Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 7 cited by

JWST/NIRSpec Observations of High Ionization Emission Lines in Galaxies at High Redshift

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports narrow N V $\lambda$1240 emission in two z>6 galaxies while C IV and He II stay undetected, and finds very high ionization lines in only 2.2% of z>4 NIRSpec grating spectra.

desk verdict A well-executed census and two plausible but unconfirmed N V detections; the doublet-ratio problem is real but the paper handles it honestly. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06359 v2 pith:O4ULV3YF submitted 2025-05-09 astro-ph.GA

Mengtao Tang , Daniel P. Stark , Adèle Plat , Anna Feltre , Harley Katz , Peter Senchyna , Charlotte A. Mason , Lily Whitler
show 2 more authors
Zuyi Chen Michael W. Topping
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshiftgalaxiesactivegalacticnucleiNVemissionNIRSpecspectroscopyLittleRedDotshighionizationlinesJWSTrest-frameUV
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper searches 851 JWST/NIRSpec grating spectra of galaxies at z>4 for emission lines that require photons above 54 eV, the signature of a hard radiation field usually attributed to active galactic nuclei (AGN). It reports narrow N V $\lambda$1240 emission in two galaxies—a z=6.98 Little Red Dot with broad H$\beta$ and a z=8.72 narrow-line galaxy—neither of which shows C IV or He II. The resulting N V/C IV and N V/He II limits are unusually high, suggesting either nitrogen-enhanced gas or resonant scattering in outflowing material. Across the full sample, only 2.2% of galaxies have very high ionization lines with rest-frame equivalent width (EW) greater than 10 $\AA$, confirming that such hard radiation fields are rare but present at z>4.

What carries the argument

The central diagnostic is the N V $\lambda\lambda$1239, 1243 doublet, whose excitation requires 77 eV photons, above the He$^+$ edge (54 eV) that separates stellar from AGN-like ionizing spectra. The paper combines detected N V with non-detections of C IV and He II into flux-ratio limits and compares them to a grid of AGN photoionization models that vary power-law slope, ionization parameter, metallicity, and nitrogen-to-oxygen abundance. Resonant scattering of Ly$\alpha$ redshifted into the N V transitions is invoked to explain the anomalous single-component doublet ratios, which fall far below or above the expected ratio of 1–2.

What would settle it

A deeper NIRSpec spectrum that resolves both N V doublet components in the z=8.72 galaxy and the Little Red Dot: if the missing component does not appear with a flux ratio near 1–2 at the expected velocity, the N V identification fails, and the high N V/C IV and N V/He II limits would no longer be supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that narrow N V $\lambda$1240 emission can appear in z>6 galaxies while C IV and He II remain undetected, and that this pattern is rare. In the z=8.72 galaxy the detected line is attributed to N V $\lambda$1243 (EW = 7.0 $\pm$ 1.1 $\AA$), and in the z=6.98 Little Red Dot it is attributed to N V $\lambda$1239 (EW = 27.9 $\pm$ 3.4 $\AA$). Neither source shows C IV or He II, yielding limits N V/C IV > 1.4 and N V/He II > 2.6 in the z=8.72 galaxy, with even larger limits in the Little Red Dot. A census of 851 z>4 NIRSpec grating spectra finds that only 2.2$^{+1.7}_{-1.0}$% show very high ionization lines (N V, He II, [Ne IV], or [Ne V]) with EW > 10 $\AA$.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation rests on the single detected line near rest wavelength 1240 $\AA$ in each galaxy being one member of the N V doublet; if it is instead a shifted Ly$\alpha$ feature or an unrelated line, the detections and the derived ratio limits collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the identifications hold, high-ionization narrow lines trace a small but real population of AGN-like engines at z>4, and searches should include the N V doublet rather than stopping at C IV and He II.
  • The detection in a Little Red Dot with Balmer absorption implies that dense neutral gas does not completely cover the nucleus in all such systems, so ionizing photons can reach narrow-line clouds.
  • The measured 2.2% incidence at EW > 10 $\AA$ sets a benchmark for AGN photoionization at z>4 that future deeper surveys can test.
  • Nitrogen-enhanced line ratios suggest unusual chemical enrichment near the nucleus, possibly from top-heavy star formation or tidal disruption events.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-line identifications are confirmed, the anomalous N V doublet ratios predict that deeper spectra should reveal scattered line flux, broadened or spatially extended, rather than a second narrow component at the systemic velocity.
  • The 2.2% fraction is likely an underestimate for fainter N V because most archival spectra cannot reach EW = 10 $\AA$; targeted deep G140H observations of Little Red Dots should yield a higher detection rate.
  • The nitrogen-loud pattern seen here may connect to nitrogen enhancement reported in other high-redshift galaxies, implying a shared abundance mechanism; a testable extension is to measure N/O in the same galaxies through rest-optical nitrogen lines once they become available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 53 new JWST/NIRSpec R=2700 G140H spectra from program GO 4287 and combines them with archival R=1000/2700 grating spectra to search for very high ionization lines (N V, [Ne IV], [Ne V], He II) at z>4. It reports narrow N V λ1240 emission in two galaxies: CEERS-1025 at z=8.7166 (EW 7.0±1.1 Å, attributed to λ1243) and the LRD CEERS-7902 at z=6.9827 (EW 27.9±3.4 Å, attributed to λ1239), with neither showing C IV or He II. The authors interpret the implied N V/C IV and N V/He II limits as evidence for hard radiation fields with nitrogen enhancement and resonant scattering, and use an 899-galaxy database to place a 2.2% incidence on high-ionization lines with EW>10 Å, together with a separate LRD census.

Significance. If the N V identifications hold, the paper provides rare evidence for hard (≥77 eV) radiation fields at z>6 and adds two important follow-up targets, including an N V-emitting LRD with Balmer absorption that constrains the covering fraction of dense neutral gas. The census is useful, and the treatment of upper limits, resampling uncertainties, and small-number statistics is careful. The archival LRD UV constraints and the composite upper limits on broad UV lines are a valuable addition. The strength of the conclusions is nonetheless tempered by the reliance of both central detections on a single N V doublet component with an anomalous doublet ratio, and by the absence of a quantitative scattering model.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1.1, §3.2.1, §3.4] The two central N V detections each rest on a single member of the λλ1239,1243 doublet, with inferred doublet ratios that are formally inconsistent with the expected 1–2 range (CEERS-1025: <0.37; CEERS-7902: >3.7 or <0.27 depending on component assignment). The resonant-scattering explanation offered in Section 3.4 is qualitative and is acknowledged by the authors to require fine tuning, but no radiative-transfer calculation is provided. Because the N V/C IV and N V/He II limits, the model comparisons in Figures 8–9, and the census detections in Section 4 all inherit this identification, this is a load-bearing issue. I request either a quantitative scattering model or an explicit reclassification of both sources as N V candidates, with the abstract and summary claims adjusted accordingly.
  2. [§4.2.1, §5, Abstract] The headline incidence fraction 2.2^{+1.7}_{-1.0}% is not derived where it first appears. Section 4.2.1 gives individual line fractions (2/87 for N V, 1/97 for [Ne IV], 1/57 for [Ne V]) and a non-BL fraction of 5/166=3.0^{+2.0}_{-1.3}%, while the abstract quotes a combined 2.2% that appears to correspond to 4/185 (excluding the two tentative detections), but this association is never stated. Please specify the exact numerator, denominator, and inclusion criteria (including whether tentative detections count) for the census used in the abstract, and reconcile the quoted 2.2% with the similarly labeled 3.0% in Section 4.2.1.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.3.1] The sentence 'We do not detect either C IV or He II in the G140H spectrum of CEERS-7902' appears in the section on CEERS-10444 and should refer to CEERS-10444.
  2. [Abstract, §6] The generic label 'NVλ1240' should be replaced by a reference to the doublet components λλ1239,1243, since the identification is component-dependent and the doublet ratio is central to the interpretation.
  3. [Figure 15] The caption contains the typo 'blue plux'; this should read 'blue plus'.
  4. [§3.1.2] The text says 'The same analysis is presented to the other 55 z>4 galaxies in the GO 4287 spectra,' while the abstract and Section 2 state that 53 new galaxies are added; please clarify whether the 55 includes the five galaxies overlapping with CEERS.
  5. [§4.2.2] The C IV detection rate of 1/8 for LRDs should be explained more explicitly: one detection plus seven non-detections with 3σ EW limits <10 Å yields the denominator 8, whereas the text mentions 15 galaxies with C IV coverage; as written, the transition is difficult to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the detections and census are direct spectral measurements, and the photoionization interpretation is explicitly exploratory rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The central claims are (1) detections of narrow features near the N V doublet in CEERS-1025 and CEERS-7902, (2) upper limits on C IV and He II implying elevated N V/C IV and N V/He II ratios, and (3) incidence fractions of high-ionization lines in archival NIRSpec samples. These are all derived from measured spectra using standard line fitting and upper-limit calculations; no parameter is fitted to a subset of the data and then renamed as a prediction of the same quantity. The 2.2% census is a detection fraction over a fixed sample, not a model output forced by construction. The Section 3.4 photoionization comparison uses external model grids (Feltre et al. 2016; Mignoli et al. 2019) with openly adjustable N/O, ionization parameter, metallicity, and power-law slope, and the paper states its goal is 'to investigate the range of factors that might adjust the N V-based line ratios and not to derive the specific properties of the two N V emitters.' Finding that nitrogen-enhanced models can reproduce the observed ratios is standard inverse modeling, not a claim that the ratios are predicted from independent inputs already containing them. Self-citations to Topping et al. (2025a) and Tang et al. (2023) concern reduction procedures and previously published redshifts, and are not load-bearing in any uniqueness or forced-ansatz sense. The acknowledged uncertainty in assigning the single detected feature to one component of the N V doublet is an empirical identification risk, not a circularity: the paper explicitly notes that deeper spectra detecting both components are required. The derivation chain therefore does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central detection claims rest on the spectroscopic data and standard line diagnostics; the model parameters in Section 3.4 are exploration choices, not fits, but several are tuned to match the observed N V ratios, so the interpretation section carries additional assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced; the funnel-like geometry and nitrogen-enhanced gas are interpretive scenarios built from existing concepts, not new postulates.

free parameters (7)
  • AGN power-law slope alpha = alpha = -2.0 and -1.2
    Chosen for the AGN continuum in photoionization models (Section 3.4); alpha=-2.0 is described as an arbitrary choice, alpha=-1.2 is a harder spectrum.
  • Ionization parameter log U = log U = -5 to -1
    Varied across the model grid; no single value is fit to the data.
  • Metallicity Z = Z = 0.006 to 4 Z_sun
    Varied in the model grid; the observed Z_neb for CEERS-1025 is derived independently via PyNeb.
  • Nitrogen enhancement log(N/O) = log(N/O) = 0 and 0.7
    Fixed N/O ratios chosen to reproduce the observed N V ratios; these are the key parameters for the nitrogen-enhancement interpretation.
  • Turbulent velocity = 100 km/s
    Model input from the updated Mignoli et al. (2019) grid; assumed, not fit.
  • Inner radius of NLR clouds = 90 pc
    Model input from the updated Feltre et al. grid; smaller than the original 300 pc, chosen to increase radiation pressure.
  • Electron density for CEERS-1025 = n_e = 1000 cm^-3
    Assumed typical at z~9 for the PyNeb electron temperature and metallicity estimate (Section 3.1.2).
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Case B recombination applies to the narrow Balmer lines (H gamma/H beta = 0.47, H alpha/H beta = 2.76).
    Used to convert H gamma or H beta to H alpha for the [O I]/H alpha ratio and to assess reddening (Sections 3.1.2, 3.2.2).
  • domain assumption Emission lines from species with ionization energy above 54 eV (N V, [Ne IV], [Ne V]) trace photoionization by a hard radiation field, primarily AGN, rather than by ordinary stars.
    This is the premise for using these lines as AGN signposts (Sections 1 and 4). The authors note shocks could also contribute, which weakens the axiom.
  • domain assumption The CLOUDY photoionization models of Feltre et al. (2016) and Mignoli et al. (2019), with the adopted parameter choices, accurately represent the narrow-line region of high-redshift AGN.
    Used in Section 3.4 to interpret N V/C IV and N V/He II ratios; the models are external and not independently validated for z>6.
  • standard math Systemic redshifts derived from narrow [O III] and H beta emission lines are accurate to the claimed precision and define the rest-frame wavelengths for line identification.
    Redshifts (z=8.7166, 6.9827, 6.6836) are derived in Sections 2 and 3; line identification of N V depends on them.
  • standard math The small-number statistics of Gehrels (1986) give valid confidence intervals for the incidence fractions.
    Applied in Section 4.2.1 for fractions like 2/87 and 1/8.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JWST/NIRSpec Observations of High Ionization Emission Lines in Galaxies at High Redshift." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O4ULV3YF

@misc{pith2026250506359,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JWST/NIRSpec Observations of High Ionization Emission Lines in Galaxies at High Redshift},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O4ULV3YF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06359}
}
abstract

JWST spectroscopy has built large emission line samples at $z\gtrsim4$, but it has yet to confidently reveal many galaxies with the hard radiation fields commonly associated with AGN photoionization. While this may indicate a weaker UV ionizing spectrum in many $z>4$ AGNs or obscuration from dense neutral gas and dust, the complete picture remains unclear owing to the small number of deep rest-UV spectra. Here we characterize the strength of high ionization lines in $53$ new galaxies observed with NIRSpec $R=2700$ grating spectroscopy. We present new detections of narrow NV$\lambda1240$ in two galaxies. One is a previously-confirmed $z=6.98$ Little Red Dot (LRD) with broad H$\beta$, and the other is a $z=8.72$ galaxy with a narrow line spectrum. Neither source exhibits CIV or HeII emission, indicating large NV/CIV and NV/HeII ratios that may reflect a combination of nitrogen-enhancement and resonant scattering effects. We investigate the incidence of narrow high ionization lines in a large database of $851$ NIRSpec grating spectra, and we separately quantify the fraction of LRDs with narrow high ionization UV emission lines. Our results likely suggest that hard radiation fields are indeed present in a small subset of LRDs ($12.5^{+23.7}_{-10.4}\%$) and UV-selected galaxies ($2.2^{+1.7}_{-1.0}\%$) at $z>4$. The identification of narrow high ionization lines in the population of LRDs with strong Balmer absorption suggests the dense neutral hydrogen gas may not uniformly cover the nucleus. The strong NV (coupled with weak CIV and HeII) suggests that efforts to identify high ionization lines should extend down in wavelength to the NV doublet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.06359 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. SEDs of the two N V emitters CEERS-1025 (left) and CEERS-7902 (LRD; middle), as well as CEERS-10444 (LRD; right). Observed photometry is shown by blue circles. Left: We show the BEAGLE model (Chevallard & Charlot 2016) spectrum of CEERS-1025 as the black line and the synthetic photometry as red squares. Middle and right: We show the NIRSpec prism spectra of CEERS-7902 and CEERS-10444 obtained from RUBIES (de Graaff … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. JWST/NIRSpec grating spectra of the N V emitter CEERS-1025. The top panels show the GO 4287 G140H spectra and the bottom panels show the composite GO 4287 and CEERS G395M spectra. We overplot the expected positions of emission lines from the systemic redshift (zsys = 8.7166) as black dotted lines. Detected emission lines are marked by blue solid lines. [O III] λ4363 is tentatively (S/N = 2.7) detected and marked by … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. N V λλ1239, 1243/C IV λλ1548, 1551 versus N V λλ1239, 1243/He II λ1640 diagnostic. The two N V emit￾ters in GO 4287 are shown as magenta star (CEERS-1025, z = 8.7166) and red diamond (CEERS-7902, z = 6.9827, a LRD). We overplot the broad line AGN GS-3073 (z = 5.55; open red pentagon) from Ji et al. (2024). Open black squares show AGN from literature (z ∼ 0 − 4; Kraemer & Crenshaw 2000; Baldwin et al. 2003; Kuraszkie… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: [O III] λλ4959, 5007/[O II] λ3727 as a function of [O III] λ5007 EW. We show the two N V emitters in GO 4287 CEERS-1025 as a magenta star and CEERS-7902 (LRD) as a red diamond. We overplot the [Ne V] λ3427 emitter GN￾42437 in Chisholm et al. (2024) as green cross. We a…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: [O III] λ4363/Hγ versus [Ne III] λ3869/[O II] diagnostics, with black dashed line showing the demarcation between galaxies dominated by stars and AGN (Mazzolari et al. 2024b). We show the two N V emitters CEERS-1025 as magenta star and CEERS-7902 (LRD) as red diamond. …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: NIRSpec spectra of the N V emitter CEERS-7902 (LRD). We show the GO 4287 G140H, the composite of GO 4287 and RUBIES G395M, and the RUBIES prism spectra from top to bottom. Spectra are shown in the same way as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: NIRSpec spectra of CEERS-10444 (LRD). We show the GO 4287 G140H spectrum in the top panel and the composite G395M spectrum (stacking the GO 4287 and RUBIES grating spectra) in the bottom panel. Spectra are shown in the same way as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p01…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: N V/C IV versus N V/He II line ratios of the two N V emitters CEERS-1025 (purple star) and CEERS-7902 (red diamond) and line ratios expected from photoionization models of narrow line AGN. The emitted spectrum of AGN accretion disk is assumed to be a power law fν ∝ ν α…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: N V/C IV versus N V/He II line ratios of CEERS-1025 (purple star) and CEERS-7902 (red diamond), and line ratios expected from photoionization models with AGN accretion disk power law spectrum α = −1.2. Symbols are shown in the same way as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left panel: MUV versus [O III]+Hβ EW for galaxies at z > 4 with R = 1000 or R = 2700 NIRSpec grating spectra (black circles). We overplot objects with high ionization line detections: CEERS-1025 (N V λ1243, magenta star), CEERS-7902 (N V λ1239, red diamond), GS-200255…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: N V, [Ne IV] λλ2422, 2424, and [Ne V] λ3427 EW versus MUV for z > 4 galaxies with R = 1000 or R = 2700 NIRSpec grating spectra. We show sources with EW or 3σ EW limit < 30 ˚A (open black circles). For N V (left), EW measurements of single component are presented. For …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Composite NIRSpec grating spectrum of the 18 LRDs at z > 4. High ionization emission lines (N V, C IV, He II, [Ne IV], [Ne V]) are not detected, which are marked by green text. We show detections of narrow forbidden [O III] λ4959 and λ5007 lines, as well as Hβ and Hα …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Schematic illustrating a scenario for AGN pho￾toionization of narrow line clouds in LRDs with significant line-of-sight covering of extremely dense neutral hydrogen (dark grey) in the vicinity of the BLR clouds (green) and the disk (orange), resulting in Balmer series…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Balmer break strengths fν,4050/fν,3670 versus Balmer absorption line EWs of LRDs presented in this work and literature (Furtak et al. 2024; Juodˇzbalis et al. 2024; Labbe et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2024; de Graaff et al. 2025a; D’Eugenio et al. 2025; Naidu et al. 2025; …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Plausible detections (S/N ≃ 3 − 4) of high ionization emission lines ([Ne V] and [Ne IV]) in the NIRSpec spectra of GN-z11, GN-42437, GS-81034, and GS-20025526. lar emission features at the line center of [Ne V] λ3427. We search for other high ionization emission line…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SPURS: Massive Stars, Dense Gas, and Ly$\alpha$ Escape in GN-z11 at $z = 10.6$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    GN-z11's rest-UV spectrum shows young massive stars with very massive star winds, dense gas, and a broad red Ly alpha wing that may help Ly alpha escape the largely neutral early universe.

  2. Misaligned or chaotic? A strong break of axial symmetry in the local LRD J1025 revealed with VLT/FORS2 spectropolarimetry

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    The local Little Red Dot J1025 shows a 48° polarisation-angle offset between continuum and broad H-alpha, requiring broken axial symmetry.

  3. What you see is what you get: empirically measured bolometric luminosities of Little Red Dots

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Directly integrating the observed spectra of two Little Red Dots shows the bolometric luminosity is dominated by rest-frame optical light, lowering implied black hole masses to about 10^5 to 10^7 solar masses.

  4. Quenching of X-ray emission in little red dots by both Compton-thick gas and high accretion rates

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    X-ray non-detection of little red dots requires both Compton-thick gas columns (~1e25 cm^-2) and intrinsically weak X-ray emission with bolometric correction k_bol,X ≳ 30.

  5. Deep JWST spectroscopy of galaxies in a candidate ionized bubble at $z = 8.7$: probing reionization at pMpc scales with Ly$\alpha$ emission

    astro-ph.GA 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Lyα transmission in the z=8.7 EGS volume is T_IGM=0.26+0.25−0.14, consistent with the field average and mildly inconsistent with a 2-pMpc ionized bubble, making such a bubble unlikely.

  6. Discovery of Multiply Ionized Iron Emission Powered by an Active Galactic Nucleus in a z~7 Little Red Dot

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The z=6.68 Little Red Dot THRILS 46403 shows a 4.5 sigma [FeVII] line, the first robust coronal-line detection among z>5 LRDs, plus narrow Balmer absorption, supporting an AGN with direct sightlines to gas at or beyon...

  7. Little Red Dots as Obscured Little Blue Dots: A Super-Eddington Unification Model

    astro-ph.GA 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Little Red Dots are proposed to be dust-reddened, edge-on views of the same super-Eddington accreting blue AGNs seen face-on as Little Blue Dots.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

162 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 3042, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2279

    Alarie, A., & Drissen, L. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 3042, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2279

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2279 2019

  2. [2]

    A., Greene, J

    Alexandroff, R., Strauss, M. A., Greene, J. E., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 3306, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1500

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1500 2013

  3. [3]

    G., Groves, B

    Allen, M. G., Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., & Kewley, L. J. 2008, ApJS, 178, 20, doi: 10.1086/589652 ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Crespo G´ omez, A., Colina, L., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A250, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451731

    doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  4. [4]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    E., Trump, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Trump, J. R., Pirzkal, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520 2024

  6. [6]

    A., Hamann, F., Korista, K

    Baldwin, J. A., Hamann, F., Korista, K. T., et al. 2003, ApJ, 583, 649, doi: 10.1086/345449

    doi:10.1086/345449 2003

  7. [7]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, L26, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad108

    Bekki, K., & Tsujimoto, T. 2023, MNRAS, 526, L26, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad108

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad108 2023

  8. [8]

    1969, JQSRT, 9, 1145, doi: 10.1016/0022-4073(69)90139-3 B¨ oker, T., Beck, T

    Bickel, W. 1969, JQSRT, 9, 1145, doi: 10.1016/0022-4073(69)90139-3 B¨ oker, T., Beck, T. L., Birkmann, S. M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 038001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb846

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-4073(69)90139-3 1969

Show all 162 references
  1. [9]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1704

    Brinchmann, J. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1704

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346159

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    J., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Cameron, A. J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A288, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347094

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.16.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6984365

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.16.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6984365

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    2011, SoPh, 268, 255, doi: 10.1007/s11207-010-9541-4 High Ionization Emission Lines in z >4 Galaxies 31

    Bonifacio, P. 2011, SoPh, 268, 255, doi: 10.1007/s11207-010-9541-4 High Ionization Emission Lines in z >4 Galaxies 31

    2011 doi

  6. [14]

    J., Katz, H., Rey, M

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Rey, M. P., & Saxena, A. 2023a, MNRAS, 523, 3516, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1579

    doi

  7. [15]

    J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 523, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1547

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A

    Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A. J., et al. 2023b, A&A, 677, A115, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346107

    doi

  9. [17]

    1986, MNRAS, 223, 811, doi: 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    Campbell, A., Terlevich, R., & Melnick, J. 1986, MNRAS, 223, 811, doi: 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    1986 doi

  10. [18]

    2024, Nature, 633, 318, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    Carniani, S., Hainline, K., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2024, Nature, 633, 318, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Fontana, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 3526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1664

    Chang, S.-J., & Gronke, M. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 3526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1664

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    2001, MNRAS, 323, 887, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04260.x

    Charlot, S., & Longhetti, M. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 887, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04260.x

    2001

  14. [22]

    P., Mason, C., et al

    Chen, Z., Stark, D. P., Mason, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 7052, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae455

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 1415, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1756

    Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1415, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1756

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    A., Endsley, R., et al

    Chisholm, J., Berg, D. A., Endsley, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 2633, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2199

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    L., Aird, J., Reddy, N., et al

    Coil, A. L., Aird, J., Reddy, N., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 35, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/35

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 1256, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1689

    Cracco, V., Ciroi, S., Berton, M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1256, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1689

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    2025, A&A, 697, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451410

    Curti, M., Witstok, J., Jakobsen, P., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451410

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    P., et al

    Davis, M., Guhathakurta, P., Konidaris, N. P., et al. 2007, ApJL, 660, L1, doi: 10.1086/517931 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16600, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16600 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025b, A&A, 697...

    2007 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    C., Wang, J.-G., et al

    Dong, X.-B., Ho, L. C., Wang, J.-G., et al. 2010, ApJL, 721, L143, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/721/2/L143

    2010 doi

  22. [30]

    L., Cardaci, M

    Dors, O. L., Cardaci, M. V., H¨ agele, G. F., & Krabbe,ˆA. C. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1291, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1218

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    E., Tang, M., et al

    Du, X., Shapley, A. E., Tang, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 890, 65, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab67b8

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2023a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02465, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02465

    doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    J., Johnson, B

    Eisenstein, D. J., Johnson, B. D., Robertson, B., et al. 2023b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.12340, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.12340

    doi

  26. [34]

    P., Whitler, L., et al

    Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Whitler, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1111, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1857

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    Feltre, A., Charlot, S., & Gutkin, J. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    J., Porter, R

    Ferland, G. J., Porter, R. L., van Hoof, P. A. M., et al. 2013, RMxAA, 49, 137, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1302.4485

    2013 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    2022, A&A, 661, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142673

    Ferruit, P., Jakobsen, P., Giardino, G., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142673

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2025, ApJL, 983, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    2023, Data from The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS), STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/Z7P0-8481

    Finkelstein, Steven, Bagley, Micaela, & Yang, Guang. 2023, Data from The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS), STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/Z7P0-8481

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Garnett, D. R. 1992, AJ, 103, 1330, doi: 10.1086/116146

    1992 doi

  35. [43]

    1986, ApJ, 303, 336, doi: 10.1086/164079

    Gehrels, N. 1986, ApJ, 303, 336, doi: 10.1086/164079

    1986 doi

  36. [44]

    2010, A&A, 519, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014039

    Gilli, R., Vignali, C., Mignoli, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 519, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014039

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    Grandi, S. A. 1980, ApJ, 238, 10, doi: 10.1086/157952

    1980 doi

  38. [46]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122, doi: 10.1086/431897

    2005 doi

  39. [47]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Dopita, M

    Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., & Sutherland, R. S. 2004, ApJS, 153, 9, doi: 10.1086/421113

    2004 doi

  41. [49]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    Gutkin, J., Charlot, S., & Bruzual, G. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    2014, A&A, 565, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322696

    Hainich, R., R¨ uhling, U., Todt, H., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322696

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    N., Shapley, A

    Hainline, K. N., Shapley, A. E., Greene, J. E., & Steidel, C. C. 2011, ApJ, 733, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/31

    2011 doi

  44. [52]

    N., Maiolino, R., Juodˇ zbalis, I., et al

    Hainline, K. N., Maiolino, R., Juodˇ zbalis, I., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9920

    2025 doi

  45. [53]

    1992, ApJL, 391, L53, doi: 10.1086/186397 —

    Hamann, F., & Ferland, G. 1992, ApJL, 391, L53, doi: 10.1086/186397 —. 1993, ApJ, 418, 11, doi: 10.1086/173366

    1992 doi

  46. [54]

    Hamann, F., & Korista, K. T. 1996, ApJ, 464, 158, doi: 10.1086/177307

    1996 doi

  47. [55]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al

    Heintz, K. E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 890, doi: 10.1126/science.adj0343 32 Tang et al

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 333, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1256

    Hirschmann, M., Charlot, S., Feltre, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 333, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1256

    2019 doi

  50. [58]

    Y.-Y., Abdurro’uf, Coe, D., et al

    Hsiao, T. Y.-Y., Abdurro’uf, Coe, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5da8

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5015

    Hu, W., Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5015

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    A., Papovich, C., Finkelstein, S

    Hutchison, T. A., Papovich, C., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab22a2

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    2025 doi

  54. [62]

    2023a, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    Isobe, Y., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    doi

  55. [63]

    2023b, ApJ, 959, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    Isobe, Y., Ouchi, M., Tominaga, N., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 959, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    doi

  56. [64]

    2025, MNRAS, 541, L71, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf056

    Isobe, Y., Maiolino, R., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 541, L71, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf056

    2025 doi

  57. [65]

    I., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., & Privon, G. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1229, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22051.x

    2012

  58. [66]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    2024, MNRAS, 535, 881, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2375

    Ji, X., ¨Ubler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 881, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2375

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.13082, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.13082, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    2008, ApJ, 679, 962, doi: 10.1086/587868

    Jiang, L., Fan, X., & Vestergaard, M. 2008, ApJ, 679, 962, doi: 10.1086/587868

    2008 doi

  62. [70]

    M., & Davis, S

    Jiang, Y.-F., Stone, J. M., & Davis, S. W. 2019, ApJ, 880, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29ff Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2367 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504....

    2019

  63. [71]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    2001 doi

  64. [72]

    2024, ApJL, 962, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1de1

    Kobayashi, C., & Ferrara, A. 2024, ApJL, 962, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1de1

    2024 doi

  65. [73]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    2023 doi

  66. [74]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    2025 doi

  67. [75]

    Kochanek, C. S. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 127, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw267

    2016 doi

  68. [76]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    Kokorev, V., Fujimoto, S., Labbe, I., et al. 2023, ApJL, 957, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    2023 doi

  69. [77]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    B., & Crenshaw, D

    Kraemer, S. B., & Crenshaw, D. M. 2000, ApJ, 544, 763, doi: 10.1086/317246

    2000 doi

  71. [79]

    H., & Voit, G

    Krolik, J. H., & Voit, G. M. 1998, ApJL, 497, L5, doi: 10.1086/311274

    1998 doi

  72. [80]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.11997, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.11997

    Kumari, N., Smit, R., Witstok, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.11997, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.11997

    2024 doi arXiv

  73. [81]

    K., Green, P

    Kuraszkiewicz, J. K., Green, P. J., Crenshaw, D. M., et al. 2004, ApJS, 150, 165, doi: 10.1086/379809

    2004 doi

  74. [82]

    Kwan, J., & Krolik, J. H. 1981, ApJ, 250, 478, doi: 10.1086/159395 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    1981 doi

  75. [83]

    E., Matthee, J., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04557, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04557

    2024 doi arXiv

  76. [84]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    2025 doi

  77. [85]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.13047, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.13047

    Lambrides, E., Garofali, K., Larson, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.13047, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.13047

    2024 doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    S., et al

    Laporte, N., Nakajima, K., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa96a8 Le F` evre, O., Lemaux, B. C., Nakajima, K., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732197

    2017 doi

  79. [87]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6565

    Lin, X., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6565

    2024 doi

  80. [88]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10659, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10659

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10659, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10659

    2025 doi

  81. [89]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    2015 doi

  82. [90]

    F., et al

    Lusso, E., Worseck, G., Hennawi, J. F., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 4204, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv516

    2015 doi

  83. [91]

    1988, ApJ, 327, 116, doi: 10.1086/166175 —

    Madau, P. 1988, ApJ, 327, 116, doi: 10.1086/166175 —. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.09854, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.09854

    1988 doi

  84. [92]

    2024, ApJL, 976, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90e1

    Madau, P., & Haardt, F. 2024, ApJL, 976, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90e1

    2024 doi

  85. [93]

    A., Stark, D

    Mainali, R., Kollmeier, J. A., Stark, D. P., et al. 2017, ApJL, 836, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/836/1/L14

    2017 doi

  86. [94]

    P., Tang, M., et al

    Mainali, R., Stark, D. P., Tang, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 719, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa751

    2020 doi

  87. [95]

    2024a, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024a, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    doi

  88. [96]

    2024b, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5 Mart´ ınez-Aldama, M

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Witstok, J., et al. 2024b, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5 Mart´ ınez-Aldama, M. L., Dultzin, D., Marziani, P., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/217/1/3

    2015 doi

  89. [97]

    2014, ApJ, 785, 153, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/153 High Ionization Emission Lines in z >4 Galaxies 33

    Masters, D., McCarthy, P., Siana, B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 153, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/153 High Ionization Emission Lines in z >4 Galaxies 33

    2014 doi

  90. [98]

    2011, A&A, 527, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015584

    Taniguchi, Y. 2011, A&A, 527, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015584

    2011 doi

  91. [99]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    2024 doi

  92. [100]

    2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.15615, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.15615

    Mazzolari, G., Scholtz, J., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.15615, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.15615

    doi

  93. [101]

    2024b, A&A, 691, A345, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450407

    Mazzolari, G., ¨Ubler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024b, A&A, 691, A345, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450407

    doi

  94. [102]

    2025, MNRAS, 540, 190, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf745

    McClymont, W., Tacchella, S., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 190, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf745

    2025 doi

  95. [103]

    2019, A&A, 626, A9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935062

    Mignoli, M., Feltre, A., Bongiorno, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935062

    2019 doi

  96. [104]

    2006a, A&A, 447, 863, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054127

    Nagao, T., Maiolino, R., & Marconi, A. 2006a, A&A, 447, 863, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054127

    doi

  97. [105]

    2006b, A&A, 447, 157, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054024

    Nagao, T., Marconi, A., & Maiolino, R. 2006b, A&A, 447, 157, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054024

    doi

  98. [106]

    P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    2025 doi arXiv

  99. [107]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    2023 doi

  100. [108]

    2018, A&A, 612, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731935

    Nakajima, K., Schaerer, D., Le F` evre, O., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731935

    2018 doi

  101. [109]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.18763, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.18763 —

    Napolitano, L., Castellano, M., Pentericci, L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.18763, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.18763 —. 2025, A&A, 693, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452090

    2024 doi

  102. [110]

    Netzer, H., Elitzur, M., & Ferland, G. J. 1985, ApJ, 299, 752, doi: 10.1086/163741

    1985 doi

  103. [111]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  104. [112]

    E., & Ferland, G

    Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  105. [113]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7

    Pacucci, F., & Narayan, R. 2024, ApJ, 976, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7

    2024 doi

  106. [114]

    J., Oh, K., et al

    Peca, A., Koss, M. J., Oh, K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10674, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10674

    2025 doi arXiv

  107. [115]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, 4058, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa078

    Pognan, Q., Trakhtenbrot, B., Sbarrato, T., Schawinski, K., & Bertemes, C. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 4058, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa078

    2020 doi

  108. [116]

    J., Kelly, D., & Horner, S

    Rieke, M. J., Kelly, D., & Horner, S. 2005, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5904, Cryogenic Optical Systems and Instruments XI, ed. J. B. Heaney & L. G. Burriesci, 1–8, doi: 10.1117/12.615554

    2005 doi

  109. [117]

    J., Kelly, D

    Rieke, M. J., Kelly, D. M., Misselt, K., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 028001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acac53

    2023 doi

  110. [118]

    2023, Data from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES), STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/8TDJ-8N28

    Rieke, Marcia, Robertson, Brant, Tacchella, Sandro, et al. 2023, Data from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES), STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/8TDJ-8N28

    2023 doi

  111. [119]

    Riffel, R., Rodr´ ıguez-Ardila, A., & Pastoriza, M. G. 2006, A&A, 457, 61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065291

    2006 doi

  112. [120]

    2023, PASP, 135, 048001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293

    Rigby, J., Perrin, M., McElwain, M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293

    2023 doi

  113. [121]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d3 Rodr´ ıguez-Ardila, A., Viegas, S

    Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., Shapley, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d3 Rodr´ ıguez-Ardila, A., Viegas, S. M., Pastoriza, M. G.,

    2024 doi

  114. [122]

    Prato, L., & Donzelli, C. J. 2002, ApJ, 572, 94, doi: 10.1086/340192

    2002 doi

  115. [123]

    Rose, M., Elvis, M., & Tadhunter, C. N. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 2900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv113

    2015 doi

  116. [124]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2023, ApJ, 955, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acedad —. 2024, ApJ, 962, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc

    2023 doi

  117. [125]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 1427, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3032

    2020 doi

  118. [126]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.09015, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.09015

    Scarlata, C., Hayes, M., Panagia, N., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.09015, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.09015

    2024 doi arXiv

  119. [127]

    2025, A&A, 697, A175, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348804

    Scholtz, J., Maiolino, R., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A175, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348804

    2025 doi

  120. [128]

    P., et al

    Senchyna, P., Plat, A., Stark, D. P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad235e

    2024 doi

  121. [129]

    E., Reddy, N

    Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., Sanders, R. L., Topping, M. W., & Brammer, G. B. 2023, ApJL, 950, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd939

    2023 doi

  122. [130]

    E., Steidel, C

    Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., & Adelberger, K. L. 2003, ApJ, 588, 65, doi: 10.1086/373922

    2003 doi

  123. [131]

    E., Sanders, R

    Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., Topping, M. W., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 242, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adad68

    2025 doi

  124. [132]

    1981, MNRAS, 196, 257, doi: 10.1093/mnras/196.2.257

    Sikora, M. 1981, MNRAS, 196, 257, doi: 10.1093/mnras/196.2.257

    1981 doi

  125. [133]

    S., Curtis-Lake, E., Smith, D

    Silcock, M. S., Curtis-Lake, E., Smith, D. J. B., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.18193, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.18193

    2024 doi arXiv

  126. [134]

    P., Richard, J., Siana, B., et al

    Stark, D. P., Richard, J., Siana, B., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3200, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1618

    2014 doi

  127. [135]

    P., Richard, J., Charlot, S., et al

    Stark, D. P., Richard, J., Charlot, S., et al. 2015a, MNRAS, 450, 1846, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv688

    doi

  128. [136]

    P., Walth, G., Charlot, S., et al

    Stark, D. P., Walth, G., Charlot, S., et al. 2015b, MNRAS, 454, 1393, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1907

    doi

  129. [137]

    P., Ellis, R

    Stark, D. P., Ellis, R. S., Charlot, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 469, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2233

    2017 doi

  130. [138]

    1987, A&A, 177, 42 34 Tang et al

    Surdej, J., & Hutsemekers, D. 1987, A&A, 177, 42 34 Tang et al

    1987

  131. [139]

    P., Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 2572, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2236

    2019 doi

  132. [140]

    P., Chevallard, J., et al

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Chevallard, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3238, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3454

    2021 doi

  133. [141]

    P., Topping, M

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Topping, M. W., Mason, C., & Ellis, R. S. 2024, ApJ, 975, 208, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7eb7

    2024 doi

  134. [142]

    P., Chen, Z., et al

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Chen, Z., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 1657, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2763

    2023 doi

  135. [143]

    J., Finkelstein, S

    Taylor, A. J., Finkelstein, S. L., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add15b

    2025 doi

  136. [144]

    W., Shapley, A

    Topping, M. W., Shapley, A. E., Stark, D. P., et al. 2021, ApJL, 917, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac1a79

    2021 doi

  137. [145]

    W., Stark, D

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Senchyna, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3301, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae682 —. 2025a, ApJ, 980, 225, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada95c

    2024 doi

  138. [146]

    W., Sanders, R

    Topping, M. W., Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.08712. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08712

    arXiv

  139. [147]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10681, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10681

    Trakhtenbrot, B., Ricci, C., Treister, E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10681, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10681

    2025 doi

  140. [148]

    E., Weaver, J

    Treiber, H., Greene, J. E., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc38f

    2025 doi

  141. [149]

    2022, ApJ, 935, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158

    Treu, T., Roberts-Borsani, G., Bradac, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158

    2022 doi

  142. [150]

    2023, High-level science products produced by the GLASS-JWST team, as described in Paris, et al

    Treu, Tommaso, & Paris, Diego. 2023, High-level science products produced by the GLASS-JWST team, as described in Paris, et al. 2024 (ADS bibcode: 2023ApJ...952...20P), and in Mascia, et al. 2024 (ADS bibcode: 2024A&A...690A...2M)., STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/KW3C-N857

    2023 doi

  143. [151]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04983, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04983

    Tripodi, R., Martis, N., Markov, V., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04983, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04983

    2024 doi arXiv

  144. [152]

    R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R

    Trump, J. R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R. C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acba8a

    2023 doi

  145. [153]

    Weymann, R. J. 1988, ApJ, 325, 651, doi: 10.1086/166036 ¨Ubler, H., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346137 ¨Ubler, H., Maiolino, R., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 355, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae943

    1988 doi

  146. [154]

    Valentino, F., Brammer, G., Gould, K. M. L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 947, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbefa Vidal-Garc´ ıa, A., Plat, A., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 7217, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3252

    2023 doi

  147. [155]

    Vink, J. S. 2022, ARA&A, 60, 203, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094949

    2022 doi

  148. [156]

    R., & Panek, R

    Walborn, N. R., & Panek, R. J. 1984, ApJL, 280, L27, doi: 10.1086/184262

    1984 doi

  149. [157]

    2024, ApJL, 969, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

    Wang, B., Leja, J., de Graaff, A., et al. 2024, ApJL, 969, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

    2024 doi

  150. [158]

    L., et al

    Wang, B., de Graaff, A., Davies, R. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc1ca

    2025 doi

  151. [159]

    2010, ApJ, 710, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/78

    Wang, H., Wang, T., Yuan, W., et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/78

    2010 doi

  152. [160]

    Wang, J.-M., Qiu, J., Du, P., & Ho, L. C. 2014, ApJ, 797, 65, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/65

    2014 doi

  153. [161]

    J., Morris, S

    Weymann, R. J., Morris, S. L., Foltz, C. B., & Hewett, P. C. 1991, ApJ, 373, 23, doi: 10.1086/170020

    1991 doi

  154. [162]

    L., Strauss, M

    Zakamska, N. L., Strauss, M. A., Krolik, J. H., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2125, doi: 10.1086/378610

    2003 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.