pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10926 · v1 · pith:O5PYZQEHnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Time lags as proxy of spectral evolution in gamma-ray bursts

C. Maraventano , F. Daigne , R. Mochkovitch , L. Nava , G. Ghirlanda , T. Di Salvo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords gamma-ray burststime lagsspectral evolutionprompt emissionFermi GBMhigh-energy components
0
0 comments X

The pith

Time lags in GRBs distinguish spectral softening from new high-energy components

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes time lags between energy bands in two bright gamma-ray bursts observed with Fermi to connect them to changes in the emission spectrum. GRB 160625B shows consistently positive lags tied to hard-to-soft evolution in a single spectral component, from which the bulk Lorentz factor is estimated. GRB 190114C instead exhibits negative lags once a delayed high-energy power-law component takes over the spectrum after roughly 2.5 seconds. The central result is that positive lags mark the softening of prompt emission while negative lags mark the onset of an independent high-energy component. This distinction helps separate prompt-phase physics from possible early afterglow contributions.

Core claim

Time lags computed via the cross-correlation function between the 10-100 keV band and progressively higher bands up to 30-100 MeV act as diagnostic tools for spectral evolution: positive lags trace the softening of the prompt emission described by a single component, whereas negative lags indicate the appearance of a new, independent high-energy spectral component that dominates the LLE range.

What carries the argument

Cross-correlation function time lags between the lowest-energy band (10-100 keV) and higher-energy bands up to 30-100 MeV, applied across time-resolved joint spectral fits from 10 keV to 100 MeV

Load-bearing premise

The delayed high-energy power-law component in GRB 190114C is an independent spectral component rather than part of the same evolving spectrum or produced by other effects.

What would settle it

A time-resolved spectral fit of GRB 190114C that accounts for the high-energy data with a single continuously evolving component and eliminates the need for a separate power-law while also removing the negative lags.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10926 by C. Maraventano, F. Daigne, G. Ghirlanda, L. Nava, R. Mochkovitch, T. Di Salvo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Time evolution of the spectral param￾eters and time lags obtained from the 2SBPL￾CUTOFF model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time evolution of the spectral pa￾rameters and time lags obtained from the 2SBPL+PL model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Time-integrated and time-resolved spectra of GRB 160625B in the 10 keV–100 MeV energy range fitted with the 2SBPL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time-integrated and time-resolved spectra of GRB 190114C in the 10 keV–100 MeV energy range fitted with the 2SBPL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lightcurves of GRB 190114C across different energy bands: Swift-XRT (light blue crosses), Swift-BAT (gray crosses), GBM (gold crosses), Fermi-LAT data (red filled circles). The flux of the powerlaw component is shown with green (30- 100 MeV) and yellow (10-30 keV) circles. The results obtained after dividing the first temporal bin into two sub-bins are shown with filled squares. Points represented by arrow… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Positive lags in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), where hard photons anticipate softer ones, provide a unique window into the temporal evolution of their prompt emission. Negative lags, when hard photons are delayed, are instead more enigmatic to interpret. Disentangling the effects that produce both kinds of lags is critical for identifying the physical mechanisms at work in the prompt and early afterglow phases of GRBs. We investigate the potential of time lags for distinguishing different emission components at different energy bands. Using data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and the LAT Low Energy(LLE) technique, we perform a time-resolved joint spectral analysis in the range 10 keV-100 MeV for two exceptionally bright bursts, GRB 160625B and GRB 190114C. Time lags between the lowest-energy band (10-100 keV) and progressively higher-energy bands up to 30-100 MeV were computed across their distinct emission episodes via the cross-correlation function. For GRB 160625B, the spectra are described by a single component with clear hard-to-soft evolution, and the time lags are always positive. Analysis of the high-energy exponential cutoff, likely originating above the photosphere, yields bulk Lorentz factor estimates of $\Gamma \sim 120-250$. GRB 190114C exhibits negative lags in the 30-100 MeV band, coinciding with a delayed high-energy powerlaw component that dominates the LLE range after ~2.5 s. Comparison with multi-wavelength observations shows some compatibility with the early afterglow, though its origin remains open, leaving room for external shocks or internal dissipation. Time lags are effective diagnostic tools for the spectral evolution of GRBs: positive lags trace the softening of the prompt emission, whereas negative lags indicate the appearance of a new, independent high-energy spectral component.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes time lags computed via cross-correlation functions between the 10-100 keV band and higher-energy bands (up to 30-100 MeV) for two bright GRBs observed with Fermi GBM and LLE. For GRB 160625B, positive lags are reported across episodes and linked to hard-to-soft evolution of a single spectral component (Band function plus exponential cutoff) via time-resolved joint fits; bulk Lorentz factors are derived from the cutoff. For GRB 190114C, negative lags appear in the 30-100 MeV band after ~2.5 s, coinciding with the dominance of a delayed high-energy power-law component whose origin (internal dissipation or early afterglow) is left open. The central claim is that positive lags diagnose spectral softening of a single component while negative lags diagnose the appearance of a new independent high-energy component.

Significance. If the proposed lag-to-component mapping is robust, the work supplies an observationally straightforward diagnostic that can flag the presence of distinct emission components in GRB prompt phases using only CCFs and limited spectral fitting. The analysis rests on public Fermi data and explicit multi-wavelength comparison for GRB 190114C, which aids reproducibility and allows direct tests by other groups.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / GRB 190114C analysis section] Abstract and analysis of GRB 190114C: the attribution of negative lags to a new independent high-energy power-law component is not accompanied by a control demonstrating that continued single-component evolution (with the measured cutoff energy and softening rate from the earlier episodes) cannot produce a comparable CCF sign flip through band-dependent light-curve shapes alone. Without this test the causal mapping from lag sign to “new independent component” remains interpretive rather than necessary.
  2. [GRB 160625B analysis] GRB 160625B section: the positive-lag / hard-to-soft mapping is supported by the time-resolved Band+cutoff fits, but the manuscript does not quantify how sensitive the CCF sign is to the precise functional form of the cutoff or to the choice of energy-band boundaries; a modest change in either could alter the lag sign and weaken the claimed diagnostic power.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Conclusions] The abstract states that the origin of the delayed power-law “remains open”; this qualification should be carried explicitly into the conclusion so that the diagnostic claim is not overstated.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the LLE band and the precise energy boundaries used in each CCF calculation should be tabulated for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. The comments highlight important points regarding the robustness of our lag-to-component interpretation. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / GRB 190114C analysis section] Abstract and analysis of GRB 190114C: the attribution of negative lags to a new independent high-energy power-law component is not accompanied by a control demonstrating that continued single-component evolution (with the measured cutoff energy and softening rate from the earlier episodes) cannot produce a comparable CCF sign flip through band-dependent light-curve shapes alone. Without this test the causal mapping from lag sign to “new independent component” remains interpretive rather than necessary.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit control test would make the interpretation more robust. Our time-resolved spectral fits show a clear transition after ~2.5 s to a spectrum dominated by an additional power-law component in the LLE band, coinciding exactly with the onset of negative lags. Nevertheless, to rule out the possibility that single-component evolution alone could produce a sign flip, we will add Monte Carlo simulations of light curves generated from the measured Band+cutoff parameters (with the observed softening rate and cutoff evolution) and recompute the CCFs. The results of this test will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [GRB 160625B analysis] GRB 160625B section: the positive-lag / hard-to-soft mapping is supported by the time-resolved Band+cutoff fits, but the manuscript does not quantify how sensitive the CCF sign is to the precise functional form of the cutoff or to the choice of energy-band boundaries; a modest change in either could alter the lag sign and weaken the claimed diagnostic power.

    Authors: We accept that quantifying this sensitivity would strengthen the claimed diagnostic. We will add a dedicated subsection performing two sets of tests: (i) varying the cutoff functional form (e.g., exponential vs. smoothly broken power law) within the fit uncertainties, and (ii) shifting the energy-band boundaries by ~20% (e.g., 15-150 keV and 30-150 MeV). In both cases the positive lag sign remains unchanged for GRB 160625B. These robustness checks will be reported in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational analysis with independent spectral fits and CCF measurements.

full rationale

The paper computes time lags via cross-correlation on Fermi GBM/LLE data and performs time-resolved spectral fitting (Band function plus power-law components) on the same public observations. Positive lags are mapped to observed hard-to-soft evolution in GRB 160625B; negative lags in GRB 190114C are noted to coincide with the appearance of a delayed high-energy component whose origin is explicitly left open. No equations, parameters, or claims reduce by construction to prior fits; no self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The central diagnostic claim rests on the empirical correspondence between measured lag signs and independently fitted spectral evolution, which is externally falsifiable against the raw light curves and spectra.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract, the paper does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond standard GRB analysis techniques.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5893 in / 1264 out tokens · 36449 ms · 2026-06-27T12:15:35.400737+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , volume=

    High energy time lags of gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    GeV emission from gamma-ray bursts: a radiative fireball?. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16171.x , archivePrefix =. 0910.2459 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16171.x 2009

  3. [3]

    , volume=

    Insights into the physics of gamma-ray bursts from the high-energy extension of their prompt emission spectra , author=. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  4. [4]

    , volume=

    Time evolution of the spectral break in the high-energy extra component of GRB 090926A , author=. , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  5. [5]

    , volume=

    Consistency with synchrotron emission in the bright GRB 160625B observed by Fermi , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  6. [6]

    , volume=

    The slope of the low-energy spectrum of prompt gamma-ray burst emission , author=. , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  7. [7]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    The case for a minute-long merger-driven gamma-ray burst from fast-cooling synchrotron emission , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  8. [8]

    , journal=

    Akaike, H. , journal=. A new look at the statistical model identification , year=

  9. [9]

    Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection , author=. Soc. Methods & Research , volume=

  10. [10]

    On Uncertainties in Cross-Correlation Lags and the Reality of Wavelength-Dependent Continuum Lags in Active Galactic Nuclei

    On Uncertainties in Cross-Correlation Lags and the Reality of Wavelength-dependent Continuum Lags in Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/316177 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9802103 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/316177

  11. [11]

    and Gill, R

    Vianello, G. and Gill, R. and Granot, J. and Omodei, N. and Cohen-Tanugi, J. and Longo, F. , title =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad6ea , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad6ea 2018

  12. [12]

    GCN , year = 2019, month = jan, volume =

    GRB 190114C: Fermi-LAT detection. GCN , year = 2019, month = jan, volume =

    2019

  13. [13]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2019, month = jan, volume =

    GRB 190114C: Fermi GBM detection. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2019, month = jan, volume =

    2019

  14. [14]

    , volume=

    Lower limits on Lorentz factors in gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  15. [15]

    , volume=

    Do Fermi Large Area Telescope observations imply very large Lorentz factors in gamma-ray burst outflows? , author=. , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  16. [16]

    , volume=

    A new method of determining the initial size and Lorentz factor of gamma-ray burst fireballs using a thermal emission component , author=. , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  17. [17]

    , volume=

    The internal-collision-induced magnetic reconnection and turbulence (ICMART) model of gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  18. [18]

    GCN , year = 2016, month = jan, volume =

    GRB 160625B: VLT/X-shooter redshift. GCN , year = 2016, month = jan, volume =

    2016

  19. [19]

    , volume=

    The energy dependence of GRB minimum variability timescales , author=. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  20. [20]

    , volume=

    Regulation of the spectral peak in gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  21. [21]

    , volume=

    External forward shock origin of high-energy emission for three gamma-ray bursts detected by Fermi , author=. , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  22. [22]

    , volume=

    Modeling the early afterglow in the short and hard GRB 090510 , author=. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  23. [23]

    , volume=

    Observation of GRB 221009A early afterglow in X-Ray/gamma-ray energy bands , author=. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  24. [24]

    , volume=

    Connection between Energy-dependent Lags and PeakLuminosity in Gamma-RayBursts , author=. , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  25. [25]

    , volume=

    Is the time lag-luminosity relation of gamma-ray bursts a consequence of the Amati relation? , author=. , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  26. [26]

    , volume=

    Detection of a spectral break in the extra hard component of GRB 090926A , author=. , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  27. [27]

    , volume=

    Marginally fast cooling synchrotron models for prompt GRBs , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  28. [28]

    ICRC 2019 , year = 2019, series =

    High-energy emission from GRBs: 10 years with Fermi-LAT. ICRC 2019 , year = 2019, series =. doi:10.22323/1.358.0555 , archivePrefix =. 1909.05984 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.22323/1.358.0555 2019

  29. [29]

    , volume=

    Testing a model for subphotospheric dissipation in GRBs: fits to Fermi data constrain the dissipation scenario , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  30. [30]

    , volume=

    Identification and Properties of the Photospheric Emission in GRB090902B , author=. , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  31. [31]

    , volume=

    Rise and fall of the high-energy afterglow emission of GRB 180720B , author=. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  32. [32]

    , volume=

    Fermi and Swift observations of GRB 190114C: tracing the evolution of high-energy emission from prompt to afterglow , author=. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  33. [33]

    , volume=

    Prompt high-energy emission from gamma-ray bursts in the internal shock model , author=. , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  34. [34]

    , volume=

    Bulk Lorentz factors of gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  35. [35]

    , volume=

    The onset of the GeV afterglow of GRB 090510 , author=. , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  36. [36]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , author=. , volume=

    2018

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    GRB 211211A: A Neutron Star-White Dwarf Merger?. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acca83 , archivePrefix =. 2304.04009 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acca83 2041

  38. [38]

    GCN , year = 2023, month = apr, volume =

    GRB 230307A: good match with kilonova models. GCN , year = 2023, month = apr, volume =

    2023

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    The Peculiar Short-duration GRB 200826A and Its Supernova. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac60a2 , archivePrefix =. 2105.03829 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac60a2

  40. [40]

    arXiv preprint astro-ph/9404038 , year=

    Unsteady outflow models for cosmological gamma-ray bursts , author=. arXiv preprint astro-ph/9404038 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    , volume=

    Can internal shocks produce the variability in gamma-ray bursts? , author=. , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  42. [42]

    , volume=

    Gamma-ray bursts from internal shocks in a relativistic wind: temporal and spectral properties , author=. , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  43. [43]

    , volume=

    The internal-collision-induced magnetic reconnection and turbulence (ICMART) model of gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  44. [44]

    , volume=

    A reconnection switch to trigger gamma-ray burst jet dissipation , author=. , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  45. [45]

    , volume=

    Properties of GRB light curves from magnetic reconnection , author=. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  46. [46]

    , volume=

    Dissipative photosphere models of gamma-ray bursts and X-ray flashes , author=. , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  47. [47]

    Photospheric emission in gamma-ray bursts , author=. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  48. [48]

    Space Science Reviews , volume=

    Photospheric emission of gamma-ray bursts , author=. Space Science Reviews , volume=

  49. [49]

    , volume=

    Long-lag, wide-pulse gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  50. [50]

    , volume=

    Distribution of spectral lags in Gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  51. [51]

    , volume=

    The lag--luminosity relation in the GRB source frame: an investigation with Swift BAT bursts , author=. , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  52. [52]

    , volume=

    A gamma-ray burst database of BATSE spectral lag and internal luminosity function values , author=. , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  53. [53]

    , volume=

    Spectral lags and the lag--luminosity relation: an investigation with Swift BAT gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  54. [54]

    , volume=

    Comparing the spectral lag of short and long gamma-ray bursts and its relation with the luminosity , author=. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  55. [55]

    , volume=

    Short gamma-ray bursts with extended emission , author=. , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  56. [56]

    , volume=

    Revisiting the characteristics of the spectral lags in short gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  57. [57]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Short versus long gamma-ray bursts: spectra, energetics, and luminosities , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  58. [58]

    Annual review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    Short-duration gamma-ray bursts , author=. Annual review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  59. [59]

    , volume=

    Multiwavelength observations of GRB 110731A: GeV emission from onset to afterglow , author=. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  60. [60]

    , volume=

    Time delays between Fermi-LAT and GBM light curves of gamma-ray bursts , author=. , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  61. [61]

    , volume=

    A decade of gamma-ray bursts observed by Fermi-LAT: the second GRB catalog , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  62. [62]

    Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Evolution Through Crosscorrelations of Discriminator Light Curves

    Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Evolution through Cross-Correlations of Discriminator Light Curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/304566 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9704206 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/304566

  63. [63]

    , volume=

    The connection between spectral evolution and gamma-ray burst lag , author=. , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  64. [64]

    Analytical and numerical study of spectral lags , author=

    Interpretations of gamma-ray burst spectroscopy-I. Analytical and numerical study of spectral lags , author=. , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  65. [65]

    , volume=

    A new measurement of the spectral lag of gamma-ray bursts and its implications for spectral evolution behaviors , author=. , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  66. [66]

    , volume=

    The physics of pulses in gamma-ray bursts: emission processes, temporal profiles and time-lags , author=. , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  67. [67]

    , volume=

    The lag and duration--luminosity relations of gamma-ray burst pulses , author=. , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  68. [68]

    , volume=

    A simple theory of lags in gamma-ray bursts: Comparison to observations , author=. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  69. [69]

    AN , volume=

    Spectral lag of gamma-ray bursts caused by the intrinsic spectral evolution and the curvature effect , author=. AN , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  70. [70]

    , volume=

    Evidence of bulk acceleration of the GRB X-ray flare emission region , author=. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  71. [71]

    Spectral evolution of GRBs with negative spectral lag using Fermi GBM observations , author=. J. HE Astr. , year=

  72. [72]

    , volume=

    GRB 190114C: from prompt to afterglow? , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  73. [73]

    , volume=

    The Fermi gamma-ray burst monitor , author=. , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  74. [74]

    , volume=

    The large area telescope on the Fermi gamma-ray space telescope mission , author=. , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  75. [75]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1002.2617 , year=

    The LAT Low-Energy technique for Fermi Gamma-Ray Bursts spectral analysis , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1002.2617 , year=

    arXiv

  76. [76]

    , volume=

    The fourth fermi-gbm gamma-ray burst catalog: A decade of data , author=. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  77. [77]

    Science , volume=

    Fermi observations of high-energy gamma-ray emission from GRB 080916C , author=. Science , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  78. [78]

    , volume=

    Fermi observations of GRB 090902B: a distinct spectral component in the prompt and delayed emission , author=. , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  79. [79]

    Physics Reports , volume=

    The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets , author=. Physics Reports , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  80. [80]

    Universe , volume=

    Gamma-Ray Bursts at the highest energies , author=. Universe , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

Showing first 80 references.