Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 79 references

Equivariant spatio-hemispherical networks for diffusion MRI deconvolution

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Exploiting the antipodal symmetry of nerve fibers, this paper replaces full-sphere graph convolutions with exact hemisphere-only operations, cutting an equivariant deconvolution U-Net's processing time by a cumulative 65 percent while…

desk verdict A solid, practical paper: the hemispherical reduction is correct and the speedups are real, but the 'less spurious fibers' claim contradicts its own table and should be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11819 v1 pith:O4OZCIZH submitted 2024-11-18 eess.IV cs.CV

Axel Elaldi , Guido Gerig , Neel Dey This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords diffusionMRIfiberorientationdistributionfunctionsphericaldeconvolutionequivariantneuralnetworksSO(3)equivariancehemisphericalgraphconvolutionantipodalsymmetrytractography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Each voxel of a diffusion MRI image carries a whole sphere of measurements describing which directions water can diffuse, and recovering the underlying fiber orientations is an ill-posed deconvolution problem. The paper argues that because the fiber orientation distribution function is antipodally symmetric — a fiber along direction $d$ is indistinguishable from one along $-d$ — the spherical graph convolutions used by equivariant networks can be cut in half with no loss of information. Its central theorem shows that applying the full-sphere graph Laplacian to an antipodal signal equals applying a reduced hemisphere Laplacian $L_+(p,q) = L(p,q) + L(p,-q)$ to half the samples. On top of this, the paper adds dense matrix multiplication, precomputed Chebyshev polynomials, and an explicit spatial smoothness loss, and claims a cumulative 65% reduction in processing time with state-of-the-art fiber recovery on simulation and in vivo benchmarks. If right, it makes clinically practical an equivariant deconvolution that previously took about a day per subject.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the hemispherical graph Laplacian $L_+$ defined in Eq. (3) by $L_+(p,q) = L(p,q) + L(p,-q)$ for $p,q$ on one hemisphere of a symmetric spherical sampling such as HEALPix. Theorem 1 (Appendix A.1) proves that for an antipodal-symmetric signal and a Laplacian satisfying $L(p,q) = L(-p,-q)$, the full spherical filtering $(Lf)(p)$ equals the hemisphere filtering $(L_+ f_+)(p_+)$, so the convolution sees exactly the same information while operating on half the vertices and a quarter of the Laplacian entries. Two further optimizations carry the argument: replacing DeepSphere's sparse matrix multiplication with dense matrix multiplication, since the dMRI Laplacian is dense, and precomputing the Chebyshev polynomials because the Laplacian is identical for all voxels and layers.

What would settle it

Compute the per-voxel antipodal mismatch $\|S(q) - S(-q)\|$ on a real or synthetic dMRI volume, then compare SHD against the full-sphere RT-ESD method on voxels ranked by that mismatch; the theorem predicts agreement only where the mismatch is zero, so a divergence growing with mismatch, or conversely complete agreement even for strongly asymmetric voxels, would settle the operating range of the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the full spherical graph filtering step in an $E(3) \times SO(3)$-equivariant spatio-spherical convolution is redundant for diffusion MRI data, because fODFs are antipodal symmetric, and can be replaced exactly by a hemisphere filter. Theorem 1 in Appendix A.1 states that for an antipodally symmetric signal $f$ with a symmetric graph Laplacian $L$, every output of the spherical filtering $(Lf)(p)$ is reproduced by the hemispherical filtering $(L_+ f_+)(p_+)$ where $L_+(p,q) = L(p,q) + L(p,-q)$ and $f_+$ is $f$ sampled on one hemisphere. The proof pairs each southern-hemisphere sample $q$ with its antipode $-q$ and uses $f(q) = f(-q)$ and $L(p,q) = L(-p,-q)$ to fold both contributions into one hemisphere term. The paper then builds this reduction into a U-Net, adds spatial total-variation regularization, and reports that the resulting SHD-TV model matches or beats prior equivariant deconvolution methods while being several times faster and far less memory-hungry, including in clinically realistic low-angular-resolution settings.

Load-bearing premise

The reduction is exact only when the signal is perfectly antipodal and the sampling contains exact antipodal pairs; real dMRI signals deviate from perfect antipodal symmetry, and the discarded asymmetric component introduces a bias that grows with that deviation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • $E(3) \times SO(3)$-equivariant deconvolution for dMRI becomes clinically practical: a full U-Net runs roughly 2.5–3.5 times faster than prior equivariant layers with 4–20 times lower memory, and single layers are 2–5 times faster than RT-ESD.
  • The hemisphere reduction is exact under the antipodal-symmetry and symmetric-sampling assumptions, so the efficiency gain need not trade away fiber-recovery accuracy.
  • Adding explicit spatial total-variation regularization (SHD-TV) improves fODF accuracy beyond the equivariant inductive bias alone, particularly at the low angular resolutions used in clinical protocols.
  • Training becomes feasible on many subjects at once, enabling a single amortized network to deconvolve new human dMRI instead of subject-specific optimization.
  • State-of-the-art fODF and tractography scores on the DiSCo and Tractometer benchmarks follow, with robustness down to single-shell low-angular protocols of 29–32 gradient directions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same hemisphere-folding argument applies to any graph Laplacian acting on an antipodal-symmetric signal, not just HEALPix grids or dMRI; other domains with antipodal spherical data could inherit the exact speedup directly.
  • Because real dMRI is only approximately antipodal, the hemisphere construction implicitly discards the antisymmetric component of the signal; a natural testable extension is to measure per-voxel asymmetry and check whether SHD's residual errors concentrate exactly there.
  • The ablation indicates the dominant gain comes from the hemisphere reduction and the precomputed polynomials, which suggests the same two tricks could accelerate other spherical-graph architectures that currently treat the sampling as varying per input.
  • The paper's finding that non-equivariant methods suffer high false-positive rates while equivariant ones do not points to the low-angular-resolution regime as the setting where the inductive bias matters most; an experiment varying only angular resolution could map where that advantage begins.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes efficient equivariant convolutions for spatio-spherical dMRI data by exploiting the approximate antipodal symmetry of fODFs. The key construction is a hemispherical graph Laplacian L_+(p,q)=L(p,q)+L(p,-q), with a proof (Theorem 1, Appendix A.1) that full-sphere graph filtering equals hemispherical filtering for antipodally symmetric signals. The authors combine this reduction with dense matrix multiplication and precomputed Chebyshev polynomials, reporting 2-5x faster single layers and a 65% reduction in U-Net processing time relative to RT-ESD. The resulting SHD/SHD-TV networks are trained with reconstruction, non-negativity, sparsity, and spatial total-variation losses, and are evaluated on DiSCo, HCP, and Tractometer benchmarks, where they claim state-of-the-art fODF recovery and tractography performance.

Significance. If the equivalence holds for real dMRI data, the paper makes a practically important efficiency contribution and provides a clean mathematical reduction with a proof, numerical equivariance-error measurements, ablations isolating each source of gain, and public code. These are genuine strengths. The main risk is that the reduction is exact only under exact antipodal symmetry, while real signals are approximately antipodal and the preprocessing already removes odd-order spherical-harmonic content; the paper does not quantify the discarded asymmetry. A second concern is that the text claims "less spurious fibers" while Table 1 reports higher false-positive rates than several baselines. Both issues affect load-bearing claims and should be addressed before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3), Appendix A.1] Theorem 1 is correct as stated, but the claim in Sec. 3.2 that the hemispherical reduction is "without loss of generality" is not justified for real dMRI. The operator L_+(p,q)=L(p,q)+L(p,-q) is a symmetrizer: any odd component f_odd(q)=(f(q)-f(-q))/2 is cancelled exactly by the hemispherical sum. Moreover, the preprocessing in Appendix C.2 removes odd-order spherical-harmonic coefficients before the network input, so asymmetric content due to noise, motion, or genuinely asymmetric microstructure is discarded before the model sees it. Because the central efficiency argument rests on the claim that hemispherical processing is equivalent to full-sphere processing, please quantify the discarded odd component on the HCP/DiSCo/Tractometer signals (e.g., the relative l2 norm of the odd-order SH coefficients before they are zeroed) and report a controlled ablation in which synthetic odd components of increasing magnitude are added to full-sphere inputs and SHD is compared against a full-sphere baseline. If the bias is negligible for these datasets, state that explicitly; otherwise the "without loss of generality" wording and the equivalence claims should be weakened.
  2. [Table 1, Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 captions] The repeated claim that SHD-TV provides "less spurious fibers" is internally contradicted by the reported FPR @F1. In Table 1, SHD-TV has FPR 0.19 (high resolution) and 0.22 (low resolution), which is higher than CSD (0.10/0.18), RUMBA (0.05/0.08), RT-ESD (0.14/0.16), and even SHD (0.17/0.19). Since FPR is the direct measure of spurious fibers, either the claim should be restricted to angular precision, F1 score, and visual coherence, or the authors should provide a threshold-independent FPR analysis demonstrating that the apparent increase is a different trade-off regime rather than a genuine excess of false peaks.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2] The Chebyshev recurrence in the text reads "T^{k+1}(L)f = (2L T^k(L) - T^{k+1}(L))f"; the second term should be T^{k-1}(L)f, not T^{k+1}(L)f.
  2. [Sec. 4.1] The text says "HEALPix resolution to 8 (V = 754)"; HEALPix nside=8 has 768 full-sphere pixels and 384 hemispherical vertices. Please correct the vertex count.
  3. [Appendix A.1] The proof of Theorem 1 contains a stray empty equation number (12); it should be removed.
  4. [Sec. 5, Conclusions] The statement "3.5x faster runtimes and up to 20x lower memory consumption as compared to existing spatio-spherical layers" mixes baselines: Fig. 4 reports 2.5x versus RT-ESD and 3.5x versus PONITA for the U-Net, with memory savings of 4x and 20x respectively. Please specify the reference method for each factor.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the hemispherical reduction is a proven identity under explicit antipodal assumptions, and performance/efficiency claims rest on external benchmarks or direct measurement.

full rationale

The paper's central efficiency claim depends on Theorem 1 (Appendix A.1), which is a self-contained algebraic identity: for antipodal f and symmetric L, (Lf)(p)=sum_{q in V+} (L(p,q)+L(p,-q)) f(q)=(L+f+)(p+), with L+ defined by Eq. (3). This is a construction with no fitted parameters, not a quantity fit to data and renamed a prediction. The runtime and memory gains (2-5x per layer, 65% U-Net reduction) are measured against RT-ESD and PONITA, and the deconvolution results are benchmarked on DiSCo and Tractometer with external ground truth. The main self-citations ([19,20]) provide the baseline architecture and E(3)xSO(3) layer formalism, but the hemisphere reduction is proven in the appendix and its equivariance error is measured on random signals rather than imported as an unverified premise, so those self-citations are not load-bearing. The paper explicitly acknowledges that real dMRI signals are only 'approximately antipodally symmetric' (Sec. 3.2) and its Limitations state that the antipodal assumption 'may need to be relaxed for many applications,' so the discarding of odd-order signal content (Appendix C.2) is an admitted approximation/robustness risk rather than a hidden circular step. The absence of a bound on the discarded odd component is a correctness concern, not a self-referential derivation. No circular step meeting the quoted-evidence standard was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The hemispherical graph is a mathematical construction, not a postulated object. The main free parameters are loss weights tuned on validation data and the graph/architecture hyperparameters inherited from prior work, which the central performance claims depend on but do not derive.

free parameters (5)
  • Graph adjacency width sigma = not reported
    The adjacency A(p,q)=exp(-||p-q||/sigma) in Section 3.1 is chosen to minimize empirical equivariance error. This is a hand-tuned or fitted constant inherited from prior spherical graph work.
  • Chebyshev polynomial degree K = not stated
    The number of spherical filter taps K in Eq. 2 is a model hyperparameter that controls the expressiveness of the spherical convolution. Its value is not reported in the main text.
  • Non-negativity loss weight lambda_nn = 0.1
    Tuned on the DiSCo validation volume using the ESD model, as described in Appendix C.4, and used in Eq. 4.
  • Sparsity loss weight lambda_sparse = 5e-5
    Tuned on the DiSCo validation volume and used in Eq. 4 to promote sparse fODFs.
  • Spatial TV loss weight lambda_tv = 0.5
    Tuned for SHD on the DiSCo validation volume and used in Eq. 4. The spatial regularization claim depends on this choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption fODFs and dMRI signals are exactly antipodally symmetric
    Invoked in Section 3.2 and Theorem 1 to justify the hemisphere reduction. Real signals are approximately antipodal, and the paper acknowledges this in its limitations.
  • domain assumption The spherical sampling V contains exact antipodal pairs
    Required for the construction of the hemispherical sampling V+ and for the equality L(p,q)=L(-p,-q) used in Eq. 9 of Appendix A.1. HEALPix is assumed to satisfy this.
  • domain assumption The fODF forward model S = C(F) with tissue response functions is a valid generative model for dMRI
    The reconstruction loss and the unsupervised training depend on this standard fODF model, stated in Appendix C.2.
  • domain assumption DeepSphere graph Laplacian filtering provides a usable SO(3)-equivariant spherical convolution
    The paper builds directly on DeepSphere and RT-ESD. Discretization makes equivariance approximate, and the paper measures this error in Appendix A.2 rather than proving exact equivariance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equivariant spatio-hemispherical networks for diffusion MRI deconvolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O4OZCIZH

@misc{pith2026241111819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equivariant spatio-hemispherical networks for diffusion MRI deconvolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O4OZCIZH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11819}
}
abstract

Each voxel in a diffusion MRI (dMRI) image contains a spherical signal corresponding to the direction and strength of water diffusion in the brain. This paper advances the analysis of such spatio-spherical data by developing convolutional network layers that are equivariant to the $\mathbf{E(3) \times SO(3)}$ group and account for the physical symmetries of dMRI including rotations, translations, and reflections of space alongside voxel-wise rotations. Further, neuronal fibers are typically antipodally symmetric, a fact we leverage to construct highly efficient spatio-hemispherical graph convolutions to accelerate the analysis of high-dimensional dMRI data. In the context of sparse spherical fiber deconvolution to recover white matter microstructure, our proposed equivariant network layers yield substantial performance and efficiency gains, leading to better and more practical resolution of crossing neuronal fibers and fiber tractography. These gains are experimentally consistent across both simulation and in vivo human datasets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11819 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A diffusion MRI (columns 1–3) and a T1w MRI (column 5) derived from a subject in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A deconvolution visualization comparing recovered fiber orientation distribution functions (fODFs) produced by the widely-used iterative CSD [66] model (top row) and our proposed SHD-TV model (bottom row) with high-resolution / clinically-infeasible (left) and low-resolution / clinically￾feasible (right) spherical sampling. At high-resolutions (left), SHD-TV demonstrates enhanced localization of fiber orientations, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Contribution overview. A. We reduce the spherical graph (G,L) to an hemispherical graph (H,L +). B. The SHD deconvolution framework operates on a grid of spherical signals and reduces computation complexity while improving neuronal fiber deconvolution. in appendix A.1). For spherical samplings V such as HEALPix, our proposed sampling reduces the number of vertices sampled to 1 2 |V| and the hemispherical Laplacian s… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Efficiency analysis. Runtime (A & C) and GPU memory usage (B & D) expressed as the percentage of the baseline [20], for both: (line plots) a convolutional layer applied to increasing angular resolution samplings and (bar plots) a U-Net applied to high-angular resolutio…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of the diffusion MRI experiments in Section 4.2. [A] We perform super￾resolved fODF estimation experiments on two datasets, DiSCo and HCP, respectively. Here, we study the impact of using either high-angular or low-angular resolution as input. [B] We perform q…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: DiSCo fiber detection performances on high (left col.) and low (right col.) angular resolutions. We first present fODF estimation results on high-angular [A] and low-angular resolution [B] input (closer to bottom-left is better). [C-D] then present a qualitative exampl…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Tractometer fODF estimation and tractography performance. Top: Unsupervised fODF estimation (A, closer to bottom left is better) and tractography (B, closer to top right is better) results. Bottom: In [C], we visualize ground-truth and estimated fibers projecting out f…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Quantitative evaluation of equivariance error, depending on the convolution equivariance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative illustration comparing the proposed equivariant dMRI deconvolution framework [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: fODF and tractography estimation in a glioma-affected brain (gray arrow). In [A], we compare the conventional CSD method ([A.1]) with our proposed SHD-TV model ([A.2]). Our approach retrieves more spatially coherent fODFs with better fiber angular separation in voxels…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top row: Spatio-Spherical MNIST generation process. Bottom row: Results from testing generalization from equivariance vs. data augmentation on the synthetic R 3 × S2 MNIST classification task. [A-C] Dataset generation process. [D-E] Segmentation dice score of models t…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Fig.11.D) and E). To quantify segmentation performance, we compute the dice score across every [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Overview of the Hemispherical E(3) × SO(3) Convolution computation. This figure is adapted from [20]. [A-C] The input of the convolution is a 3D grid of hemispherical graphs with V vertices per voxel. The input is first processed by voxel-wise spherical filtering usin…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Model description. We compare conventional and learnable methods. Learnable methods have increasing embedded geometric prior through equivariance. Training implementation. All models are trained for 50 epochs with a batch size of 16 patches using the Adam optimizer [4…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion-tensor mri

    Andrew L Alexander, Khader M Hasan, Mariana Lazar, Jay S Tsuruda, and Dennis L Parker. Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion-tensor mri. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 45(5):770–780, 2001

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    How to correct susceptibility distor- tions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging

    Jesper LR Andersson, Stefan Skare, and John Ashburner. How to correct susceptibility distor- tions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage, 20(2):870–888, 2003

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Non-parametric representation and prediction of single-and multi-shell diffusion-weighted mri data using gaussian processes

    Jesper LR Andersson and Stamatios N Sotiropoulos. Non-parametric representation and prediction of single-and multi-shell diffusion-weighted mri data using gaussian processes. Neuroimage, 122:166–176, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion mr imaging

    Jesper LR Andersson and Stamatios N Sotiropoulos. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion mr imaging. Neuroimage, 125:1063– 1078, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (charmed) mr imaging of the human brain

    Yaniv Assaf and Peter J Basser. Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (charmed) mr imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage, 27(1):48–58, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    V olterranet: A higher order convolutionalnetwork with group equivariance forhomogeneous manifolds

    Monami Banerjee, Rudrasis Chakraborty, Jose Bouza, and Baba C Vemuri. V olterranet: A higher order convolutionalnetwork with group equivariance forhomogeneous manifolds. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the nmr spin echo

    Peter J Basser, James Mattiello, and Denis LeBihan. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the nmr spin echo. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series B , 103(3):247–254, 1994

    1994

  8. [8]

    Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor mri

    Peter J Basser and Carlo Pierpaoli. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor mri. Journal of magnetic resonance, 213(2):560– 570, 2011

    work page 2011

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Fast, expressive se (n) equivariant networks through weight-sharing in position- orientation space

    Erik J Bekkers, Sharvaree Vadgama, Rob D Hesselink, Putri A van der Linden, and David W Romero. Fast, expressive se (n) equivariant networks through weight-sharing in position- orientation space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02970, 2023

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    A higher order manifold-valued convolutional neural network with applications to diffusion mri processing

    Jose J Bouza, Chun-Hao Yang, David Vaillancourt, and Baba C Vemuri. A higher order manifold-valued convolutional neural network with applications to diffusion mri processing. 10 In International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pages 304–317. Springer, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Spherical deconvolution of multi- channel diffusion mri data with non-gaussian noise models and spatial regularization

    Erick J Canales-Rodríguez, Alessandro Daducci, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos, Emmanuel Caruyer, Santiago Aja-Fernández, Joaquim Radua, Jesús M Yurramendi Mendizabal, Yasser Iturria- Medina, Lester Melie-García, Yasser Alemán-Gómez, et al. Spherical deconvolution of multi- channel d...

    2015

  4. [12]

    Sparse wars: A survey and comparative study of spherical deconvolution algorithms for diffusion mri

    Erick Jorge Canales-Rodríguez, Jon Haitz Legarreta, Marco Pizzolato, Gaëtan Rensonnet, Gabriel Girard, et al. Sparse wars: A survey and comparative study of spherical deconvolution algorithms for diffusion mri. NeuroImage, 184:140–160, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Xq-sr: joint xq space super-resolution with application to infant diffusion mri

    Geng Chen, Bin Dong, Yong Zhang, Weili Lin, Dinggang Shen, and Pew-Thian Yap. Xq-sr: joint xq space super-resolution with application to infant diffusion mri. Medical image analysis, 57:44–55, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Estimating tissue microstructure with undersampled diffusion data via graph convolutional neural networks

    Geng Chen, Yoonmi Hong, Yongqin Zhang, Jaeil Kim, Khoi Minh Huynh, Jiquan Ma, Weili Lin, Dinggang Shen, Pew-Thian Yap, and UNC/UMN Baby Connectome Project Consortium. Estimating tissue microstructure with undersampled diffusion data via graph convolutional neural networks. In ...

    2020

  7. [15]

    Spherical cnns

    Taco S Cohen, Mario Geiger, Jonas Köhler, and Max Welling. Spherical cnns. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.10130, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Spherenet: Learning spher- ical representations for detection and classification in omnidirectional images

    Benjamin Coors, Alexandru Paul Condurache, and Andreas Geiger. Spherenet: Learning spher- ical representations for detection and classification in omnidirectional images. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 518–533, 2018

    2018

  9. [17]

    Quantitative comparison of reconstruction methods for intra-voxel fiber recovery from diffusion mri

    Alessandro Daducci, Erick Jorge Canales-Rodrıguez, Maxime Descoteaux, Eleftherios Garyfal- lidis, Yaniv Gur, et al. Quantitative comparison of reconstruction methods for intra-voxel fiber recovery from diffusion mri. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2013

    2013

  10. [18]

    Improved white matter response function estimation for 3-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution

    Thijs Dhollander, Remika Mito, David Raffelt, and Alan Connelly. Improved white matter response function estimation for 3-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution. In Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med, volume 555, 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Equivariant spherical deconvolu- tion: Learning sparse orientation distribution functions from spherical data

    Axel Elaldi, Neel Dey, Heejong Kim, and Guido Gerig. Equivariant spherical deconvolu- tion: Learning sparse orientation distribution functions from spherical data. In International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pages 267–278. Springer, 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    E (3) x so (3)-equivariant networks for spherical deconvolution in diffusion mri

    Axel Elaldi, Guido Gerig, and Neel Dey. E (3) x so (3)-equivariant networks for spherical deconvolution in diffusion mri. In Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Learn- ing so (3) equivariant representations with spherical cnns

    Carlos Esteves, Christine Allen-Blanchette, Ameesh Makadia, and Kostas Daniilidis. Learn- ing so (3) equivariant representations with spherical cnns. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 52–68, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Patch2self: Denoising diffu- sion mri with self-supervised learning

    Shreyas Fadnavis, Joshua Batson, and Eleftherios Garyfallidis. Patch2self: Denoising diffu- sion mri with self-supervised learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:16293–16303, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Patch2self2: Self-supervised denoising on coresets via matrix sketching

    Shreyas Fadnavis, Agniva Chowdhury, Joshua Batson, Petros Drineas, and Eleftherios Garyfal- lidis. Patch2self2: Self-supervised denoising on coresets via matrix sketching. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 27641–27651, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Performance of orientation distribution function-fingerprinting with a biophysical multicompartment diffusion model

    Patryk Filipiak, Timothy Shepherd, Ying-Chia Lin, Dimitris G Placantonakis, Fernando E Boada, and Steven H Baete. Performance of orientation distribution function-fingerprinting with a biophysical multicompartment diffusion model. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , 88(1):418–435, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Freesurfer

    Bruce Fischl. Freesurfer. Neuroimage, 62(2):774–781, 2012

    2012

  18. [26]

    Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks

    Sara Fridovich-Keil, Alex Yu, Matthew Tancik, Qinhong Chen, Benjamin Recht, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5501–5510, 2022. 11

    2022

  19. [27]

    Simultaneous noddi and gfa parameter map generation from subsampled q-space imaging using deep learning

    Eric K Gibbons, Kyler K Hodgson, Akshay S Chaudhari, Lorie G Richards, Jennifer J Majersik, Ganesh Adluru, and Edward VR DiBella. Simultaneous noddi and gfa parameter map generation from subsampled q-space imaging using deep learning. Magnetic resonance in medicine , 81(4):239...

    2019

  20. [28]

    The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project

    Matthew F Glasser, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos, J Anthony Wilson, Timothy S Coalson, Bruce Fischl, Jesper L Andersson, Junqian Xu, Saad Jbabdi, Matthew Webster, Jonathan R Polimeni, et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project. Neuroimage, 80:105–124, 2013

    2013

  21. [29]

    Estimating orientation distribution functions with probability density constraints and spatial regularity

    Alvina Goh, Christophe Lenglet, Paul M Thompson, and René Vidal. Estimating orientation distribution functions with probability density constraints and spatial regularity. InInternational Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pages 877–885. ...

    2009

  22. [30]

    Q-space deep learning: twelve-fold shorter and model-free diffusion mri scans

    Vladimir Golkov, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Jonathan I Sperl, Marion I Menzel, Michael Czisch, Philipp Sämann, Thomas Brox, and Daniel Cremers. Q-space deep learning: twelve-fold shorter and model-free diffusion mri scans. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 35(5):1344–1351, 2016

    2016

  23. [31]

    How can spherical cnns benefit ml-based diffusion mri parameter estimation? In International Workshop on Computational Diffusion MRI, pages 101–112

    Tobias Goodwin-Allcock, Jason McEwen, Robert Gray, Parashkev Nachev, and Hui Zhang. How can spherical cnns benefit ml-based diffusion mri parameter estimation? In International Workshop on Computational Diffusion MRI, pages 101–112. Springer, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    The healpix primer

    Krzysztof M Gorski, Benjamin D Wandelt, Frode K Hansen, Eric Hivon, and Anthony J Banday. The healpix primer. arXiv preprint astro-ph/9905275, 1999

    1999 arXiv

  25. [33]

    The lie derivative for measuring learned equivariance

    Nate Gruver, Marc Finzi, Micah Goldblum, and Andrew Gordon Wilson. The lie derivative for measuring learned equivariance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02984, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 1026–1034, 2015

    2015

  27. [35]

    Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury

    Thierry AGM Huisman, Lee H Schwamm, Pamela W Schaefer, Walter J Koroshetz, Neetha Shetty-Alva, Yelda Ozsunar, Ona Wu, and A Gregory Sorensen. Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 25...

    2004

  28. [36]

    Mark Jenkinson, Christian F Beckmann, Timothy EJ Behrens, Mark W Woolrich, and Stephen M Smith. Fsl. Neuroimage, 62(2):782–790, 2012

    2012

  29. [37]

    Diffusion mri fiber tractography of the brain

    Ben Jeurissen, Maxime Descoteaux, Susumu Mori, and Alexander Leemans. Diffusion mri fiber tractography of the brain. NMR in Biomedicine, 32(4):e3785, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion mri data

    Ben Jeurissen, Jacques-Donald Tournier, Thijs Dhollander, Alan Connelly, and Jan Sijbers. Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion mri data. NeuroImage, 103:411–426, 2014

    2014

  31. [39]

    Vrfrnet: V olumetric roi fodf reconstruction network for estimation of multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution with only single shell dmri

    Ranjeet Ranjan Jha, Sudhir K Pathak, Vishwesh Nath, Walter Schneider, BV Rathish Kumar, Arnav Bhavsar, and Aditya Nigam. Vrfrnet: V olumetric roi fodf reconstruction network for estimation of multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution with only single shell dmri. Magneti...

    2022

  32. [40]

    Asymmetric orientation distri- bution functions (aodfs) revealing intravoxel geometry in diffusion mri

    Suheyla Cetin Karayumak, Evren Özarslan, and Gozde Unal. Asymmetric orientation distri- bution functions (aodfs) revealing intravoxel geometry in diffusion mri. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 49:145–158, 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization

    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Clebsch–gordan nets: a fully fourier space spherical convolutional neural network

    Risi Kondor, Zhen Lin, and Shubhendu Trivedi. Clebsch–gordan nets: a fully fourier space spherical convolutional neural network. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    Direct estimation of fiber orientations using deep learning in diffusion imaging

    Simon Koppers and Dorit Merhof. Direct estimation of fiber orientations using deep learning in diffusion imaging. In International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, pages 53–60. Springer, 2016. 12

    2016

  36. [44]

    Mr imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders

    Denis Le Bihan, Eric Breton, Denis Lallemand, Philippe Grenier, Emmanuel Cabanis, and Maurice Laval-Jeantet. Mr imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology, 161(2):401–407, 1986

    1986

  37. [45]

    Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications

    Denis Le Bihan, Jean-François Mangin, Cyril Poupon, Chris A Clark, Sabina Pappata, Nicolas Molko, and Hughes Chabriat. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 13(4):534–546, 2001

    2001

  38. [46]

    Fast learning of fiber orientation distribution function for mr tractography using convolutional neural network

    Zhichao Lin, Ting Gong, Kewen Wang, Zhiwei Li, Hongjian He, Qiqi Tong, Feng Yu, and Jianhui Zhong. Fast learning of fiber orientation distribution function for mr tractography using convolutional neural network. Medical physics, 46(7):3101–3116, 2019

    2019

  39. [47]

    Group convolutional neural networks for DWI segmentation

    Renfei Liu, Francois Bernard Lauze, Erik J Bekkers, Kenny Erleben, and Sune Darkner. Group convolutional neural networks for DWI segmentation. In Geometric Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Spatio-angular convolutions for super-resolution in diffusion mri

    Matthew Lyon, Paul Armitage, and Mauricio A Álvarez. Spatio-angular convolutions for super-resolution in diffusion mri. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36, 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography

    Klaus H Maier-Hein, Peter F Neher, Jean-Christophe Houde, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Eleftherios Garyfallidis, et al. The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nature communications, 8(1):1–13, 2017

    2017

  42. [50]

    Rotation-equivariant deep learning for diffusion mri

    Philip Müller, Vladimir Golkov, Valentina Tomassini, and Daniel Cremers. Rotation-equivariant deep learning for diffusion mri. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.06942, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Deep learning estimation of multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution with limited single shell dw-mri

    Vishwesh Nath, Sudhir K Pathak, Kurt G Schilling, Walter Schneider, and Bennett A Landman. Deep learning estimation of multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution with limited single shell dw-mri. In Medical Imaging 2020: Image Processing, 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    Deep learning reveals untapped information for local white-matter fiber reconstruction in diffusion-weighted mri

    Vishwesh Nath, Kurt G Schilling, Prasanna Parvathaneni, Colin B Hansen, Allison E Hainline, et al. Deep learning reveals untapped information for local white-matter fiber reconstruction in diffusion-weighted mri. Magnetic resonance imaging, 62:220–227, 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Deepsphere: Efficient spherical convolutional neural network with healpix sampling for cosmological appli- cations

    Nathanaël Perraudin, Michaël Defferrard, Tomasz Kacprzak, and Raphael Sgier. Deepsphere: Efficient spherical convolutional neural network with healpix sampling for cosmological appli- cations. Astronomy and Computing, 27:130–146, 2019

    2019

  46. [54]

    The diffusion-simulated connectivity (disco) dataset

    Jonathan Rafael-Patino, Gabriel Girard, Raphaël Truffet, Marco Pizzolato, Emmanuel Caruyer, and Jean-Philippe Thiran. The diffusion-simulated connectivity (disco) dataset. Data in Brief, 38:107429, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    Apparent fibre density: a novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images

    David Raffelt, J-Donald Tournier, Stephen Rose, Gerard R Ridgway, Robert Henderson, Stuart Crozier, Olivier Salvado, and Alan Connelly. Apparent fibre density: a novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage, 59(4):3976–3994, 2012

    2012

  48. [56]

    Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis

    David A Raffelt, J-Donald Tournier, Robert E Smith, David N Vaughan, Graeme Jackson, Gerard R Ridgway, and Alan Connelly. Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage, 144:58–73, 2017

    2017

  49. [57]

    Diffusion basis functions decomposition for estimating white matter intravoxel fiber geometry

    Alonso Ramirez-Manzanares, Mariano Rivera, Baba C Vemuri, Paul Carney, and Thomas Mareci. Diffusion basis functions decomposition for estimating white matter intravoxel fiber geometry. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 26(8):1091–1102, 2007

    2007

  50. [58]

    Using synthetic training data in neural networks for the estimation of fiber orientation distribution functions from single shell data

    Amelie Rauland and Dorit Merhof. Using synthetic training data in neural networks for the estimation of fiber orientation distribution functions from single shell data. In 2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  51. [59]

    Fiber continuity: an anisotropic prior for odf estimation

    Marco Reisert and Valerij G Kiselev. Fiber continuity: an anisotropic prior for odf estimation. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 30(6):1274–1283, 2011

    2011

  52. [60]

    Validate your white matter tractography algorithms with a reappraised ismrm 2015 tractography challenge scoring system

    Emmanuelle Renauld, Antoine Théberge, Laurent Petit, Jean-Christophe Houde, and Maxime Descoteaux. Validate your white matter tractography algorithms with a reappraised ismrm 2015 tractography challenge scoring system. Scientific Reports, 13(1):2347, 2023

    2015

  53. [61]

    A spherical convolutional neural network for white matter structure imaging via dmri

    Sara Sedlar, Abib Alimi, Théodore Papadopoulo, Rachid Deriche, and Samuel Deslauriers- Gauthier. A spherical convolutional neural network for white matter structure imaging via dmri. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pag...

    2021

  54. [62]

    Diffu- sion mri fiber orientation distribution function estimation using voxel-wise spherical u-net

    Sara Sedlar, Théodore Papadopoulo, Rachid Deriche, and Samuel Deslauriers-Gauthier. Diffu- sion mri fiber orientation distribution function estimation using voxel-wise spherical u-net. In Computational Diffusion MRI, MICCAI Workshop, 2020

    2020

  55. [63]

    Reinforcement learning based tractography with so (3) equivariant agents

    Fabian Leander Sinzinger and Rodrigo Moreno. Reinforcement learning based tractography with so (3) equivariant agents. In Geometric Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis (Extended abstracts), 2022

    2022

  56. [64]

    Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient

    Edward O Stejskal and John E Tanner. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. The journal of chemical physics, 42(1):288–292, 1965

    1965

  57. [65]

    Diffusion mri of cancer: From low to high b-values

    Lei Tang and Xiaohong Joe Zhou. Diffusion mri of cancer: From low to high b-values. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 49(1):23–40, 2019

    2019

  58. [66]

    Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion mri: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution

    J-Donald Tournier, Fernando Calamante, and Alan Connelly. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion mri: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage, 35(4):1459–1472, 2007

    2007

  59. [67]

    Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted mri data using spherical deconvolution

    J-Donald Tournier, Fernando Calamante, David G Gadian, and Alan Connelly. Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted mri data using spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage, 23(3):1176–1185, 2004

    2004

  60. [68]

    Mrtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation

    J-Donald Tournier, Robert Smith, David Raffelt, Rami Tabbara, Thijs Dhollander, et al. Mrtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. NeuroImage, 202:116137, 2019

    2019

  61. [69]

    Q-ball imaging

    David S Tuch. Q-ball imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 52(6):1358–1372, 2004

    2004

  62. [70]

    The wu-minn human connectome project: an overview

    David C Van Essen, Stephen M Smith, Deanna M Barch, Timothy EJ Behrens, Essa Yacoub, Kamil Ugurbil, Wu-Minn HCP Consortium, et al. The wu-minn human connectome project: an overview. Neuroimage, 80:62–79, 2013

    2013

  63. [71]

    Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke

    Steven Warach, D Chien, W Li, M Ronthal, and RR Edelman. Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke. Neurology, 42(9):1717–1717, 1992

    1992

  64. [72]

    Trajectory optimization on manifolds with applications to so (3) and r3xs2

    Michael Watterson, Sikang Liu, Ke Sun, Trey Smith, and Vijay Kumar. Trajectory optimization on manifolds with applications to so (3) and r3xs2. InRobotics: Science and Systems, volume 20, 2018

    2018

  65. [73]

    Mapping fiber orientation spectra in cerebral white matter with fourier-transform diffusion mri

    VJ Wedeen, TG Reese, DS Tuch, MR Weigel, JG Dou, RM Weiskoff, and D Chessler. Mapping fiber orientation spectra in cerebral white matter with fourier-transform diffusion mri. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, 2000

    2000

  66. [74]

    Globally optimized super-resolution of diffusion mri data via fiber continuity

    Ye Wu, Yoonmi Hong, Sahar Ahmad, Wei-Tang Chang, Weili Lin, Dinggang Shen, and Pew- Thian Yap. Globally optimized super-resolution of diffusion mri data via fiber continuity. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2020: 23rd Interna- tional Confer...

    2020

  67. [75]

    An open relaxation-diffusion mri dataset in neurosurgical studies

    Ye Wu, Xiaoming Liu, Yunzhi Huang, Tao Zhou, and Fan Zhang. An open relaxation-diffusion mri dataset in neurosurgical studies. Scientific Data, 11(1):177, 2024

    2024

  68. [76]

    DDM$^2$: Self-supervised diffusion MRI denoising with generative diffusion models

    Tiange Xiang, Mahmut Yurt, Ali B Syed, Kawin Setsompop, and Akshay Chaudhari. DDM$^2$: Self-supervised diffusion MRI denoising with generative diffusion models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  69. [77]

    Tractography methods and findings in brain tumors and traumatic brain injury

    Fang-Cheng Yeh, Andrei Irimia, Dhiego Chaves de Almeida Bastos, and Alexandra J Golby. Tractography methods and findings in brain tumors and traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage, 245:118651, 2021

    2021

  70. [78]

    Fod-net: A deep learning method for fiber orientation distribution angular super resolution

    Rui Zeng, Jinglei Lv, He Wang, Luping Zhou, Michael Barnett, Fernando Calamante, and Chenyu Wang. Fod-net: A deep learning method for fiber orientation distribution angular super resolution. Medical Image Analysis, 79:102431, 2022

    2022

  71. [79]

    Noddi: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain

    Hui Zhang, Torben Schneider, Claudia A Wheeler-Kingshott, and Daniel C Alexander. Noddi: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neu- roimage, 61(4):1000–1016, 2012. 14 A Additional results A.1 Spherical and hemisphere convoluti...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.