and its winding, and the unidirectional construction hands you an $n$-th-root non-Hermitian model with that band; parents with flat bands or higher winding numbers would be natural untested cases.
  • Beyond the paper: the open-boundary equivalence may extend past eigenvalues — level-spacing statistics, zero-mode degeneracies, and the response power $P(\epsilon)$ of the chain should match the clock model's, giving circuit and photonic simulators a measurable fingerprint to verify the parafermion claim.
  • Beyond the paper: applying the same construction to other integrable parents (Kitaev-like chains, diamond ladders) would produce non-Hermitian models with other exactly known spectra, extending the unification to new symmetry classes.
  • Beyond the paper (editorial note): the abstract prefixed to this record describes a different manuscript, on nonparametric learning of stochastic differential equations, with no connection to the body text; this extraction summarizes the body text.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript, despite carrying an abstract on nonparametric learning of stochastic differential equations, is in fact a condensed-matter theory paper proposing a construction of non-Hermitian tight-binding models with p orbitals per unit cell and fully unidirectional hopping. The Bloch Hamiltonian H^{(m,n)}(k,1) is a generalized permutation matrix; the paper derives Eq. (5), (H^{(m,n)}(k,1))^p = γ^{p-2}|h(k)|^2 I_p, and hence the band formula Eq. (6). For the SSH parent, the paper further claims in Sec. II.D that the open-boundary position-space Hamiltonian H^{(1,p-1)} has the same single-particle energy levels as free parafermions in Baxter's clock model, summarized by Eq. (12), (ε_j^{(p)})^p = γ^{p-2}(ε_j^{SSH})^2. The rest of the paper treats partial unidirectional hopping for p=3 and p=4, exceptional points, topology, solitons, and a graphene application. The body of the paper is self-contained in its Bloch-band analysis, but the parafermion equivalence is asserted rather than proved.

Significance. If the central claim of Sec. II.D is correct, the paper offers a simple algebraic mechanism for constructing non-Hermitian models whose single-particle spectra coincide with those of free parafermions, with potential implications for synthetic non-Hermitian lattices and root topological models. The Bloch-band derivation (Eqs. (5)–(6)) is explicit and, for the specific matrices written, correct; the p=3, L=2 position-space spectrum can be checked to satisfy Eq. (12). However, the connection to Fendley's free parafermion construction is a single unproved sentence, and this is the load-bearing joint for the title claim. The paper contains useful numerical studies of edge states and exceptional points, and the graphene square-root discussion is attractive. Yet without a proof of the matrix isomorphism or of the open-boundary polynomial identity, the main novelty is not established. The manuscript also suffers from a complete mismatch between the stated title/abstract and the actual content.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.D, Eq. (12)] The central claim that H^{(1,p-1)} has the same single-particle energy levels as free parafermions rests entirely on the sentence 'The matrices H^{(1,p-1)} are the same as the matrices in the construction [49] ... denoted M_n in [49], except for re-scaling of the hopping parameters.' No mapping is given: no site relabeling, no statement of boundary conditions, no demonstration that the open-boundary matrix (11) satisfies the same algebraic relations as Fendley's M_n. Equation (5), derived for periodic Bloch matrices, does not imply the open-boundary statement (12), and the position-space matrix is not a generalized permutation matrix. This missing proof is the bridge from the tight-binding model to the free-parafermion result and must be supplied before the title claim can be accepted.
  2. [Title and Abstract] The submitted manuscript is titled 'Nonparametric learning of stochastic differential equations from sparse and noisy data' and its abstract describes an EM-SMC-RKHS estimation method. The full text, however, is a physics paper on a non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with free-parafermion energy levels. There is no SDE, no RKHS, and no EM algorithm anywhere in the body. As presented, the manuscript is internally inconsistent at the level of its central topic; the journal cannot evaluate or publish it in this form. This needs to be resolved editorially, either by correcting the submission or by reframing the physics paper with an appropriate title and abstract.
  3. [Sec. II.D, Eq. (12)] Even if the matrix identity with Fendley's construction were established, the text does not derive the open-boundary spectrum (12) from it. The parent SSH chain with L unit cells has L positive eigenvalues ε_j^{SSH}; the claim that the pL eigenvalues of H^{(1,p-1)} satisfy (ε_j^{(p)})^p = γ^{p-2}(ε_j^{SSH})^2 is a nontrivial polynomial identity. The paper provides no proof for general L, and the discussion in Sec. V only states the generalization for inhomogeneous parameters without justification. A direct proof of the characteristic-polynomial factorization, or a similarity transformation to a block-diagonal form, is required.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] The text labels some terms as 'intercell' and 'intracell' in a way that appears reversed relative to the standard SSH convention; the definitions in Eq. (9) are clear, but the wording is confusing.
  2. [Sec. III and figures] The figures showing complex spectra (Figs. 2, 4, 5, 6) are information-dense and the captions would benefit from explicit statements of which curves are analytic bands and which are numerical eigenvalues, especially for the edge-state circles.
  3. [Sec. V and Supplemental Material] The Supplemental Material statement in Ref. [103] says 'degree of universality' where 'unidirectionality' is intended. Also, the generalization discussion in Sec. V would be more useful with at least a sketch of why Eq. (12) remains valid for inhomogeneous t and J.
  4. [References] Ref. [49] is cited as the source of the free-parafermion construction, but the specific equations or section of that paper corresponding to the claimed matrix identity are not indicated. The reader cannot check the assertion without a pointer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the band formula follows from the explicit matrix definition and the parafermion-level claim imports an external, independent result rather than the paper's own conclusions.

full rationale

The central derivation, Eqs. (5)-(6), is self-contained: H^{(m,n)}(k,1) is explicitly defined as a generalized permutation matrix in Eq. (4), and direct multiplication gives (H^{(m,n)})^p = gamma^{p-2}|h(k)|^2 I_p; the p complex bands are then the p-th roots of the common factor. No fitted parameter or pre-assumed spectrum enters. The only load-bearing external step is Sec. II.D, where the paper asserts that the position-space matrices H^{(1,p-1)} equal Fendley's M_n matrices up to rescaling and cites Fendley (Ref. [49]). This is an independently published construction, not a self-citation, and the energy-level identification is imported from that external work; it is not the paper's own conclusion recycled as a premise. Even if the matrix isomorphism is not proven in the text (a rigor gap), it does not make the argument circular, because the target statement is not an input to the derivation. The paper also explicitly notes that the many-body spectra differ, avoiding overclaim. The only self-citations (Refs. [87], [112]) support background material and are not load-bearing. No self-definitional, fitted-input, self-citation-chain, imported-uniqueness, or renamed-known-result pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constant is fitted to data. The band formulas (Eqs. 5-6 and 12) are closed-form consequences of the explicit matrices, valid for general nonnegative t, J, gamma. The plotted parameter values are illustrative only. The main imported assumptions are the chiral parent form, perfect unidirectionality, real (TRS-preserving) hoppings, and the identification with Fendley's parafermion matrices. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • model parameters t, J, gamma, u = t=0.5, J=gamma=1.0 for SSH plots; gamma0=gamma=1.0 for graphene; u varied 0 to 1
    Chosen by hand for illustrative numerics; the analytic results hold for general nonnegative values, so these are not fitted to data and do not determine the central claims.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Parent model is a bipartite two-band Hermitian Hamiltonian H = [[0, h*],[h, 0]] (Eq. 2)
    The construction and all spectra (Eqs. 5-8) are defined only for parents of this chiral block-off-diagonal form, stated in Sec. II.A.
  • domain assumption Fully unidirectional hopping (u=1) realizes a generalized permutation matrix with one nonzero entry per row and column (Eq. 4)
    The p-th-root spectrum (Eq. 6) is exact only in this limit; partial unidirectionality is treated separately via perturbation and block decomposition.
  • domain assumption All tight-binding parameters are real, giving time-reversal symmetry (Eq. 14)
    The spectral structure used throughout Sec. III (real or complex-conjugate paired energies) depends on this.
  • domain assumption H^{(1,p-1)} equals Fendley's M_n parafermion matrices up to hopping rescaling (Sec. II.D)
    Load-bearing for the title claim; asserted by inspection rather than proven.
  • standard math Non-Hermitian symmetry classification (Ref. [35]) and uniform response theory (Refs. [43,46]) are correct as applied
    The topological indices and the P(epsilon) scaling laws are imported from prior literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonparametric learning of stochastic differential equations from sparse and noisy data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O3M5IQ5M

@misc{pith2026250811597,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonparametric learning of stochastic differential equations from sparse and noisy data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O3M5IQ5M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11597}
}
read the original abstract

The paper proposes a systematic framework for building data-driven stochastic differential equation (SDE) models from sparse, noisy observations. Unlike traditional parametric approaches, which assume a known functional form for the drift, our goal here is to learn the entire drift function directly from data without strong structural assumptions, making it especially relevant in scientific disciplines where system dynamics are partially understood or highly complex. We cast the estimation problem as minimization of the penalized negative log-likelihood functional over a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). In the sparse observation regime, the presence of unobserved trajectory segments makes the SDE likelihood intractable. To address this, we develop an Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm that employs a novel Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) method to approximate the filtering distribution and generate Monte Carlo estimates of the E-step objective. The M-step then reduces to a penalized empirical risk minimization problem in the RKHS, whose minimizer is given by a finite linear combination of kernel functions via a generalized representer theorem. To control model complexity across EM iterations, we also develop a hybrid Bayesian variant of the algorithm that uses shrinkage priors to identify significant coefficients in the kernel expansion. We establish important theoretical convergence results for both the exact and approximate EM sequences. The resulting EM-SMC-RKHS procedure enables accurate estimation of the drift function of stochastic dynamical systems in low-data regimes and is broadly applicable across domains requiring continuous-time modeling under observational constraints. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through a series of numerical experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    J. T. Gohsrich, J. Fauman, F. K. Kunst, Exceptional points of any order in a generalized Hatano-Nelson model, arXiv:2403.12018

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  3. [2]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Soliton exci- tations in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. B22, 2099 (1980)

  4. [3]

    We focus on the case ofH (2,2), discussed for the SSH model in Sec

    cos(kxa/2),(44) whereais the lattice constant. We focus on the case ofH (2,2), discussed for the SSH model in Sec. III D, which has two orbitals (A1 andA2) on everyAsite of the honeycomb lattice and two orbitals (B1 andB2) on everyBsite. This is similar to Fig. 3(b) where one can view the top and bottom layers as being honeycomb lattices, with hoppingstan...

  5. [4]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi,A Short Course on Topological Insulators(Springer, Switzerland, 2016)

    2016

  6. [5]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and supercon- ductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  7. [6]

    Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf

    A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc.1134, 22 (2009)

    2009

  8. [7]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys.12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

Show all 121 references
  1. [8]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real Spectra in Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PT Symmetry, Phys. 14 Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998)

    1998

  3. [10]

    Y. C. Hu and T. L. Hughes, Absence of topological insula- tor phases in non-Hermitian PT-symmetric Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. B84, 153101 (2011)

    2011

  4. [11]

    Liang and G.-Y

    S.-D. Liang and G.-Y. Huang, Topological invariance and global Berry phase in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. A87, 012118 (2013)

    2013

  5. [12]

    Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Optics Letters38, 1912 (2013)

    H. Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Optics Letters38, 1912 (2013)

    1912

  6. [13]

    B. Zhu, R. Lu, and S. Chen, PT symmetry in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with complex boundary potentials, Phys. Rev. A89, 062102 (2014)

    2014

  7. [14]

    Weimann, M

    S. Weimann, M. Kremer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, K. G. Makris, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Topologically protected bound states in pho- tonic parity–time-symmetric crystals, Nat. Mater.16, 433 (2017)

    2017

  8. [15]

    Klett, H

    M. Klett, H. Cartarius, D. Dast, J. Main, and G. Wun- ner, Relation between PT-symmetry breaking and topo- logically nontrivial phases in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger and Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. A95, 053626 (2017)

    2017

  9. [16]

    Lieu, Topological phases in the non-Hermitian Su- Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys

    S. Lieu, Topological phases in the non-Hermitian Su- Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B97, 045106 (2018)

    2018

  10. [17]

    Halder, S

    D. Halder, S. Ganguly, and S. Basu, Properties of the non-Hermitian SSH model: role of PT symmetry, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter35, 105901 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    C. C. Ye, W. L. Vleeshouwers, S. Heatley, V. Gritsev, and C. Morais Smith, Quantum metric of non-Hermitian Su- Schrieffer-Heeger systems, Phys. Rev. Research6, 023202 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    Slootman, W

    E. Slootman, W. Cherifi, L. Eek, R. Arouca, E. J. Bergholtz, M. Bourennane, and C. Morais Smith, Break- ing and resurgence of symmetry in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model in photonic waveguides, Phys. Rev. Research6, 023140 (2024)

    2024

  13. [20]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  14. [21]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Vortex pinning and non- Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. B56, 8651 (1997)

    1997

  15. [22]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Non-Hermitian delocaliza- tion and eigenfunctions, Phys. Rev. B58, 8384 (1998)

    1998

  16. [23]

    Longhi, D

    S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. D. Valle, Non-Hermitian transparency and one-way transport in low-dimensional lattices by an imaginary gauge field, Phys. Rev. B92, 094204 (2015)

    2015

  17. [24]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge States and Topological In- variants of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  18. [25]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Topologi- cal Invariants in Real Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 246801 (2019)

    2019

  19. [26]

    J. S. Liu, Y. Z. Han, and C. S. Liu, Topological phases of a non-Hermitian coupled SSH ladder, Chinese Phys. B 28, 100304 (2019)

    2019

  20. [27]

    Y. Z. Han, J. S. Liu and C. S. Liu, The topological coun- terparts of non-Hermitian SSH models, New J. Phys.23, 123029 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    Ryu, J.-H

    J.-W. Ryu, J.-H. Han, C.-H. Yi, M. J. Park, and H. C. Park, Exceptional classifications of non-Hermitian sys- tems, Commun. Phys.7, 109 (2024)

    2024

  23. [30]

    Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, New York, 1966)

    T. Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, New York, 1966)

    1966

  24. [31]

    W. D. Heiss, Exceptional points of non-Hermitian oper- ators, J. Phys. A37, 2455 (2004)

    2004

  25. [32]

    M. V. Berry, Physics of non-Hermitian degeneracies, Czech. J. Phys.54, 1039 (2004)

    2004

  26. [33]

    Klaiman, U

    S. Klaiman, U. G¨ unther, and N. Moiseyev, Visualiza- tion of Branch Points in PT-Symmetric Waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 080402 (2008)

    2008

  27. [34]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45, 444016 (2012)

    2012

  28. [35]

    T. E. Lee, Anomalous Edge State in a Non-Hermitian Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 133903 (2016)

    2016

  29. [36]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Bessho, and M. Sato, Classification of Exceptional Points and Non-Hermitian Topological Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 066405 (2019)

    2019

  30. [37]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alu, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  31. [38]

    Wiersig, Response strengths of open systems at excep- tional points, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Response strengths of open systems at excep- tional points, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023121 (2022)

    2022

  32. [39]

    Wiersig, Distance between exceptional points and dia- bolic points and its implication for the response strength of non-Hermitian systems, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Distance between exceptional points and dia- bolic points and its implication for the response strength of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033179 (2022)

    2022

  33. [40]

    Manna and B

    S. Manna and B. Roy, Inner skin effects on non-Hermitian topological fractals, Commun. Phys.6, 10 (2023)

    2023

  34. [41]

    Wiersig, Petermann factors and phase rigidities near exceptional points, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Petermann factors and phase rigidities near exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033042 (2023)

    2023

  35. [42]

    Sayyad, M

    S. Sayyad, M. St ˚ alhammar, L. Rødland, and F. K. Kunst, Symmetry-protected exceptional and nodal points in non- Hermitian systems, SciPost Phys.15, 200 (2023)

    2023

  36. [43]

    Schomerus, Eigenvalue sensitivity from eigenstate geometry near and beyond arbitrary-order exceptional points, Phys

    H. Schomerus, Eigenvalue sensitivity from eigenstate geometry near and beyond arbitrary-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013044 (2024)

    2024

  37. [44]

    Bid and H

    S. Bid and H. Schomerus, Uniform response theory of non-Hermitian systems: Non-Hermitian physics beyond the exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023062 (2025)

    2025

  38. [45]

    Het´ enyi and B

    B. Het´ enyi and B. D´ ora, Localized states and skin effect around non-Hermitian impurities in tight-binding models, Phys. Rev. B112, 075123 (2025)

    2025

  39. [46]

    Kullig, J

    J. Kullig, J. Wiersig, H. Schomerus, Generalized Pe- termann factor of non-Hermitian systems at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Research7, 043246 (2025)

    2025

  40. [47]

    Bid and H

    S. Bid and H. Schomerus, Fragmented exceptional points and their bulk and edge realizations in lattice models, Phys. Rev. B112, 195433 (2025)

    2025

  41. [48]

    Bid and H

    S. Bid and H. Schomerus, Exceptionally deficient topo- logical square-root insulators, arXiv:2508.11490

  42. [50]

    Fendley, Free parafermions, J

    P. Fendley, Free parafermions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 075001 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    A. M. Marques and R. G. Dias, Generalized Lieb’s the- orem for noninteracting non-Hermitiann-partite tight- binding lattices, Phys. Rev. B106, 205146 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Viedma, A

    D. Viedma, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias and V. Ahufinger, Topologicaln-root Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model in a non- Hermitian photonic ring system, Nanophotonics13, 51 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Longhi, D

    S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. D. Valle, Robust light trans- port in non-Hermitian photonic lattices, Scientific Reports 5, 13376 (2015). 15

    2015

  46. [54]

    Weidemann, M

    S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science368, 311 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    C. Qin, B. Wang, Z. J. Wong, S. Longhi, and P. Lu, Dis- crete diffraction and Bloch oscillations in non-Hermitian frequency lattices induced by complex photonic gauge fields, Phys. Rev. B101, 064303 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Z. Lin, S. Ke, X. Zhu, and X. Li, Square-root non-bloch topological insulators in non-hermitian ring resonators, Opt. Express29, 8462 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Weidemann, M

    S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, S. Longhi, and A. Szameit, Topological triple phase transition in non-Hermitian Flo- quet quasicrystals, Nature601, 354 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Y. G. N. Liu, Y. Wei, O. Hemmatyar, G. G. Pyrialakos, P. S. Jung, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Complex skin modes in non-Hermitian coupled laser ar- rays, Light: Science & Applications11, 336 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Z. Gao, X. Qiao, M. Pan, S. Wu, J. Yim, K. Chen, B. Midya, L. Ge, and L. Feng, Two-Dimensional Reconfig- urable Non-Hermitian Gauged Laser Array, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 263801 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    S. Ke, W. Wen, D. Zhao, and Y. Wang, Floquet engineer- ing of the non-Hermitian skin effect in photonic waveguide arrays, Phys. Rev. A107, 053508 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Tian, J.-H. Jiang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Observation of higher-order non-Hermitian skin ef- fect, Nat. Commun.12, 5377 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    H. Gao, H. Xue, Z. Gu, L. Li, W. Zhu, Z. Su, J. Zhu, B. Zhang, and Y. D. Chong, Anomalous Floquet non- Hermitian skin effect in a ring resonator lattice, Phys. Rev. B106, 134112 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Z. Gu, H. Gao, H. Xue, J. Li, Z. Su, and J. Zhu, Transient non-Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun.13, 7668 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    J.-H. Wu, M. Artoni, and G. C. La Rocca, Non- Hermitian Degeneracies and Unidirectional Reflectionless Atomic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 123004 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    J. Li, A. K. Harter, J. Liu, L. de Melo, Y. N. Joglekar, and L. Luo, Observation of parity-time symmetry break- ing transitions in a dissipative Floquet system of ultracold atoms, Nat. Commun.10, 855 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    Liu, Y.-R

    T. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, Q. Ai, Z. Gong, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, and F. Nori, Second-Order Topological Phases in Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 076801 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    Hofmann, T

    T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Chiral Voltage Propagation and Calibration in a Topolectrical Chern Circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 247702 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    Helbig, T

    T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Generalized bulk–boundary cor- respondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nat. Phys.16, 747 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    S. Liu, R. Shao, S. Ma, L. Zhang, O. You, H. Wu, Y. J. Xiang, T. J. Cui, and S. Zhang, Non-Hermitian Skin Ef- fect in a Non-Hermitian Electrical Circuit, Research2021, 5608038 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    S. M. Rafi-Ul-Islam, Z. B. Siu, and M. B. A. Jalil, Topo- logical phases with higher winding numbers in nonrecip- rocal one-dimensional topolectrical circuits, Phys. Rev. B 103, 035420 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    Zhang, K

    X. Zhang, K. Xu, C. Liu, X. Song, B. Hou, R. Yu, H. Zhang, D. Li, and J. Li, Gauge-dependent topology in non- reciprocal hopping systems with pseudo-Hermitian sym- metry, Commun. Phys.4, 166 (2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    D. Zou, T. Chen, W. He, J. Bao, C. H. Lee, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Observation of hybrid higher-order skin- topological effect in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nat. Commun.12, 7201 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    X. Xie, F. Ma, W. B. Rui, Z. Dong, Y. Du, W. Xie, Y. X. Zhao, H. Chen, F. Gao, and H. Xue, Non-Hermitian Dirac cones with valley-dependent lifetimes, Nat. Commun.16, 1627 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    Sahin, M

    H. Sahin, M. B. A. Jalil, and C. H. Lee, Topolectrical circuits - Recent experimental advances and developments, APL Electronic Devices1, 021503 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    Arkinstall, M

    J. Arkinstall, M. H. Teimourpour, L. Feng, R. El- Ganainy, and H. Schomerus, Topological tight-binding models from nontrivial square roots, Phys. Rev. B95, 165109 (2017)

    2017

  68. [76]

    Pelegr ´ ı, A

    G. Pelegr ´ ı, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias, A. J. Daley, V. Ahufinger, and J. Mompart, Topological edge states with ultracold atoms carrying orbital angular momentum in a diamond chain, Phys. Rev. A99, 023612 (2019)

    2019

  69. [77]

    Kremer, I

    M. Kremer, I. Petrides, E. Meyer, M. Heinrich, O. Zil- berberg, and A. Szameit, A square-root topological insu- lator with non-quantized indices realized with photonic aharonov-bohm cages, Nat. Commun.11, 907 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    Ezawa, Systematic construction of square-root topo- logical insulators and superconductors, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Systematic construction of square-root topo- logical insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. Re- search2, 033397 (2020)

    2020

  71. [79]

    A. M. Marques, L. Madail, and R. G. Dias, One- dimensional 2 n-root topological insulators and supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B103, 235425 (2021)

    2021

  72. [80]

    B. Li, S. Qiu, L. Xu, S. Guo, R. Huang, and W. Qiu, Investigation of square-root higher-order topological in- sulator based on honeycomb-Kagome lattice of graphene plasmonic crystals, Phys. Scr.99, 1159100 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    Huang, M

    H. Huang, M. Sarker, P. Zahl, C. S. Hellberg, J. Levy, I. Petrides, A. Sinitskii, and P. Narang, Topological Soli- tons in Square-Root Graphene Nanoribbons Controlled by Electric Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 256601 (2025)

    2025

  74. [82]

    Y. Zhao, X. Zhang, Z. Cui, C. Wu, and N. Liu, Square- root topological insulator with high winding number, Phys. Rev. B111, 014109 (2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    L. Song, H. Yang, Y. Cao, and P. Yan, Realization of the square-root Dirac semimetal in electrical circuits, J. Appl. Phys.137, 124902 (2025)

    2025

  76. [84]

    R. J. Baxter, A simple solvableZ N Hamiltonian, Phys. Lett. A140, 155 (1989)

    1989

  77. [85]

    R. J. Baxter, Superintegrable chiral Potts model: Ther- modynamic properties, an “inverse” model, and a simple associated Hamiltonian. J. Stat. Phys.57, 1 (1989)

    1989

  78. [86]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films, Science306, 666 (2004)

    2004

  79. [87]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 109 (2009)

    2009

  80. [88]

    McCann and M

    E. McCann and M. Koshino, The electronic properties of bilayer graphene, Rep. Prog. Phys.76, 056503 (2013)

    2013

  81. [89]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adi- abatic changes, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  82. [90]

    H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Topological Band Theory for Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 146402 (2018). 16

    2018

  83. [91]

    Fan, G.-Y

    A. Fan, G.-Y. Huang, and S.-D. Liang, Complex Berry curvature pair and quantum Hall admittance in non- Hermitian systems, J. Phys. Commun.4, 115006 (2020)

    2020

  84. [92]

    Tsubota, H

    S. Tsubota, H. Yang, Y. Akagi, and H. Kat- sura, Symmetry-protected quantization of complex Berry phases in non-Hermitian many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B105, L201113 (2022)

    2022

  85. [93]

    Longhi and L

    S. Longhi and L. Feng, Complex Berry phase and imper- fect non-Hermitian phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B107, 085122 (2023)

    2023

  86. [94]

    Lee, S.-C

    J.-K. Lee, S.-C. Lee, J.-P. Ahn, S.-C. Kim, J. I. B. Wil- son, and P. John, The growth of AA graphite on (111) diamond, J. Chem. Phys.129, 234709 (2008)

    2008

  87. [95]

    A. V. Rozhkov, A. O. Sboychakov, A. L. Rakhmanov, and F. Nori, Electronic properties of graphene-based bi- layer systems, Phys. Rep.648, 1 (2016)

    2016

  88. [96]

    Kawabata, S

    K. Kawabata, S. Higashikawa, Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, and M. Ueda, Topological unification of time-reversal and particle-hole symmetries in non-Hermitian physics, Nat. Commun.10, 297 (2019)

    2019

  89. [97]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  90. [98]

    Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT Symme- try: The Necessary Condition for the Reality of the Spec- trum of a Non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, J

    A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT Symme- try: The Necessary Condition for the Reality of the Spec- trum of a Non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, J. Math. Phys.43, 205 (2002)

    2002

  91. [99]

    Leykam, S

    D. Leykam, S. Flach, O. Bahat-Treidel, and A. S. Desyat- nikov, Flat band states: Disorder and nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. B88, 224203 (2013)

    2013

  92. [100]

    Flach, D

    S. Flach, D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, P. Matthies, and A. S. Desyatnikov, Detangling flat bands into Fano lattices, EPL105, 30001 (2014)

    2014

  93. [101]

    Leykam, A

    D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Artificial flat band systems: from lattice models to experiments, Adv. Phys. X3, 677 (2018)

    2018

  94. [102]

    Danieli, A

    C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, D. Leykam, and S. Flach, Flat band fine-tuning and its photonic applications, Nanophotonics13, 3925 (2024)

    2024

  95. [103]

    M. J. Rice and E. J. Mele, Elementary Excitations of a Linearly Conjugated Diatomic Polymer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1455 (1982)

    1982

  96. [104]

    The Supplemental Material contains additional plots for modelH (1,2) describing the evolution of the spectrum as a function of the degree of universality. There is a descrip- tion of the non-Hermitian skin effect which occurs when the parent SSH model has non-reciprocal hoppin...

  97. [105]

    R. T. Clay and S. Mazumdar, Cooperative Density Wave and Giant Spin Gap in the Quarter-Filled Zigzag Electron Ladder, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 207206 (2005)

    2005

  98. [106]

    X. Li, E. Zhao, and W. V. Liu, Topological states in a ladder-like optical lattice containing ultracold atoms in higher orbital bands, Nat. Commun.4, 1523 (2013)

    2013

  99. [107]

    Cheon, T.-H

    S. Cheon, T.-H. Kim, S.-H. Lee, and H. W. Yeom, Chiral solitons in a coupled double Peierls chain, Science350, 182 (2015)

    2015

  100. [108]

    Zhang and G

    T. Zhang and G. B. Jo, One-dimensional sawtooth and zigzag lattices for ultracold atoms, Sci. Rep.5, 16044 (2015)

    2015

  101. [109]

    Zhang and Q

    S.-L. Zhang and Q. Zhou, Two-leg Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain with glide reflection symmetry, Phys. Rev. A95, 061601(R) (2017)

    2017

  102. [110]

    C. Li, S. Lin, G. Zhang, and Z. Song, Topological nodal points in two coupled Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains, Phys. Rev. B96, 125418 (2017)

    2017

  103. [111]

    Matveeva, T

    P. Matveeva, T. Hewitt, D. Liu, K. Reddy, D. Gutman, and S. T. Carr, One-dimensional noninteracting topolog- ical insulators with chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. B107, 075422 (2023)

    2023

  104. [112]

    M. Inui. S. A. Trugman, and E. Abrahams, Unusual properties of midband states in systems with off-diagonal disorder, Phys. Rev. B49, 3190 (1994)

    1994

  105. [113]

    R. E. J. Allen , H. V. Gibbons , A. M. Sherlock , H. R. M. Stanfield , and E. McCann, Nonsymmorphic chiral symmetry and solitons in the Rice-Mele model, Phys. Rev. B106, 165409 (2022)

    2022

  106. [114]

    Saito, M

    R. Saito, M. S. Dresselhaus, and G. Dresselhaus,Phys- ical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes(Imperial College Press, London, 1998)

    1998

  107. [115]

    C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, and R. Thomale, Topolec- trical Circuits, Commun. Phys.1, 39 (2018)

    2018

  108. [116]

    Kaifa Luo, Jiajin Feng, Y. X. Zhao, and Rui Yu, Nodal Manifolds Bounded by Exceptional Points on Non- Hermitian Honeycomb Lattices and Electrical-Circuit Re- alizations, arXiv:1810.0923

  109. [117]

    J. Yao, X. Hao, B. Song, Y. Jia, C. Hua, and M. Zhou, Multi-orbital topolectrical circuit for topological quantum states, Nano Futures6, 021001 (2022)

    2022

  110. [118]

    S. Luo, L. Song, H. Yang, P. Yan, and Y. Cao, Topolectrical circuit simulation of two-dimensional gra- phyne structures, Phys. Rev. B111, 024113 (2025)

    2025

  111. [119]

    Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory

    J. Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory. Phys. Rev. A93, 033809 (2016)

    2016

  112. [120]

    Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photonics Res.8, 1457 (2020)

    J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photonics Res.8, 1457 (2020)

    2020

  113. [121]

    Topology and partial unidirectional hopping A.H (1,2) B.H (1,3) C.H (2,2) II

    https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/researchdata/738 1 Supplemental material: A non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with the energy levels of free parafermions CONTENTS I. Topology and partial unidirectional hopping A.H (1,2) B.H (1,3) C.H (2,2) II. Non-Hermitian skin effe...

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.